Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 37(6); 2024 > Article
Kim, Ediriweera, Cho, Chung, Manjula, Yu, Macharia, Nam, and Lee: Major histocompatibility complex genes exhibit a potential immunological role in mixed Eimeria-infected broiler cecum analyzed using RNA sequencing

Abstract

Objective

This study was conducted to investigate the differential expression of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) gene region in Eimeria-infected broiler.

Methods

We profiled gene expression of Eimeria-infected and uninfected ceca of broilers sampled at 4, 7, and 21 days post-infection (dpi) using RNA sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two sample groups were identified at each time point. DEGs located on chicken chromosome 16 were used for further analysis. Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was conducted for the functional annotation of DEGs.

Results

Fourteen significant (false discovery rate <0.1) DEGs were identified at 4 and 7 dpi and categorized into three groups: MHC-Y class I genes, MHC-B region genes, and non-MHC genes. In Eimeria-infected broilers, MHC-Y class I genes were upregulated at 4 dpi but downregulated at 7 dpi. This result implies that MHC-Y class I genes initially activated an immune response, which was then suppressed by Eimeria. Of the MHC-B region genes, the DMB1 gene was upregulated, and TAP-related genes significantly implemented antigen processing for MHC class I at 4 dpi, which was supported by KEGG pathway analysis.

Conclusion

This study is the first to investigate MHC gene responses to coccidia infection in chickens using RNA sequencing. MHC-B and MHC-Y genes showed their immune responses in reaction to Eimeria infection. These findings are valuable for understanding chicken MHC gene function.

INTRODUCTION

Chicken coccidiosis is a debilitating disease that has imposed a substantial economic burden on the global chicken breeding industry due to declines in productivity, elevated mortality rates, and costs associated with disease prevention [1]. This parasitic disease is caused by protozoa belonging to genus Eimeria, which colonize the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and cecum of chickens, eliciting an inflammatory reaction [1]. Upon Eimeria infection, affected chickens exhibit diarrhea, compromised nutrient absorption and growth, and the induction of cellular and humoral immune responses [2]. Enhanced cellular and humoral immune functions play a pivotal role in bolstering resistance against Eimeria infection, consequently mitigating intestinal damage and curtailing oocyte development [3,4]. The involvement of T lymphocytes is crucial during coccidiosis infection, as they orchestrate cellular immunity [4]. Therefore, it is essential to improve the immune capacity of chickens to increase resistance to Eimeria infection.
The MHC is an important molecular system that profoundly influences the chicken immune response. MHC molecules on cell membranes facilitate crucial cell-to-cell communication within the immune system [5]. Notably, when cells are infected by pathogens, antigen-presenting cells process and present protein fragments derived from these pathogens, and T cells and natural killer cells identify them, thereby triggering immune responses. During parasite infestation, MHC molecules play a critical role by presenting parasite-derived antigens to T cells, thereby contributing significantly to the adaptive immune system [6]. In addition, MHC class I and II affect intestinal parasite resistance via the microbiome [7]. The resistance of chickens to Eimeria infection is related to MHC genetics, with resistance and susceptibility differing depending on the MHC gene haplotype. However, the precise involvement of individual genes within the chicken MHC gene region in the response to Eimeria infection remains to be fully elucidated [8].
Many genes on chicken chromosome 16 play significant roles in the immune response [8]. This chromosome harbors an MHC-B gene region responsible for classical antigen presentation and an MHC-Y gene region that includes specialized class I and II genes plus C-type lectin-like genes [8]. Although many functional studies have elucidated the roles of MHC-B genes in disease resistance, the precise association between mutations in MHC-Y genes and disease resistance remains elusive [9,10].
To uncover candidate genes and biological pathways underlying the immune response to disease, researchers have investigated changes in gene expression [1113]. RNA sequencing technology has enabled comprehensive examinations of gene expression across the genome. By identifying the immune responses of livestock to specific diseases, these studies offer valuable insights into the proteins involved in immune function, the corresponding genes that encode them, and the factors that regulate gene expression. Consequently, gene expression data assumes paramount importance in studies focused on understanding the immune response.
Numerous studies have examined chicken coccidiosis to develop antibiotic alternatives [14,15] and effective anti-coccidial vaccines [16,17], and identified candidate genes associated with immune function [11,18]. Previously, our research team identified chronological changes in gene expression patterns throughout the genome in the cecum of broilers affected by coccidiosis, thereby elucidating key responses and pathways [11]. Building upon these past findings, the present study aims to extend our understanding by investigating the gene expression profiles of chromosome 16, encompassing MHC genes, using an updated reference genome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animal care

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chungnam National University (202012A -CNU-164).

Eimeria infection and sample collection

Figure 1 summarizes the experimental design. This study used 39 1-day-old male broiler chicks (Indian River; Aviagen, AL, USA). After ensuring that the chicks were free from oocysts, we randomly allocated them to 13 cages. Following a 14-day acclimation period, 21 chickens, referred to as the positive control (PC), were orally administered 1 mL of Livacox T (Biopharm, Prague, Czech Republic), which is a live attenuated vaccine. Each chicken in the PC group received a 10-fold increased dose containing 3 to 5×103 active oocysts of Eimeria acervulina, Eimeria tenella, and Eimeria maxima for infection. The 18 chickens in the non-challenged negative control (NC) were inoculated with distilled water to simulate inoculation stress.
At 4, 7, and 21 days post-infection (dpi), birds in the PC and NC treatments were humanely euthanized. Cecum tissue samples were collected from all chickens and used for RNA extraction. At each time point, three samples from the NC group and five samples from the PC group were randomly selected for RNA sequencing.

RNA extraction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from cecal tissue samples using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The TruSeq Stranded mRNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to construct a cDNA library. Following library construction, all samples were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform, which generated 101 bp paired-end reads.

Sequencing read processing and differentially expressed gene analysis

Adaptor-trimmed sequence data, which we described previously [11], were mapped to the chicken reference genome (GRCg7b, GCA_016699485.1). The reference genome was constructed using bowtie2 v2.5.1 and SAMtools v1.17. STAR v2.7.10b was used for sequence mapping to the reference genome and counting mapped reads. The gene annotation version used was GRCg7b (National Center for Biotechnology Information Annotation Release 106). The EdgeR v3.42.4 package in R [19] was used to quantify gene expression. To avoid statistical bias, only genes with a total read count >8 were used for estimating expression levels. Then, the read count was normalized using the trimmed mean of M-value method. Expression levels were compared between the PC and NC groups at every time point. The p-values of the differential expression tests were adjusted using the false discovery rate (FDR) method [20]. Then, genes located on chicken chromosome 16 were selected for the next step. Significant DEGs were defined based on the following criteria: FDR<0.05 and absolute fold change ≥1.5. A lower level of significance for differential expression was also identified within the range 0.05≤FDR<0.1 and absolute fold change ≥1.5. The final DEGs were identified at each time point. Volcano plots depicting the DEGs were generated using the ggplot2 package in R [21]. To determine the functions of the group of DEGs, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) analyses were performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). Gene functions were also searched in the relevant literature.

RESULTS

Results of RNA sequencing and read mapping

Sequencing of the 24 samples yielded an average of 40,967,230 raw reads per sample after combining forward and reverse sequences. After removing sequencing adapters and trimming low-quality reads, at least 98.29% of the reads remained in all datasets. On average, 40,455,803 reads were retained for subsequent mapping. We aligned the reads to the chicken reference genome, and successfully assembled an average of 37,600,629 reads (approximately 92.95% of the total mapped reads). Table 1 summarizes the sequence data processing.

Differentially expressed genes between the NC and PC groups

The chicken chromosome 16 reference genome contained 309 annotated genes. Figure 2 and Table 2 present the findings for 4 dpi, in which five significant DEGs were identified as having FDR<0.05. Of these DEGs, three genes were upregulated in Eimeria-infected chickens, whereas two genes were downregulated. Two additional upregulated genes were identified among DEGs with a lower significance threshold (0.05≤FDR<0.1). Upon comparing the NC and PC samples at 7 dpi, we found four significant DEGs having FDR<0.05. Of these genes, three genes were upregulated and only one gene was downregulated in Eimeria-infected chickens. Also, there were two additional upregulated genes and one downregulated gene showing a lower significance level (0.05≤FDR <0.1). Notably, no differential expression was observed in any gene at 21 dpi. Therefore, the gene expression comparison results for 21 dpi were excluded from subsequent analyses.

Categorization of differentially expressed genes based on gene clusters

In Eimeria-infected chickens, five genes had significantly higher expression at 4 dpi (FDR<0.1). These genes included MHCY36 and LOC112529954, which are located in the MHC-Y region of the chicken genome, and DMB1, TAP1, and TAPBP, which are located in the MHC-B region. Of the downregulated genes, two (LOC124417245 and LOC124417241) were in the non-MHC region. Notably, at 4 dpi, the most significant DEG was the TAP1 gene and the largest fold change was for the MHCY36 gene.
At 7 dpi, five genes were significantly upregulated (FDR<0.1): the TRIM39.2 gene in the MHC-B region and LOC121106941, LOC121106957, and two ribosomal RNA genes in the non-MHC region. Two genes (MHCYL and LOC124417244) downregulated in infected chickens were classified in the MHC-Y class I gene cluster. Among the upregulated genes, the TRIM39.2 gene had the most significantly upregulated differential expression (FDR = 0.0046). The differential gene expression results are provided in Table 2 and Figure 2.

Functional analysis of differentially expressed genes

GO analysis conducted on the DEGs at 4 and 7 dpi yielded no significant GO terms. However, KEGG analysis revealed one significant biological pathway (p = 0.03) at 4 dpi, herpes simplex virus 1 infection (gga05168) pathway, which includes the TAP1 and TAPBP genes.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we examined the roles of chicken MHC genes, which have not been fully characterized functionally. Differential expression of chicken MHC genes was observed in cecal tissues infected with Eimeria. This is the first study to focus on MHC gene expression in coccidiosis-infected chickens.
The number of DEGs on chicken chromosome 16 was higher at 4 dpi than at 7 dpi in Eimeria infection. This trend of decreasing numbers of DEGs differed from that of a previous study, which observed numerous DEGs across the whole genome as a result of heightened cellular stress and subsequent recovery [11]. These mechanisms were triggered by parasitic attack, rather than being associated with the effects of MHC-related genes. Considering studies that reported a decrease in symptoms after 7 days of coccidial infection [22, 23], we inferred that the immune response of MHC-related genes changed between 4 and 7 dpi. This finding suggests a dynamic immune response during the course of Eimeria infection, particularly in relation to MHC genes.
Notably, the pattern of DEGs changed over time following infection. Specifically, the TAP1 and TAPBP genes showed a significant increase in expression at 4 dpi, but not at 7 dpi. TAP1, in conjunction with TAP2, forms the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) complex, which plays a crucial role in processing antigenic peptides for loading onto MHC class I molecules. Additionally, tapasin, which is encoded by the TAPBP gene, assists in the interaction between the TAP complex and MHC class I molecules [24]. The action of TAP is essential for processing antigens derived from intracellular protozoan parasites [25]. Therefore, we inferred that antigen presentation via MHC class I molecules was strongly induced at 4 dpi. According to KEGG pathway analyses of DEGs at 4 dpi, TAP and tapasin process antigenic peptides derived from viral proteins and deliver them to MHC class I when a chicken is infected by a pathogen. Our experiment further demonstrated the operation of this pathway.
In comparison, DMB1 gene expression increased only at 4 dpi. The DMB1 gene is a non-classical MHC-II gene that plays a role in the transmission of exogenous antigens in the chicken [26]. Parker et al [27,28] reported that the only chicken tissues in which DMB1 was highly expressed were the intestine and spleen, confirming that DMB1 is involved in immunity in the infected cecum. As a result, the upregulation of TAP-related genes and the DMB1 gene at 4 dpi demonstrated the role of both MHC class I and II in Eimeria infestation.
Additionally, MHCY36 and LOC112529954 were upregulated DEGs at 4 dpi; these genes are functionally related to MHC-Y class I molecules. MHC-Y class I molecules lack the ability to present antigens [8]. However, because MHC-Y genes were significantly upregulated in the cecum at 4 dpi, we infer that MHC-Y class I is responsible for a specific immune response. This finding supports a previous report that MHC-Y genes may be involved in disease resistance [10]. The current result is in line with studies showing the upregulation of chicken MHC-Y genes in response to bacteria and sheep red blood cells [2931].
Interestingly, the expression pattern of these MHC-Y class I-related genes was reversed at 7 dpi. MHC-Y class I genes were significantly upregulated at 4 dpi, whereas DEGs related to MHC-Y class I genes were downregulated at 7 dpi. According [32], Eimeria infection reduces the expression of antimicrobial peptides, and pathogens such as the Marek disease virus induce the downregulation of MHC genes [33], which blocks the host immune response and increases susceptibility to invasion. Thus, Eimeria may have suppressed the MHC-Y immune response at 7 dpi.
The TRIM39.2 gene, which is in the MHC-B region, was differentially expressed at 7 dpi with the highest level of significance (FDR = 0.0046). Although no structural variants or functions of TRIM genes have been identified in chickens, based on homology with other species, TRIM genes seem to confer innate immunity from viral infection [8,34,35]. There is no evidence that TRIM39.2 acts in conjunction with MHC-B genes in chickens, and no DEG was found to be functionally related to the classical MHC-B molecule at 7 dpi. As of now, there is no evidence that the TRIM genes are functional in intracellular infections in chickens, although they were significantly upregulated in this experiment.
The limited results obtained from the functional analyses using GO and KEGG in this study can be attributed to two factors. First, statistical performance was restricted by the small number of DEGs analyzed. Second, little is known about chicken MHC genes. The number of loci in the MHC-Y gene region was determined only recently [36]; however, the gene functions remain to be studied in many cases. Consequently, we did not anticipate extensive results from the gene function database analysis, as the functions of many recently discovered genes are not known. Future studies should explore the functions of chicken MHC genes, to enable more comprehensive functional analyses.
Importantly, this study elucidated the role of chicken MHC genes under disease conditions. Of particular note is the identification of the association between both MHC-B and MHC-Y genes and the response to pathogen-induced diseases. Although our understanding the precise involvement of the MHC gene in the disease response remains incomplete, further functional genetics research should shed light on this relationship.

CONCLUSION

We examined the immune response of broiler chickens to Eimeria infection at different time points using RNA sequencing and observed the expression patterns of several DEGs on chicken chromosome 16. The results confirmed that MHC classes I and II play roles in immunity during Eimeria infection, and that MHC-Y and MHC-B genes were involved in the immune responses. Both gene families changed their differential expression patterns over time. The MHC genes potentially affecting disease resistance reported in this study will be useful for breeding resistant chickens and developing effective drugs and/or vaccines to overcome coccidiosis in the chicken industry.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

FUNDING

This research was funded by a grant from the National Research Foundation, Republic of Korea (grant number 2022 R1F1A1064025).

Figure 1
Schematic summary of the experimental design. Modified from Kim et al [11], according to the Creative Commons License. dpi, days post-infection.
ab-23-0412f1.jpg
Figure 2
Volcano plots showing significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) on chicken chromosome 16 obtained via time-series comparison between positive (PC) and negative control (NC) treatments. The x-axis is the log2(fold change) and the y-axis the −log10(false discovery rate (FDR)) of the tested genes. Vertical dashed lines indicate 1.5-fold changes (up or down). Orange and blue horizontal dashed lines indicate −log10 scaled FDR values of 0.05 and 0.1, respectively. Blue dots indicate that the DEGs are MHC-Y class I genes. Red dots are DEGs in the MHC-B region. Black dots are non-MHC genes that belong to neither the MHC-B nor MHC-Y gene region. Because the comparison at 21 days post-infection (dpi) did not show any DEGs, we excluded this time point from the volcano plot.
ab-23-0412f2.jpg
Table 1
Summary of processing sequence data generated from Eimeria-infected and uninfected chicken cecum at different time points
Period Sample ID Raw reads Trimmed reads Trimmed reads ratio (%) Uniquely mapped read Uniquely mapped reads ratio (%)
4 dpi NC4_1 38,168,795 37,724,492 98.84 34,550,630 91.59
NC4_2 41,692,595 41,135,440 98.66 37,901,703 92.14
NC4_3 41,677,418 41,127,242 98.68 38,374,220 93.31
PC4_1 40,485,404 40,015,394 98.84 37,291,833 93.19
PC4_2 41,718,630 41,100,356 98.52 38,299,348 93.18
PC4_3 44,287,812 43,727,660 98.74 40,731,044 93.15
PC4_4 35,459,079 35,051,183 98.85 32,622,878 93.07
PC4_5 44,735,022 44,182,732 98.77 41,305,106 93.49
7 dpi NC7_1 44,744,786 44,186,056 98.75 41,365,713 93.62
NC7_2 44,491,519 43,990,288 98.87 40,793,780 92.73
NC7_3 42,966,690 42,389,121 98.66 39,686,399 93.62
PC7_1 35,019,444 34,605,372 98.82 32,246,094 93.18
PC7_2 43,326,264 42,863,327 98.93 39,947,213 93.20
PC7_3 44,438,060 43,855,953 98.69 40,825,891 93.09
PC7_4 39,942,948 39,418,324 98.69 36,674,774 93.04
PC7_5 40,783,881 40,357,387 98.95 37,150,687 92.05
21 dpi NC21_1 33,730,093 33,368,276 98.93 31,301,701 93.81
NC21_2 44,672,291 44,027,266 98.56 40,371,861 91.70
NC21_3 41,969,337 41,253,407 98.29 38,207,324 92.62
PC21_1 37,804,068 37,359,671 98.82 34,729,850 92.96
PC21_2 39,437,362 38,924,098 98.70 36,298,146 93.25
PC21_3 43,515,518 42,990,643 98.79 39,791,503 92.56
PC21_4 43,657,011 43,155,250 98.85 40,037,005 92.77
PC21_5 34,489,491 34,130,326 98.96 31,910,395 93.50
Total 983,213,518 970,939,264 - 902,415,098 -
Average 40,967,230 40,455,803 98.76 37,600,629 92.95

dpi, days post-infection.

Table 2
List of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the positive (PC) and negative control (NC) treatment groups at 4 and 7 days post-infection with Eimeria
Period Gene symbol Description Classification Regulation Log2(FC) FDR Gene type
4 dpi LOC112529954 major histocompatibility complex-Y, class I heavy chain-like MHC-Y class I UP 1.9553 0.0138* Protein coding
MHCY36 major histocompatibility complex Y, class I heavy chain 36 MHC-Y class I UP 2.8424 0.0651 Protein coding
TAP1 transporter 1, ATP-binding cassette, sub-family B (MDR/TAP) MHC-B region UP 0.8627 0.0130* Protein coding
DMB1 major histocompatibility complex, class II, DM beta 1 MHC-B region UP 1.0276 0.0306* Protein coding
TAPBP TAP binding protein MHC-B region UP 0.6659 0.0848 Protein coding
LOC124417241 collagen alpha-1(I) chain-like Non-MHC region DOWN −2.6799 0.0396* Protein coding
LOC124417245 translation initiation factor IF-2-like Non-MHC region DOWN −2.7874 0.0426* Protein coding
7 dpi TRIM39.2 tripartite motif containing 39.2 MHC-B region UP 1.3251 0.0046* Protein coding
LOC121106941 estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8-like Non-MHC region UP 0.8922 0.0055* Protein coding
LOC121106957 estradiol 17-beta-dehydrogenase 8-like Non-MHC region UP 0.9048 0.0282* Protein coding
RNA28S5 RNA, 28S ribosomal 5 Non-MHC region UP 1.4817 0.0976 rRNA
RNA28S1 RNA, 28S ribosomal 1 Non-MHC region UP 1.4941 0.0983 rRNA
MHCYL major histocompatibility complex Y, class I heavy chain like MHC-Y class I DOWN −2.2694 0.0414* Protein coding
LOC124417244 class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like MHC-Y class I DOWN −2.2863 0.0655 Protein coding

FC, fold change; FDR, false discovery rate; dpi, days post-infection; UP, upregulated differential expression; DOWN, downregulated differential expression.

* FDR<0.05.

REFERENCES

1. Madlala T, Okpeku M, Adeleke MA. Understanding the interactions between Eimeria infection and gut microbiota, towards the control of chicken coccidiosis: a review. Parasite 2021; 28:48 https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021047
crossref pmid pmc
2. Laurent F, Mancassola R, Lacroix S, Menezes R, Naciri M. Analysis of chicken mucosal immune response to Eimeria tenella and Eimeria maxima infection by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Infect Immun 2001; 69:2527–34. https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.69.4.2527-2534.2001
crossref pmid pmc
3. Jang SI, Lillehoj HS, Lee SH, et al. Eimeria maxima recombinant Gam82 gametocyte antigen vaccine protects against coccidiosis and augments humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Vaccine 2010; 28:2980–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.011
crossref pmid
4. Lillehoj HS, Min W, Dalloul RA. Recent progress on the cytokine regulation of intestinal immune responses to Eimeria. Poult Sci 2004; 83:611–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.4.611
crossref pmid
5. Zhou H, Lamont SJ. Chicken MHC class I and II gene effects on antibody response kinetics in adult chickens. Immunogenetics 2003; 55:133–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-003-0566-9
crossref pmid
6. Eizaguirre C, Lenz TL, Kalbe M, Milinski M. Rapid and adaptive evolution of MHC genes under parasite selection in experimental vertebrate populations. Nat Commun 2012; 3:621 https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1632
crossref pmid pmc
7. Montero BK, Wasimuddin , Schwensow N, et al. Evidence of MHC class I and II influencing viral and helminth infection via the microbiome in a non-human primate. PLoS Pathog 2021; 17:e1009675 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1009675
crossref pmid pmc
8. Miller MM, Taylor RL. Brief review of the chicken major histocompatibility complex: the genes, their distribution on chromosome 16, and their contributions to disease resistance. Poult Sci 2016; 95:375–92. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev379
crossref pmid pmc
9. Manjula P, Kim M, Cho S, Seo D, Lee JH. High levels of genetic variation in MHC-linked microsatellite markers from native chicken breeds. Genes 2021; 12:240 https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12020240
crossref pmid pmc
10. Zhang J, Goto RM, Miller MM. A simple means for MHC-Y genotyping in chickens using short tandem repeat sequences. Immunogenetics 2020; 72:325–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-020-01166-6
crossref pmid
11. Kim M, Chung Y, Manjula P, et al. Time-series transcriptome analysis identified differentially expressed genes in broiler chicken infected with mixed Eimeria species. Front Genet 2022; 13:886781 https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.886781
crossref pmid pmc
12. Xu ZY, Yu Y, Liu Y, et al. Differential expression of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory genes of layer chicken bursa after experimental infection with infectious bursal disease virus. Poult Sci 2019; 98:5307–14. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez312
crossref pmid
13. Williams J, Soutter F, Burrell C, et al. Differential expression of microRNAs in the caecal content and faeces of broiler chickens experimentally infected with Eimeria. Avian Pathol 2022; 51:395–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2022.2076581
crossref pmid
14. Yu M, Jeon JO, Cho HM, et al. Broiler responses to dietary 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid and oregano extracts under Eimeria challenge conditions. J Anim Sci Technol 2021; 63:1362–75. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2021.e121
crossref pmid pmc
15. Wickramasuriya SS, Park I, Lee Y, et al. Oral delivery of Bacillus subtilis expressing chicken NK-2 peptide protects against Eimeria acervulina infection in broiler chickens. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:684818 https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.684818
crossref pmid pmc
16. Ahmed MM, Akram MW, Tahir MHN, et al. Avian coccidiosis: recent advances in alternative control strategies and vaccine development. Agrobiol Rec 2020; 1:26–30. https://doi.org/10.47278/journal.abr/2020.004
crossref
17. Venkatas J, Adeleke MA. A review of Eimeria antigen identification for the development of novel anticoccidial vaccines. Parasitol Res 2019; 118:1701–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06338-2
crossref pmid
18. Boulton K, Nolan MJ, Wu Z, et al. Phenotypic and genetic variation in the response of chickens to Eimeria tenella induced coccidiosis. Genet Sel Evol 2018; 50:63 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0433-7
crossref pmid pmc
19. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:139–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
crossref pmid
20. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995; 57:289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
crossref
21. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. 2nd edCham, Switzerland: Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4

22. Morris GM, Woods WG, Richards DG, Gasser RB. Investigating a persistent coccidiosis problem on a commercial broiler–breeder farm utilising PCR-coupled capillary electrophoresis. Parasitol Res 2007; 101:583–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0516-9
crossref pmid
23. Long PL, Johnson J, Wyatt RD. Pathological and clinical effects of Eimeria tenella in partially immune chickens. J Comp Pathol 1981; 91:581–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9975(81)90087-6
crossref pmid
24. Ritz U, Seliger B. The transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP): structural integrity, expression, function, and its clinical relevance. Mol Med 2001; 7:149–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401948
crossref pmid pmc
25. Goldszmid RS, Sher A. Processing and presentation of antigens derived from intracellular protozoan parasites. Curr Opin Immunol 2010; 22:118–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.017
crossref pmid pmc
26. Chazara O, Tixier-Boichard M, Morin V, Zoorob R, Bed’Hom B. Organisation and diversity of the class II DM region of the chicken MHC. Mol Immunol 2011; 48:1263–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2011.03.009
crossref pmid
27. Parker A, Stains K, Butter C, Kaufman J. The non-classical class II genes of the chicken, DMA and DMB, are similar to those of mammals, but a second DMB gene (DMB1) is differentially expressed with unusual regulatory and structural features. In : 15th International Congress of Immunology (ICI); 2013 Aug 22–27; Milan, Italy. https://doi.org/10.3389/conf.fimmu.2013.02.01174
crossref
28. Parker A, Kaufman J. What chickens might tell us about the MHC class II system. Curr Opin Immunol 2017; 46:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2017.03.013
crossref pmid
29. Connell S, Meade KG, Allan B, et al. Avian resistance to Campylobacter jejuni colonization is associated with an intestinal immunogene expression signature identified by mRNA sequencing. PLoS One 2012; 7:e40409 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040409
crossref pmid pmc
30. Geng T, Guan X, Smith EJ. Screening for genes involved in antibody response to sheep red blood cells in the chicken, Gallus gallus. Poult Sci 2015; 94:2099–107. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev224
crossref pmid
31. Wu G, Liu L, Qi Y, et al. Splenic gene expression profiling in White Leghorn layer inoculated with the Salmonella enterica serovar E nteritidis. Anim Genet 2015; 46:617–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12341
crossref pmid
32. Casterlow S, Li H, Gilbert ER, et al. An antimicrobial peptide is downregulated in the small intestine of Eimeria maxima-infected chickens. Poult Sci 2011; 90:1212–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-01110
crossref pmid
33. Kim T, Hunt HD, Parcells MS, van Santen V, Ewald SJ. Two class I genes of the chicken MHC have different functions: BF1 is recognized by NK cells while BF2 is recognized by CTLs. Immunogenetics 2018; 70:599–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-018-1066-2
crossref pmid
34. Kaufman J. Innate immune genes of the chicken MHC and related regions. Immunogenetics 2022; 74:167–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-021-01229-2
crossref pmid pmc
35. Wang W, Huang Y, Yu Y, et al. Fish TRIM39 regulates cell cycle progression and exerts its antiviral function against iridovirus and nodavirus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2016; 50:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2016.01.016
crossref pmid
36. Goto RM, Warden CD, Shiina T, et al. The Gallus gallus RJF reference genome reveals an MHCY haplotype organized in gene blocks that contain 107 loci including 45 specialized, polymorphic MHC class I loci, 41 C-type lectin-like loci, and other loci amid hundreds of transposable elements. G3 (Bethesda). 2022. 12:jkac218 https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac218
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 1,475 View
  • 114 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next