3. Zhang J, Khazalwa EM, Abkallo HM, et al. The advancements, challenges, and future implications of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in swine research. J Genet Genomics 2021;48:347–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2021.03.015
12. Hung SW, Chuang Ck, Wong CH, et al. Activated macrophages of CD 163 gene edited pigs generated by direct cytoplasmic microinjection with CRISPR gRNA/Cas9 mRNA are resistant to PRRS virus assault. Anim Biotechnol. 2022. May. 4:1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2062602
13. Tanihara F, Hirata M, Nguyen NT, et al. Generation of PDX-1 mutant porcine blastocysts by introducing CRISPR/Cas9-system into porcine zygotes via electroporation. Anim Sci J 2019;90:55–61.
https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13129
15. Tanihara F, Hirata M, Nguyen NT, et al. Generation of CD163-edited pig via electroporation of the CRISPR/Cas9 system into porcine in vitro-fertilized zygotes. Anim Biotechnol 2021;32:147–54.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2019.1668801
20. Wu Z, Chen J, Ren J, et al. Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells with a drug-inducible system. J Mol Cell Biol 2009;1:46–54.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjp003
21. West FD, Terlouw SL, Kwon DJ, et al. Porcine induced pluripotent stem cells produce chimeric offspring. Stem Cells Dev 2010;19:1211–20.
22. West FD, Uhl EW, Liu Y, et al. Brief report: chimeric pigs produced from induced pluripotent stem cells demonstrate germline transmission and no evidence of tumor formation in young pigs. Stem Cells 2011;29:1640–3.
https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.713
23. Liu K, Ji G, Mao J, et al. Generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells by using OCT4 and KLF4 porcine factors. Cell Reprogram 2012;14:505–13.
https://doi.org/10.1089/cell.2012.0047
33. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 1997;385:810–3.
https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
34. Polejaeva IA, Chen SH, Vaught TD, et al. Cloned pigs produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells. Nature 2000;407:86–90.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35024082
35. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, et al. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:1055–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
37. Hua Z, Xu G, Liu X, et al. Impact of different sources of donor cells upon the nuclear transfer efficiency in Chinese indigenous Meishan pig. Pol J Vet Sci 2016;19:205–12.
https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0029
39. Fahrudin M, Kikuchi K, Kurniani Karja NW, et al. Development to the blastocyst stage of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed by the fusion of cumulus cells and cytoplasts prepared by gradient centrifugation. Cloning Stem Cells 2007;9:216–28.
https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2006.0048
40. Li X, Zhang P, Jiang S, et al. Aging adult porcine fibroblasts can support nuclear transfer and transcription factor-mediated reprogramming. Anim Sci J 2018;89:289–297.
https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12871
45. Yin XJ, Tani T, Yonemura I, et al. Production of cloned pigs from adult somatic cells by chemically assisted removal of maternal chromosomes. Biol Reprod 2002;67:442–6.
https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod67.2.442
47. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, et al. Production of cloned pigs from in vitro systems. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:1055–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
60. Huang Y, Tang X, Xie W, et al. Vitamin C enhances in vitro and in vivo development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;411:397–401.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.06.160
62. Yin R, Mao SQ, Zhao B, et al. Ascorbic acid enhances Tet-mediated 5-methylcytosine oxidation and promotes DNA demethylation in mammals. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135:10396–403.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4028346
64. Lee K, Hamm J, Whitworth K, et al. Dynamics of TET family expression in porcine preimplantation embryos is related to zygotic genome activation and required for the maintenance of NANOG. Dev Biol 2014;386:86–95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2013.11.024
73. Chung YG, Matoba S, Liu Y, et al. Histone demethylase expression enhances human somatic cell nuclear transfer effciency and promotes derivation of pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2015;17:758–66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2015.10.001
75. Weng XG, Cai MM, Zhang YT, et al. Improvement in the in vitro development of cloned pig embryos after kdm4a overexpression and an H3K9me3 methyltransferase inhibitor treatment. Theriogenology 2020;146:162–70.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.11.027
76. Greiner D, Bonaldi T, Eskeland R, Roemer E, Imhof A. Identification of a specific inhibitor of the histone methyltransferase SU(VAR)3–9. Nat Chem Biol 2005;1:143–5.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio721
83. Cuello C, Sanchez-Osorio J, Almiñana C, et al. Effect of the cryoprotectant concentration on the in vitro embryo development and cell proliferation of OPS-vitrified porcine blastocysts. Cryobiology 2008;56:189–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2008.02.005
84. Du Y, Li J, Kragh PM, et al. Piglets born from vitrified cloned blastocysts produced with a simplified method of delipation and nuclear transfer. Cloning Stem Cells 2007;9:469–76.
https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2007.0037
85. Nakano K, Matsunari H, Nakayama N, et al. Cloned porcine embryos can maintain developmental ability after cryopreservation at the morula stage. J Reprod Dev 2011;57:312–6.
https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.10-142a
90. Suzuki C, Iwamura S, Yoshioka K. Birth of piglets through the non-surgical transfer of blastocysts produced in vitro. J Reprod Dev 2004;50:487–91.
https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.50.487
94. Gomis J, Cuello C, Sanchez-Osorio J, et al. Non-surgical deep intrauterine transfer of superfine open pulled straw (SOPS)-vitrified porcine embryos-evaluation of critical steps of the procedure. Theriogenology 2012;78:1339–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.035
95. Martinez EA, Nohalez1 A, Martinez CA, et al. The recipients’ parity does not influence their reproductive performance following non-surgical deep uterine porcine embryo transfer. Reprod Dom Anim 2016;51:123–9.
https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12654