2. Latorre MA, Medel P, Fuentetaja A, Lázaro R, Mateos GG. Effect of gender, terminal sire line and age at slaughter on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of heavy pigs. Anim Sci 2003; 77:33–45.
4. Alonso V, del Campo MM, Espanol S, Roncales P, Beltran JA. Effect of crossbreeding and gender on meat quality and fatty acid composition in pork. Meat Sci 2009; 81:209–17.
5. Suzuki K, Shibata T, Kadowaki H, Abe H, Toyoshima T. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2003; 64:35–42.
6. Bunter KL, Bennett C, Luxford BG, Graser HU. Sire breed comparisons for meat and eating quality traits in Australian pig populations. Animal 2008; 2:1168–77.
7. Latorre MA, Lazaro R, Gracia MI, Nieto M, Mateos GG. Effect of sex and terminal sire genotype on performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of pigs slaughtered at 117 kg body weight. Meat Sci 2003; 64:1369–77.
9. Chaweewan K, Nakavisut S, Jumparat V, Srisuriya V. Genetic parameters of selection for economic traits over five generations of Pakchong 5 swine. In : Proceeding of the 15th AAAP Animal Science Congress 2012; 2012 Nov 26–30; Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Thailand.
11. Honikel KO. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 1998; 49:447–57.
12. Tuma HJ, Venable JH, Wuthier PR, Henrickson RL. Relationship of fiber diameter to tenderness and meatiness as influenced by Bovine age. J Anim Sci 1962; 21:33–6.
14. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th edGaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
15. Hill F. The solubility of intramuscular collagen in meat animals of various ages. J Food Sci 1966; 31:161–6.
16. SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 17.0 version. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc; 2008.
21. Dube B, Mulugeta SD, Dzama K. Genetic relationship between growth and carcass traits in Large White pigs. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013; 43:482–92.
22. McCann MEE, Beattie VE, Watt D, Moss BW. The effect of boar breed type on reproduction, production performance and carcass and meat quality in pigs. Irish J Agric Food Res 2008; 47:171–85.
23. Faucitano L, Ielo MC, Ster C, et al. Shelf life of pork from five different quality classes. Meat Sci 2010; 84:466–9.
24. Warriss PD, Brown SN. The relationships between initial pH, reflectance and exudation in pig muscle. Meat Sci 1987; 20:65–74.
25. Okrouhlá M, Čítek J, Stupka R, Brzobohatý L, Mahcová M. The effect of gender on the characteristics of muscle fibers in pork. J Cen Eur Agric 2014; 15:64–71.
26. Picard B, Lefaucheur L, Berri C, Duclos MJ. Muscle fibre ontogenesis in farm animal species. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002; 42:415–31.
27. Aberle ED, Forrest JC, Gerrard DE, Mills EW. Principles of meat science. Kendall Hunt Publishing; 2012.
28. Ryu YC, Rhee MS, Kim BC. Estimation of correlation coefficients between histological parameters and carcass traits of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2004; 17:428–33.
30. Bulotienė G, Jukna V. The influence of muscle fibre area on pork quality. Vet Med Zoot 2008; 42:34–7.
31. Christensen M, Kok C, Ertbjerg P. Mechanical properties of type I and type IIB single porcine muscle fibres. Meat Sci 2006; 73:422–5.
33. Font-i-Furnols M, Tous N, Esteve-Garcia E, Gispert M. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content. Meat Sci 2012; 91:448–53.
34. Glinoubol J, Jaturasitha S, Mahinchaib P, Wicke M, Kreuzer M. Effects of crossbreeding Thai native or Duroc pigs with Pietrain pigs on carcass and meat quality. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 2015; 5:133–8.
35. Weston RA, Rogers WR, Althen GT. Review: the role of collagen in meat tenderness. Prof Anim Sci 2002; 18:107–11.