1. Cowieson AJ, Ruckebusch JP, Sorbara JOB, Wilson JW, Guggenbuhl P, Roos FF. A systematic view on the effect of phytase on ileal amino acid digestibility in broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 225:182–94.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.008
3. Nielsen AVF. Phytate and phytase enzyme kinetics. Dam-Johansen K, Vudayagiri S, Gernaey KV, editorsGraduate schools yearbook. Denmark: 2012. p. 181–2.
5. Abbasi F, Fakhur-un-Nisa T, Liu J, Luo X, Abbasi IHR. Low digestibility of phytate phosphorus, their impacts on the environment, and phytase opportunity in the poultry industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 2019; 26:9469–79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-4000-0
6. Liu N, Ru YJ, Li FD, Wang JP, Lei XQ. Effect of dietary phytate and phytase on proteolytic digestion and growth regulation of broilers. Arch Anim Nutr 2009; 63:292–303.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390903020422
7. Selle PH, Cadogan DJ, Creswell DC, Partridge G. Phytase supplementation of sorghum-based broiler diets with reduced phosphorus levels. In : 23rd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium; 2012.
10. Delezie E, Maertens L, Huyghebaert G. Consequences of phosphorus interactions with calcium, phytase, and cholecalciferol on zootechnical performance and mineral retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2012; 91:2523–31.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01937
11. Bozsik A, Kökény S, Olah E. Molecular mechanisms for the antitumor activity of inositol hexakisphosphate (IP6). Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2007; 4:43–51.
12. Haslam SM, Brown SN, Wilkins LJ, Kestin SC, Warriss PD, Nicol CJ. Preliminary study to examine the utility of using foot burn or hock burn to assess aspects of housing conditions for broiler chicken. Br Poult Sci 2006; 47:13–8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660500475046
13. Swiatkiewicz S, Arczewska-Wlosek A, Jozefiak D. The nutrition of poultry as a factor affecting litter quality and foot pad dermatitis – an updated review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2017; 101:e14–e20.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12630
15. Roenchen S, Scholz B, Hamann H, Distl O. Foot pad health, plumage condition, integument and claw length of Lohmann Silver laying hens kept in small aviary housing systems, furnished cages and an aviary housing system. Arch Anim Breed 2007; 50:388–402.
https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-50-388-2007
16. Delezie E, Bierman K, Nollet L, Maertens L. Impacts of calcium and phosphorus concentration, their ratio, and phytase supplementation level on growth performance, foot pad lesions, and hock burn of broiler chickens. J Appl Poult Res 2015; 24:115–26.
https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfv011
17. Kim JH, Han GP, Shin JE, Kil DY. Effect of dietary calcium concentrations in phytase-containing diets on growth performance, bone mineralization, litter quality, and footpad dermatitis score in broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 229:13–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.04.008
19. Dersjant-Li Y, Hruby M, Evans C, Greiner R. A critical review of methods used to determine phosphorus and digestible amino acid matrices when using phytase in poultry and pig diets. J Appl Anim Nutr 2019; 7:E2
https://doi.org/10.1017/JAN.2019.1
21. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). International Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 16th edWashington, DC, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
22. Reichwald K, Hatzack F. Application of a modified Haug and Lantzsch method for the rapid and accurate photometrical phytate determination in soybean, wheat, and maize meals. J Agric Food Chem 2008; 56:2888–91.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0730690
23. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). International Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 18th edWashington, DC, USA: AOAC International; 2005.
24. Sales J, Janssens PJ. The use of markers to determine energy metabolizability and nutrient digestibility in avian species. Worlds Poult Sci J 2003; 59:314–27.
https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS20030019
26. Yu S, Cowieson A, Gilbert C, Plumstead P, Dalsgaard S. Interactions of phytate and myo-inositol phosphate esters (IP1-5) including IP5 isomers with dietary protein and iron and inhibition of pepsin. J Anim Sci 2012; 90:1824–32.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-3866
28. Menezes–Blackburn D, Greiner R. Enzymes used in animal feed: leading technologies and forthcoming developments. Cirillo G, Spizzirri UG, Iemma F, editorsFunctional polymers in food science: from technology to biology. 2015. p. 47–73.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119108580.ch4
29. Yavas I, Cenesiz AA, Ceylan N. Effects of herbal vitamin D3 and phytase supplementation to broiler feed on performance, bone development and serum parameters of broilers. J Agric Sci 2020; 26:212–9.
https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.479182
30. Al-Harthi MA, Attia YA, El-Shafey AS, Elgandy MF. Impact of phytase on improving the utilisation of pelleted broiler diets containing olive by-products. Ital J Anim Sci 2020; 19:310–8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1740896
31. Abudabos AM. Phytate phosphorus utilization and intestinal phytase activity in laying hens. Ital J Anim Sci 2012; 11:e8
32. Nourmohammadi R, Hosseini SM, Farhangfar H, Bashtani M. Effect of citric acid and microbial phytase enzyme on ileal digestibility of some nutrients in broiler chicks fed corn-soybean meal diets. Ital J Anim Sci 2012; 11:e7
33. Ngxumeshe AM. Evaluating the efficacy of exogenous composite microbial enzymes in maize-soybean based broiler chicken feeds [MsC Dissertation]. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal; 2006.
34. Hajimohammadi A, Mottaghitalab M, Hashemi M. Influence of microbial fermentation processing of sesame meal and enzyme supplementation on broiler performances. Ital J Anim Sci 2020; 19:712–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2020.1790045
35. Chung TK, Rutherfurd SM, Thomas DV, Moughan PJ. Effect of two microbial phytases on mineral availability and retention and bone mineral density in low-phosphorus diets for broilers. Br Poult Sci 2013; 54:362–73.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.783902
36. Attia YA, El-Tahawy WS, El-Hamid A, et al. Effect of feed form, pellet diameter and enzymes supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of broiler during days 21–37 of age. Arch Anim Breed 2014; 57:34
https://doi.org/10.7482/0003-9438-57-034
37. Maenz DD. Enzymatic characteristics of phytases as they relate to their use in animal feeds Enzymes in farm animal nutrition. Bedford MR, Partridge GG, editorsEnzymes in farm animal nutrition. Wallingford UK: CABI Publishing; 2001. p. 61–84.
39. NRC. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th rev edWashington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 1994.
40. Woyengo TA, Guenter W, Sands JS, Nyachoti CM, Mirza MA. Nutrient utilisation and performance responses of broilers fed a wheat-based diet supplemented with phytase and xylanase alone or in combination. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 146:113–23.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.013
41. Zaefarian F, Romero LF, Ravindran V. Effects of microbial phytase on nutrient digestibility and energy utilisation in young broilers fed phosphorus-adequate diets. In : Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Australian Poultry Science Symposium; 2011; Sydney, Australia.
42. Zaefarian F, Romero LF, Ravindran V. Influence of a microbial phytase on the performance and the utilisation of energy, crude protein and fatty acids of young broilers fed on phosphorus-adequate maize- and wheat-based diets. Br Poult Sci 2013; 54:653–60.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2013.830209
43. Scholey DV, Morgan NK, Riemensperger A, Hardy R, Burton EJ. Effect of supplementation of phytase to diets low in inorganic phosphorus on growth performance and mineralization of broilers. Poult Sci 2018; 97:2435–40.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey088
44. Walk C. Evaluation of the efficacy of high levels of microbial phytase in broilers [MsC Dissertation]. Columbia, MO, USA: University of Missouri; 2006.
46. European Food Safety AAuthority. Opinion of the panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on the safety and efficacy of the enzyme preparation Phyzyme™ XP 5000L and Phyzyme™ XP 5000G (6-phytase) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, laying hens, turkeys for fattening, ducks for fattening, piglets (weaned), pigs for fattening and sows in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. EFSA J 2006; 4:404
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2006.404
47. Selle PH, Ravindran V, Partridge GG. Beneficial effects of xylanase and/or phytase inclusions on ileal amino acid digestibility, energy utilisation, mineral retention and growth performance in wheat-based broiler diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2009; 153:303–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.06.011
48. Taheri HR, Mirisakhani L. Effect of citric acid, vitamin D3, and high-dose phytase on performance of broiler chicken fed diet severely limited in non-phytate phosphorus. Livest Sci 2020; 241:104223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104223
49. Taheri HR, Abbasi MM. Effect of high-dose phytase and low calcium concentration on performance of broiler chicken given diet severely limited in nonphytate phosphorus. J Appl Poult Res 2020; 29:817–29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.07.004
51. Al-Harthi MA. The effect of olive cake, with or without enzymes supplementation, on growth performance, carcass characteristics, lymphoid organs and lipid metabolism of broiler chickens. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 2017; 19:83–90.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2016-0311
52. Karimian RA, Rezaeipour V. Effects of dietary mannan-oligosaccharides and phytase supplementation alone or in combination on growth performance, serum metabolites, cecal microbiota activity and intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. Poult Sci J 2020; 8:27–32.
https://doi.org/10.22069/psj.2020.17229.1513
53. Suliman WSAA. Comparative study to investigate different enzyme sources on the energy utilization in broiler diets [MsC Dissertation]. Gaza, Palestine: AL-Azhar University Gaza; 2012.
55. Zhang AW, Ju GC, Xue J, Zuo LY, Dong B. Effects of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and yeast extracts on meat quality of broiler chickens. Chinese J Anim Nutr 2011; 23:299–306.
58. Farahat MH, Abdel-Razik WM, Hassanein EI, Noll SL. Effect of phytase supplementation to diets varying in chloride level on performance, litter moisture, foot pad score, and gait score of growing turkeys. Poult Sci 2013; 92:1837–47.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02869
59. Farhadi D, Karimi A, Sadeghi G, Rostamzadeh J, Bedford MR. Effects of a high dose of microbial phytase and myo-inositol supplementation on growth performance, tibia mineralization, nutrient digestibility, litter moisture content, and foot problems in broiler chickens fed phosphorus-deficient diets. Poult Sci 2017; 96:3664–75.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex186
60. Mukovozov IM, Morra DE, Giustini D, Tadrous M, Cheung AM, Drucker AM. Atopic dermatitis and bone health: a systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2021; 35:615–28.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.16895