Go to Top Go to Bottom
Anim Biosci > Volume 33(5); 2020 > Article
Jo, Peng, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Nejad, Lee, and Lee: The effects of vitamin A supplementation during late-stage pregnancy on longissimus dorsi muscle tissue development, birth traits, and growth performance in postnatal Korean native calves



This study investigated the effects of vitamin A (VA) supplementation during late-stage pregnancy on longissimus dorsi muscle tissue development, birth traits, and growth performance of postnatal Korean native calves.


In the preliminary experiment, twenty-six pregnant cattle (initial body weight [BW] = 319 kg (standard deviation [SD] = 30.1; 1st parity) were randomly assigned to the control and treatment groups. The treatment group received VA supplementation at 24,000 IU/d from gestational day 225 until delivery. In the main experiment, twelve pregnant cattle (initial BW = 317 kg [SD = 31.3]; 1st parity) were treated with VA supplementation at 24,000 IU/d (gestational days 150 to 225) and at 78,000 IU/d (gestational day 225 until delivery). Serum VA levels were analyzed in pregnant cattle, and the growth performance, gene expression, and serum VA levels were analyzed in the offspring.


Serum VA levels in pregnant cattle decreased the late gestation in both experiments (p<0.001). In the main experiment, pregnant cattle at parturition and offspring at birth in the treatment group had higher serum VA levels than those in the control group (p<0.05). In the treatment groups, an increased birth weight was observed in the main experimental group (p = 0.022), and a tendency (p = 0.088) toward an increased birth weight was observed in the preliminary experimental group. However, no differences were observed in the feed intake, average daily gain, gain-to-feed ratio, or BW of 31-day-old calves. Gene expression was analyzed in longissimus dorsi muscles of 31-day-old calves. VA supplementation in pregnant cattle stimulated postnatal muscle development in offspring by elevating myogenic factor 5 (MYF5), MYF6, and myoblast determination levels (p<0.05). Moreover, preadipocyte-related marker genes such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 and krüppel-like factor 2 were higher in the treatment group than in the control group (p<0.05).


VA supplementation (78,000 IU/d) in late-stage pregnant cattle maintained serum VA levels. In addition, 78,000 IU/d VA supplementation increased the birth weight and expression of genes related to muscle and preadipocyte development in offspring. Overall, 78,000 IU/d VA supplementation in pregnant cattle is beneficial to newborn calves.


In many countries, the production of beef with a high level of intramuscular fat contributes to consumer satisfaction and results in substantial benefits to producers [1]. According to a previous study [2], the increase in marbling stems from both intramuscular fat hypertrophy (increase in adipocyte size) and hyperplasia (increase in adipocyte number). Although numerous studies have pinpointed how adipocyte size can be increased [3,4], the question of how adipocyte number can be increased remains poorly understood.
A previous review [5] hypothesized that adipogenic and myogenic cells derived from the same pool of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells play a crucial role in enhancing carcass traits in cattle. Additionally, this hypothesis was tentatively confirmed in a mouse model; the results showed that adipogenic determination and preadipocyte proliferation are highly activity during the fetal and early growth stages [6]. Regulation by environmental and nutritional aspects during the fetal and early growth stages can alter organismal resilience to environmental stressors and the developmental process in humans and laboratory animals [7]. Previous research has indicated the effect of vitamin A (VA) on adipocyte hyperplasia and muscle development in cell lines, and primary cells [4,8]. However, to the best of our knowledge, an in vivo evaluation of the effects of VA supplementation in cattle in late pregnancy on their offspring has not yet been reported. Therefore, we hypothesize that VA supplementation during late-stage pregnancy can improve longissimus dorsi muscle tissue development, birth traits, and growth performance in offspring.


Animals and management

All experimental procedures were in accordance with the “Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals” of Konkuk University (Approval no: KU17099). Originally, fifty Korean native (Hanwoo) heifers were included in this research; however, twelve heifers were unexpectedly excluded due to premature birth, abortion or missed. Ultimately, thirty-eight 20-month-old heifers were selected for this study. In the preliminary experiment, twenty-six pregnant Hanwoo cattle (initial body weight [BW] = 319 kg (standard deviation [SD] = 30.1; 1st parity) were randomly allocated to two groups (high-VA group, n = 8; control group, n = 18). The same number of pregnant cattle were included in each group. However, it was difficult to control the experimental period during pregnancy. All the cattle were impregnated by artificial insemination, and the date of pregnancy was estimated by a commercial kit. As a result, nine cows had an inadequate treatment period due to an incorrect prediction of the delivery date, one cow experienced abortion during the preliminary experiment.
We supplied diets with total mixed ration (TMR). Animals were placed in a large pen with a Kalan gate in which clean dry sawdust was spread onto the floor for bedding, and water was available ad libitum. All pregnant cattle in the control and treatment groups were fed 13 kg of TMR feedstuff (on an as-fed basis) once a day at 0900 h (Table 1). None of the pregnant cattle remained on a TMR diet during the experiment (data not shown). The TMR contained VA (1,662 IU per kg) on an as-fed basis. The total amount of VA feeding was 21,606 IU per day from the TMR diet. In the treatment group, an additional 24,000 IU VA (retinyl acetate, Hanyou Feed, Wuxi, China) was supplied by oral administration for each heifer from day 225 of pregnancy until delivery. To achieve accurate VA supplementation, all the experimental pregnant cattle were locked with the stanchion gate, and 50 g of powdered VA was fed to the cattle in the treatment group. The total amount of VA feeding was 45,606 IU per day in the treatment group (Table 1).
In the main experiment, twelve Hanwoo cattle (initial BW = 317 kg [SD = 31.3]; 1st parity) in advanced pregnancy were randomly selected and allocated into two groups (high VA group, n = 5; control group, n = 7). We supplied the cattle with diets containing the same TMR feedstuff as the cattle in the preliminary experiment. All cattle were housed in the same conditions as those in the preliminary experiment, except the amount of VA supplementation differed in the treatment group. For the treatment group, each heifer was orally administered an additional 24,000 IU VA from 150 to 225 days of gestation (period 1) and 78,000 IU/d from day 225 of pregnancy until parturition (period 2; Table 1).
All newborn calves born to experimental cattle were weigh ed at birth. The birth weights averaged 26.9 kg (SD = 4.51) in the preliminary experiment and 23.7 kg (SD = 3.48) in main experiment. The average birth weight in the two experiments was similar to Korean Feeding Standard for Hanwoo (KFS [9]); the claves were immediately separated from their dams and randomly housed in individual wooden pens [200 cm (L)×135 cm (B)×120 cm (H)] with a stainless steel gate for one month. We provided individual buckets for both water and feedstuff for the calves. Clean dry sawdust, which was changed weekly, was spread onto the floor inside the pen for bedding. For newborn calves, 3.6 L of commercial colostrum (225 g in 625 mL of 45°C water, Headstart, Cat. No. 15360020, Saskatoon Colostrum Company Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada) was given within 12 h after birth, followed by feeding with a commercial milk replacer at an approximate volume of 20% of the birth weight (140 g in 1 L, 45°C water, Nukamel Yellow, The Dawn Ltd., Seoul, Korea) until one month of age (Table 2). Calves who presented clinical diarrhea were treated with Biodyl, Baytril, and ketoprofen injections; and simultaneously administered a nutritional supplement formula (Life-aid, Norbrook, Northamptonshire, UK) with Neodiaristin.
The BWs of the calves were measured every week using a CAS for a month. We investigated the growth performance of the offspring for 31 days, and then, we collected muscle samples from the offspring. Biopsy causes considerable damage and stress to the calves, and this prevents the calves from growing normally.

Preparation of blood samples

Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of each pregnant heifer and calf by using 18-gauge needles at 0900 h. In the preliminary experiment, blood samples were collected via the jugular vein from each pregnant heifer at day 150 of pregnancy and 7 days after delivery. In the main experiment, blood samples were collected in the same way at days 150 and 225 of pregnancy and 7 days after delivery. Blood samples (15 mL) were obtained from each calf via the jugular vein at postnatal day 7 in the preliminary experiment and at postnatal days 7 and 31 in the main experiment. Each calf was born at a different time under different circumstances. Thus, a buffer period of one week was instituted for the calves and blood sampling was conducted at the same time in the morning. Serum tubes (wrapped in tin foil for VA analysis) and K2 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (K2E) 7.2 mg Plus Tubes (BD Vacutainer, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were prepared, and the collected blood samples were stored on ice before being transferred to the laboratory. Then, the blood samples in the serum tubes were centrifuged at 2,740×g for 15 min at 4°C. Serum was transferred to a brown 1.5 mL tube and stored in a freezer (−80°C) before further analysis. The K2 EDTA blood sample was temporarily stored at 4°C for subsequent analysis.

Serum vitamin A analysis

The serum VA analysis was performed with a previously described method [10]. In detail, the experiment was conducted in a dark room with red light to prevent oxidation. Retinyl acetate (>99%, Sigma-Aldrich R7882-1g, Yongin, Korea) was dissolved into 0.04% BHT-ethanol solution (2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenyl, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. B1378, Yongin, Korea) as an internal standard (1 mg/mL, stock solution; 25 μg/mL, working solution). The ethanol, methanol, and hexane used in this study were of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) grade. After the serum samples were thawed at room temperature, 200 μL of serum and 20 μL of the internal standard working solution were added to a 2-mL microtube. Then, 200 μL of distilled water and 400 μL of 0.04% BHT-ethanol solution were added, and the solutions were thoroughly vortexed. After adding 800 μL of 0.04% BHT–hexane solution, the tube was vortexed vigorously again. The samples were then centrifuged at 3,500×g for 10 min at 4°C, after which 700 μL of the hexane layer was transferred to a new 1.5-mL brown microtube, followed by complete hexane evaporation under flowing N2 gas in a dry block bath (MG-2200, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). The samples were dissolved in 95% methanol and mixed well by vortexing. Meanwhile, three controls (internal standards) were prepared in new 1.5-mL brown microtubes by mixing 20 μL of the internal standard working solution with 480 μL of 0.04% BHT-ethanol. Finally, the serum concentration of VA was analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1100 series; Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) in a brown LC vial (Infochroma AG, Goldau, Switzerland) after filtration with a syringe filter (PES, 0.33 mm, 0.22 μm, Millex, Darmstadt, Germany). A stainless steel Novapak C18 column (4-μm reversed-phase column, 3.9 mm ID×150 mm, Waters, Dublin, Ireland) was used in this system, with 95% methanol as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Serum VA (retinol) was detected by measuring the absorbance at 325 nm using a DAD-UV lamp. The column was set at 20°C. Peaks of retinol and retinyl acetate in the samples were obtained using an HPLC computer program. The standard curve was generated by diluting retinol (>99%, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. R7632-25mg, Korea) to different concentrations (12.5, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, 0.39, 0.20, 0.10, and 0.05 μg/mL) with 1 μg/mL of the internal standard at each concentration. All serum VA samples were analyzed in duplicate.

Longissimus dorsi muscle sampling and total RNA extraction

Longissimus dorsi muscle sampling and total RNA extraction were performed with minor modifications of previously described methods [10,11]. Tissue samples (approximately 2 g) were collected from the longissimus dorsi muscles of 31-day-old calves (n = 8) by biopsy. One calf in the treatment group had consistent diarrhea. Therefore, four calves were selected for the analysis of gene expression level. The biopsy causes considerable damage and stress to the calves, and this prevents the calves from growing normally. Therefore, we investigated the growth performance of the offspring for 31 days, and then, we collected muscle samples from the offspring. The biopsy procedure was in accordance with the “Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals” of Konkuk University. Briefly, local anesthetic agents were administered at 6 equidistant points around the resection area, namely, the longissimus dorsi muscle at position 12 to 13 of the ribs. The veterinarian resected 5 cm of skin in the direction of the muscle and then dissected the longissimus dorsi muscle tissue using surgical equipment. The collected tissue was washed immediately with DEPC-treated distilled water (diethyl pyrocarbonate, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat. No. D5758-50ML, Korea), placed in liquid nitrogen until completely frozen, and placed on dry ice until transfer to the laboratory. Then, the tissue samples were ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted by using TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies, Cat. No. 15596-018, Seoul, Korea); 0.1 g of tissue sample was mixed with 1 mL of TRIzol. Next, the sample was homogenized by a homogenizer (IKA T10 basic, Seoul, Korea) and centrifuged at 4°C and 12,000×g for 10 min; then, the upper aqueous phase was transferred into a new 1.5 mL tube. Then, 200 μL of chloroform was added, and the mixture was incubated for 2 min at room temperature after vortexing, followed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 15 min at 4°C. The upper transparent aqueous phase was transferred into a new 1.5 mL tube. Isopropanol (500 μL) was added, and the sample was incubated for 10 min at room temperature after vortexing, followed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 10 min at 4°C to precipitate the RNA. Next, the supernatant was discarded, and the RNA was washed by adding 1 mL of 75% ethanol to the tube. After vortexing, the mixture was centrifuged at 4°C and 12,000×g for 10 min. To collect the RNA, the wash step was repeated with 1 mL of 100% ethanol following the same procedure. After washing, the extracted RNA was dried under a vacuum for approximately 15 min, redissolved in 30 μL of DEPC-treated distilled water, and then incubated at 60°C for 10 min. The RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometric analysis (NanoDrop 1000, Thermo Scientific, Seoul, Korea). The RNA integrity was assessed using an RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit for the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, Richardson, TX, USA). Samples with an RNA integrity number (RIN) of 6 or higher were subjected to complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis. The RNA used for real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis had a RIN of 7.5 (SD = 0.4).

Design of primers and probes

Bovine myoblast determination (MyoD), myogenic factor 5 (MYF5), myogenic factor 6 (MYF6), desmin, myogenie (MyoG), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), lipoprotein lipase (LPL), stearoyl-CoA desaturase (SCD), extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1, 2 (ERK1, ERK2), Wnt family member 10B (Wnt10B), β-catenin, preadipocyte factor 1 (Pref-1), zinc finger protein 423 (Zfp423), Sox9, krüppel-like factor 2 (KLF2), 18S ribosomal RNA (18S), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (RPLP0) primers were designed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information website (Table 3).

Synthesis of cDNA and gene expression analysis

Real-time PCR was performed with minor modifications of previously described methods described [10,11]. To synthesize cDNA, 1 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed in a 100 μL reaction volume with an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed on duplicate samples by using a CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Seoul, Korea) with IQTM SYBR Green Supermix reagents (Bio-Rad, Seoul, Korea). The following PCR conditions were used: 95°C for 3 min and 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s, 51°C to 65°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s. The mRNA levels of genes involved in myogenesis, adipogenesis, and preadipocyte determination and proliferation, including MyoD, MYF5, MYF6, desmin, MyoG, C/EBPα, PPARγ, LPL, SCD, ERK1, ERK2, Wnt10B, β-catenin, Pref-1, Zfp423, Sox9, and KLF2, were determined. 18S, GAPDH, and RPLP0 were used as housekeeping genes to normalize expression and minimize errors in the analysis.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The experimental data were analyzed based on the mean serum VA, birth weight, and growth performance, and mRNA expression was assessed using independent (unpaired) samples t-tests for unequal variances. For the time effect in pregnant cattle, the mean serum VA values in each group were analyzed by (unpaired) sample t-tests and a generalized linear modeling procedure with Tukey’s test in the preliminary and main experiment, respectively. Significance was set at p≤0.05, and the tendency was declared at 0.05<p≤0.1.


Effect of 78,000 IU vitamin A supplementation on serum vitamin A levels in pregnant cattle and the extended effect on newborn calves

In the preliminary experiment, no difference was observed in serum VA levels in pregnant cattle (p = 0.516; Figure 1A) 7 days after delivery or in newborn calves (p = 0.553; Figure 1B). In addition, we found a decreased serum VA levels in pregnant cattle (p<0.001; Figure 1A) after parturition both in the control and treatment groups. This phenomenon may indicate that pregnant cattle need higher levels of VA than those suggested by the Nutrient Requirements of Beef cattle (NRC [12]) and KFS [9] or may need 24,000 IU/d VA supplementation during late pregnancy, close to delivery. A previous study showed the same pattern, in which serum VA concentrations decreased in cattle during late pregnancy to support fetal growth [13,14].
When ingested VA is absorbed in mice, 66% to 75% goes to the liver through the blood vessels and can be stored in the form of retinyl ester, and 25% to 33% is transferred to peripheral tissues [15]. A fetus grows more rapidly after 150 days of gestation, and the fetus requires more nutrients, including VA, for growth [16]. Thus, the ratio of VA supplied to the fetus increase, and 25% to 33% of VA is transported to peripheral tissue. On 0 day, we found that mid-pregnant cows had an average serum VA concentration 152.7 IU/dL, which is considered within the a normal range in blood (84 to 200 IU/dL) [17]. However, the serum VA levels in our study were below the normal range at 7 days after delivery in both groups in the preliminary experiment, at 225 days of pregnancy in both groups in the main experiment, and at 7 days after delivery in the control group in the main experiment (p<0.05). Although the VA content in the basal diet was 21,606 IU/kg DM, it satisfied the NRC and KFS [9,12]. All mammals tend to maintain homeostasis, but few pregnant cows could remain within the normal VA range. A previous study showed a positive correlation (r2 = 0.77) between the VA stored in the liver and VA concentration in the blood [18]. Although the amount of VA stored in the liver was not confirmed in this experiment, decreased blood VA levels may indicate decreased VA levels stored in the liver. The control group was provided with 21,606 IU/kg VA in the basal diet, and this amount was based on the NRC and KFS guidelines for VA [9,12]. The serum VA concentration decreased in both the preliminary and main experiments. Thus, further studies are is needed to examine whether current requirements (NRC and KFS) are insufficient. However, the treatment group supplied with 24,000 IU/d VA showed no change in the serum VA level, perhaps because VA could not be stored in the liver and thus was directly supplied to and used by peripheral tissue, including the fetus. Therefore, we decided to increase the level of VA to 78,000 IU/d in pregnant cattle from day 225 of pregnancy until parturition (period 2) to clearly investigate the effects of supplemented VA. This level of VA was within the safe range of below 500,000 IU/d/head [19] to avoid toxicity. In the main experiment, the serum VA level in both groups dropped (p<0.01) during pregnancy whereas no significant difference (p = 0.839; Figure 1C) was observed between the two groups at day 225 of pregnancy. However, a significant increase in the serum VA level of the treatment group was observed 7 days after parturition (p = 0.021; Figure 1C). Vitamin A supplementation at 78,000 IU/d recovered blood VA levels to 120.3 IU/dL in the treatment group, which was higher than the value in the control group (83.7 IU/dL) (Figure 1C). Cattle were protected from the unexpected VA decrease during a critical time in the development of fetal organs [20]. Pregnant cattle have a greater need than nonpregnant cattle for different nutrients to complete normal body development. Furthermore, the serum VA concentration in the newborn calves showed a significant increase in the treatment group (p = 0.033, Figure 1D). The newborn calves receive VA through the placenta but not the colostrum; thus, we provided commercial colostrum. However, there was no difference in the serum VA level in 31-day-old calves (p = 0.719; Figure 1D). The level of VA supplementation in pregnant cattle may increase serum VA levels during birth but has no effect on subsequent serum VA levels in newborn calves.

Effect of vitamin A supplementation in pregnant cattle on the growth performance of newborn calves

In the current study, we found that high VA supplementation in the preliminary experiment of 24,000 IU per day from day 225 of pregnancy led to an increasing trend in the birth weight of offspring (p = 0.088; Table 4). When the VA supplementation strategy increased to 24,000 IU/d from day 150 of pregnancy to day 225 (period 1) and to 78,000 IU/d from day 225 of pregnancy until parturition (period 2), we found an increased birth weight of the offspring of cattle that received with extra dietary VA supplementation in the main experiment (p = 0.022, Table 4). The addition of VA (78,000 IU/d) during late pregnancy had a preferable effect on postnatal birth weight; in the preliminary experiment, treated offspring were 3.2 kg heavier (p = 0.088) than untreated offspring, but, in the main experiment, treated offspring were 4.2 kg heavier (p = 0.022, Table 4) than untreated offspring. However, we did not obtain a balanced sex ratio in these two studies. Previous research showed that bull calves are approximately 1.9 to 2.3 kg heavier than heifer calves [21], but data in the current study showed no significant difference in weight between bull calves and heifer calves (p = 0.145) in the preliminary experiment (data not shown in the table). The results indicated that VA positively affected fetal growth during pregnancy. However, the BW of 31-day-old calves, feed intake, and gain-to-feed ratio were not different between the two groups (p>0.05). It was determined that the effects of VA supplementation were not sustained long enough to affect growth performance after birth; we did not proceed with VA supplementation after birth. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm the effect of VA supplementation on postnatal Korean native calves.

Effect of high vitamin A supplementation in pregnant cattle on myogenesis in newborn calves

The relative mRNA expression of myogenic-related growth factors was greater in the offspring of the treatment group than in the offspring of the control group; included MYF5 (p = 0.003), MYF6 (p<0.001) and MyoD (p = 0.002; Figure 2A). In contrast, no differences were observed in the expression of desmin (p = 0.185) or MyoG (p = 0.382; Figure 2A) between the two groups. Uezumi et al [22] reported that myocytes and adipocytes are originally derived from the same pool of multipotent progenitor cells. Moreover, retinoic acid was reported to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by stabilizing and enhancing the transcriptional activity of β-catenin [23]; in particular, MYF5 expression was increased by 3.2-fold, and the expression of this gene is thought to be regulated by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. The Wnt/β-catenin levels pathway may activate MYF5 [24]. However, Wnt10B and β-catenin were not different between the control and treatment groups (p>0.05) (Figure 2C). It is possible that VA stimulated the expression of growth hormone genes such as thyroid (T3, T4) and glucocorticoid hormones to influence muscle growth [25]; not all of these hormones were measured in the current study. Hence, more research needs to be carried out to investigate the relationship between growth hormone genes and VA in muscle development.
In addition, a previous study showed that primary muscle fibers form in the bovine fetus within the first two months of conception and that the majority of muscle fibers form during the secondary myogenesis that occurs in the fetal stage between two and eight months of gestation in pregnant cattle [26]. Similarly, another previous study in bovine revealed that the number of muscle fibers continues to increase until the time around birth [27]. Therefore, in our study, the expression of MYF5, MYF6, and MyoD in the longissimus dorsi muscles of 31-day-old calves may positively affect muscle differentiation under the influence of maternal VA supplementation but will not affect the proliferation of myocytes, according to the aforementioned theory. These results suggest that VA supplementation contributed to the muscle differentiation via hypertrophy.

Effects of high vitamin A supplementation in pregnant cattle on the development of preadipocytes in newborn calves

For adipocyte-related genes, KLF2 (p<0.001) and ERK2 (p = 0.004) levels were higher in the treatment group than in the control group (Figure 2). The KLF2 and ERK2 genes are critical in the embryogenesis stage and adipogenesis. KLF2 has also been demonstrated to maintain the preadipocyte condition rather than promote adipogenic commitment [28]. In addition, 3T3-L1 cells overexpressing KLF2 showed reduced gene expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα, which are related to adipogenesis [28]. However, in the current study, both KLF2 and PPARγ were expressed a higher level (p<0.05) in the VA treatment group than in the control group. KLF2 is highly expressed in the preadipocyte period and is rapidly downregulated upon the induction of adipogenic differentiation [29]. Based on a previous study, we considered that KLF2 gene expression indicates cells to maintain the preadipocyte state. PPARγ has been reported to play an essential role in adipogenesis in adipocytes [30] and a key role in the development of muscle by regulating of the insulin sensitivity and the transition of myosin heavy chain isoforms [31]. Longissimus dorsi muscle contains many types of cells, including muscle cells, preadipocytes, progenitor cells and immunocytes. Especially in the early growth stage in calves, longissimus dorsi muscle contains more muscle cells than other cell types. PPARγ is expressed in human skeletal muscle, although this expression level is two-thirds of that in adipocytes [32]. Amin et al [33] reported that the overexpression of PPARγ in murine muscle cells affects muscle fiber-type composition, lipid metabolism, and the synthesis and secretion of adiponectin (such as fatty acid oxidation), as well as improves muscle insulin sensitivity. Therefore, the upregulated PPARγ expression in the VA treatment group seemed to be related more to muscle development (corresponding to the increased gene expression of MyoD, MYF5, and MYF6, p<0.05) than to terminal adipogenic differentiation. Taken together, these data showing increased KLF2 and PPARγ gene expression levels in the VA treatment group suggest that VA supplementation may help maintain the preadipocyte status and promote muscle development in the calf. Activation of the ERK pathway (ERK1 and ERK2) promots adipogenic commitment in mouse embryonic stem cells upon retinoic acid supplementation [34], indicating that additional VA supplementation at 78,000 IU/d in pregnant cattle may increase the preadipocyte development of offspring. However, no differences were observed in the expression of Wnt10B (p = 0.054), β-catenin (p = 0.131), SOX9 (p = 0.683), Pref-1 (p = 0.275), ERK1 (p = 0.097), or Zfp423 (p = 0.201; Figure 2B). In a previous study, Pref-1 and Wnt10B were used as potential markers of preadipocytes [35]. In addition, Berry et al [36] reported that high VA supplementation in 8-week-old male mice for 8 weeks and retinoic acid treatment in preadipocytes resulted in increased Pref-1, Sox9, and KLF2 gene expression levels both in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, Zfp423 was reported to be highly expressed in preadipocytes (within adipogenic epithelial cells) and mature adipocytes (brown adipocytes and white adipocytes), which is also related to preadipocyte proliferation and adipogenic differentiation [6]. Furthermore, retinoic acid reduces DNA methylation at CpG-rich promoters, such as the Zfp423 promotor, that are primarily regulated by epigenetic modifications [6]. However, in the current study, we did not find any significant changes in the expression of Pref-1, Sox9, ERK1, or Zfp423.
The mRNA expression of a genes related to late adipogen esis, such as LPL, C/EBPα, and SCD, was not show different between the two groups (p>0.05, Figure 2B). C/EBPα, LPL, and SCD are used as marker genes for mature adipocytes and are considered as important factors for stimulating adipogenic differentiation and lipid accumulation in mature adipocytes [3]. We hypothesized that VA supplementation inhibited adipogenic differentiation, but longissimus dorsi muscle in calves contain few mature adipocytes.


Vitamin A supplementation was administered to pregnant cattle from days 150 or 225 of pregnancy until parturition in our study. Our results suggested that a high level of VA supplementation (78,000 IU/d) during late pregnancy increases the birth weight of offspring; however, there was no significant increase in later growth performance. For gene expression in the 31-day-old calves, increased levels of MYF5, MYF6, MyoD, and PPARγ were observed in the muscles of the VA treatment group, while increased levels of KLF2 and ERK2 were observed in the VA-treated group, indicated potential development. Although this experiment showed that VA supplementation in the fetal stage can change gene expression in the longissimus dorsi muscles of calves, there is insufficient evidence of an increase in preadipocytes. Overall, to examine an increase in number of preadipocytes, future studies should investigate the histology of preadipocytes or mature adipocytes.



We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.


This work was supported by the Cooperation Research Project (2017R1A2B2009752) and was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea.

Figure 1
Changes in the concentration of serum vitamin A (VA) through VA supplementation in pregnant cattle and in calves. (A), (B) In the preliminary experiment, changes in serum VA (IU/dL) through the addition of VA (24,000 IU/d) for 75 days in pregnant cattle. (B) Serum VA levels in 7-day-old calves 3 control group (n = 18), ▪ treatment group (n = 8). (C), (D) In the main study, changes in serum VA (IU/dL) through the addition of VA (24,000 IU/d) from days 150 to 225 of gestation and 78,000 IU/d from day 225 until parturition in pregnant cattle. (C) In pregnant cattle, blood sampling was performed 3 times (pregnancy day 150, pregnancy day 225 and 7 days after delivery). (D) In calves, blood sampling was performed 2 times (age 7 days and age 31 days). 3 control group (n = 7), ▪ treatment group (n = 5). Mean±standard error, * p<0.05 indicates a significant difference between the groups. a,b Indicate that the means of each group are significantly different among the experimental period, (C) control group, and (T) treatment group.
Figure 2
Gene expression study in offspring of vitamin A (VA)-treated pregnant cattle. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) validation of 18 genes in longissimus dorsi muscles of 31-day-old calves. The qPCR values are shown as the fold change in expression after normalization to the control genes 18S rRNA, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0. □, control group (n = 4), ▪, treatment group (n = 4). Data are presented as the means±standard error. Desmin, desmin; MYF5, myogenic factor 5; MYF6, myogenic factor 5; MyoG, myogenin; MyoD, myoblast determination protein; SCD, stearoyl-CoA desaturase; C/EBPα, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; Wnt10B, wnt family member 10B; β-catenin, beta-catenin; ERK1/2, extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2; KLF2, Krüppel-like factor 2; Pref-1, preadipocyte factor-1; SOX9, sox9; ZFP423, zinc finger protein 423. ** p<0.01; n = 4.
Table 1
Composition and nutrient content of experimental diets for pregnant cattle (as-fed basis)*
Items Dietary treatment1)

Basal Supplementation2)

Period 1 Period 2
Ingredients (%)
 Pineapple core and rind 44.3 44.3 44.3
 Rice straw 33.2 33.2 33.2
 Base feed3) 11.1 11.1 11.1
 Cottonseed 5.5 5.5 5.5
 Alfalfa 2.8 2.8 2.8
 Wheat flour 1.1 1.1 1.1
 Bean flour 1.1 1.1 1.1
 Azomite4) 0.6 0.6 0.6
 Vitamin mixture5) 0.1 0.1 0.1
 Calcium carbonate 0.2 0.2 0.2
 Vitamin A supplementation (IU/50 g/d)6) - 24,000 78,000
Analyzed composition (%)
 Water 62.3 62.3 62.3
 Crude protein 4.0 4.0 4.0
 Ether extraction 1.54 1.54 1.54
 Crude fiber 9.41 9.41 9.41
 Acid detergent fiber 13.6 13.6 13.6
 Neutral detergent fiber 22.9 22.9 22.9
 Crude ash 5.28 5.28 5.28
 Ca 0.8 0.8 0.8
 P 0.3 0.3 0.3
 Vitamin A (IU/d) 21,606 45,606 99,606

DM, dry matter; VA, vitamin A; TMR, total mixed ration.

1) Thirteen kilograms of basal feed (as-fed basis) were supplied in the daily diet; the feed was 4.9 kg of DM. As a result, the composition level was similar to that required by the NRC [12]. The control and treatment groups consumed the same basal feed. VA supplementation was provided to pregnant cattle for 75 days. The amount of supplementation was very small (50 g) compared to that in the basal feedstuff (as-fed basis, 0.38%) and did not affect the energy value.

2) Supplementation: Period 1, days 150 to 225 of gestation, VA 24,000 IU/50 g; Period 2, day 225 of gestation to delivery, VA 78,000 IU/50 g.

3) Basal feedstuff: CP 18%, EE 4.7%, CF 20%, CA 12%, Ca 0.8%, P 1.6%.

4) Supplied per kilogram of complete diet: soluble potash (K2O) 120 mg, calcium (Ca) 108 mg, magnesium (Mg) 30 mg and sodium 6 mg.

5) Supplied per kilogram of complete diet: vitamin A 1,662 IU, vitamin D3 332 IU, vitamin E 5.5 mg, vitamin K3 2.2 mg, Mn 11 mg, Fe 11.1 mg, Cu 1.1 mg, Zn 11.1 mg, Se 0.2 mg and ethoxyquin 5.5 mg.

6) Composition of VA: 4,580 IU/g

* If a pregnant heifer weighs 400 kg and eats 7.85 kg of feed (DM basis), the VA requirement is 21,980 IU (2,800 IU×7.85 [kg, DM] = 21,980 IU/d). The total VA in the TMR (basal feedstuff) met NRC requirement [12].

Table 2
Composition and nutrient content of experimental diets for calves (as-fed basis)
Nutrient composition Dietary treatment

Colostrum milk1) Milk replacer2)
Moisture (%) 71.88 90.9
Crude protein (%) 14.92 2.0
Ether extraction (%) 6.7 1.6
Crude fiber (%) - 0.5
Crude ash (%) 0.05 1.1
Calcium (%) 0.05 0.06
Phosphorus (%) 0.05 0.14
Retinyl acetate (IU/L) - 2,275
Retinol (IU/L) 458,800 -
β-Carotene (IU/L) 76,500 -
Immunoglobulin G (g/L) 60 -

1) Colostrum milk (Headstart, Saskatoon Colostrum Company Ltd., Saskatoon, SK, Canada). This product is a dried colostrum, which is supplemented with IgG.

2) Milk replacer (Denkavit Co, Voorthuizen, Netherlands). The 1:10 dilution was recommended by the company.

Table 3
Primer sequences used in quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction assays
Gene symbol Gene name Annealing temperature (°C) Forward primer1) (5′→ 3′)
MYF5 Myogenic factor 5 63.0 F: TGTCTTTAAGGTGGGGCTCA
MYF6 Myogenic factor 6 60.7 F: GAAGGAGGGACAAGCATTGA
MYOD Myoblast determination protein 59.6 F: AGAGTTGCTTTGCCAGAG
C/EBPα CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha 60.3 F: CCGTGGACAAGAACAGCAACGA
LPL Lipoprotein lipase 60.0 F: TACCCTGCCTGAAGTTTCCAC
SCD Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 60.0 F: TCCGACCTAAGAGCCGAGAA
PPARγ Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma 61.0 F: TGGAGACCGCCCAGGTTTGC
ERK1 Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 60.0 F: GGACCTGATGGAGACAGACCTGTA
ERK2 Extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 60.0 F: AACAAAGTCCGAGTCGCCAT
KLF2 Krüppel-like factor 2 62.5 F: ATTAAGCGTCGTCTTCCCCC
Pref-1 Preadipocyte factor-1 58.8 F: CCTCTTGCTCCTGCTGGCTTTC
β-Catenin Beta-catenin 63.8 F: AACACAGCAGCAGTTTGTGG
Wnt10B Wnt family member 10 B 63.9 F: TTGATACTCACAACCGCAACTCCG
GAPDH Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 60.0 F: GGCAAGGTCATCCCTGAG
RPLP0 Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 55.0 F: CAACCCTGAAGTGCTTGACAT

1) F, forward; R, reverse.

Table 4
Growth performance of newborn calves under vitamin A supplementation from gestational days 225 until parturition (the preliminary experiment) or from gestational days 150 until parturition (the main experiment)
Items Group SEM p-value

Control Treatment
Birth weight (kg)
 Preliminary experiment1) 25.9 29.1 1.07 0.088
 Main experiment2) 21.8 26.0 1.56 0.022
Growth performance2)
 Body weight of 1-month-old (kg) 25.7 28.7 1.83 0.124
 Feed intake (dry matter basis, kg/d) 0.23 0.24 0.02 0.568
 Vitamin A intake (IU/d) 5,723 6,003 399 0.568
 Average daily gain (kg/d) 0.33 0.41 0.05 0.324
 Gain to feed ratio (kg/kg) 0.51 0.41 0.10 0.404

SEM, standard error of the mean.

1) Control: n = 18 (7 bulls and 11 heifers); treatment: n = 8 (4 bulls and 4 heifers).

2) Control: n = 7 (0 bulls and 7 heifers); treatment: n = 5 (3 bulls and 2 heifers).


1. Park SJ, Beak S-H, Jung DJS, et al. Genetic, management, and nutritional factors affecting intramuscular fat deposition in beef cattle—a review. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2018; 31:1043–61. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0310
crossref pmid pmc pdf
2. Lane MD, Tang QQ. From multipotent stem cell to adipocyte. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2005; 73:476–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20150
crossref pmid
3. Smith SB, Gill CA, Lunt DK, Brooks MA. Regulation of fat and fatty acid composition in beef cattle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2009; 22:1225–33. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.r.10
crossref pdf
4. Berry DC, Noy N. All-trans-retinoic acid represses obesity and insulin resistance by activating both peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor β/δ and retinoic acid receptor. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:3286–96. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01742-08
crossref pmid pmc
5. Du M, Huang Y, Das AK, et al. Manipulating mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation to optimize performance and carcass value of beef cattle. J Anim Sci 2013; 91:1419–27. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5670
crossref pmid pdf
6. Yang QY, Liang JF, Rogers CJ, Zhao JX, Zhu MJ, Du M. Maternal obesity induces epigenetic modifications to facilitate Zfp423 expression and enhance adipogenic differentiation in fetal mice. Diabetes 2013; 62:3727–35. https://doi.org/10.2337/db13-0433
crossref pmid pmc
7. Vickers MH. Early life nutrition, epigenetics and programming of later life disease. Nutrients 2014; 6:2165–78. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6062165
crossref pmid pmc
8. Dani C, Smith A, Dessolin S, et al. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells into adipocytes in vitro . J Cell Sci 1997; 110:1279–85.
9. National Institute of Animal Science. Korean feeding standard for Hanwoo (Korean native cattle). Jeonju, Korea: NIAS; 2017.

10. Peng DQ, Lee JS, Kim WS, et al. Effect of vitamin A restriction on carcass traits and blood metabolites in Korean native steers. Anim Prod Sci 2018; 39:2138–46. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17733
11. Kim W, Ghassemi Nejad J, Peng DQ, et al. Identification of heat shock protein gene expression in hair follicles as a novel indicator of heat stress in beef calves. Animal 2020; Feb. 10[Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000075
12. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Washington, DC, USA: National Acdemy Press; 2016.

13. Calderón F, Chauveau-Duriot B, Martin B, Graulet B, Doreau M, Nozière P. Variations in carotenoids, vitamins A and E, and color in cow’s plasma and milk during late pregnancy and the first three months of lactation. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:2335–46. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-630
crossref pmid
14. Prior RL, Laster DB. Development of the bovine fetus. J Anim Sci 1979; 48:1546–53. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.4861546x
crossref pmid pdf
15. Li Y, Wongsiriroj N, Blaner WS. The multifaceted nature of retinoid transport and metabolism. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2014; 3:126–39. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.05.04
pmid pmc
16. Ferrell C, Garrett W, Hinman N. Growth, development and composition of the udder and gravid uterus of beef heifers during pregnancy. J Anim Sci 1976; 42:1477–89. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.4261477x
crossref pmid pdf
17. Van der Lugt JJ, Prozesky L. The pathology of blindness in new-born calves caused by hypovitaminosis A. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1989; 56:99–109.
18. Oka A, Maruo Y, Miki T, Yamasaki T, Saito T. Influence of vitamin A on the quality of beef from the Tajima strain of Japanese Black cattle. Meat Sci 1998; 48:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00086-7
crossref pmid
19. Bailey E. Vitamins for beef cattle [Internet]. University of Missouri Extension; 2017. [cited 2017 Nov]. Available from: https://extension2.missouri.edu/g2058

20. Franklin ST, Sorenson CE, Hammell DC. Influence of vitamin A supplementation in milk on growth, health, concentrations of vitamins in plasma, and immune parameters of calves. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81:2623–32. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75820-5
crossref pmid
21. Burris MJ, Blunn CT. Some factors affecting gestation length and birth weight of beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1952; 11:34–41. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1952.11134x
crossref pdf
22. Uezumi A, Ito T, Morikawa D, et al. Fibrosis and adipogenesis originate from a common mesenchymal progenitor in skeletal muscle. J Cell Sci 2011; 124:3654–64. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.086629
crossref pmid
23. Kim DM, Choi HR, Park A, et al. Retinoic acid inhibits adipogenesis via activation of Wnt signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013; 434:455–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.095
crossref pmid
24. Borello U, Berarducci B, Murphy P, et al. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway regulates Gli-mediated Myf5 expression during somitogenesis. Development 2006; 133:3723–32. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.02517
crossref pmid
25. Bedo G, Santisteban P, Aranda A. Retinoic acid regulates growth hormone gene expression. Nature 1989; 339:231–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/339231a0
crossref pmid pdf
26. Russell RG, Oteruelo F. An ultrastructural study of the dufferentiation of skeletal muscle in the bovine fetus. Anat Embryol 1981; 162:403–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301866
crossref pmid pdf
27. Robelin J, Lacourt A, Bechet D, Ferrara M, Briand Y, Geay Y. Muscle differentiation in the bovine fetus: a histological and histochemical approach. Growth Dev Aging 1991; 55:151–60.
28. Banerjee SS, Feinberg MW, Watanabe M, et al. The Krüppel-like factor KLF2 inhibits peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ expression and adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:2581–4. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M210859200
29. Wu Z, Wang S. Role of krüppel-like transcription factors in adipogenesis. Dev Biol 2013; 373:235–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.10.031
crossref pmid
30. Farmer S. Regulation of PPARγ activity during adipogenesis. Int J Obes 2005; 29:S13–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802907
crossref pdf
31. Verma NK, Singh J, Dey CS. PPAR-γ expression modulates insulin sensitivity in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Br J Pharmacol 2004; 143:1006–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0706002
crossref pmid pmc
32. Loviscach M, Rehman N, Carter L, et al. Distribution of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) in human skeletal muscle and adipose tissue: relation to insulin action. Diabetologia 2000; 43:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001250050048
crossref pmid pdf
33. Amin RH, Mathews ST, Camp HS, Ding L, Leff T. Selective activation of PPARgamma in skeletal muscle induces endogenous production of adiponectin and protects mice from diet-induced insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2010; 298:E28–37. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00446.2009
crossref pmid
34. Bost F, Caron L, Marchetti I, Dani C, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Binetruy B. Retinoic acid activation of the ERK pathway is required for embryonic stem cell commitment into the adipocyte lineage. Biochem J 2002; 361:621–7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
35. Zubiría MG, Alzamendi A, Moreno G, et al. Relationship between the balance of hypertrophic/hyperplastic adipose tissue expansion and the metabolic profile in a high glucocorticoids model. Nutrients 2016; 8:410 https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8070410
crossref pmc
36. Berry DC, DeSantis D, Soltanian H, Croniger CM, Noy N. Retinoic acid upregulates preadipocyte genes to block adipogenesis and suppress diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 2012; 61:1112–21. https://doi.org/10.2337/db11-1620
crossref pmid pmc
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  • 2 Scopus
  • 2,021 View
  • 104 Download
Related articles

Editorial Office
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies(AAAP)
Room 708 Sammo Sporex, 23, Sillim-ro 59-gil, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08776, Korea   
TEL : +82-2-888-6558    FAX : +82-2-888-6559   
E-mail : animbiosci@gmail.com               

Copyright © 2021 by Animal Bioscience.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next