Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 29(1); 2016 > Article
Han, Xu, Yang, Yu, Bai, and Bian: Effect of Polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus on Intestinal Mucosal Barrier of Escherichia coli Lipopolysaccharide Challenged Mice


To investigate the role of polysaccharide from Acanthopanax senticosus (ASPS) in preventing lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced intestinal injury, 18 mice (at 5 wk of age) were assigned to three groups with 6 replicates of one mouse each. Mice were administrated by oral gavage with or without ASPS (300 mg/kg body weight) for 14 days and were injected with saline or LPS at 15 days. Intestinal samples were collected at 4 h post-challenge. The results showed that ASPS ameliorated LPS-induced deterioration of digestive ability of LPS-challenged mice, indicated by an increase in intestinal lactase activity (45%, p<0.05), and the intestinal morphology, as proved by improved villus height (20.84%, p<0.05) and villus height:crypt depth ratio (42%, p<0.05), and lower crypt depth in jejunum (15.55%, p<0.05), as well as enhanced intestinal tight junction proteins expression involving occludin-1 (71.43%, p<0.05). ASPS also prevented intestinal inflammation response, supported by decrease in intestinal inflammatory mediators including tumor necrosis factor α (22.28%, p<0.05) and heat shock protein (HSP70) (77.42%, p<0.05). In addition, intestinal mucus layers were also improved by ASPS, as indicated by the increase in number of goblet cells (24.89%, p<0.05) and intestinal trefoil peptide (17.75%, p<0.05). Finally, ASPS facilitated mRNA expression of epidermal growth factor (100%, p<0.05) and its receptor (200%, p<0.05) gene. These results indicate that ASPS can prevent intestinal mucosal barrier injury under inflammatory conditions, which may be associated with up-regulating gene mRNA expression of epidermal growth factor and its receptor.


The gastrointestinal tract mucosa constantly confronts a variety of potentially injurious agents involving pathogenic bacteria, normal bacterial floras, and even toxic dietary factors, which usually cause infection and inflammation and have been implicated in essential barrier function failure including inflammatory bowel disease (Irvine and Marshall, 2000). Nutritional modulation offers an appropriate approach to prevent mucosal barrier injury.
Herbal ingredients are deemed significant nutrients to improve animal health in China. Acanthopanax senticosus (AS) is a well-known shrub native to far eastern areas of Russia and the northern regions of Japan, Korea, and China (Deyama et al., 2001). Polysaccharides (ASPS) are a major active ingredient of the aqueous extract isolated from AS. Our previous research revealed that the anti-inflammatory role was closely linked to down-regulatory expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Han et al., 2014). Due to inflammatory intestinal condition resulting in compromised intestinal barrier function preliminary research was conducted to determine the effect of ASPS on intestinal function. From this, we hypothesized that ASPS would sustain positive changes during intestinal mucosal damage during inflammation conditions.
In the present study, we employed a well-documented intestinal injury model in the mouse by injecting Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to assess the effect of ASPS on intestinal morphology, gut digestive profile, intestinal tight junction proteins, and mucous layer secretions that characterize intestinal mucosal barrier function, and to probe into the potential mechanisms by which ASPS protects the intestinal mucosal against injurious agents.


Acanthopanax senticosus polysaccharide preparation

ASPS were prepared from the root of Acanthopanax senticosus using Ethanol precipitation method as previously described (Han et al., 2014). Protein was removed by Sevag method (Staub, 1965) and the polysaccharide content at post-purification was 92.7% as determined by the phenol sulfuric acid method (DuBois et al., 1956). Monosaccharide composition analysis of ASPS by ion chromatography according to the method of Ou et al. (2006) showed that it was a type of heteropolysaccharide composed of glucose, galactose, arabinose, mannose, rhamnose, and xylopyranose.

Mice care and experimental design

All studies were approved by and performed in compliance with the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of Liaoning Province, China. Male Kunming mice with SPF grade at 5 wk of age (Changsheng Life Sciences Co. Ltd., Changchun Jilin, China) were kept under stable temperature (21°C±1°C) and humidity (45%±2%) with a 12-h-light/dark cycle and free access to food and water. Following the adaption to the housing condition for 1 wk, mice were distributed into random groups of 6 mice (3 mice/cage) and treated as follows: mice were given ASPS aqueous solution at 300 mg/kg body weight (BW) by daily oral gavage for continuous 14 days (ASPS+LPS group), the others were given an equivalent amount of sterile saline (Control group) and (LPS group). On the morning of 15 days, mice in LPS group and ASPS+LPS group were injected intraperitoneally with Escherichia coli LPS (E. coli Serotype 055: B5, Sigma, Saint Louis, MO, USA) at 4 mg/kg BW, and others in Control group were given an equivalent amount of sterile saline. ASPS dose was determined in accordance with optimal dose obtained in piglets of our previous study (Han et al., 2014), by using dose conversion formula for different animals in pharmacological studies (Xu et al., 2002).

Intestinal sample collections

Following 4 h post-injection with LPS or saline, all the mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Intestinal segments measuring 1 cm and 10 cm in length were excised respectively from the proximal jejunum in each mouse. The 1-cm intestinal segments were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and the liquid removed with filter paper, and then fixed in 10% formaldehyde for histology sections to observe intestinal morphology. The 10-cm intestinal segments were opened longitudinally and flushed with ice-cold PBS and scraped to gather mucosa samples, which were rapidly freeze-clamped in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80°C.

Intestinal morphology

Tissue slices were prepared by hematoxylin and eosin straining according to the method of Luna (1968). In brief, intestinal segments were processed by being fixed, dehydrated, paraffined, embedded, sliced and stained. Five observations were made on each slice and in each observation two villi that were well-stretched and parallel were measured quantitatively for analysis of villus height (the vertical distance from intestinal gland to the villus tip), crypt depth (the vertical distance from the opening of intestinal gland to the bottom), and villus height:crypt depth ratio (VCR).

Intestinal mucosa cells count

Intraepithelial goblet cells and lymphocytes were assayed by hematoxylin and eosin straining. Tissue slices were prepared according to the method of Luna (1968). In brief, intestinal segments were processed by fixed, dehydrated, paraffined, embedded, sliced and stained. Lymphocytes near the side of the intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) base membrane were characterized as small cells with hyperchromatic large nucleus. Goblet cells located between IEC were characterized by relative large cell with hyperchromatic small nucleus. These two kinds of intestinal mucosa cells were observed among one hundred IEC of the third pair of well-stretched and parallel villi in each of the five observation fields of a Axio Scope A1 of ZEISS biomicroscope (Oberkochen, German)

Determination of biochemical parameters of intestinal mucosa

Mucosal disaccharidase activity including lactase, sucrase, and maltase were measured by glucose oxidase-peroxidase conjugated method according to Hou et al. (2006) using commercial kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Product, Nanjing, China), and the values of enzyme activity are expressed as U/mg protein. The activity of diamine oxidase (DAO), as well as the concentration of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and intestinal trefoil peptide (ITP) were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with commercial kits (R&D Inc., Los Angeles, CA, USA).

Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection

In brief, total RNA was extracted from intestinal mucosa using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of the RNA were verified by spectrophotometry (UV-300; Applied Photophysics, Manchester, England) and agarose electrophoresis. cDNA synthesis was performed using a Promega GoScript reverse transcription system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Gene-specific primers for β-actin (forward: 5′-TCCCTGTATGCCTCTGGT-3′; reverse: 5′-TGTCACGCACGATTTCC-3′; GenBank No: NM_007393), heat shock protein (HSP70) (forward: 5′-CACAAGAAGG ACATCAGCCAGAA-3′; reverse: 5′-GGAACAGGTCCG AGCACAGC-3′; GenBank No: NM_010478); epidermal growth factor (EGF) (forward: 5′-CCCTCGTCA CTGGTTGT -3′; reverse: 5′- TTCTGTCCCATCATCGTC -3′; GenBank No: NM_010113); epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (forward: 5′- AATCCCTTTGGAGAA CCT -3′; reverse: 5′- TGAATCGCACAGCACC -3′; GenBank No: NM_007912) were synthesized by Dingguo Changsheng Biotech Co. (Beijing, China). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) quantitative analysis was carried out on PCR system (T300, Biometra, Jena, Germany) and performed in a 20 uL reaction system containing 7 μL nuclease-free water, 0.4 μL up-premier (10 μmol/L) and 0.4μL down-premier (10 μmol/L), 10.0 μL qPCR master mix (2×). The PCR cycling conditions were a pre-denaturation cycle at 95°C for 10 min firstly, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s, then 1 cycle at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 60 min and 95°C for 15 s. The relative expression of target genes relative to β-actin was calculated by using the 2−ΔΔCT method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Western blot for protein expression analysis

In brief, intestinal mucosal samples were homogenized in 1 mL lysis buffer and centrifuged at 12,000×g at 4°C for 30 min for supernatants collection, and then the protein concentrations were measured using phenol reagent method. An equal amount of proteins samples (20 to 40 μg) was separated on a 10% or 12% reducing polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and incubated with primary antibodies. Immunoblots were blocked with 3% bull serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline for 70 min at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with the specific primary antibodies in Tris-buffered saline and 0.05% Tween 20 containing 1% BSA. The specific primary antibody included rabbit anti-claudin-1 (1:1,000; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA) and anti-occludin-1 (1:1,000; Proteintech, USA). Blots were washed with the same buffer and then incubated with anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000; Proteintech, USA) for 120 min at room temperature. Membranes were washed in the same buffer and antigen-antibody complexes visualized by using an ECL kit (Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA). The density of the bands was quantified using the Image J 1.46r analysis software.

Statistical analyses

Individual mouse was used as experimental unit for analysis of experimental indices. Data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. Differences between the groups were analyzed by Duncan multiple comparisons Tests. The results were expressed as means±standard error of mean (SEM), and a 5% level of probability was considered significant for all analyses. The statistical calculations were carried out by using SPSS 19.0 software (Cabit Co., LTD, Shanghai, China).


Intestinal morphology and mucosal cell count

The mice in LPS group had significantly lowered villus height (24.55% lower, p<0.05) and VCR (38.78% lower, p<0.05), as well as greater crypt depth (21.69% greater, p<0.05) in jejunum compared with the mice in control group (Figure 1; Table 1). Correspondingly, ASPS+LPS group significantly increased the villus height (20.84% higher, p<0.05) and VCR (42% higher, p<0.05), as well as decreased the crypt depth (15.55% lower, p<0.05) compared with the LPS group. Intestinal goblet cells number in LPS group was not significantly different from the mice in control group (Figure 2). The mice in ASPS+LPS group showed significantly increased goblet cells (24.89% higher, p<0.05) relative to those in LPS group. Intraepithelial lymphocytes were not significant different among different groups (p>0.05).

Proteins expression of intestinal tight junction

Mucosal Occludin-1 proteins expression was significantly lower (53.33% lower, p<0.05) in LPS group compared with control group although intestinal claudin-1 protein expression did not differ between the two groups (p>0.05) (Figure 3; Table 2). Correspondingly, the mice in ASPS+LPS group demonstrated significant increase in intestinal occludin-1 (71.43%, p<0.05) proteins expression compared with those in LPS group. ASPS pre-treatment had no effect on intestinal claudin-1 protein expression.

Mucosal disaccharidase activity and other biochemical parameters

The mice in LPS group had significantly lower lactase (20% lower, p<0.05) and sucrase (50% lower, p<0.05) activities compared to the mice in control group (Table 3). Compared to the LPS mice without ASPS treatment, the mice in ASPS+LPS group had significant higher lactase activity (45% higher, p<0.05). However, jejunal sucrase and maltase activities were not different (p>0.05) among different groups. The mice in LPS group exhibited lower level of DAO and ITP as well as higher TNF-α than did the Control groups (Table 3). Correspondingly, significantly improved DAO activity (61.48% higher, p<0.05) and ITP (17.75% higher, p<0.05) as well as reduced concentration of TNF-α (22.28% lower, p<0.05) were observed compared with those in LPS group. There were no differences on these indices between control and ASPS+LPS group (p>0.05).

Intestinal HSP70, EGF, and EGFR mRNA expression

The mice in LPS group displayed significantly lower EGF and EGFR gene mRNA expression as well as increased HSP70 gene expression in intestinal mucosa compared to those in control group (Table 4). In contrast to those in LPS group, the mice treated with ASPS had significantly raised mRNA expression of EGF (100% higher, p<0.05) and EGFR (200% higher, p<0.05) gene, and reduced the HSP70 (77.42% lower, p<0.05) gene expression. There were no differences on these indices between control and ASPS+LPS group (p>0.05).


ASPS has demonstrated its immune-regulatory and inhibitory inflammatory activity in animal models and clinical trials in many studies (Fang et al., 1985; Zhang et al., 1993; Steinmann et al., 2001; Han et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2011; Han et al., 2014). However, focusing on the gastrointestinal tract mucosa constantly being confronted with a variety of potentially injurious agents, few researches were conducted to determine the role of pre-treatment with ASPS on the intestinal mucosal barrier under inflammatory conditions.
In the current study, to evaluate whether ASPS pre-treatment could attenuate the damage to intestinal mucosal function in a challenged animal, we employed a well-documented model of mucosal impairment in mice built by administrating Escherichia coli LPS. This toxin molecule is present on the membrane of gram-negative bacteria and causes acute systemic inflammatory symptoms characterized by transient fever, anorexia, somnolence and inactivity (Spurlock, 1997), as well as intestinal morphologic alterations. Exposure to LPS further results in dysfunction of intestinal mucosa including negative alternations in digestive function, mucosal integrity and immune function (Kruzel et al., 2000), and has been frequently applied in many researches for studying nutrition and gastrointestinal physiology (Liu et al., 2008; Hou et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2012). In addition, the time point of sampling in the present experiment was chosen at 4 h post-injection with LPS as previous studies suggest that the acute intestinal inflammatory response occurs 3 to 6 h following LPS injection (Mercer et al., 1996; Liu et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2012).
Intestinal epithelial barrier consists of the intestinal morphology, which includes a tight junction (TJ) between epithelial cells, mucus layer overlying the mucous epithelium, various digestive enzymes that simultaneously affects biological and immunological barriers and plays vital role in protecting gut against a variety of injurious agents. Villus height, crypt depth, as well as VCR are the critical factors of the intestinal epithelial barrier and vital to the full digestion and absorption of nutrients (Scharek et al., 2005). Of them, enhanced villus height and VCR present absorption ability improvement through increased contact area, and decreased crypt depth reflects the elevated proliferation rate of IEC. Our present study demonstrated intestinal morphology damage at 4 h following LPS challenge. As expected, ASPS treatment resulted in the alleviation of intestinal morphology damage induced by LPS challenge which suggests potently that ASPS might improve intestinal nutrients absorption ability, and the reason may be partially do with the capacity of ASPS to sustain growth and differentiation of epithelial cells. However, the underlying mechanism needs further research.
The complete TJ between IEC is a vital structural foundation of the intestinal mucosal epithelial barrier (Vicente et al., 2001). In agreement with many researches demonstrating LPS-induced inflammation results in expression alterations of TJ proteins (Weiler et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2012), our study found that occludin-1 protein expression was reduced by LPS challenge and ASPS facilitated its protein expression to nearly restore it to control level. Therefore, our finding concerning improved intestinal occludin-1 protein expression suggests that ASPS can be a preventive nutrient to lessen the loss of the epithelial barrier suffering from inflammatory challenge.
Disaccharidases including lactase, sucrase, and maltase overlying the mucosal surface play a vital part in decomposing disaccharides and facilitating mucosa maturation and gut digestive function (Lorenzsonn et al., 1987). In the present study, ASPS increased intestinal lactase activity in challenged mice, which indicates that ASPS protected the intestinal digestive function from damage. Zheng et al. (1999) has reported that insulin can promote mucosa maturation, and increase mucosal disaccharidase activities in neonatal pigs. Interestingly, although not direct observation of insulin level, based on our previous research demonstrating that ASPS can induce the increase in growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I and decrease glucose in LPS-challenged weaned piglets (Han et al., 2014), we can infer an increase in insulin concentration was induced by ASPS. Therefore, it is possible that ASPS supplementation attenuated the decrease in disaccharidase activity partially by stimulating insulin release.
DAO as intracellular enzyme with high activity exists in the intestinal villous cells and its activity declines when IEC is injured. Thus, the DAO activity of intestinal mucosa can reflect the changes in intestinal mucosa integrity, permeability and the barrier function (Zhang et al., 2002). In the current study, our findings concerning oral ASPS alleviated the loss of DAO activity further prove the intestinal mucosal function is boosted with the treatment of ASPS under the condition of challenge.
The modulation of mucosal inflammatory response by ASPS was assessed under inflammatory intestinal conditions resulting in compromised barrier function (Irvine and Marshall, 2000). Over-release of TNF-α to the mucosa induced by LPS is primarily responsible for the disruptive intestinal mucosal function (Pié et al., 2004; Field et al., 2010). Similar to TNF-α, a high level of HSP70 is also indicative to inflammatory response in the intestine. Consistent with our previous study demonstrating the relief of inflammatory response by ASPS via modulating the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, interleukin (IL)-1β, and IL-6 in the blood of piglets (Han et al., 2014), our current determination of inflammatory mediators showed that ASPS decreased the intestinal mucosal concentration of TNF-α and HSP70, which further support the above results concerning an improved intestinal mucosal barrier by ASPS.
It is apparent that the intestinal mucosal barrier is dependent on the presence of a monolayer of epithelial cells joined by TJ, which form a cellular barrier to many of the wide range of potential injuries. Although intestinal epithelium represents the cellular frontier of the mucosa, it has long been recognized that the apical surface of this population is covered by a viscoelastic coat including large amounts of trefoil peptides selectively secreted by goblet cells (Pié et al., 2004), which are in conjunction with mucin glycoproteins to form a continuous gel on the luminal surface to prevent intestinal barrier damage (Hoffmann, 2005). Previous studies revealed the ability of ITP in facilitating restitution of wounded mucosa and protecting the integrity of model intestinal epithelial monolayers against a variety of injurious agents (Dignass et al., 1994). In our current study, relative to lower number of goblet cells and ITP concentration in challenged mice, the mice in ASPS groups presented a higher number of goblet cells and concentration of ITP even when compared with control group, which may be due to the capacity of ASPS functioning under both challenged and normal conditions as reported in our previous study (Han et al., 2014). This observation also elucidates the distinct protective role of ASPS against injurious agents via promoting the formation of viscoelastic gel overlying the mucosa by the secreted products of the goblet cell population. However, the underlying mechanism needs further research.
EGF and its receptor EGFR are implicated by many studies (Barnard et al., 1995; Scharek et al., 2005) in the regulation of intestinal epithelium growth and differentiation, which are required for normal gut development and repair of intestinal mucosal injury (Abud et al., 2005). In the current study, these two indicators were examined to seek to further clarify the mechanism by which ASPS protect against mucosal barrier loss. EGF combination with its receptor EGFR conducts its stimulation signal intracellularly and can launch a series of cascade reaction through signaling pathways, where they act on transcription factors to modulate various physiological process (Park et al., 2005). As expected, the sharply down-regulated EGF and EGFR mRNA expression following LPS challenge indicate the presence of intestinal epithelial damage. However, for the mice given LPS, the findings of ASPS pre-treatment elevating mRNA expression of EGF and EGFR suggest that ASPS contributes to proliferation and differentiation of the IEC to a certain extent, which coincided with the positive alteration in intestinal morphology, TJ, and mucus layer. Especially, our finding that an increased spectrum of EGFR superior to those of EGF was observed, this may involve various growth factors participating in the mucosal developmental process where these growth factors compete to combine with EGFR and lead to increased need of EGFR. These results propose that improvement in intestinal epithelium growth and differentiation may be the mechanism by which intestinal mucosal barrier damage is ameliorated by ASPS.


The present study demonstrates that oral pre-treatment of ASPS could mitigate intestinal mucosal barrier loss under challenged conditions by modulating the mRNA expression of EGF and EGFR. These results suggest that improvement in intestinal epithelium growth and differentiation may be the mechanism by which damage to the intestinal mucosal barrier by challenging agents is ameliorated by ASPS.



We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.


The work was supported by Technology Team of Liaoning Province and the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Liaoning Province (20141061).

Figure 1
Intestinal morphology of mice in different groups (H&E staining). (a), (b), and (c) are the representative jejunal morphology images of in control, LPS and ASPS+LPS groups respectively. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ASPS, Acanthopanax senticosus polysac polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus.
Figure 2
Goblet cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes of intestinal mucosal in different groups (H&E staining, ×200). (a), (b), and (c) are representative jejunal goblet cells images in control, LPS and ASPS+LPS groups respectively. (d), (e), and (f) are representative jejunal intraepithelial lymphocytes images in control, LPS and ASPS+LPS groups respectively. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ASPS, polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus.
Figure 3
Effects of polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus (ASPS) on protein expression of occludin-1 and claudin-1 challenged mice. The bands represent Western blot images of β-actin (a), occludin-1 (b), and claudin-1 (c) in jejunum. Column control, mice administrated by saline and injected with saline; Column LPS, mice administrated by saline and injected with LPS; Column ASPS+LPS, mice administrated by ASPS and injected with LPS. LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
Table 1
Effects of ASPS on intestinal morphology and mucosal cells count in LPS challenged mice1
Items Control LPS LPS+ASPS p-value
Villus height, μm 241.67 ± 13.95a 182.33 ± 15.77b 220.33 ± 5.41a 0.014
Crypt depth, μm 102.17 ± 7.24b 124.33 ± 5.22a 105.00 ± 5.73b 0.044
VCR 2.45 ± 0.25a 1.50 ± 0.18b 2.13 ± 0.13a 0.011
Goblet cells number/100 villous epithelium cells 700 ± 0.44b 6.67 ± 0.56b 8.33 ± 0.21a 0.036
Intraepithelial lymphocytes/100 villous epithelium cells 69.33 ± 4.45 85.33 ± 9.97 76 ± 7.44 0.123

ASPS, polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus; LPS, lipopolysaccharide. VCR, villus height:crypt depth ratio.

1 Values are means±standard error of the mean of 6 mice per group.

a,b Different superscript in a row indicates significant difference at p<0.05.

Table 2
Effects of ASPS on protein expression of intestinal tight junction proteins in LPS challenged mice1
Items Control LPS LPS+ASPS p-value
Claudin-1/β-actin 0.087 ± 0.003 0.080 ± 0.007 0.073 ± 0.003 0.153
Occludin-1/β-actin 0.15 ± 0.03a 0.07 ± 0.007b 0.12 ± 0.01a 0.006

ASPS, polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus; LPS, lipopolysaccharide.

1 Values are means±standard error of the mean of 6 mice per group.

a,b Different superscript in a row indicates significant difference at p<0.05.

Table 3
Effects of ASPS on disaccharidase activity and parameters of mucosa in LPS challenged mice1
Item Control LPS LPS+ASPS p-value
Lactase (U/mg protein) 2.00 ± 0.09b 1.60 ± 0.07c 2.32 ± 0.11a <0.001
Sucrase (U/mg protein) 0.36 ± 0.03 0.25 ± 0.06 0.37 ± 0.05 0.108
Maltase (U/mg protein) 0.18 ± 0.01 0.22 ± 0.02 0.14 ± 0.03 0.06
TNF-α (pg/mL) 365 ± 38.40a 534 ± 32.89b 415 ± 38.07a 0.015
ITP (ng/mL) 8.87 ± 0.28a 7.55 ± 0.53b 8.89 ± 0.22a 0.033
DAO (U/kg) 102.04 ± 11.59a 54.49 ± 7.70b 87.99 ± 13.27a 0.024

ASPS, polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus; LPS, lipopolysaccharide. TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; ITP, intestinal trefoil peptide; DAO, diamine oxidase.

1 Values are means±standard error of the mean of 6 mice per group.

a,b Different superscript in a row indicates significant difference at p<0.05.

Table 4
Effects of polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus (ASPS) on HSP70, EGF and its receptor EGFR mRNA expression of intestinal mucosal in LPS challenged mice1
Items Control LPS LPS+ASPS p-value
HSP70 0.34 ± 0.04a 0.93 ± 0.26b 0.21 ± 0.02a 0.011
EGF 0.003 ± 0.0006a 0.001 ± 0.0003b 0.003 ± 0.0003a 0.016
EGFR 0.016 ± 0.002a 0.006 ± 0.002b 0.012 ± 0.004a 0.005

ASPS, polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; HSP70, heat shock protein 70; EGF, pidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor.

1 Values are means±standard error of the mean of 6 mice per group.

a,b Different superscript in a row indicates significant difference at p<0.05.


Abud HE, Watson N, Heath JK. 2005. Growth of intestinal epithelium in organ culture is dependent on EGF signaling. Exp Cell Res 303:252–262.
crossref pmid
Barnard JA, Beauchamp RD, Russell WE, Dubois RN, Coffey RJ. 1995. Epidermal growth factor-related peptides and their relevance to gastrointestinal pathophysiology. Gastroenterol 108:564–580.
Chen RZ, Liu ZQ, Zhao JM, Chen RP, Meng FL, Zhang M. 2011. Antioxidant and immunobiological activity of water-soluble polysaccharide fractions purified from Acanthopanax senticosus. Food Chem 127:434–440.
crossref pmid
Deyama T, Nishibe S, Nakazawa Y. 2001. Constituents and pharmacological effects of Eucommia and Siberian ginseng. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica 22:1057–1070.
Dignass A, Lynch-Devaney K, Kindon H, Thim L, Podolsky DK. 1994. Trefoil peptides promote epithelial migration through a transforming growth factor β-independent pathway. J Clin Invest 94:376–383.
crossref pmid pmc
DuBois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356.
Fang JN, Proksch A, Wagner H. 1985. Immunologically active polysaccharides of Acanthopanax senticosus. Phytochemistry 24:2619–2622.
Field FJ, Watt K, Mathur SN. 2010. TNF-alpha decreases ABCA1 expression and attenuates HDL cholesterol efflux in the human intestinal cell line Caco-2. J Lipid Res 51:1407–1415.
crossref pmid pmc
Han J, Bian LQ, Liu XJ, Zhang F, Zhang YR, Yu N. 2014. Effects of Acanthopanax senticosus polysaccharide supplementation on growth performance, immunity, blood parameters and expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines genes in challenged weaned piglets. Asian Australas J Anim 27:1035–1043.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
Han SB, Yoon YD, Ahn HJ, Lee HS, Lee CW, Yoon WK, Park SK, Kim HM. 2003. Toll-like receptor-mediated activation of B cells and macrophages by polysaccharide isolated from cell culture of Acanthopanax senticosus. Int lmmunopharmacol 3:1301–1312.
Hoffmann W. 2005. Trefoil factors. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2932–2938.
crossref pmid
Hou YQ, Wang L, Ding BY, Liu YL, Zhu HL, Liu J, Liu YT, Wu X, Yin YL, Wu GY. 2010. Dietary α-ketoglutarate supplementation ameliorates intestinal injury in lipopolysaccharide-challenged piglets. Amino Acids 39:555–564.
crossref pmid
Hou YQ, Liu YL, Hu J, Shen WH. 2006. Effects of lactitol and tributyrin on growth performance, small intestinal morphology and enzyme activity in weaned pigs. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 19:1470–1477.
Irvine EJ, Marshall JK. 2000. Increased intestinal permeability precedes the onset of Crohn’s disease in a subject with familial risk. Gastroenterology 119:1740–1744.
crossref pmid
Kruzel ML, Harari Y, Chen CY, Castro GA. 2000. Lactoferrin protects gut mucosal integrity during endotoxemia induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. Inflammation 24:33–44.
crossref pmid
Liu YL, Chen F, Odle J, Lin X, Jacobi SK, Zhu HL, Wu Z, Hou Y. 2012. Fish oil enhances intestinal integrity and inhibits TLR4 and NOD2 signaling pathways in weaned pigs after LPS challenge. J Nutr 142:2017–2024.
crossref pmid
Liu YL, Huang JJ, Hou YQ, Zhu HL, Zhao SJ, Ding BY, Yin Y, Yi G, Shi J, Fan W. 2008. Dietary arginine supplementation alleviates intestinal mucosal disruption induced by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide in weaned pigs. Br J Nutr 100:552–560.
crossref pmid
Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt method. Methods 25:402–408.
crossref pmid
Lorenzsonn V, Korsmo H, Olsen WA. 1987. Localization of sucrase-isomaltase in the rat enterocyte. Gastroenterology 92:98–105.
crossref pmid
Luna LG. 1968. Manual of histologic staining methods of the armed forces institute of pathology. 3th EdMcGraw-Hill Book Company Press; New York, NY, USA:

Mercer DW, Smith GS, Cross JM, Russell DH, Chang L, Cacioppo J. 1996. Effects of lipopolysaccharide on intestinal injury: potential role of nitric oxide and lipid peroxidation. J Surg Res 63:185–192.
crossref pmid
Ou YF, Yin PH, Zhao L, Huang XS. 2006. Determination of Monsaccharides in the garlic polysaccharide using pulsed amperometric ion chromatography. Chinese J Spectrographic Lab 23:629–632.

Park HG, Han SI, Oh SY, Kang HS. 2005. Cellular responses to mild heat stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:10–23.
crossref pmid
Pié S, Lallès JP, Blazy F, Laffitte J, Sève B, Oswald IP. 2004. Weaning is associated with an upregulation of expression of inflammatory cytokines in the intestine of piglets. J Nutr 134:641–647.
crossref pmid
Scharek L, Guth J, Reiter K, Weyrauch KD, Taras D, Schwerk P, Schierack P, Schmidt MF, Wieler LH, Tedin K. 2005. Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 105:151–161.
crossref pmid
Spurlock ME. 1997. Regulation of metabolism and growth during immune challenge: An overview of cytokine function. J Anim Sci 75:1773–1783.
crossref pmid
Staub AM. 1965. Removal of protein-sevag method. Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Whistler RL, editorAcademic Press; New York, USA:

Steinmann GG, Esperester A, Joller P. 2001. Immunopharmacological in vitro effects of Eleutheroeoceus senticosus extracts. Arzneimittel-forschung 5l:76–83.

Vicente Y, Da Rocha C, Yu J, Hernandez-Peredo G, Martinez L, Pérez-Mies B, Tovar JA. 2001. Architecture and function of the gastroesophageal barrier in the piglet. Dig Dis Sci 46:1899–1908.
crossref pmid
Weiler F, Marbe T, Scheppach W, Schauber J. 2005. Influence of protein kinase C on transcription of the tight junction elements ZO-1 and occludin. J Cell Physiol 204:83–86.
crossref pmid
Xu SY, Bian RL, Chen X. 2002. Pharmacological Experiment Methodology. 3th EdPeople’s Medical Publishing House Press; Beijing, China:

Zhang C, Sheng ZY, Hu S, Gao JC, Yu S, Liu Y. 2002. The influence of apoptosis of mucosal epithelial cells on intestinal barrier integrity after scald in rats. Burns 28:731–737.
crossref pmid
Zhang LP, Chen LY, Zhang YS. 1993. Study on water soluble polysaccharides from Acanthopanax senticosus fruits isolation and purification and structural investigating of AS-2. Chin J Biochem Mol Biol 9:1–5.

Zheng CT, Wang T, Lu ZN, Zou SG, Xu RJ, Zhang JS. 1999. Effects of oral insulin and trypsinized formula milk on small intestinal growth and development in newborn pigs. Acta Vet Et Zootech Sin 30:405–413.

Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next