1. Delgado C, Rosegrant M, Steinfeld H, Ehui S, Courbois C. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution Food, Agriculture, and the Environment. Washington DC, USA: International Food Policy Research Institute; 1999. Discussion Paper No. 28
2. Rossi R, Costa A, Guarino M, et al. Effect of group size, floor space allowance and floor type on growth performance and carcass characteristics of heavy pigs. J Swine Health Prod 2008; 16:304–11.
3. Brumm MC, Ellis M, Johnston LJ, Rozeboom DW, Zimmerman DR. Interaction of swine nursery and grow-finish space allocations on performance. J Anim Sci 2001; 79:1967–72.
4. Hamilton DN, Ellis M, Wolter BF, Schinckel AP, Wilson ER. The growth performance of the progeny of two swine sire lines reared under different floor space allowances. J Anim Sci 2003; 81:1126–35.
5. National Research Council. Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine. Nutrient requirements of swine. 11th edWashington, DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
6. Gonyou HW, Brumm MC, Bush E, et al. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. J Anim Sci 2006; 84:229–35.
7. Lindermann MD, Kim BG. Technical note: a model to estimate individual feed intake of swine in group feeding. J Anim Sci 2007; 85:972–5.
8. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 10th edAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
9. Kauffman RG, Eikelenboom PG, Van der Wal , Engel B, Zaar M. A comparision of methods to estimate water-holding capacity in post-rigor porcine muscle. Meat Sci 1986; 18:307–22.
10. Steel RG, Torrie JH. Principle and procedures of statistic: A biometrical approach. New York, USA: Me-Graw Hill Book; 1980. p. 161
11. Gonyou HW, Chapple RP, Frank GR. Productivity, time budgets and social aspects of eating in pigs penned in groups of five or individually. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992; 34:291–301.
12. Pearce GP, Paterson AM. The effect of space restriction and provision of toys during rearing on the behaviour, productivity and physiology of male pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993; 36:11–28.
13. White HM, Richert BT, Schinckel AP, et al. Effects of temperature stress on growth performance and bacon quality in grow-finish pigs housed at two densities. J Anim Sci 2008; 86:1789–98.
14. Petherick JC. A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. Baxter SH, Baxter MR, McCormack JAC, editorsFarm animal housing and welfare. Lancaster, UK: Martinus Nuhoff Publishers; 1983. p. 103–20.
15. The European Community. European Council Directive 2001/88/EC of 23rd October 2001 amending directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Off. J. L316 (2001/12/01) 2001.
16. Schinckel AP. Describing the pig. Kyriazakis I, editorA quantitative biology of the pig. NY, USA: CABI; 1999.
17. Terlouw EM, Schouten WPG, Ladewig J. Appleby C, Hughes BO, editorsPhysiology in animal welfare. Oxon, NY: CABI; 1997.
18. McGlone JJ, Vines B, Rudine AC, DuBois P. The physical size of gestating sows. J Anim Sci 2004; 82:2421–7.
20. Bohus B, Koolhaas JM, Nyakas C, et al. Physiology of stress: a behavioral view. Wiepkema PR, van Adrichem PWM, editorsBiology of stress in farm animals: an integrative approach. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1987.
21. Li P, Yin YL, Li D, Kim SW, Wu G. Amino acids and immune function. Br J Nutr 2007; 98:237–52.
22. Woof JM, Kerr MA. The function of immunoglobulin A in immunity. J Pathol 2006; 208:270–82.
23. Tuchscherer M, Puppe B, Tuchscherer A, Kanitz E. Effects of social status after mixing on immune, metabolic, and endocrine responses in pigs. Physiol Behav 1998; 64:353–60.
24. Stefanski V, Hendrichs H. Social confrontation in male guinea pigs: behavior, experience, and complement activity. Physiol Behav 1996; 60:235–41.
25. Liorancas V, Bakutis B, Januskeviciene G. Influence of rearing space on the behavior, performance, carcass and meat quality of pigs. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 2006; 62:274–7.
26. Warriss PD, Kestin SC, Robinson JM. A note on the influence of rearing environment on meat quality in pigs. Meat Sci 1983; 9:271–9.
27. Enfält A, Lundström K, Ingemar Hansson KI, Lundeheim N, Nyström PE. Effects of outdoor rearing and sire breed (Duroc or Yorkshire) on carcass composition and sensory and technological meat quality. Meat Sci 1997; 45:1–15.
28. Maganhini MB, Mariano B, Soares AL, et al. Meats PSE (pale, soft, exudative) and DFD (dark, firm, dry) of an industrial slaughterline for swine loin. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment 2007; 27:69–72.
31. Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Verstegen MWA. Effect of processing plant on pork quality. Meat Sci 2003; 64:125–31.
32. Wolter BF, Ellis M. Impact of large group sizes on growth performance in pigs in the USA. Pigs of News Inf 2002; 23:17–20.
33. Jenen T, Kold Nielsen C, Vinther J, D’Eath RB. The effect of space allowance for finishing pigs on productivity and pen hygiene. Livest Sci 2012; 149:33–40.
34. Bornett HLI, Guy JH, Cain PJ. Impact of animal welfare on costs and viability of pig production in the UK. J Agric Environ Ethics 2003; 16:163–86.