INTRODUCTION
Bovine subclinical mastitis, characterized by elevated milk somatic cell counts (SCC), is not only associated with dairy animals’ health and welfare, but also with the quality of dairy products. Amongst numerous factors, bacterial infection is one of the major causes of subclinical mastitis. Under normal circumstances, the composition of microbial community is in dynamic balance in the mammary gland of lactating cows, however, various endogenous and exogenous upsets can disrupt intramammary homeostasis, resulting in dysbiosis in the mammary gland, thus, leads to mastitis or subclinical mastitis. The host-associated factors and microbial profile are main determinants of the bovine udder homeostasis [
1,
2].
Recently, multiple advances have been gained in studies of milk microbiota and its association with the bovine mammary health status. Historically, bacteria detected in milk was linked to external contamination but latest researches suggested otherwise [
3]. Isolation and cultivation of milk bacteria has yielded a lot of results in common clinical or subclinical mastitis pathogens identification. Various metagenomics studies have shown that milk microbiota composition can reflect the mammary gland health state to greater extent. A shift in microbiota composition is reported in milk from subclinical mastitis cows [
1,
4–
6], however, there lacks a consensus on which microbiota constitutes the microbial community of milk from healthy quarters.
Host-microbe interplay, shaped by host defense against potential harmful microorganisms and the response of microorganisms to the host immune system attack, is present in many immune-mediated diseases including bovine mastitis and subclinical mastitis [
2]. Alternation in host gene expression pattern of specific pathogen-induced subclinical mastitis has also been well studied in recent years [
7]. Despite lots of bacterial infection experiments performed
in vitro to elucidate host-bacteria interaction in bovine mammary diseases, the mechanism of the interplay between host and colonized microbiota as a whole remains vague. To our knowledge, a combined analysis of milk microbiota and host gene expression in attempt to unveil the relationship among host immune response, microbiota and bovine subclinical mastitis has not been reported till date.
The present study offers a new perspective to understand how microbes interact with the host in bovine subclinical mastitis and to elucidate the role of the gene-bacteria interplay in developing such diseases. We implemented a comparative analysis based on the host transcriptome and metagenome sequencing and investigated a differential gene expression profile between subclinical mastitis and healthy cows.
DISCUSSION
Though, previous studies have identified lots of candidate genes and potential microbial biomarkers associated with subclinical mastitis, however, to our knowledge this is the first study to combine bovine transcriptome and milk metagenome to explore the connections of host and microbiota in dairy cattle subclinical mastitis.
The present study identified a difference in the relative abundance of
Ralstonia and
Sphingomonas between MS and LS group. Previous studies reported association of
Ralstonia with mastitis and subacute mastitis in human [
9] and detected both
Ralstonia and
Sphingomonas as main components of donkey milk [
10,
11].
Ralstonia is well known to come from environmental resources and was reported to be associated with water contamination and it shows greater adaptability to adverse conditions than many other bacteria [
4,
12]. Same as
Ralstonia,
Sphingomonas are also environmental bacteria and can be found in tap water or soil. Notably, two species belonging to
Sphingomonas genus (
S. paucimobilis and
S. maltophilia) were isolated from milk samples of clinical mastitis cows [
13]. Another milk microbiota profiling study reported that
Sphingomonas was more enriched in culture negative clinical milk samples, whereas,
Ralstonia was more easily detected in the microbiota of healthy quarters [
4]. Though, no direct association was identified between the presence of the two bacteria and clinical or subclinical mastitis, however, these were reported to be related with some human diseases, such as colitis associated cancer [
14], cystic fibrosis [
15] and gastric inflammation [
16]. Besides, opportunistic infection can sometimes be caused by non-pathogenic bacteria.
Common KEGG pathways and GO enriched by genes in modules highly correlated with
Ralstonia and
Sphingomonas and genes in DEGs were associated with immune responses. Apart from that, a significantly positive correlation between the two bacteria and expression level of
TCN1 and
UPP1 was determined in this study (p<0.05).
TCN1 encodes cobalamin (a vitamin B12-binding protein) and
UPP1 is the coding gene of uridine phosphorylase 1. High expression of
TCN1 and
UPP1 was present in many malignant cancers.
TCN1 was associated with breast phyllodes tumors [
17] and was noticed to be a negative indicator in prognostic evaluation of rectal cancer [
18]. High expression of
UPP1 was reported in breast cancer and thyroid cancer cells [
19]. Keeping in view the combined role of cobalamin and UPP1 in cell metabolism, the up-regulation of
TCN1 and
UPP1 in MS was reasonable, due to its involvement in a wide range of basic biological processes.
Metagenomic functional annotation results further demonstrated active host-microbe interplay in MS group. For Gram-negative bacteria, LPS is an important component of outer membrane and plays an essential part in host-pathogen interaction during infection [
20]. Similarly, molecular oxygen exhaustion has been proved to be in relevance to some pathological states, such as inflammation and bacterial infection. This was also consistent with the result that hypoxia inducible factor (HIF-1) signaling pathway was significantly enriched by host genes in M11 and DEGs. The findings of the present study are in line with the previous study showing that the therapeutic effect of alpha-linolenic acid based intra-mammary nano-suspension on LPS induced mastitis in rat resulted in suppression of the HIF-1α [
21]. Contrary to previous studies [
5,
6], our results showed that no distinct differences of global diversity and richness existed between the microbial communities in subclinical mastitis cows and in healthy ones due to great variation within group. However, we can see most samples in LS had a higher index, implying greater microbiota diversity in healthy milk samples. Similar finding in beta-diversity pattern further illustrated that there was no clear separation in overall microbial composition in different groups. Besides, sample distance – variable association assessed by PERMANOVA demonstrated that none of the three variables (SCC, parity, and lactation) can perfectly explain the dissimilarity. This was probably because the SCC of cows we sampled was relatively concentrated and phenotype such as parity or lactation stage is unlikely to have a huge impact on composition of microbial community since it is usually in a dynamic balance [
22]. Another important reason that may account for this phenomenon is the relatively inadequate depth of our metagenome sequencing to cover some rare bacteria species, as microbiota richness is sensitive to perturbation with rare bacteria [
23].
In this study, metagenome sequencing was implemented instead of 16S rRNA gene sequencing, due to its advantage in gene function annotation. However, host contamination caused by somatic cells in milk posed a huge problem for this study and led to inadequate sequencing depth for rare species identification and other functional analyses i.e. virulence factors abundance investigation. However, to maintain statistic power, comparison between groups was all based on relative abundance, a typical library size correction method in metagenomics analysis. And we set a high threshold for the minimum sample size of each group that specific bacteria or GO term needed to be present in order to be kept for subsequent comparative analysis.
Transcriptome analysis was performed based on RNA derived from peripheral blood instead of milk mainly because of an ease of RNA extraction and representativeness of peripheral blood transcriptomic signature [
24]. We noticed that using 100,000 SCC/mL as a cut-off value for differentiation between healthy and subclinical mastitis is controversial in different countries [
25]. Though, some studies reported that a history of bovine mastitis may also lead to changes in microbial community [
26,
27], however, we did not take the information into account at the beginning of this study. It is suggested to use strict criteria for selection of samples with different cut-off values and a higher sequencing depth in future study.