1. Wouters B, Lee JVD, Thieu NQ, Man NV, Quang NMV. Improved forage strategies for high-yielding dairy cows in Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh; Vietnam: 2013. Report No. 718
2. Wongpom B, Koonawootrittriron S, Elzo MA, Suwanasopee T. Milk yield, fat yield and fat percentage associations in a Thai multibreed dairy population. Agric Nat Resour 2017;51:218–22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anres.2016.12.008
3. Boonkum W, Misztal I, Duangjinda M, Pattarajinda V, Tumwasorn S, Sanpote J. Genetic effects of heat stress on milk yield of Thai Holstein crossbreds. J Dairy Sci 2011;94:487–92.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3421
7. Shabi Z, Arieli A, Bruckental I, et al. Effect of the synchronization of the degradation of dietary crude protein and organic matter and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation and flow of digesta in the abomasum of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1998;81:1991–2000.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75773-X
8. NEN-ISO 5983-2. Animal feeding stuffs - Determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content - Part 2: Block digestion and steam distillation method; No. 5983. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO); 2009.
11. Cone JW, van Gelder AH, Visscher GJW, Oudshoorn L. Influence of rumen fluid and substrate concentration on fermentation kinetics measured with a fully automated time related gas production apparatus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;61:113–28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00950-9
12. Pellikaan WF, Hendriks WH, Uwimana G, Bongers LJGM, Becker PM, Cone JW. A novel method to determine simultaneously methane production during in vitro gas production using fully automated equipment. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;168:196–205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.096
13. Williams BA, Bosch MW, Boer H, Verstegen MWA, Tamminga S. An in vitro batch culture method to assess potential fermentability of feed ingredients for monogastric diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;123–124:445–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.031
14. Pellikaan WF, Stringano E, Leenaars J, et al. Evaluating effects of tannins on extent and rate of in vitro gas and CH4 production using an automated pressure evaluation system (APES). Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011;166–167:377–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.072
15. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Release 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute Inc; 2012.
16. Groot JCJ, Cone JW, Williams BA, Debersaques FMA, Lantinga EA. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;64:77–89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01012-7
17. Van Gelder AH, Hetta M, Rodrigues MAM, et al. Ranking of in vitro fermentability of 20 feedstuffs with an automated gas production technique: Results of a ring test. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;123–124:243–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.044
18. Yang HJ, Tamminga S, Williams BA, Dijkstra J, Boer H. In vitro gas and volatile fatty acids production profiles of barley and maize and their soluble and washout fractions after feed processing. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;120:125–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.01.007
19. Ørskov ER. Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum food utilization. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 1975;22:152–82.
20. NRC. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised edWashington DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2001.
21. Feedipedia. Animal feed resources information system [Internet]. c2021. [cited 2021 July]. Available from:
https://feedipedia.org/
22. Shen HS, Ni DB, Sundstøl F. Studies on untreated and urea-treated rice straw from three cultivation seasons: 1. Physical and chemical measurements in straw and straw fractions. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1998;73:243–61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00157-6
23. Wanapat M, Sundstøl F, Garmo TH. A comparison of alkali treatment methods to improve the nutritive value of straw. I. Digestibility and metabolizability. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1985;12:295–309.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(85)90006-9
24. Drake DJ, Nader GA, Forero LC. Feeding rice straw to cattle. University of California: Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2002. ANR Publication 8079p. 18
26. Fauzi MM, Soetanto H, Mashudi . Effects of nitrogen and sulphur fertilization on the production and nutritive values of two elephant grass cultivars at two different harvesting times. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 2020;478:012082.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/478/1/012082
27. Manyawu GJ, Chakoma C, Sibanda S, Mutisi C, Chakoma IC. The effect of harvesting interval on herbage yield and nutritive value of Napier grass and Hybrid Pennisetums. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2003;16:996–1002.
http://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.996
28. Macome FM, Pellikaan WF, Hendriks WH, et al. In vitro gas and methane production of silages from whole-plant corn harvested at 4 different stages of maturity and a comparison with in vivo methane production. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:8895–905.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-12953
29. Campos PRSS, Coelho da Silva JF, Vásquez HM, Vittori A, de Almeida e Silva M. Fractions of carbohydrates and of nitrogenous compounds of tropical grasses at different cutting ages. R Bras Zootec 2010;39:1538–47.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000700021