4. Krehbiel CR. Ruminal and physiological metabolism of glycerin. J Anim Sci 2008;86:392.
6. Pereira ES, Pimentel PG, Fontenele RM, Medeiros AN, Regadas Filho JGL, Villarroel ABS. Characteristics and yields of carcass and cuts in Santa Ines sheep fed with different concentrations of metabolizable energy. Acta Sci 2010;32:431–7.
8. Rego FCA, Françozo MC, Ludovico A, et al. Development, economic viability and attributes of lamb carcass from confined animals fed on different amounts of crude glycerin. Semin Ciênc Agrár 2015;36:3445–54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2015v36n5p3445
9. D’Aurea AP, Ezequiel JMB, D’Aurea EMO, et al. Glycerin associated with urea in finishing beef cattle: performance and meat characteristics. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2017;69:165–72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8895
10. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2007.
11. AOACOfficial methods of analysis. 17th edAssociation of Analytical Chemists. Gaithersburg: VA, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
12. Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fibre in feeds with refluxing beakers or crucibles: a collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2002;85:1217–40.
14. Weiss WP. Energy prediction equations for ruminant feeds. In : Cornell Nutrition Conference Feed Manufactures, 61th Proceedings; Ithaka, NY, USA: Cornell University; 1999. p. 176–85.
16. BRASIL, Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply. Normative Instruction Nunber 3 of January 17th, 2000 [Internet]. Technical regulation on methods of desensitization for humanitarian slaughtering of animals. Official Journal of the Union; Brasília: January. 242000. section 1 p
17. Cezar MF, Souza WH. Sheep and goat carcasses: obtaining, evaluation and classification. Uberaba, MG, Brazil: Tropical Agriculture Publishing; 2007. p. 147
18. SAS. Statistical analysis system User’s guide, version 9.0. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 2002.
19. Lage JF, Paulino PVR, Pereira LGR, et al. Carcass characteristics of feedlot lambs fed crude glycerin contaminated with high concentrations of crude fat. Meat Sci 2014;96:108–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.06.020
20. Carvalho VB, Leite RF, Almeida MTC, et al. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed high concentrations of crude glycerin in low-starch diets. Meat Sci 2015;110:285–92.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.08.001
21. Martins RRC, Oliveira NM, Osorio JCS, Osório MTM. Live weight at slaughter as an indicator of carcass weight and quantitative and qualitative characteristics in Ideal sheep. Bagé, Brazil: Embrapa Pecuária Sul; (Research Bulletin, 21)2000. p. 29
22. Gerrard DE, Grant AL. Principles of animal growth and development Revised Printing. Purdue University, Dubuque, Iowa, USA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company; 2006. p. 264
23. Osório JCS, Osório MTM, Oliveira NRM, Siewerdt L. Carcass quality, morphology and evaluation. Pelotas, Brazil: University Press and Graphics – UFPel; 2002. p. 195
25. Silva Sobrinho AG. Sheep breeding. 2 th edJaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil: FUNEP (Research Support Foundation); 2001. p. 302
26. Furusho-Garcia IFF, Perez JRO, Bonagurio S, Lima AL, Quintão FA. Study of the carcass cuts of Santa Inês and crosses with Texel, ile de France and Bergamacia lambs. R Bras Zootec 2004;33:453–62.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982004000200024