Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 36(11); 2023 > Article
Authaida, Ratchamak, Boonkum, and Chankitisakul: Increasing sperm production and improving cryosurvival of semen in aged Thai native roosters as affected by selenium supplementation



Aging roosters typically exhibit subfertility with decreasing semen quality, furthermore Thai native roosters reared in rural areas are raised for a longer duration than their usual lifespan. The present study therefore aimed to assess the effect of selenium supplementation as an antioxidative substance in diets to improve the semen cryopreservation of aged roosters.


Semen samples were collected from young (n = 20) and aged (n = 20) Thai native roosters (Pradu Hang Dum) at 36 and 105 weeks of age when starting the experiment, respectively. They were fed diets either non-supplemented or supplemented with selenium (0.75 ppm). Fresh semen quality and lipid peroxidation of fresh semen was evaluated before cryopreservation using the traditional liquid nitrogen vapor method. Post-thaw sperm quality and fertility potential were determined.


Advancing age is unrelated to decreasing fresh semen quality (p>0.05). However, lipid peroxidation in rooster semen depended on age, and the malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration increased in aged roosters (p<0.05). Selenium supplementation in diets significantly decreased the MDA concentration and increased the sperm concentration (p<0.05). In contrast, cryopreserved semen was affected by advancing rooster age, and selenium influenced sperm quality (p<0.05). Younger roosters had higher post-thaw sperm quality and fertility potential than aged roosters (p<0.05). Likewise, diet selenium supplements improved post-thaw sperm quality and fertility compared with the non-supplement group.


Rooster’s age does not influence the rooster sperm quality of fresh semen, while sperm cryotolerance and fertility were greater in young roosters than in aged roosters. However, sperm of aged roosters could be improved by dietary selenium supplementation.


Traditionally, native Thai chickens have been raised mainly for home consumption and play an essential role in the economy at the community level. These chickens are typically raised on backyard farms for longer utilization by small farmers with poor husbandry practices, and insufficient nutrition often results in poor growth performance [1], low egg production [2], and low fertility [3]. However, large-scale commercial rearing of exotic chicken breeds subjected to efficient meat and egg performances has become a large part of the supply chain, decreasing the number of Thai native chickens and their genetic diversity. One of the strategies to conserve the genetic diversity of those purebred, semen cryopreservation is a preferable procedure. However, the ability to freeze and thaw sperm depends on several factors, including ejaculated semen quality and cryotolerance during semen cryopreservation.
Previous studies have demonstrated a negative association between ejaculated semen quality and increasing age [4]. The effects of aging on cellular and hormonal changes, such as falling testis weight and decreased testosterone concentration leading to sperm quantity and quality of fresh semen, are decreased [5], subsequently affecting potential fertilization quality [6,7]. The maximum semen volume and sperm concentration were reported at different ages according to rooster breeds [8]. For instance, the maximum obtained from roosters of 24 to 48 weeks of age then gradually decreased in White Leghorn roosters [9]. Testicular functional integrity is achieved throughout rooster age (30 to 50 weeks). At the same time, there was a noticeable reduction in the amount of sperm in the tubules, mild atrophy, sperm degeneration, and calcification of the seminiferous tubules at 60 weeks of age. These changes become more noticeable as the rooster ages [5]. Escorcia et al [10] showed that oxidative damage was more significant in the testicles of roosters between 36 and 72 weeks of age than in those at 30 weeks of age. It might be inferred that the quality of reproductive capacity would begin to decline as the rooster ages. Therefore, in almost all commercial flocks, roosters are commonly used for breeding for 36 weeks or up to 55 weeks of age [5]. In contrast, native Thai roosters in rural backyard farms are raised longer than their usual lifespan [11]. Therefore, conserving sperm from aging roosters is possible. However, rooster age had a detrimental effect on post-thaw sperm function [12].
Another crucial factor that affects cryopreserved semen is the high cryoinjury of sperm cells, which mainly results from cold shock and oxidative stress during the freezing procedure, leading to membrane damage and sperm. High amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in the chicken plasma membrane increase their susceptibility to oxidative stress. The antioxidant system is therefore required to protect sperm membranes against peroxidative damage. However, the natural antioxidant contents were apparently affected by semen processing and cryopreservation. Increasing membrane fluidity [13] or supplementing several antioxidant substances [14] are therefore introduced to improve the quality of frozen rooster semen.
Selenium, an essential element for chickens, is an antioxidant that defends cells from free radicals. A severe selenium deficit is linked to lower poultry development and reproduction [15]. Selenium protects cells in a cell culture system from oxidative damage by reducing free radical generation and inhibiting lipid peroxidation [16]. At 0.5 ppm, selenium supplementation boosted the enzyme glutathione peroxidase activity, lowered blood malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, and increased sperm volume [17]. Even though many research publications used selenium to improve chicken semen production; however, only one study reported the effect of selenium supplementation on cryopreserved rooster semen. According to Chauychu-noo et al [18], the optimal concentration of selenium supplemented on a diet between 0 and 0.9 ppm was examined. The researchers suggested that selenium supplementation in diets at 0.6 ppm was recommended to improve the quantity and quality of fresh and frozen semen. Within those levels, the toxicity or adverse affected on semen quality were not found. However, that research did not mention the factor of rooster age, which is a main factor in the present study, as mentioned above.
To our knowledge, limited studies on semen cryopreservation have been conducted on roosters of advanced age. Additionally, there have never been reports on oxidative stress in the fresh semen of Thai native roosters. In the present study, it is important to evaluate the differences in oxidative stress in roosters of different ages before using antioxidant supplementation (selenium) in diets to improve the semen cryopreservation of aged roosters. Different stages of sexual maturity (young and aged roosters) were included in the study. This finding helps extend the reproductive life of aged roosters and maintain semen cryopreservation to conserve genetic diversity in aging Thai native chickens.


The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the experimental procedures based on the Ethics of Animal Experimentation of the National Research Council of Thailand (record no. IACUC-KKU-90/65; reference no. 660201.2.11/ 632 (114)). Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals used in this study were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Experimental animals

The roosters were composed of young (n = 20) and aged (n = 20) Thai native roosters (Pradu Hang Dum) at 36 and 105 weeks of age when starting the experiment, respectively. The roosters were kept in individual cages in an open-house system with an average temperature of 27°C and relative humidity of 72%. Each rooster was fed 130 g of commercial diet daily, providing 16% crude protein and a base of selenium of 0.15 ppm, as determined by Central Laboratory (Thailand) Co. Ltd. The water was given ad libitum throughout the experimental period.
Forty-eight Thai synthetic hens (Kaen Thong breed) at 32 weeks of age with egg production >80% were used for the fertility test. The hens were housed individually, fed approximately 110 g of commercial diet daily, and given water ad libitum.

Experimental design

Based on a previous report on rooster semen cryopreservation [18], the concentration of the selenium supplementation was 0.6 ppm. To examine the effect of selenium supplementation in diets on semen cryopreservation of aged roosters, the roosters were fed a basal diet supplemented with or without 0.6 ppm selenium (ECONOMASE TM Alltech, Inc., Nicholasville, KY, USA) for at least 14 days before starting semen collection and continued supplementing until the end of the experiment. The total level of selenium in the experiment group is 0.75 ppm.
The semen samples were collected twice a week. Fresh and frozen semen quality was evaluated. Additionally, the fertilizing ability of the frozen–thawed semen was tested. The experiment was repeated six times.

Semen collection

The dorso-abdominal massage technique was used to collect sperm twice a week. Individual rooster semen was collected in 1.5 mL microtubes with 0.1 mL of Schramm diluent, which was composed of 0.7 g magnesium acetate, 28.5 g sodium glutamate, 5 g glucose, 2.5 g inositol, and 5 g potassium acetate, all dissolved in 1,000 mL of deionized water; the pH was 7.1, and the osmotic pressure was 395 mOsm/kg. To maximize semen quantity and quality, the same person conducted the collection simultaneously under the same conditions. Great care was taken to avoid contamination of the sperm with feces, urates, and clear fluid, all of which degraded the sperm quality. Within 20 min of collection, sperm samples were transferred to the laboratory, and semen quality was determined. Semen with the following criteria were pooled to eliminate the individual effects for further semen cryopreservation. The criteria were as follows: semen volume, at or above 0.3 mL; sperm concentration, ≥3×109 spz/mL; and motility (MOT) score, ≥4.

Evaluation of fresh sperm quality

The volume of ejaculated semen was measured by aspirating the whole semen sample into a 1 mL syringe with an accuracy of 0.02 mL.
The sperm concentration was determined using a hemocytometer chamber. One microliter of semen sample was diluted with 999 μL (1:1,000) of 4% sodium chloride. A drop of semen sample was placed on a hemocytometer, and the reading was recorded under a compound microscope (400× magnification). The sperm concentration was expressed as billions (109) of sperm cells/mL.
The intensity of the waves formed by sperm movements was assessed. A drop of 10 μL semen was placed on a slide without a coverslip, examined under a compound microscope (100×), and scored on a scale of 0 to 5 (0 = no sperm movement; 5 = very rapid waves and whirlwinds visible, with more than 90% of sperm showing a forward movement).
The MDA concentration as an index of lipid peroxidation in the semen samples was measured using the thiobarbituric acid reaction as previously described [13]. Semen samples from each treatment were adjusted to 250×106 spz/mL; then the semen was added to 0.25 mL ferrous sulfate (0.2 Mm; Riedel-de haen, 12354 Seelze, Germany) and 0.25 mL ascorbic acid (1 mM; Sigma, A5960 Steinheim, Germany) and incubated at 37°C for 60 min, after which 1 mL trichloroacetic acid (15%; Sigma, T6399, Germany) and 1 mL thiobarbituric acid (0.375%; Sigma, T550, Germany) were added and boiled in water for 10 min, after which the samples were cooled to 4°C to stop the reaction. Finally, the samples were centrifuged at a controlled temperature of 4°C at 4,000× g for 10 min and analyzed using UV-vis spectrophotometry (Analytikjena Model Specord 250 plus; Analytikjena, Jena, Germany) at 532 nm.

Semen cryopreservation

After fresh semen evaluation, pooled semen was diluted 1:3 (v:v) in Schramm diluent and cooled to 5°C for 1 hour (1°C per 3 minutes). Afterward, DMF (N, N-dimethylformamide) was added to a semen extender at a final concentration of 6% (v/v) and mixed. Semen was loaded into 0.5 mL plastic straws and immediately closed with polyvinylpyrrolidone powder. The final sperm concentration in each 0.5 straw was approximately 625×106 spz/mL. After 15 min of equilibration, the filled straws were placed horizontally on a rack above the liquid nitrogen surface at −35°C for 12 min, placed at −135°C for 5 min, and finally plunged into liquid nitrogen for storage at −196°C until analysis. Thawing was achieved at 5°C for 5 min in cool water. The freezing and thawing protocols were conducted according to our previous study [13].

Evaluation of frozen sperm quality

Total MOT and progressive motility (PMOT) were analyzed using a computer-assisted sperm analysis system (version 10 HIM-IVOS; Hamilton Thorne Biosciences, Beverly, MA USA). For each sample, two slides (maintained at 25°C) were filled with 5 μL diluted semen, and three fields per slide were recorded for 10 s using a 10× phase-contrast objective (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) in conjunction with a digital camera (Olympus DP 71/25). They were operating at 30 frames per second (60 Hz). Sperm was defined as nonmotile when the average path velocity was less than 5 μm/s, and sperm was considered progressively motile when the average path velocity was greater than 20 μm/s, and the straightness index was 80%.
The percentage sperm viability was determined by SYBR-14 and propidium iodide (PI) (LIVE/DEAD Sperm Viability Kit; Invitrogen TM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), as described by Partyka et al [19] with minor modifications. Briefly, the semen sample was first incubated for 10 min with 5 μL of SYBR-14 solution, followed by staining with 5 μL PI for 5 min. The cells were then fixed with 10% formaldehyde. For assessment, at least 200 sperm cells were analyzed under an IX71 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan) at 400× magnification. PI-negative cells showing red fluorescence were dead, and SYBR-14-positive cells showing green fluorescence were considered to be live, with sperm plasma membrane intact.
The MDA content was determined using 200 μL (250×106 spz/mL) frozen-thawed semen. The protocol was conducted in a similar manner with fresh semen samples.


Forty-eight hens were assigned randomly to four groups (twelve hens/group) with six replications. All hens were inseminated with 0.4 mL (500×106 spz) of frozen-thawed semen once a week. Insemination was performed between 15.00 and 17.00 h. Eggs were obtained between days 2 and 8 following inseminations. The total number of eggs collected from the hens in each treatment group was recorded. Candling the eggs on day 7 of incubation determined fertility.

Statistical analysis

The study used a factorial experiment in a completely randomized design with two factors monitored at two levels and six replications for all parameters. Factor A was the rooster age (young and aged), and factor B was the selenium supplement in diets (presence-absence of selenium). The effects of rooster age, selenium supplement in diets, and their interaction mean values for each parameter were compared using Tukey’s post hoc test (F-value and p<0.05 were presented). All data were arcsine transformed before statistical analysis, and results are expressed as mean values±standard error.


Determination of fresh semen quality and lipid peroxidation

The interaction effect between rooster age and selenium was nonsignificant for all quality parameters of fresh semen with F-values of 0.11, 0.25, and 0.38 (p>0.05; Table 1) for semen volume, sperm concentration, and mass movement, respectively. The age of the rooster did not influence any semen quality parameter with F-values of 1.34, 0.29, and 0.34 (p> 0.05), respectively, while only the effect of selenium was significant for the sperm concentration with an F-value of 15.96 (p<0.01). For lipid peroxidation, the interaction effect between rooster age and selenium was nonsignificant for MDA levels of fresh semen with an F-value of 0.28 (p>0.05). However, aged roosters had higher MDA levels than young roosters, with an F-value of 16.35 (p<0.01). Additionally, selenium supplementation in diets significantly decreased the MDA concentration with an F-value of 17.53 (p<0.01).

Determination of cryopreserved semen quality and fertility

The levels of significance for the influence of rooster age and selenium on sperm MOT, sperm viability, and lipid peroxidation of cryopreserved semen are demonstrated in Table 2. The interaction effect between rooster age and selenium was significant for sperm viability and MDA level with F-values of 10.56 and 6.54, respectively (p<0.05), but insignificant for total MOT and PMOT with F-values of 1.72 and 1.49, respectively (p>0.05).
The mean percentages of total MOT and PMOT were more significant in the presence of selenium (54.13% and 29.08%, respectively) than in the absence of selenium (49.14% and 25.37%, respectively; p<0.05); these percentages were also significantly greater in young roosters than in aged roosters (p<0.05; Figure 1A–1B). The mean percentages of viability were highest in young roosters with selenium supplementation, while the lowest percentage was found in aged roosters without selenium supplementation (p<0.05; Figure 1C). Interestingly, the viability of aged roosters with selenium supplementation was comparable to that of young roosters without selenium supplementation (Figure 1C). For lipid peroxidation (Figure 1D), the mean MDA level was lower in the selenium supplementation groups than in the absence of selenium on diets (p<0.05).
Regarding fertility, as shown in Table 3, there was no interaction between age and selenium supplementation regarding fertility with an F-value of 0.76 (p>0.05). Younger roosters had higher fertility potential than aged roosters with an F-value of 126.50 (p<0.01). Likewise, dietary selenium supplementation improved fertility compared with the absence of selenium on diets with an F-value of 17.14 (p<0.01).


Aging roosters typically exhibit subfertility by decreasing semen quality [10,11]; however, the factors that influence fertility reduction are poorly understood. The available data improving the fresh semen quality in aging roosters at 52 weeks of age have been provided by Akhlaghi et al [20], in which ginger extract was used, and by Adeldust et al [21], in which letrozole and herbal extract were used. A decrease in sperm abnormality and an increasing number of sperm counts were reported in those investigations, which could enhance fertility and extend the reproductive life of aged roosters. In the current study, selenium was used in the diets of young (36 weeks of age) and aging roosters (105 weeks of age) and showed that neither rooster age nor selenium in the present study affected fresh semen quality in terms of semen volume and sperm movement, even though the presence of selenium in young roosters resulted in a lower MDA content compared with aged roosters (Table 1). In aging, oxidative stress in sperm can also occur due to different factors, generating more reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, the authors assumed that those ranges in mean levels of ROS production of young and aged semen roosters would not be harmful, as they were inactivated to keep only a small amount necessary to maintain normal cell functions and not affect sperm quality [22]. The mean ranges of MDA in this study were similar to those of fresh semen chicken in a previous report [19]. Additionally, this could be confirmed by Sonseeda et al [23], who observed that age did not affect semen characteristics during a year in native Thai roosters. The difference in genetics might explain this. For example, the semen of Indian red jungle fowl could be achieved at least 4 years in the spring season [24], while semen of Thai native chickens could be collected until 79 weeks of age without affecting semen production, except during the season [11].
However, selenium supplementation in diets significantly increased sperm concentration. Accordingly, it is noted that the semen MDA concentration was significantly lower in semen with higher sperm concentration in comparison with those having low sperm counts (Table 1). This result is in accordance with previous reports in which sperm concentration was the most correlated parameter with ROS in fertile and infertile humans [25]. Selenium is required for spermatogenesis because of its vital role in the modulation of antioxidant mechanisms, which might explain why the MDA levels in this study decreased in the selenium groups. It has been suggested that testosterone concentration is positively correlated with the concentration of selenium and semen quality in several mammal species [26,27]. Moreover, in chickens, selenium plays a modulatory role by regulating the signaling pathways in chicken Sertoli cells for survival and normal functioning in the spermatogenesis process [28]. Therefore, we inferred that using selenium in diets resulted in decreased MDA levels and could improve sperm concentration in roosters. In addition, it might be suggested that in Thai native roosters, semen quality in terms of sperm concentration is mainly affected by season variations or heat stress [11], and supplementing diets with selenium might be an alternative to increase sperm counts.
In contrast with fresh semen, the younger roosters had higher post-thaw sperm quality than aged roosters (Table 2; Figure 1A–1C). However, it is of interest that the MDA concentrations after cryopreservation between different rooster ages showed similarly (Table 2; Figure 1D). This suggests that an antioxidant system that protects sperm membranes against peroxidative damage in both rooster ages would be comparable. The idea that post-thaw sperm quality declines with age might result from the structure of the sperm plasma membrane. The lipid composition of the sperm membrane impacts the resistance to cryopreservation through its contributions to membrane fluidity and stability [29]. In other words, sperm membrane fluidity behaves as an indicator of sperm freezability. A high cholesterol to phospholipids (C/PL) ratio allows the membrane to remain fluid during freezing [13]. However, the changing lipid composition with advancing age in roosters may lead to impairment in the physical and/or signal transducing properties of the sperm membranes [30], resulting in less cryotolerance of aged rooster sperm in the present study.
Regarding selenium supplementation, our findings revealed an increase in post-thaw sperm quality in terms of sperm MOT and sperm viability, while the MDA content decreased significantly (Table 2; Figure 1). This observation might be explained by the positive influence of selenium, as reported by our previous study [18]. Selenium is considered to function as an antioxidative substance that protects cells from free radicals occurring during cryopreservation. Roster sperm has high amounts of PUFAs, making sperm cells susceptible to harmful ROS [29]. Selenium protects cells in a cell culture system from oxidative damage by reducing free radical generation and inhibiting lipid peroxidation [16]. Therefore, antioxidants are needed to improve post-thaw semen. An interesting finding in the present study was that the fertility percentage increased by approximately 4% when the roosters were fed selenium (Table 3).
Very few studies look at aging and oxidative stress in the context of male reproduction in poultry. The results from this study suggest that aging is associated with an increase in ROS production; also, using selenium as dietary supplementation has the potential as an antioxidant substance. However, it might be noted that the selenium supplement level in the present study was chosen based on the previous report [18]. Therefore, it is elucidated whether a high-dose antioxidant supplementation in an aging rooster might impact semen quality. However, no study examined whether variation in either supplement over the optimal dose or longer treatment period is associated with fresh and frozen semen quality. Therefore, further investigation might be required to examine whether the higher levels of selenium supplementation can significantly improve sperm cryotolerance and fertility in the aged, comparable to those seen in young roosters.


The present study reports that age does not influence the rooster sperm quality of fresh semen, while sperm cryotolerance and fertility were greater in young roosters than in aged roosters. However, those of aged roosters could be improved by dietary selenium supplementation. This finding is beneficial for extending the reproductive life of aged roosters and maintaining semen cryopreservation for conserving genetic diversity in aged Thai native chickens.



We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.


The Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, supported Supakorn Authaida through the Research Fund for Supporting Lecturers to Admit High Potential Students to Study and Research in His Expert Program Year 2020, grant no. 641JT103.


The authors thank The Research and Development Network Center of Animal Breeding and Omics, Khon Kaen University, for financial support. We would like to thank the Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, for service support of semen quality evaluation equipment, and Alltech, Inc., Nicholasville, for support of organic selenium.

Figure 1
Effects of supplementation of diet with organic selenium on frozen-thawed total motility (A), progressive motility (B), sperm viability (C), and lipid peroxidation (D) in different rooster ages (mean±standard error); Values with different superscripts (a,b) are different between age groups; values with different superscripts (x,y) are different between the presence and absence of selenium groups; values with different superscripts(i,ii,iii) are different between the selenium and age groups; p<0.05.
Table 1
Comparison of fresh semen quality in the presence-absence of selenium on diets in different ages of roosters (mean±standard error)
Groups Selenium in diets Volume (mL) Concentration (×109 spz/mL) Mass movement (Score 1 to 5) MDA (250×106 spz+/μMol/mL)
Young 0.38±0.23 4.61±1.54y 4.27±0.79 1.27±0.02a,y
+ 0.41±0.22 5.23±1.43x 4.38±0.61 0.85±0.02a,x
Aged 0.41±0.25 4.78±2.43y 4.30±0.85 1.44±0.03b,y
+ 0.43±0.34 5.16±2.14x 4.45±0.40 1.01±0.03b,x
Age (p-value/F1,20) 0.260/1.34 0.597/0.29 0.913/0.34 0.001/16.35
Selenium (p-value/F1,20) 0.428/0.65 0.001/15.96 0.336/2.43 0.001/17.53
Interaction (p-value/F1,20) 0.917/0.11 0.626/0.25 0.590/0.38 0.703/0.28

MDA, malondialdehyde.

Values with different superscripts (a,b) are different between age groups; values with different superscripts (x,y) are different between the presence and absence of selenium groups.

Table 2
Comparison of frozen-thawed semen quality in the presence/absence of selenium on diets in a different age of rooster
Factor Motility parameter Viability MDA

Age (p-value/F1,20) 0.001/26.81 0.001/68.60 0.001/131.93 0.905/1.49
Selenium (p-value/F1,20) 0.006/9.39 0.001/110.96 0.001/76.93 0.010/8.94
Interaction (p-value/F1,20) 0.205/1.72 0.236/1.49 0.004/10.56 0.030/6.54

MOT, total motility; PMOT, progressive motility; MDA, malondialdehyde.

Table 3
The percentages of fertility using frozen-thaw semen from the roosters (young and aged) in the presence/absence of selenium in diets (mean±standard error)
Groups Selenium in diets Fertility (%) Total number of eggs
Young 61.94±0.69a,y 432
+ 64.50±0.49a,x 448
Aged 52.67±1.01b,y 442
+ 56.56±0.77b,x 470
Age (p-value/F1,20) 0.001/126.50
Selenium (p-value/F1,20) 0.001/17.14
Interaction (p-value/F1,20) 0.401/0.76

Values with different superscripts (a,b) are different between age groups; values with different superscripts (x,y) are different between the presence and absence of selenium groups.


1. Chaikuad N, Loengbudnark W, Chankitisakul V, Boonkum W. Genetic comparisons of body weight, average daily gain, and breast circumference between slow-growing thai native chickens (pradu hang dum) raised on-site farm and on-station. Vet Sci 2023; 10:11 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci10010011
crossref pmid pmc
2. Boonkum W, Duangjinda M, Kananit S, Chankitisakul V, Kenchaiwong W. Genetic effect and growth curve parameter estimation under heat stress in slow-growing thai native chickens. Vet Sci 2021; 8:297 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8120297
crossref pmid pmc
3. Mookprom S, Duangjinda M, Puangdee S, Kenchaiwong W, Boonkum W. Estimation of additive genetic, dominance, and mate sire variances for fertility traits in thai native (pradu hang dam) chickens. Trop Anim Health Prod 2021; 53:81 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02485-2
crossref pmid
4. Lagares MA, Ecco R, Martins NRS, et al. Detecting reproductive system abnormalities of broiler breeder roosters at different ages. Reprod Domest Anim 2017; 52:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12804
crossref pmid
5. Sarabia Fragoso J, Pizarro Díaz M, Abad Moreno JC, Casanovas Infesta P, Rodriguez-Bertos A, Barger K. Relationships between fertility and some parameters in male broiler breeders (body and testicular weight, histology and immunohistochemistry of testes, spermatogenesis and hormonal levels). Reprod Domest Anim 2013; 48:345–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2012.02161.x
crossref pmid
6. Bramwell RK, Mcdaniel CD, Wilson JL, Howarth B. Age effect of male and female broiler breeders on sperm penetration of the perivitelline layer overlying the germinal disc. Poult Sci 1996; 75:755–62. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0750755
crossref pmid
7. Shanmugam M, Vinoth A, Rajaravindra KS, Rajkumar U. Evaluation of semen quality in roosters of different age during hot climatic condition. Anim Reprod Sci 2014; 145:81–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.12.015
crossref pmid
8. Adeoye GO, Oleforuh-Okoleh VU, Chukwuemeka UM. Influence of breed type and age on spermatological traits of nigerian local chickens. Agro-Sci 2018; 16:11–6. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v16i1.3
9. Shanmugam M, Rajkumar U, Reddy MR, Rao SVR. Effect of age on semen quality in naked neck and dwarf chicken under tropical climatic conditions. Anim Prod Sci 2012; 52:964–8. https://doi.org/10.1071/an12033
10. Escorcia M, Sánchez-Godoy F, Ramos-Vidales D, Medina-Campos ON, Pedraza-Chaverri J. Effect of the age and body weight of the broiler breeders male on the presentation of oxidative stress and its correlation with the quality of testicular parenchyma and physiological antioxidant levels. Vet Sci 2020; 7:69 https://doi.org/10.3390/vetsci7020069
crossref pmid pmc
11. Pimprasert M, Kheawkanha T, Boonkum W, Chankitisakul V. Influence of semen collection frequency and seasonal variations on fresh and frozen semen quality in thai native roosters. Animals 2023; 13:573 https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040573
crossref pmid pmc
12. Long JA, Bongalhardo DC, Pelaéz J, et al. Rooster semen cryopreservation: effect of pedigree line and male age on postthaw sperm function. Poult Sci 2010; 89:966–73. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00227
crossref pmid
13. Chuaychu-noo N, Thananurak P, Chankitisakul V, Vongpralub T. Supplementing rooster sperm with cholesterol-loaded-cyclodextrin improves fertility after cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2017; 74:8–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2016.12.012
crossref pmid
14. Partyka A, Niżański W. Supplementation of avian semen extenders with antioxidants to improve semen quality—is it an effective strategy? Antioxidants 2021; 10:1927 https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10121927
crossref pmid pmc
15. Surai PF, Fisinin VI. Selenium in poultry breeder nutrition: an update. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2014; 191:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.02.005
16. Tatemoto H, Muto N, Sunagawa I, Shinjo A, Nakada T. Protection of porcine oocytes against cell damage caused by oxidative stress during in vitro maturation: role of superoxide dismutase activity in porcine follicular fluid. Biol Reprod 2004; 71:1150–7. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.029264
crossref pmid
17. Shi L, Yang R, Yue W, et al. Effect of elemental nano-selenium on semen quality, glutathione peroxidase activity, and testis ultrastructure in male boer goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 118:248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.10.003
crossref pmid
18. Chauychu-noo N, Thananurak P, Boonkum W, Vongpralub T, Chankitisakul V. Effect of organic selenium dietary supplementation on quality and fertility of cryopreserved chicken sperm. Cryobiology 2021; 98:57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.12.008
crossref pmid
19. Partyka A, Łukaszewicz E, Nizański W. Effect of cryopreservation on sperm parameters, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes activity in fowl semen. Theriogenology 2012; 77:1497–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.11.006
crossref pmid
20. Akhlaghi A, Jafari Ahangari Y, Zhandi M, Peebles ED. Reproductive performance, semen quality, and fatty acid profile of spermatozoa in senescent broiler breeder roosters as enhanced by the long-term feeding of dried apple pomace. Anim Reprod Sci 2014; 147:64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.03.006
crossref pmid
21. Adeldust H, Farzinpour A, Farshad A, Rostamzadeh J, Lopez-Bejar M. Increased sperm cell production in ageing roosters by an oral treatment with an aromatase inhibitor and a natural herbal extract designed for improving fertility. Reprod Domest Anim 2017; 52:58–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13058
22. Sies H. Strategies of antioxidant defense. Eur J Biochem 1993; 215:213–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1993.tb18025.x
crossref pmid
23. Sonseeda P, Vongpralub T, Laopaiboon B. Effects of environmental factors, ages and breeds on semen characteristics in thai indigenous chickens: a one-year study. Thai J Vet Med 2013; 43:347–52.
24. Rakha BA, Ansari MS, Akhter S, Blesbois E. Effect of season and age on indian red jungle fowl (gallus gallus murghi) semen characteristics: a 4-year retrospective study. Theriogenology 2017; 99:105–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.05.016
crossref pmid
25. Pasqualotto FF, Sharma RK, Kobayashi H, Nelson DR, Thomas AJ, Agarwal A. Oxidative stress in normospermic men undergoing infertility evaluation. J Androl 2001; 22:316–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02185.x
crossref pmid
26. Richards JB, Hallford DM, Duff G. Serum luteinizing hormone, testosterone, and thyroxine and growth responses of ram lambs fed locoweed (Oxvtropis sericea) and treated with vitamin e/selenium. Theriogenology 1999; 52:1055–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00194-6
crossref pmid
27. Ren XM, Wang GG, Xu DQ, et al. The protection of selenium on cadmium-induced inhibition of spermatogenesis via activating testosterone synthesis in mice. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:3521–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.021
crossref pmid
28. Sattar H, Yang J, Zhao X, et al. Selenoprotein-U (SelU) knockdown triggers autophagy through PI3K-Akt-MTOR pathway inhibition in rooster sertoli cells. Metallomics 2018; 10:929–40. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8mt00090e
crossref pmid
29. Blesbois E, Grasseau I, Segineurin F. Membrane fluidity and the ability of domestic bird spermatozoa to survive cryopreservation. Reproduction 2005; 129:371–8. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00454
crossref pmid
30. Cerolini S, Kelso KA, Noble RC, Speake BK, Pizzi F, Cavalchini LG. Relationship between spermatozoan lipid composition and fertility during aging of chickens. Biol Reprod 1997; 57:976–80. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod57.5.976
crossref pmid
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 968 View
  • 87 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next