Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 37(5); 2024 > Article
Rama Rao, Raju, Nagalakshmi, Srilatha, Paul, Prakash, and Kannan: Higher concentrations of folic acid reduced the dietary requirements of supplemental methionine for commercial broilers

Abstract

Objective

An experiment was conducted to study the effect of supplementing DL methionine (DL Met) at graded concentrations on performance, carcass variables, immune responses and antioxidant variables in broiler chicken fed folic acid (FA) fortified (4 mg/kg) low-methionine diet.

Methods

A basal diet (BD) without supplemental DL Met, but with higher level (4 mg/kg) of FA and a control diet (CD) with the recommended concentration of methionine (Met) were prepared. The BD was supplemented with DL Met at graded concentrations (0%, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% supplemental DL Met of CD). Each diet was fed ad libitum to 10 replicates of 5 broiler male chicks in each from 1 to 42 d of age.

Results

Body weight gain (BWG) reduced, and feed conversion ratio (FCR) increased in broilers fed low-Met BD. At 30% and 20% inclusion of DL met, the BWG and FCR, respectively were similar to those fed the CD. Similarly, supplementation of 10% DL Met to the BD significantly increased ready to cook meat yield and breast meat weight, which were similar to those of the CD fed broilers. Lipid peroxidation reduced, the activity of antioxidant enzymes (GSHPx and GSHRx) in serum increased and lymphocyte proliferation increased with increased supplemental DL Met level in the BD. The concentrations of total protein and albumin in serum increased with DL Met supplementation to the BD.

Conclusion

Based on the data, it can be concluded that supplemental Met can be reduced to less than 50% in broiler chicken diets (4.40, 3.94, and 3.39 g/kg, respectively in pre-starter, starter and finisher phases) containing 4 mg/kg FA.

INTRODUCTION

Methionine (Met) is an essential amino acid, which is required for protein synthesis, immune modulation [1,2] and glutathione synthesis [3], and is involved in more than 100 transmethylation reactions [4]. Methyl donors (MDs) like choline, folic acid (FA) and betaine are known to spare Met by participation in MD function of the amino acid [59]. Thus, additional supplementation of diet with these MD would reduce the dietary requirement of Met. Folic acid is an important water soluble vitamin, which plays a pivotal role in the single carbon transfer in the trans-methylation reaction [10]. The FA, in the form of tetrahydrofolate, donates methyl group to homocysteine to synthesize Met in the biological system [11]. Therefore, by supplementing adequate concentrations of FA, the Met drain out for methylation could be minimized. Literature suggested dietary requirement of FA as 2 to 4 mg/kg for optimum performance in chicken [12,13]. Besides methyl donation, supplementation of FA was reported to elicit a positive response in the immune system [14,15] and reduction of oxidative stress [16,17] in the liver of rats.
The data from our laboratory [8,9] indicated improved broiler performance with supplementation of higher concentrations of FA in diets containing sub-optimal concentrations of Met. Supplementation of 4 to 6 mg of FA/kg diet significantly improved the weight gain and FE in broilers fed corn soybean meal diet without crystalline Met, which suggests the sparing function of the FA for the amino acid in the diet. Therefore, it was presumed that Met concentration can be reduced in diets containing higher concentrations of FA. As the cost of FA is lower than DL Met per unit of broiler feed, an attempt was made to reduce the requirement of supplemental DL Met in broiler diet having higher concentrations of FA (4 mg/kg).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Birds and management

Broiler (Vencobb 400) male chicks (n = 350) were randomly and equally distributed into 7 dietary groups having 10 replicates with 5 chicks per replicate. The birds were reared in 3-tier battery brooder pens (0.61×0.75×0.432 m) with wire floor from 1 to 42 d of age in an open sided poultry house. Supplemental heat was provided with incandescent bulbs and coal burner to brood the chicks at 36°C±1°C up to 7 d of age, which was gradually reduced to 28°C±1°C by 21 d of age, after which, the broilers were maintained at ambient temperature (23.4°C to 30.1°C). Fluorescent bulbs were used to provide 20 h light and 4 h dark in a d from d 22 till the end of the experiment. Birds were vaccinated against Newcastle (Lasota) disease at 5 and 21 d and against infectious bursal disease at 11 and 28 d of age. The experiment was conducted by following the guidelines of the Institute Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC/DPR/17/1 dated 1st October 2017).

Diets

Yellow maize and soybean meal-based basal diets (BD) having 2,925, 3,050, and 3,100 kcal/kg ME and 220, 200, and 189 g crude protein/kg, respectively for pre-starter (1 to 7 d), starter (8 to 21 d), and finisher (22 to 42 d of age) phases were prepared (Table 1). The BD has all the nutrients recommended for the strain (Vencobb 400 Broiler Management Guide; Venkateswara Hatcheries Pvt Ltd, Pune, India) except Met and FA. The BD was supplemented with commercial broiler vitamin premix having all the vitamins, except FA at the recommend concentration. A set of control diets (CD) were prepared by supplementing crystalline Met (DL-Met) to the BD to meet the 100% recommendations of the Met for the strain i.e. 5.52, 4.85, and 3.93 g/kg, respectively in pre-starter, starter and finisher diets. Concentrations of Met in the pre-starter, starter and finisher BD were 3.28, 3.03, and 2.85 g/kg, Met, respectively in pre-starter, starter and finisher diets. The BD was supplemented with 4 mg/kg FA (Badische Anilin- und Soda Fabrik). The test diets were formulated by supplementing the FA-rich BD with crystalline DL-Met at 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% concentration of DL-Met supplemented in the CD. Each diet was allotted to 10 replicates of 5 chicks each by following the completely randomized design and fed ad libitum from one to 42 d of age. The FA concentration in the premix was estimated using UV spectrophotometric method and distilled water as the blank at an absorbance of 281 nm [18]. The Met concentration in diets was estimated as per Llames and Fontaine [19].

Parameters recorded

Performance parameters

Body weight and feed intake (FI) per replicate were recorded at 21 and 42 d of age. FI per unit body weight gain (BWG) was calculated as the feed conversion ratio (FCR). The body weight of dead birds was considered to calculate the FCR.

Carcass variables

Carcass variables were recorded at 43 d of age by slaughtering one bird by cervical dislocation from each replicate having the body weight nearest to the average of the replicate (+3%). Relative weights of ready-to-cook yield (without liver, gizzard, and heart), abdominal fat and breast meat were recorded and expressed as g/kg pre-slaughter live weight.

Serum protein fraction

Blood samples (about 2.5 to 3 mL) were collected from the brachial vein of one bird in each replicate at 42 d of age. Diagnostic kits (Product No 72111 and 72131, respectively, M/S Qualigens India, Mumbai, India) were used to calculate the concentration of total protein and albumin in serum.

Serum oxidative parameters

The oxidative parameters like lipid peroxidation (LP) and the activities of antioxidant enzymes like red blood cells catalase (RBCC), glutathione peroxidase (GSHPx) and glutathione reductase (GSHRx) in blood were measured. About two mL of blood from one bird per replicate at 43 d of age was collected into a centrifuge tube containing citrate buffer (1.5 mL/10 mL blood) for erythrocyte separation and antioxidant enzyme estimation. The blood samples were centrifuged at 500×g for 15 min at 4°C to separate buffy coat (white blood cells) and form an erythrocyte pellet. The erythrocytes were washed thrice with phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). The packed RBC obtained was mixed with an equal volume of phosphate buffered saline and then diluted as per the requirement with distilled water.
The LP was estimated in serum by quantifying malonyl dialdehyde (MDA). The MDA reacts with 2-thiobarbituric acid to form a trimethine colored substance (pink chromogen), which was extracted into butanol. The color intensity was measured at 548 nm. The LP activity in the erythrocytes was expressed in nmol MDA/mg protein [20].
The enzyme catalase decomposes H2O2 and the rate of decomposition as measured in terms of reduction in absorbance is indicative of the enzyme activity in the serum sample [21]. The activity of GSHPx and GSHRx were estimated following the method of Paglia and Valantine [22].

Immune responses

The effect of supplementing graded concentrations of DL Met on cell mediated immunity (CMI) (in vitro lymphocyte proliferation ratio [LPR]) and humoral immunity (HI) (antibody response against Newcastle disease [ND] vaccine) were studied. Blood samples were collected at 20 d of age from one bird per replicate in all the treatments to study the CMI and HI responses.
The difference between the in vitro proliferation of lymphocytes with and without the stimulant (concanavalin A, Con A) was expressed as the ratio. The LPR was assayed using MTT tetrazodium salt (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) [23]. About 2 mL of blood was collected from the brachial vein of the bird in a centrifuge tube containing heparin disodium salt (5 mg). One bird from each replicate was used to collect blood samples at 20 d of age. The un-clotted blood sample was layered gently over histopaque 1077 (Sigma, Mumbai, India) and centrifuged at 500×g for 20 minutes at 4°C. The cellular band at the interface was collected and transferred to another tube and washed 3 times with RPMI 1640 medium (AL 028A; Himedia, Mumbai, India). The viable cells were counted by using the trypan blue dye exclusion method and the cell concentration was adjusted to 1×107 cells/mL of RPMI 1640 medium. These cells (105 purified lymphocytes) were used to measure lymphocyte proliferation by adding 10 μL of suspension to each well of a 96-well flat bottom sterile tissue culture plate. Con A (0.9 μg in 150 μL RPMI/well) was used as the stimulant for lymphocyte proliferation. The plate was incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 concentration for 69 h in a humid atmosphere, then 20 μL MTT (10 mg/mL) was added to each well and the plate was re-incubated for 3 h. At 72 h, 100 μL of 4% 1 N HCl - isopropanol was added to each well and mixed thoroughly with a micropipette to dissolve the formazin crystals, which gave a deep purple colour. The colour intensity was measured in an ELISA reader (V.200.1, μ Quant; Biotek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) at 550 nm. The LPR was calculated as (optical density [OD] of well with Con A – OD of well without Con A)/OD of well without Con A.
The broilers were vaccinated against ND by ocular route at 5 and 21 d of age with Lasota strain (ND Lasota Vac-500; Indovax Pvt., Ltd., Hyderabad, India). At 20 d of age, 2 mL of blood was collected from one bird per replicate and the antibody titres in sera against ND vaccine were measured [24] by haemagglutination test.

Economics

Feed cost to produce kg BWG in different treatment groups was calculated based on the prevailing market price of major feed ingredients, feed additives, DL Met, and FA. Feed intake, BWG, and feed cost of different treatments were considered to calculated the feed cost per unit live weight gain.

Statistical analysis

The replicate mean was considered as the experimental unit for performance variables, while the data of each bird were considered as the experimental unit for slaughter, immune responses, serum analysis and antioxidant variables. The data were analysed by one-way analysis of variance to test the effect of dietary treatment on various dependant variables studied in the experiment [25]. The treatment means were compared with Tukey’s test at p<0.05. The effect of supplementing graded concentrations of Met to the BD on various dependant variables were tested with a regression equation Y = a+bx+cx2, where Y is the dependant variable and x is the concentration of supplemental DL met in the diet.

RESULTS

The FA content in the pre-starter, starter and finisher BDs were respectively 4.82, 4.72, and 4.69 mg/kg. Similarly, the analysed concentrations of Met and lysine in the respective diets were 3.21 and 11.4, 2.97, and 10.1, and 2.80 and 9.10 g/kg.

Performance

The BWG and FCR at d 21 were not affected (p>0.05) by the treatments employed in the current study (Table 2). At the end of the experiment (d 42), the BWG (p = 0.024) reduced and FCR (p = 0.001) increased in broilers fed low-Met BD. The weight gain increased progressively with DL Met supplementation and at 30% inclusion, the BWG was similar to those fed the CD. Similarly, at 20% inclusion of Met to the BD, the FCR reduced similar to the level of the CD. And a further increase in DL Met did not show any additional influence on these performance variables.
The regression analysis indicated that the performance variables were not affected (p>0.05) by DL Met supplementation to the BD at day 21, while both BWG and FCR increased (p = 0.011) and reduced (p = 0.001), respectively in a non–linear manner, with an increase in DL Met concentration in the BD.
The feed cost required to gain kg live weight in the BD fed broilers was 0.73 USD which was 7 cents higher than those fed the CD diet (0.66 USD). The feed cost in broilers fed 40% DL Met and 50% DL Met was similar to those fed the CD (0.66 USD).

Slaughter variables

The ready to cook (RTC) yield reduced and abdominal fat content increased in broilers fed the low Met BD compared to the CD group (Table 3). Supplementation of 10% DL Met to the BD increased (p = 0.001) the RTC yield, which was like the CD fed broilers. Similarly, the abdominal fat content reduced (p = 0.008) progressively with DL Met supplementation and the fat deposition at 30% or 40% DL Met was significantly higher than the BD, but similar to the CD groups. The relative weight of breast meat weight at 40% DL Met supplementation to the BD was higher (p = 0.023) than those fed the BD without supplemental DL Met. However, the breast weight in DL Met supplementation at all levels was similar to the CD group. The relative weights of giblet and bursa were not affected with the dietary variations. The lowest weight of spleen was recorded in broilers fed the BD, but supplementation of DL Met increased the organ weight and at 50% inclusion, the spleen weight was significantly higher than the BD and the organ weight in other groups was similar to the CD group.
The relative weights of RTC (p = 0.001), breast meat (p = 0.032), and spleen (p = 0.067) increased non-linearly, while the abdominal fat (p = 0.011) decreased non-linearly with increased DL Met concentration in the BD.

Antioxidant variables

Though the LP reduced in the BD-fed broilers compared to the CD group, the difference between these groups was not statistically significant (Table 4). However, the LP reduced progressively with increase in the supplemental DL Met and the LP was reduced (p = 0.001) at 20% or higher Met supplementation to the BD compared to the CD group. The lowest LP was observed at the highest DL Met inclusion in the BD. The activity of both the antioxidant enzymes (GSHPx and GSHRx) was reduced (p = 0.001) in the low-Met BD fed broilers compared to those fed the CD diet. In general, supplementation of DL Met increased the activity of both the enzymes. Maximum activity of GSHRx and GSHPx were observed, respectively at 50% and 40% inclusion of DL Met in the BD.
Similarly, the regression analysis indicated a non-linear decrease in LP (p = 0.001) and increase in the activities of GSHPx (p = 0.001) and GSHRx (p = 0.001) in serum of broilers fed higher concentration of DL Met in the BD.

Immune responses

The antibody titre against ND vaccine was not affected (p< 0.05) by the treatments employed in the current study (Table 4). The cell mediated immune response in terms of LPR was reduced (p = 0.001) in broilers fed the BD compared to those fed the CD. In general, the LPR increased with the level of supplemental DL met and at 50% amino acid inclusion, the LPR was higher than those fed the CD. Increase in concentration of the DL Met in the BD non-linearly (p = 0.001) increased the LPR, however such improvement was not observed (p>0.05) in antibody titre against ND vaccine.

Serum protein fractions

The serum total protein was significantly (p<0.05) reduced in the BD fed broilers compared to the CD group (Table 4). Both total protein and albumin concentrations increased (p = 0.001) with the inclusion of 20% DL Met compared to the BD. Higher inclusion levels (>20%) did not show any additional improvement in the concentrations of these protein fractions. The regression analysis indicated significant and non-linear increase (p = 0.001) in the concentrations of total protein and albumin with increase in DL Met concentration in the diet. The serum cholesterol concentration reduced non-linearly (p<0.001) with an increase in DL Met in the BD.

DISCUSSION

Compared to the CD, feeding low-Met BD resulted in a significant reduction in BWG and feed efficiency (FE) in broilers at d 42. This implies that Met deficiency caused a significant reduction in growth and FE in broiler chicken. Similar to the current study, previous work [5,8,9] also showed a significant reduction in performance of broilers fed maize-soybean meal diets without supplemental Met. The primary hypothesis of the study assumed that at higher inclusion levels of FA, the dietary requirement of DL Met will be reduced due to the sparing effect of additional dietary levels of FA on the MD function of Met. As expected, the BWG at 30% and FE at 20% inclusion of the DL Met to FA fortified BD was significantly improved over the BD and were similar to those fed the CD having 100% DL Met at the end of the experiment. The improved performance of broilers with lower inclusion levels of DL Met to the BD (FA fortified) suggested the reduced requirement of DL Met in diets containing higher levels of FA. The reduced requirement of Met in FA-fortified BD can be explained by the role of FA in single carbon transfer reactions. As the FA is the nucleolus in the transmethylation cycle, inclusion of higher concentrations of FA and betaine were reported to spare Met from the MD function [26,2]. Similarly, in our previous studies, inclusion of higher levels of FA or other MDs (betaine, biotin, vitamin B12) improved the performance (BWG and or FE) of broilers fed Met-deficient maize-soybean meal-based diets [79]. The higher levels of FA were able to support the broiler performance when supplemented to the diets with sub-optimal levels of Met. The improvement in broiler performance with the addition of DL Met was reported to be mediated by stimulating synthesis and release of insulin-like growth factor I [27] with Met supplementation. Though the cost of feed ingredients and additives are highly variable, the current study indicated that the feed cost per kg BWG in broilers fed the BD with 40% or 50% DL Met compared to those fed the CD. These observations imply that the possibility of sparing about 50% of supplemental DL met in broiler diet without affecting the performance and feed cost per kg BWG.
The reduced requirement of supplemental DL Met (or dietary requirement of the amino acid) in the presence of higher levels of FA could be due to the role of FA in the conversion of homocysteine to Met by donating methyl group through transmethylation. Similarly, the Met sparing function of certain MDs (FA, choline, or DL-Met) was reported to improve the growth in broiler chicks fed the diets having lower concentrations (<3.8 g/kg) of Met [28,29].
Reduction in RTC yield and breast weight in broilers fed the low-Met BD compared to the CD indicate that the levels of Met in the BD fortified with FA appears to be inadequate to support these carcass variables. However, supplementation of 10% and 40% DL Met to the BD, respectively improved the RTC yield and breast meat weight similar to the Met-adequate CD fed broilers. These results of carcass variables clearly indicated that the presence of FA could considerably reduce the requirement of supplemental DL Met to a level lower than those present in the CD. In line with results of the current study, the recent finding of Akter et al [30] reported significant improvement in dressing percent and the relative weight of the back in broilers fed 0.3% supplemental L Met in the diet. Similar improvement in the breast meat yield was reported with supplementation of certain MDs (betaine or vitamin B12) to diets either with adequate Met or its sub-optimal concentration in the diet [4,26]. Similarly, Acar et al [31] reported reduced abdominal fat deposition in broilers fed higher dietary Met. The increase in abdominal fat deposition in the BD-fed broilers could be due to inadequate concentration of Met in the diet. The lower dietary Met concentration might have reduced the weight gain probably due to the reduced protein synthesis and thereby favoured the diversion of nutrients to fatty acid synthesis. In the current study, supplementation of even marginal levels of DL Met (30% to 40%) to FA-fortified BD were able to reduce the fat deposition in the abdominal area. As the level of DL Met increased, the BWG improved (and more protein accretion), which might have reduced the fatty acid synthesis and abdominal fat deposition.
Though the weight of bursa was not affected, the relative weight of spleen increased progressively with the levels of DL Met in the diet. The increase in the lymphoid organ weight was also reflected in a significant improvement in the cell mediated immune response (LPR) at 20% to 50% DL Met in diet compared to the BD fed broilers. The improved LPR observed at lower inclusion levels of DL Met (50%) compared to the CD (100% supplemental Met) could be due to the possible synthesis of Met from homocysteine in the presence of FA (present in the BD), which might have increased the availability of Met, whose immune modulator role is well established [32,33,2]. Similar to these findings, an increase in CMI response to PHA-P inoculation was observed in our previous study with increased concentrations of Met in broiler diet [2]. Similarly, a higher immune response in broiler chickens was reported when they were fed higher Met levels in the diet [34,35].
Variations in environmental temperature and humidity in open type poultry houses, which are common in tropical countries, will have a direct impact on the bird’s thermoregulation and make them prone to oxidative stress. The thermal stress leads to oxidation processes and excess production of free radicals, which are scavenged by anti-oxidant enzymes like GSHPx and GSHRx and converted into less harmful substances. In the current study, the LP was not affected, but the activities of GSHPx and GSHRx were reduced in broilers fed the low-Met BD compared to those fed the CD. The reduced activities of antioxidant enzymes in broilers fed the BD could be due to the deficit levels of Met, which is essential for synthesis of glutathione. Similarly, Met is known to increase the expression levels of genes related to antioxidant activity, particularly under heat stress conditions [36]. The oxidative stress appears to be reduced (progressive and significant reduction in LP and increase in activities of GSHPx and GSHRx) in broilers fed with higher levels of DL Met in the BD. Similar to the current findings, our previous studies [8,9] also indicated the reduced stress indices and improved immune responses in broilers fed MDs like FA, biotin, betaine and vitamin B12.
The increased broiler performance in the current study with DL Met supplementation to BD is likely due to improved protein synthesis [37,38]. In general, the concentrations of total protein and albumin in serum increased with supplementing DL Met to the BD. The concentrations of these protein fractions at higher levels of supplemental Met were higher than those fed the BD and equal or higher than those fed the CD. The increased concentration of protein fractions in serum suggested an increased protein synthesis by supplementing DL Met to the BD. Similar improvement in the concentrations of total protein, globulin and albumin in plasma or serum with Met or MD supplementation was also recorded in our previous studies [8,9].

CONCLUSION

Based on the data of the current study, it can be concluded that the dietary requirement of supplemental Met for broilers can be reduced to 50% in diets (4.40, 3.94, and 3.39 g/kg, respectively in pre-starter, starter, and finisher phases) containing 4 mg/kg FA.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

FUNDING

The authors wish to express thanks to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India for funding the research work under AP Cess Fund scheme (REF: F. No. 8(43)/2003-ASR-III, dated June 2004 P C No 3030428006).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

The data will be provided by the author on request to svramarao1@gmail.com

Table 1
Ingredient and nutrient composition (g/kg) of basal diets
Ingredient Pre starter (1 to 7 d) Starter (8 to 21 d) Finisher (22 to 42 d)
Maize 555.3 597.9 641.5
Soybean meal 387.0 334.0 292.0
Vegetable oil 21.5 33.2 32.8
Common salt 2.50 2.48 2.45
Sodium bi-carbonate 1.00 1.00 1.00
Dicalcium phosphate 18.8 17.5 16.6
Shell grit 10.90 10.92 10.65
DL-methionine 0.0 0.0 0.0
L-lysine HCl 0.0 0.0 0.0
Additives1) 3.00 3.00 3.00
Nutrient
 Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)2) 12.24 12.76 12.97
 Crude protein2) 220 200 185
 Crude protein3) 226 206 191
 Lysine2) 12.1 10.8 9.50
 Lysine3) 11.4 10.1 9.10
 Mehionine2) 3.28 3.03 2.85
 Methionine3) 3.21 2.97 2.80
 Threonine2) 7.97 7.26 6.72
 Tryptophan2) 2.58 2.29 2.07
 Folic acid (mg/kg)3) 4.82 4.72 4.69
 Calcium2) 9.00 8.50 8.00
 Non-phytate phosphorus2) 4.50 4.20 4.00

1) Provided (mg/kg diet): thiamin 1; pyridoxine, 2; cyanocobalamine, 0.01; niacin, 15; pantothenic acid, 10; a tocopherol, 10; riboflavin, 10; biotin, 0.08; menadione, 2; retinol acetate, 2.75; cholecalciferol, 0.06; choline, 650; copper, 8; iron, 45; manganese, 80; zinc, 60; selenium, 0.18; hydrated sodium calcium alumino silicates, 800; phytase, 375 units

2) Calculated values.

3) Analysed values.

Table 2
Performance of broiler chickens fed graded concentrations of supplemental methionine in diets fortified with folic acid
Treat 1 to 21 d 1 to 42 d


BWG (g) FI/BWG BWG (g) FI/BWG
CD 924.2 1.232 2,534A 1.638B
BD 881.0 1.271 2,259B 1.828A
DLM 101) 902.6 1.292 2,378AB 1.800A
DLM 201) 848.1 1.250 2,375AB 1.711B
DLM 301) 870.5 1.293 2,493A 1.706B
DLM 401) 864.8 1.259 2,415AB 1.673B
DLM 501) 910.4 1.295 2,541A 1.681B
SEM 8.720 0.0076 25.308 0.0130
p-value
 ANOVA 0.207 0.184 0.024 0.001
 Linear 0.773 0.720 0.003 0.001
 Quadratic 0.317 0.815 0.011 0.001

BWG body weight gain, FI fed intake, CD control diet; BD basal diet; SEM, standard error mean; p-value, probability; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

1) DLM 10 to 50 supplemental DL methionine concentration 10% to 50% of the CD.

A,B Means having common superscript in a column do not vary significantly (p<0.05).

Table 3
Slaughter variables and relative weight of lymphoid organs (g/kg live weight) in broiler chickens fed graded concentrations of supplemental methionine in diets fortified with folic acid
Treat RTC Breast meat Abdominal fat Giblet Bursa Spleen
CD 736.3A 237.8AB 13.79C 47.94 1.902 2.440AB
BD 691.4B 227.1B 19.55A 50.18 1.758 1.732B
DLM 101) 727.8A 239.0AB 18.93AB 50.68 1.776 1.925B
DLM 201) 738.2A 242.5AB 17.48ABC 46.33 1.579 2.174AB
DLM 301) 739.4A 238.0AB 15.69BC 51.30 1.770 2.279AB
DLM 401) 725.9A 252.0A 14.28C 49.26 1.732 2.201AB
DLM 501) 734.2A 244.0AB 16.75ABC 48.32 1.960 2.810A
SEM 2.89 2.23 0.5045 0.5152 0.0592 0.0920
p-value
 ANOVA 0.001 0.023 0.008 0.127 0.733 0.047
 Linear 0.001 0.017 0.007 0.468 0.362 0.021
 Quadratic 0.001 0.022 0.011 0.761 0.277 0.067

RTC, ready to cook, CD control diet; BD basal diet; SEM, standard error mean; p-value, probability; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

1) DLM 10 to 50 supplemental DL methionine concentration 10% to 50% of the CD.

A–C Means having common superscript in a column do not vary significantly (p<0.05).

Table 4
Antioxidant variables and immune responses in broiler chickens fed graded concentrations of supplemental methionine in diets fortified with folic acid
Treat LP (nM MDA/mg protein) GSHRx GSHPx Immune responses Serum (g/dL)



Units/mL LPR ND titre, log 2 Total protein Albumin
CD 1.361A 76.94B 51.83B 0.635B 4.600 1.735A 0.528C
BD 1.304AB 64.55E 46.21C 0.414D 5.100 0.930B 0.533C
DLM 101) 1.277BC 73.09BCD 47.64C 0.440CD 5.100 0.991B 0.548C
DLM 201) 1.213CD 70.17CDE 52.18B 0.483C 4.100 1.420A 0.675AB
DLM 301) 1.177DE 75.47BC 52.18B 0.471C 5.300 1.460A 0.605BC
DLM 401) 1.130E 68.04DE 56.75A 0.614B 5.300 1.533A 0.735A
DLM 501) 1.117E 91.94A 55.22AB 0.792A 4.400 1.779A 0.737A
SEM 0.0142 1.261 0.599 0.0167 0.398 0.0558 0.0181
p-value
 ANOVA 0.001 0.001 0..01 0.001 0.280 0.001 0.001
 Linear 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.549 0.001 0.001
 Quadratic 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.826 0.001 0.001

LP, lipid peroxidation; GSHRx, glutathopne reductase; GSHPx, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malonyl dialdehyde; LPR, lymphocyte proliferation ratio; CD, control diet; BD, basal diet, SEM standard error mean; p-value, probability; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

1) DLM 10 to 50 supplemental DL methionine concentration 10% to 50% of the CD.

A–E Means having common superscript in a column do not vary significantly (p<0.05)

REFERENCES

1. Takahashi K, Ohata N, Akiba Y. Influences of dietary methionine and cysteine on metabolic responses to immunological stress by Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide injection, and mitogenic response in broiler chickens. Br J Nutr 1997;78:815–21. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19970197
crossref pmid
2. Rama Rao SV, Praharaj NK, Panda AK, Reddy MR. Interaction between genotype and dietary concentrations of methionine for immune function in commercial broilers. Br Poult Sci 2003;44:104–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085283
crossref pmid
3. Wang ST, Chen HW, Sheen LY, Lii CK. Methionine and cysteine affect glutathione level, glutathione-related enzyme activities and the expression of glutathione s-transferase isozymes in rat hepatocytes. J Nutr 1997;127:2135–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/127.11.2135
crossref pmid
4. Larbier M, Leclerco B. Nutrition and feeding of poultry. Leicestershire, UK: Nottingham University Press; 1992.

5. Pesti GM, Benevenga NJ, Harper AE, Sunde ML. Factors influencing the assessment of the availability of choline in feedstuffs. Poult Sci 1981;60:188–96. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0600188
crossref pmid
6. Virtanen E, Rosi L. Effects of betaine on methionine requirement of broilers under various environmental conditions. In : Proceedings, Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 1995; University of Sydney; Sydney NSW, Australia. p. 88–92.

7. Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Panda AK, Poonam S, Shyam Sunder G. Effect of supplementing betaine on performance, carcass traits and immune responses in broiler chicken fed diets containing different concentrations of methionine. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2011;24:662–9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.10286
crossref
8. Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Prakash B, Paul SS, Nagalakshmi D. Effect of methyl donors supplementation on performance, immune responses and anti-oxidant variables in broiler chicken fed diet without supplemental methionine. Anim Biosci 2022;35:475–83. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0812
crossref pmid pmc
9. Rama Rao SV, Raju MVLN, Paul SS, et al. Enhancement of performance and anti-oxidant variables in broiler chicken fed diets containing sub-optimal methionine level with graded concentrations of sulphur and folic acid. Anim Biosci 2022;35:721–9. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0258
crossref pmid pmc
10. Stover PJ. Physiology of folate and vitamin B12 in health and disease. Nutr Rev 2004;62:S3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2004.tb00070.x
crossref pmid
11. Finkelstein JD, Martin JJ. Methionine metabolism in mammals. distribution of homocysteine between competing pathways. J Biol Chem 1984;259:9508–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(17)42728-1
crossref pmid
12. Whitehead CC, Mccormack HA, Rennie JS, Frigg M. Folic acid requirements of broilers. Br Poult Sci 1995;36:113–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417757
crossref pmid
13. Jing M, Munyaka PM, Tactacan GB, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC, House JD. Performance, serum biochemical responses, and gene expression of intestinal folate transporters of young and older laying hens in response to dietary folic acid supplementation and challenge with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Poult Sci 2014;93:122–31. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03384
crossref pmid
14. Munyaka PM, Tactacan G, Jing M, House JD, Rodriguez-Lecompte JC. Immunomodulation in young laying hens by dietary folic acid and acute immune responses after challenge with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide. Poult Sci 2012;91:2454–63. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02381
crossref pmid
15. Munyaka PM, Tactacan G, Jing M, Karmin O, House JD. Response of older laying hens to an Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide challenge when fed diets with or without supplemental folic acid. Poult Sci 2013;92:105–13. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02579
crossref pmid
16. Huang SR, Hsu Y, Lin HL, Yang FL. Folate depletion and elevated plasma homocysteine promote oxidative stress in rat livers. J Nutr 2001;131:33–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.1.33
crossref pmid
17. Joshi R, Adhikari S, Patro BS, Chattopadhyay S, Mukherjee T. Free radical scavenging behavior of folic acid: evidence for possible antioxidant activity. Free Radic Biol Med 2001;30:1390–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5849(01)00543-3
crossref pmid
18. Kshirsagar SS, Bhalekar SM, Gopale DK, Shirishkumar DA. Development and validation of new uv- spectroscopic method for water soluble folic acid. Int J Chem Concepts 2017;3:364–70.

19. Llames CR, Fontaine Y. Determination of amino acids in feeds: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 1994;77:1362–402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/77.6.1362
crossref
20. Placer ZA, Cushman LL, Johnson BC. Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malonyl dialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Anal Biochem 1966;16:359–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90167-9
crossref pmid
21. Bergmeyer HU. Catalase. Bergmeyer HU, editorMethods of enzymatic analysis. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie; 1983. 2:p. 165–6.

22. Paglia DE, Valantine WN. Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med 1967;70:158–69. https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:0022214367900765
crossref pmid
23. Bounous DI, Campagnoli RP, Brown J. Comparison of MTT colorimetric assay and tritiated thymidine uptake for lymphocyte proliferation assays using chicken splenocytes. Avian Dis 1992;36:1022–7. https://doi.org/10.2307/1591566
crossref pmid
24. Reynolds DL, Maraqa AD. Protective immunity against Newcastle disease: the role of antibodies specific to Newcastle disease virus polypeptides. Avian Dis 2000;44:138–44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1592517
crossref pmid
25. SAS Institute. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics. Version 6. 12 editionCary, NC, USA: SAS Institute; 1994.

26. Harms RH, Miles RD. Effects of supplemental methionine and potassium sulfate on the choline requirement of the turkey poult. Poult Sci 1984;63:1464–6. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0631464
crossref pmid
27. Del Vesco AP, Gasparino E, Oliveira Neto AR, Guimarães Sef, Marcato SMM, Voltolini DM. Dietary methionine effects on IGF-I and GHR MRNA expression in broilers. Genetics Mol Res 2013;12:6414–23. https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.December.10.2
crossref
28. Martin WG, Miraglia RJ, Spaeth DG, Patrick H. Synthesis of taurine from sulfate by the chick. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1966;122:841–4. https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-122-31265
crossref pmid
29. Pesti GM, Rowland GN, Ryu KS. Folate deficiency in chicks fed diets containing practical ingredients. Poult Sci 1991;70:600–4. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0700600
crossref pmid
30. Akter N, Islam Md S, Zaman S, Jahan I, Hossain MA. The impact of different levels of l-methionine (l-met) on carcass yield traits, serum metabolites, tibial characters, and profitability of broilers fed conventional diet. J Adv Vet Anim Res 2020;7:253–9. https://doi.org/10.5455/javar.2020.g417
crossref pmid pmc
31. Acar N, Barbato GF, Patterson PH. The effect of feeding excess methionine on live performance, carcass traits, and ascitic mortality. Poult Sci 2001;80:1585–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.11.1585
crossref pmid
32. Miles RD, Ruiz N, Harms RH. The interrelationship between methionine, choline, and sulfate in broiler diets. Poult Sci 1983;62:495–8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0620495
crossref pmid
33. Tillman PB, Pesti GM. The response of male broiler chicks to a corn-soy diet supplemented with L-Methionine, L-Cystine, Choline, Sulfate, and Vitamin B12. Poult Sci 1986;65:1741–8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0651741
crossref pmid
34. Tsiagbe VK, Cook ME, Harper AE, Sunde ML. Enhanced immune responses in broiler chicks fed methionine-supplemented diets. Poult Sci 1987;66:1147–54. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0661147
crossref pmid
35. Maroufyan E, Kasim A, Meng GY, et al. Effect of dietary combination of methionine and fish oil on cellular immunity and plasma fatty acids in infectious bursal disease challenged chickens. Sci World J. 2013. 2013:Article ID 531397. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/531397
crossref
36. Del Vesco AP, Gasparino E, Grieser DO, Zancanela V, Soares MAM, Neto ARO. Effects of methionine supplementation on the expression of oxidative stress-related genes in acute heat stress-exposed broilers. Br J Nutr 2015;113:549–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114514003535
crossref pmid
37. Ryu KS, Pesti GM, Roberson KD, Edwards HM, Eitenmiller RR. The folic acid requirements of starting broiler chicks fed diets based on practical ingredients.: 2. Interrelationships with dietary methionine. Poult Sci 1995;74:1456–62. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0741456
crossref pmid
38. El-Demerdash FM, Yousef MI, Elaswad FM. Biochemical study on the protective role of folic acid in rabbits treated with chromium (VI). J Env Sci Health B 2006;41:731–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230600704282
crossref
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 1,046 View
  • 75 Download
Related articles


Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next