Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 36(9); 2023 > Article
Yoo, Oh, and Yoon: Isolation of Debaryomyces hansenii and selection of an optimal strain to improve the quality of low-grade beef rump (middle gluteal) during dry aging



The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Debaryomyces hansenii isolated from dry-aged beef on the tenderness and flavor attributes of low-grade beef during dry aging.


Five D. hansenii strains were isolated from dry-aged beef samples. The rump of low-grade beef was inoculated with individual D. hansenii isolates and subjected to dry aging for 4 weeks at 5°C and 75% relative humidity. Microbial contamination levels, meat quality attributes, and flavor attributes in the dry-aged beef were measured.


Of the five isolates, the shear force of dry-aged beef inoculated with SMFM201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 was lower than that of control samples. Meanwhile, all five isolates increased the total free amino acid, glutamic acid, serine, glycine, alanine, and leucine contents in dry-aged beef. In particular, the total fatty acid, palmitic acid, and oleic acid contents in samples inoculated with D. hansenii SMFM201905-5 were higher than those in control samples.


These results indicate that D. hansenii SMFM201905-5 might be used to improve the quality of beef during dry aging.


Fermented sausage and dry-aged meat are reported to contain yeast, which plays an important role in the aging process of meat products [13]. Debaryomyces hansenii (D. hansenii) is found in dry-aged meat [4,5]. The peptidases and proteases of yeast play a major role in the meat aging process. Consequently, yeast promotes enhanced protein degradation in dry-fermented sausages and increases the production of volatile compounds in dry-cured meat upon co-inoculation with other starter cultures [68].
During dry aging, the carcasses are exposed to air under refrigeration without packaging for 1 to 5 weeks, which increases the flavor of the meat [9,10]. The dry aging process imparts a strong taste and a unique flavor that cannot be sensed in meat subjected to other processing methods. Additionally, dry aging softens the meat [11].
During dry aging, the protein and fat components undergo chemical decomposition, which enhances the nutty flavor of the beef. Additionally, natural enzymes in beef degrade proteins and connective tissues in the muscles during dry aging [12]. Thus, dry-aged beef has a rich nutty and buttery flavor, excellent taste, and soft texture [13].
The use of microorganisms such as lactic acid bacteria, yeast, and mold during dry aging promotes the production of amino acids and fatty acids through the microbial degradation of proteins and fats [1416]. Transamination and the subsequent decarboxylation of amino acids (branched, aromatic, and linear) result in the formation of respective aldehydes, alcohols, and acids, which impart aroma to meat [17]. In meat products, yeast is involved in the production of flavor compounds such as peptides, amino acids, fatty acids, and ester compounds, which improve the palatability of consumers [15,18]. Among yeast species, D. hansenii is known to have proteolytic and lipolytic activity, as well as the ability to ferment various sugars and degrade peroxides and amino acids [19]. D. hansenii is used as a starter in the production of dry-fermented sausage due to these characteristics [20].
In this study, D. hansenii was isolated from dry-aged beef. The effects of D. hansenii on the tenderness and flavor profiles of low-grade beef were examined.


Isolation of D. hansenii from dry-aged beef

Thirty-one pieces of dry-aged beef manufactured by 11 different companies were purchased from an online shopping mall in South Korea. The dry-aged beef samples (25 g) were placed in sterile bags and homogenized with 50 mL of 0.1% buffered peptone water (BPW; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) for 60 s using a pummeller (BagMixer 400 W; Interscience, St. Nom, France). To isolate yeast colonies, the homogenates were diluted 10-fold with BPW. Aliquots (0.1 mL) of the diluted homogenate were spread-plated onto potato dextrose agar (PDA; Becton Dickinson, USA) supplemented with 10% tartaric acid (Samchun, Seoul, Korea). The samples were incubated at 20°C for 48 h. White and round colonies (typical morphological characteristics of D. hansenii) were subjected to 26S rRNA sequencing analysis. The D1 and D2 domains of the 26S rRNA were amplified with the following primers: NL1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGG AGGAAAAG-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGA CGG-3′). Sequencing was performed at COSMOGENETECH (Seoul, Korea). The 26S rRNA sequence of the strains was compared with that obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The identified strains were cultured in 10 mL potato dextrose broth (PDB; Becton Dickinson, USA) supplemented with 10% tartaric acid and stored at −70°C as glycerol (20%) stocks.

Safety analysis of D. hansenii inoculation

Hemolysis: Hemolytic properties were examined, following the guidelines of the American Society for Microbiology [21]. The cultured D. hansenii isolates (SMFM201812-1, SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, SMFM201905-5, and SMFM201905-15) were streaked onto Columbia agar plates containing 5% sheep blood (bioMerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) and incubated at 20°C for 48 h to evaluate their hemolytic activities. Strains without a clear zone around the colonies were considered non-hemolytic. Meanwhile, strains with partially clear zones around the colonies with green color were considered to exhibit α-hemolysis, whereas those with clear transparent zones around the colonies were considered to exhibit β-hemolysis.
Cytotoxicity: The cytotoxicity was measured by modifiying the method of Sadeghi-Aliabadi et al [22]. HT-29 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Welgene, Gyeongsan, Korea) supplemented with 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Welgene, Korea) and 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were subcultured when more than 80% were attached to the T-75 flask. For trypsinization, cells were incubated with 3 mL trypsin (Gendepot, Barker, TX, USA) for 3 min. The trypsinized cells were centrifuged at 217 g and 25°C for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL of DMEM. The cell suspension (1 mL) was transferred to a new T-75 flask and cultured in 19 mL of fresh DMEM. When more than 80% of cells were attached to the 75-T flask, the subcultured cells were treated with 3 mL of trypsin for 3 min. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 217 g and 25°C for 5 min. Next, the cell pellet was washed with the medium and resuspended in DMEM. The cells were then seeded in a 96-microtiter plate at a density of 5×104 cells/mL and incubated at 35°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. In individual wells of the microtiter plate, 20 μL of the D. hansenii isolates (5 log CFU/mL) were incubated with 180 μL of DMEM without antibiotics at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. The culture supernatant was carefully removed from each well using a micropipette. The samples were then incubated with 5 mg/mL of 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) reagent at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 4 h to allow the metabolism of MTT by HT-29 cells. The supernatant was removed using a micropipette, and the samples were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide (Samchun, Korea). The absorbance of the mixture at 540 nm (OD540) was measured using a microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA). Cytotoxicity was evaluated by measuring cell viability, and cell viability was calculated using the following equation:
Cell viability (%)=(OD540of the sample/OD540of the control)×100
Analysis of D. hansenii-inoculated beef quality during dry aging production of dry-aged beef: D. hansenii isolates (SMFM 201812-1, SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, SMFM201905-5, and SMFM201905-15) (100 μL) stored at −70°C were inoculated into 10 mL PDB and cultured at 20°C for 72 h. For subculturing, 0.1 mL aliquots of the cultures were inoculated into 10 mL fresh PDB and cultured at 20°C for 72 h. The subculture was transferred to a 15-mL conical tube and centrifuged at 1,912 g and 4°C for 15 min. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4; 8.0 g NaCl, 1.5 g NaHPO4, 0.2 g KH2PO4, 0.2 g KCl in 1 L distilled water). The cell density of the suspension was adjusted to 6 log CFU/mL before inoculation. The cattle (22 month old Holstein steer) was slaughtered in Anseong, Korea on August 6, 2019. The grade of the beef was grade 2 which is the fourth grade out of five grades (1++, 1+, 1, 2, and 3) in South Korea. The rump beef within 1 week after slaughtering was subjected to UV irradiation for 10 min in a bio cabinet. Next, rump beef (600 g) was evenly sprayed with 3 mL of five D. hansenii isolates using a sprayer. The control samples were sprayed with PBS. The inoculated beef sample was incubated at room temperature for 15 min to allow D. hansenii attachment and subjected to dry aging at 5°C and 75% relative humidity in a thermo-hygrostat (KCL-2000; EYELA, Tokyo, Japan) for 4 weeks.
Microbial analysis: Microbial analysis of dry-aged beef crusts was performed after 4 weeks of dry aging. After trimming the crust, 10 g of dry-aged meat crust and 20 mL of 0.1% BPW were transferred to a filter bag (3M, St. Paul, MN, USA). The samples were homogenized for 60 s using a pummeller (BagMixer 400 W; Interscience, France). The homogenate was serially diluted with 0.1% BPW. Each dilution (0.1 mL) was plated onto tryptic soy agar (TSA; Becton Dickinson, USA) or PDA supplemented with 10% tartaric acid. The samples plated onto TSA plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 h to determine the total aerobic bacterial counts. To enumerate yeast, each dilution of the sample was plated onto PDA supplemented with 10% tartaric acid and cultured at 20°C for 48 h.
pH: Before measurement, the pH meter was calibrated using pH 4.01, pH 7.00, and pH 10.01 buffered solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), and the pH was measured by modifying the method of Calicioglu et al [23]. The dry-aged beef sample (10 g) along with 0.1% BPW (20 mL) was transferred to sterile sample bags and homogenized for 60 s using a pummeller. The pH value of the homogenate was measured using a pH meter (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA).
Anlaysis of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance: Lipid rancidity was measured following the methods described by Park et al [24] and Hwang et al [25]. The samples (1 g) along with 3 mL distilled water were placed in sterile sample bags and homogenized for 60 s using a pumeller. Next, 1 mL aliquots of the homogenate without solid contents were incubated with 2 mL of 20 mM 2-thiobarbituric acid/20% trichloroacetic acid at 100°C for 15 min in a water bath. The reaction was stopped by cooling the reactant in flowing water. After filtering the supernatants with No. 1 filter paper (Advantec, Tokyo, Japan), the absorbance of the filtrate at 531 nm was measured using an Epoch microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek, USA).
Shear force: The beef sample (100 g) was heated upto 70°C the core temperature followed by cooling under running water. The sample was cut into pieces (1 cm×1 cm ×4 cm) perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fiber. The shear force was measured using a texture analyzer (TA-XT2; Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Haslemere, UK) equipped with a Warner-Bratzler shear blade. The test conditions were as follows: pre-test speed 2.0 mm/s, test speed 2.0 mm/s, post-test speed 8.0 mm/s, and distance 30.0 mm. Measurements were performed until the sample was completely cut perpendicular to the direction of the muscle fiber.
Free amino acid analysis: The sample (3 g) was incubated with 15 mL of 0.01 N HCl and homogenized using a pummeller for 1 min. The homogenate was filtered through a No. 1 filter paper (Advantec, Japan). The filtrate (600 μL) was incubated with 20 μL of internal standard solution (1 mg/mL L-citrulline; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 1,380 μL of acetonitrile. The mixture was left undisturbed for 30 min and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.2-μm syringe filter. Free amino acid content was analyzed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) at the National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (Seoul, Korea) as follows: column, Inno C18 column (4.6 mm×150 mm, 5 μm); column temperature, 40°C; injection volume, 0.5 μL; mobile phase A, 40 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7); mobile phase B, distilled water/acetonitrile/methanol = 10%/45%/45% (v/v).
Fatty acid analysis: The sample (1 g) was mixed with 2 mL of pyrogallol, 2 mL of an internal standard solution (triundecanoin), and 10 mL of 8.3 M HCl, and the mixture was sealed with parafilm. To promote decomposition, the samples were incubated at 70°C to 80°C for 40 min in a drying oven. The decomposed product was incubated with 25 mL of ethyl ether for 5 min with shaking, followed by incubation with 25 mL of petroleum ether for 5 min with shaking. The sample was evaporated at 35°C to 40°C using a nitrogen concentrator, vortex-mixed with 2 mL of chloroform and 3 mL of ethyl ether, and concentrated at 40°C using a nitrogen microconcentrator. The concentrate was incubated with 2 mL of 7% BF3-methanol and 1 mL of toluene at 100°C for 45 min, followed by incubation at room temperature. Next, the sample was incubated with 5 mL distilled water, 1 mL isooctane, and 1 g Na2SO4; vortexed; and centrifuged at 448 g for 5 min. The supernatant was used as a test solution. Gas chromatography was performed using Agilent 7890A (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with an SP-2560 (100 m×0.25 mm×0.2 μm) column. The chromatography conditions were as follows: sample inlet temperature, 225°C; detector temperature, 285°C; and mobile phase flow rate, 0.75 mL/min. The results of the test samples were compared with those of the standard solution (a fatty acid standard: isooctane). The analysis was performed at the Food Analysis Research Center (Suwon, Korea).

Statistical analysis

The experiment was repeated three times, and every replication used beef from different carcasses. Dry-aged beef samples treated with six treatments were analyzed on week 0 and week 4. Data were analyzed using the general linear model procedure of SAS (version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Significant differences in least squares means were determined by a pairwise t-test at α = 0.05.


Genetic characteristics of D. hansenii isolated from dry-aged beef

The isolates from dry-aged beef were identified using 26S rRNA sequencing. The following microorganisms were identified in the samples: yeasts such as Debaryomyces hansenii, Yarrowia lipolytica, Serratia spp., Candida zeylanoides, Debaryomyces maramus, Pantoea agglomerans, and Candida sake; molds such as Pilaira anomala, Mucor circinelloides, Mucor velutinosus, and Trichosporon pullulans; lactic acid bacteria such as Leuconostoc gelidum, Lactobacillus sakei, Carnobacterium gallinarum, and Carnobacterium divergens. Yeasts whose pathogenecity has not been evaluated were excluded. Accordingly, D. hansenii was selected for further experiments evaluating the effects of D. hansenii on beef quality during dry aging. Five D. hansenii isolates (SMFM 201812-1, SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, SMFM201905-5, and SMFM201905-15) were identified in this study.

Safety of D. hansenii isolates

Hemolytic property: Strains without a clear zone around their colonies were considered non-hemolytic. However, strains with a green-colored colony and a transparent clear zone were considered to exhibit α-hemolytic and β-hemolytic properties, respectively. None of the D. hansenii isolates formed clear zones on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood or green-colored colonies. This indicates that the isolates did not exhibit hemolytic activity.
Cytotoxicity: Cytotoxicity of the isolates against an intestinal epithelial cell line (HT-29 cells) was evaluated and isolates exerting low cytotoxicity were selected. In the MTT assay, yellow-colored MTT penetrates the viable cells where it is converted into purple-colored formazan by mitochondrial reductase, thereby confirming viable cells [26]. The percentage viability of HT-29 cells infected with D. hansenii isolates was in the range of 87.1% to 101.8% (Figure 1). However, the percentage viability was not significantly different between cells individually infected with five D. hansenii isolates and control cells. This suggested that D. hansenii isolates did not exert cytotoxic effects against HT-29 cells.

Effects of D. hansenii isolates on beef quality during dry aging

Bacterial counts in dry-aged beef crust: The initial counts of total aerobic bacteria and yeast were 4.1 log CFU/g and 2.6 log CFU/g, respectively. The total aerobic bacterial counts in the crust varied from 3.3 log CFU/g to 6.8 log CFU/g after 4 weeks of aging depending on the isolates. After 4 weeks of dry aging, the yeast cell counts in dry-aged beef samples inoculated with the D. hansenii isolates were higher than those in the control dry-aged beef samples (Table 1). These D. hansenii isolates in beef may improve flavor of dry-aged meat by the protease and lipase of microorganisms [5], because the enzymes cleave peptidic bonds in muscle proteins, causing muscle structure degradation and increasing meat tenderness as the aging process progresses [27].
pH: One of the major factors affecting beef quality is the pH as it affects quality parameters, such as the water-holding capacity and tenderness [28]. The pH of raw beef, which is between 5.6 and 5.8, gradually increases with the increase in the storage period [29]. After 4 weeks of dry aging, the pH values were in the range of 5.70 to 5.82. However, the pH values were not significantly different among the treatment groups. Increased pH by spoilage bacteria may catalyze proteins to amino acids and volatile organic compounds [30]. The pH values were higher than 6.2 to 6.3, which indicates early spoilage in meat [29]. These findings suggest that dry-aged beef inoculated with D. hansenii did not undergo spoilage.
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance: Rancidity is determined based on the thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values. The TBARS value of raw beef was 0.34 mg of malonaldehyde (MDA)/kg, while that of dry-aged beef was in the range of 0.39 to 0.56 mg of MDA/kg (Figure 2). In this study, the control group had the highest TBARS value after dry aging, but there was no significant difference between experimental groups of dry-aged beef and beef not treated to dry-aging (Figure 2). This indicated that D. hansenii isolates did not enhance the rancidity of dry-aged beef. Lowered lipid oxidation by yeast was observed in several studies [18, 31,32]. Flores et al [32] suggested that D. hansenii could lower the lipid oxidation and the formation of ethyl esters in the fermented meat.
Shear force: After 4 weeks of dry aging, the shear force of the control group was 5.97 kg, which was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that of the dry-aged beef samples inoculated with strains SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, and SMFM 201905-5 (Figure 3). Among the several sensory and physical factors that positively influence beef consumption, tenderness is the major factor affecting the sensory quality of meat. Shear force measurement is the most representative method for determining tenderness [33,34]. In this study, D. hansenii strains SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, and SMFM201905-5 decreased the shear force of beef samples. D. hansenii is known to have lipolytic and proteolytic activities that can affect shear force [8]. Dashdorj et al [12] and Lee et al [35] reported that proteolytic and collagenolytic enzymes could reduce the shear force of the meat after dry-aging. As the enzymes penetrate the meat, muscle and connective tissue could be broken down. However, the level of lipolytic and proteolytic activity was dependent on the yeast strains [36]. As for the treated strains, the 3 strains (SMFM201812-3, SMFM201905-4, and SMFM 201905-5) are considered to have higher lipolytic and proteolytic activities and thus, lower shear force than other strains.
Free amino acid composition: Based on the results of pH, TBARS, and shear force analyses, SMFM201812-3 and SMFM 201905-5 were selected as the most effective isolates for improving beef quality during dry aging. The effects of SMFM 201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 on the free amino acid and fatty acid contents in the dry-aged beef samples were examined. The total free amino acid, glutamic acid, serine, glycine, alanine, and leucine contents increased in the groups inoculated with SMFM201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 strains and were higher than those in the control group (Table 2). The contents of free amino acids increased during beef aging due to the proteolytic enzyme-mediated degradation of myofibril proteins in beef [37]. Free amino acids, which are flavor component precursors, generate various flavor components through the Maillard reaction and Strecker degradation, as well as reducing sugar components, when meat is heated [38]. Glutamic acid and aspartic acid, which are reported to produce beefy and/or umami flavors in beef [39], are considered one of the primary contributors to the enhanced flavor of dry-aged beef products. Alanine and glycine have a sweet taste, whereas serine and proline have sweet and bitter tastes. The leucine content in dry-aged beef is higher than that in wet-aged beef. Leucine and isoleucine, in particular, can interact with dicarbonyl compounds produced by the Maillard reaction to produce meat odorants such as 2- and 3-methylbutanal [40,41]. Hydrolysis of meat proteins results in the production of small peptides and polypeptides that can be further degraded into free amino acids. Debaryomyces exhibited aminopeptidase activity, which can affect the flavor of aged meat by degrading meat proteins [7,42]. The enzymatic activity of the D. hansenii isolates was confirmed using the API ZYM kit (bioMerieux, France). SMFM 201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 exhibited leucine arylamidase activities, which affected increase in leucine concentrations in dry-aged beef inoculated with SMFM201812-3 and SMFM 201905-5 (Supplementary Table S1). Therefore, during dry aging, the production of free amino acids may be accelerated by the enzymes of SMFM201812-3 and SMFM201905-5.
Fatty acid composition: Total fatty acid, palmitic acid, palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, and linoleic acid contents in the groups inoculated with SMFM201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 were higher than those in the control group after 4 weeks of dry aging (Table 3).
In particular, total fatty acid, palmitic acid, and oleic acid contents in the group inoculated with SMFM201905-5 were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those in the control group (Table 3). Several studies have reported increased total fatty acid contents during lipolysis upon D. hansenii inoculation for dry sausage production [8,40]. The results of our study are consistent with those of the previous studies [8,43]. Even more, D. hansenii is well known yeast that can produce lipid it self [41,42]. The enzyme ATP citrate lyase is the key factor in the biosynthesis of fatty acids [44,45]. This enzyme generates acetyl-CoA from citrate, the key substrate for fatty acid biosynthesis, in the cytoplasm [44,45]. Thus, this characteristic of D. hansenii may contribute the increased total fatty acid content in our study.
Moreover, SMFM201812-3 and SMFM201905-5 exhibited esterase and esterase lipase activities (Supplementary Table S1). Esterase and esterase lipase, which are involved in the esterification reaction of alcohol and acid, can enhance the flavor of aged meat through ester generation [46]. Fatty acids in meat are known to enhance the flavor and enrich the taste as they are associated with juiciness. Palmitic acid content is positively correlated with consumer preference, while oleic acid content is positively correlated with taste, juiciness, and tenderness [27,47]. This indicates that D. hansenii SMFM 201905-5 increased the contents of fatty acids associated with meat flavor, especially palmitic acid and oleic acid contents, during dry aging.


Among the D. hansenii isolates examined in this study, SMFM 201905-5 improved the quality of dry-aged beef by decreasing the shear force and increasing the contents of flavor-related free amino acids and fatty acids.



We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.


The authors received no financial support for this article.


Supplementary file is available from: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0475
Supplementary Table S1. Enzyme profile of Debaryomyces hansenii isolates

Figure 1
Effect of Debaryomyces hansenii isolates on the viability of HT-29 cells using MTT assay. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation from three replications. MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide.
Figure 2
Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values of dry-aged beef inoculated with different Debaryomyces hansenii isolates for 4 weeks. Data are reported as mg malondialdehyde (MDA) per kg as mean and standard deviation from three replications.
Figure 3
Shear force of dry-aged beef inoculated with Debaryomyces hansenii isolates for 4 weeks. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation from three replications. A–C Different letters indicate significant differences among means at p<0.05.
Table 1
Cell counts of total aerobic bacteria and yeast in crust of dry-aged beef inoculated with Debaryomyces hansenii isolates for 4 weeks
Treatment Total aerobic bacteria (log CFU/g) Yeast (log CFU/g)
Control 6.7±1.1A 6.5±0.5B
D. hansenii SMFM201812-1 5.8±3.2AB 7.0±0.7AB
D. hansenii SMFM201812-3 6.8±0.5A 7.3±0.2AB
D. hansenii SMFM201905-4 6.6±1.3A 7.7±0.5A
D. hansenii SMFM201905-5 3.3±0.5B 6.7±0.7AB
D. hansenii SMFM201905-15 5.7±2.0AB 7.3±0.4AB

Data are presented as mean±standard deviation.

A,B Different letters in a column indicate significant differences among means at p<0.05.

Table 2
Free amino acid concentration (mean±standard deviation) of dry-aged beef inoculated with Debaryomyces hansenii after 4 weeks of dry-aging
Free amino acid (mg/100 g) Non aging1) Control1) SMFM201812-31) SMFM201905-51)
Aspartic acid 0.37±0.06B 1.39±0.81AB 1.71±0.89A 0.86±0.16AB
Glutamic acid 6.64±1.56B 11.75±1.34B 35.80±11.46A 34.27±7.99A
Asparagine 2.35±0.42B 4.91±0.57B 14.31±2.16A 13.04±2.70A
Serine 3.25±0.26B 7.46±0.72B 24.17±2.55A 22.41±4.87A
Glutamine 76.01±4.09 82.65±24.78 95.40±37.08 67.42±11.00
Histidine 1.76±0.35B 3.25±0.39B 9.05±2.00A 7.40±1.80A
Glycine 3.48±0.88B 6.09±1.22B 18.87±2.95A 16.37±2.98A
Threonine 4.12±0.43B 8.10±0.42B 19.74±1.91A 17.72±4.38A
Arginine 5.36±0.10B 6.13±0.62B 19.24±3.26A 17.85±4.40A
Alanine 20.59±7.33B 26.42±5.24B 91.05±12.62A 72.62±12.52A
Tyrosine 2.71±0.08B 5.92±0.27B 16.84±0.72A 15.62±3.88A
Valine 3.75±0.74B 7.49±0.28B 26.74±0.49A 24.46±5.82A
Methionine 1.55±0.23B 3.74±0.41B 13.16±0.26A 12.70±2.80A
Tryptophane 2.26±0.59C 4.33±0.58B 9.33±0.71A 8.14±1.79A
Phenylalanine 3.61±0.61B 5.19±0.38B 17.92±0.78A 16.91±3.86A
Isoleucine 2.52±0.29B 4.77±0.44B 18.51±0.35A 17.59±4.06A
Leucine 5.04±0.81B 9.26±0.82B 33.79±1.59A 32.30±7.71A
Lysine 3.88±0.79B 6.03±1.25B 24.45±3.59A 21.51±5.71A
Proline 1.59±0.67B 2.35±0.95B 6.93±1.76A 8.55±2.00A
Total free amino acid 150.86±9.72B 207.25±37.66B 497.00±77.57A 427.75±88.37A

1) Non aging, non-inoculated group before dry-aging; Control, non-inoculated group; SMFM201812-3, D. hansenii SMFM201812-3 inoculated group; SMFM201905-5, D. hansenii SMFM201905-5 inoculated group.

A–C Different letters within a row indicate significant differences among means at p<0.05.

Table 3
Fatty acid concentration (mean±standard deviation) of dry-aged beef inoculated with Debaryomyces hansenii after 4 weeks of dry-aging
Fatty acid (m/100 g) Control1) SMFM201812-31) SMFM201905-51)
Butyric acid (C4:0) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Caproic acid (C6:0) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.001
Caprylic acid (C8:0) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.001
Capric acid (C10:0) 0.003±0.000B 0.004±0.002AB 0.008±0.003A
Undecanoic acid (C11:0) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Lauric acid (C12:0) 0.005±0.001 0.006±0.004 0.011±0.005
Tridecanoic acid (C13:0) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.001±0.002
Myristic acid (C14:0) 0.134±0.041B 0.216±0.181AB 0.458±0.209A
Myristoleic acid (C14:1) 0.064±0.009 0.076±0.071 0.163±0.081
Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) 0.016±0.001 0.016±0.012 0.033±0.015
Pentadecenoic acid (C15:1) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Palmitic acid (C16:0) 1.139±0.096B 1.874±1.318AB 3.786±1.555A
Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) 0.234±0.017 0.275±0.225 0.573±0.26
Margaric acid (C17:0) 0.043±0.002 0.053±0.038 0.108±0.051
Heptaecenoic acid (C17:1) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Stearic acid (C18:0) 0.338±0.383B 0.794±0.452AB 1.523±0.638A
Oleic acid (C18:1,trans) 0.078±0.025 0.110±0.050 0.202±0.098
Oleic acid (C18:1,cis) 1.861±0.075B 3.041±2.093AB 6.152±2.797A
Linoleic acid (C18:2,trans) 0.015±0.003 0.020±0.011 0.047±0.034
Linoleic acid (C18:2,cis) 0.208±0.050B 0.294±0.051AB 0.361±0.093A
Arachidic acid (C20:0) 0.002±0.001B 0.006±0.003AB 0.010±0.004A
γ-linolenic acid (C18:3n-6) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) 0.013±0.007 0.008±0.003 0.014±0.005
Gadoleic acid (C20:1) 0.007±0.001B 0.015±0.008AB 0.030±0.013A
Heneicosanoic acid (C21:0) 0.008±0.000B 0.016±0.012B 0.037±0.022A
Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2) 0.003±0.001B 0.004±0.002AB 0.008±0.004A
Behenic acid (C22:0) 0.000±0.000B 0.002±0.000A 0.002±0.001A
Dihomo-γ-linolenic acid (C20:3n-6) 0.019±0.006B 0.037±0.003A 0.037±0.004A
Erucic acid (C22:1n-9) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.001
Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n-3) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) 0.060±0.174B 0.093±0.009A 0.080±0.004AB
Tricosanoic acid (C23:0) 0.000±0.000B 0.001±0.000A 0.001±0.001A
Brassic acid (C22:2) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Lignoceric acid (C24:0) 0.000±0.000B 0.002±0.000A 0.002±0.001A
EPA (C20:5n-3) 0.000±0.000B 0.002±0.000A 0.001±0.001A
Nervonic acid (C24:1) 0.003±0.001 0.003±0.001 0.005±0.002
DHA (C22:6n-3) 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000 0.000±0.000
Total fatty acid 4.306±0.225B 6.970±4.524AB 13.655±5.894 A

EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.

1) Control, non-inoculated group; SMFM201812-3, D. hansenii SMFM201812-3 inoculated group; SMFM201905-5, D. hansenii SMFM201905-5 inoculated group.

A,B Different letters within a row indicate significant differences among means at p<0.05.


1. Andrade MJ, Córdoba JJ, Casado EM, Córdoba MG, Rodríguez M. Effect of selected strains of Debaryomyces hansenii on the volatile compound production of dry fermented sausage “salchichón. ” Meat Sci 2010; 85:256–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.01.009
2. Ozturk I, Sagdic O, Yetim H. Effects of autochthonous yeast cultures on some quality characteristics of traditional turkish fermented sausage “sucuk. ” Food Sci Anim Resour 2021; 41:196–213. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e89
crossref pmid pmc
3. Seleshe S, Kang SN. Effect of different Pediococcus pentosaceus and Lactobacillus plantarum strains on quality characteristics of dry fermented sausage after completion of ripening period. Food Sci Anim Resour 2021; 41:636–49. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e21
crossref pmid pmc
4. Oh H, Lee HJ, Lee J, Jo C, Yoon Y. Identification of microorganisms associated with the quality improvement of dry-aged beef through microbiome analysis and DNA sequencing, and evaluation of their effects on beef quality. J Food Sci 2019; 84:2944–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14813
crossref pmid
5. Flores M, Corral S, Cano-García L, Salvador A, Belloch C. Yeast strains as potential aroma enhancers in dry fermented sausages. Int J Food Microbiol 2015; 212:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.028
crossref pmid
6. Aquilanti LS, Santarelli G, Silvestri A, Osimani A, Petruzzelli A, Clementi F. The microbial ecology of a typical Italian salami during its natural fermentation. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 120:136–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.06.010
crossref pmid
7. Bolumar T, Sanz Y, Aristoy MC, Toldrá F. Purification and characterization of a prolyl aminopeptidase from Debaryomyces hansenii. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:227–32. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.69.1.227-232.2003
crossref pmid pmc
8. Patrignani F, Iucci L, Vallicelli M, Guerzoni ME, Gardini F, Lanciotti R. Role of surface-inoculated Debaryomyces hansenii and Yarrowia lipolytica strains in dried fermented sausage manufacture. Part 1: Evaluation of their effects on microbial evolution, lipolytic and proteolytic patterns. Meat Sci 2007; 75:676–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.09.017
crossref pmid
9. Kim H, Shin M, Ryu S, et al. Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated lactic acid bacteria from dry-aged hanwoo beef. Food Sci Anim Resour 2021; 41:468–80. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e11
crossref pmid pmc
10. Park S, Kim H. Quality properties of Bulogogi sauce with crust derived from dry-aged beef loin. Food Sci Anim Resour 2021; 41:247–60. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e95
crossref pmid pmc
11. Hodges JH, Cahill VR, Ockerman HW. Effect of vacuum packaging on weight loss, microbial growth and palatability of fresh beef wholesale cuts. J Food Sci 1974; 39:143–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1974.tb01009.x
12. Dashdorj D, Tripathi VK, Cho S, Kim Y, Hwang I. Dry aging of beef; Review. J Anim Sci Technol 2016; 58:20 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-016-0101-9
crossref pmid pmc
13. Jin S, Yim D. Comparison of effects of two aging methods on the physicochemical traits of pork loin. Food Sci Anim Resour 2020; 40:844–51. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e22
crossref pmid pmc
14. Flores M, Olivares A. Handbook of fermented meat and poultry. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley; 2007. p. 217–25.

15. Santos NN, Santos-Mendonça RC, Sanz Y, Bolumar T, Aristoy MC, Toldrá F. Hydrolysis of pork muscle sarcoplasmic proteins by Debaryomyces hansenii. Int J Food Microbiol 2001; 68:199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(01)00489-5
crossref pmid
16. Smith S, Lunt D, Chung K, Choi C, Tume R, Zembayashi M. Adiposity, fatty acid composition, and delta-9 desaturase activity during growth in beef cattle. Anim Sci J 2006; 77:478–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2006.00375.x
17. Ordóñez JA, de la Hoz L. Mediterranean products. Handbook of fermented meat and poultry. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing; 2007. p. 333–48.

18. Cano-García L, Belloch C, Flores M. Impact of Debaryomyces hansenii strains inoculation on the quality of slow dry-cured fermented sausages. Meat Sci 2014; 96:1469–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.12.011
crossref pmid
19. Ramos-Moreno L, Ruiz-Pérez F, Rodríguez-Castro E, Ramos J. Debaryomyces hansenii is a real tool to improve a diversity of characteristics in sausages and dry-meat products. Microorganisms 2021; 9:1512 https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071512
crossref pmid pmc
20. Perea-Sanz L, Peris D, Belloch C, Flores M. Debaryomyces hansenii metabolism of sulfur amino acids as precursors of volatile sulfur compounds of interest in meat products. J Agric Food Chem 2019; 67:9335–43. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b03361
crossref pmid
21. Buxton R. Blood agar plates and hemolysis protocols. Am Soc Microbiol 2005; 15:1–9.

22. Sadeghi-Aliabadi H, Mohammadi F, Fazeli H, Mirlohi M. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum A7 with probiotic potential on colon cancer and normal cells proliferation in comparison with a commercial strain. Iran J Basic Med Sci 2014; 17:815–9.
pmid pmc
23. Calicioglu M, Sofos JN, Kendall PA. Influence of marinades on survival during storage of acid-adapted and nonadapted Listeria monocytogenes inoculated post-drying on beef jerky. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 86:283–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(02)00565-2
crossref pmid
24. Park JA, Joo SY, Hwang HJ, et al. Effects of freezing storage temperature on the storage stability of beef. Korean J Food Sci Technol 2016; 48:301–5. https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2016.48.4.301
25. Hwang YH, Joo ST. Fatty acid profiles, meat quality, and sensory palatability of grain-fed and grass-fed beef from Hanwoo, American, and Australian crossbred cattle. Food Sci Anim Resour 2017; 37:153–61. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.2.153
crossref pmid pmc
26. Kim J, Kim M, Kang C, et al. The Use of MTT assay, in vitro and ex vivo, to predict the adiosensitivity of colorectal cancer. J korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2008; 26:166–72. https://doi.org/10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.3.166
27. Álvarez S, Mullen AM, Hamill R, O’Neill E, Álvarez C. Dry-aging of beef as a tool to improve meat quality. Impact of processing conditions on the technical and organoleptic meat properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press; 2021. p. 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.afnr.2020.10.001
28. Bouton PE, Hariis PT, Shorthose WR. Effect of ultimate pH upon the water-holding capacity and tenderness of mutton. J Food Sci 1971; 36:435–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1971.tb06382.x
29. Johnson JL, Doyle MP, Cassens RG. Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in ground beef. Int J Food Microbiol 1988; 6:243–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(88)90016-5
crossref pmid
30. Demeyer D, Vandekerckhove P, Moermans R. Compounds determining pH in dry sausage. Meat Sci 1979; 3:161–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(79)90033-0
crossref pmid
31. Liu Y, Wan Z, Yohannes KW, et al. Functional characteristics of Lactobacillus and yeast single starter cultures in the ripening process of dry fermented sausage. Front Microbiol 2021; 11:611260 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.611260
crossref pmid pmc
32. Flores M, Durá MA, Marco A, Toldrá F. Effect of Debaryomyces spp. on aroma formation and sensory quality of dry-fermented sausages. Meat Sci 2004; 68:439–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.04.001
crossref pmid
33. Jeremiah LE. A review of factors influencing consumption, selection and acceptability of meat purchases. J Consum Stud Home Econ 1982; 6:137–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.1982.tb00593.x
34. Miller MF, Carr MA, Ramsey CB, Crockett KL, Hoover LC. Consumer thresholds for establishing the value of beef tenderness. J Anim Sci 2001; 79:3062–8. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79123062x
crossref pmid
35. Lee H, Yoon J, Kim M, Oh H, Yoon Y, Jo C. Changes in microbial composition on the crust by different air flow velocities and their effect on sensory properties of dry-aged beef. Meat Sci 2019; 153:152–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.03.019
crossref pmid
36. Cano-García L, Rivera-Jiménez S, Belloch C, Flores M. Generation of aroma compounds in a fermented sausage meat model system by Debaryomyces hansenii strains. Food Chem 2014; 151:364–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.051
crossref pmid
37. Feidt C, Petit A, Bruas-Reignier F, Brun-Bellut J. Release of free amino-acids during ageing in bovine meat. Meat Sci 1996; 44:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(96)00088-5
crossref pmid
38. Fu Y, Cao S, Li Z. Flavor formation based on lipid in meat and meat products: A review. J Food Biochem 2022; 46:e14439 https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.14439
crossref pmid
39. Joo ST, Choi JS, Hur SJ, et al. A comparative study on the taste characteristics of satellite cell cultured meat derived from chicken and cattle muscles. Food Sci Anim Resour 2022; 42:175–85. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2021.e72
crossref pmid pmc
40. Kim YHB, Kemp R, Samuelsson LM. Effects of dry-aging on meat quality attributes and metabolite profiles of beef loins. Meat Sci 2016; 111:168–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.09.008
crossref pmid
41. Koutsidis G, Elmore JS, Oruna-Concha MJ, Campo MM, Wood JD, Mottram DS. Water-soluble precursors of beef flavour. Part II: Effect of post-mortem conditioning. Meat Sci 2008; 79:270–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.09.010
crossref pmid
42. Durá MA, Flores M, Toldrá F. Effect of Debaryomyces spp. on the proteolysis of dry-fermented sausages. Meat Sci 2004; 68:319–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.03.015
crossref pmid
43. Corral S, Salvador A, Belloch C, Flores M. Improvement the aroma of reduced fat and salt fermented sausages by Debaromyces hansenii inoculation. Food Control 2015; 47:526–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.08.001
44. Gientka I, Kieliszek M, Jermacz K, Błażejak S. Identification and characterization of oleaginous yeast isolated from kefir and its ability to accumulate intracellular fats in deproteinated potato wastewater with different carbon sources. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017:6061042 https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6061042
crossref pmid pmc
45. Breuer U, Harms H. Debaryomyces hansenii—an extremophilic yeast with biotechnological potential. Yeast 2006; 23:415–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1374
crossref pmid
46. Casaburi A, Piombino P, Nychas GJ, Villani F. Ercolini D Bacterial populations and the volatilome associated to meat spoilage. Food Microbiol 2015; 45:83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.02.002
crossref pmid
47. Dryden FD, Maechello JA. Influence of total lipid and fatty acid composition upon the palatability of three bovine muscles. J Anim Sci 1970; 31:36–41. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.31136x
METRICS Graph View
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Crossref
  • 1 Scopus
  • 1,935 View
  • 82 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : editor@animbiosci.org               

Copyright © 2024 by Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next