1. Noblet J, Henry Y. Energy evaluation systems for pig diets - a review. Livest Prod Sci 1993;36:121–41.
2. Adeola O. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. Lewis AJ, Southern LL, editorsSwine nutrition. Washington DC: CRC Press; 2001. p. 903–16.
3. Schurch AF, Crampton EW, Haskell SR, Lloyd LE. The use of chromic oxide in digestibility studies with pigs fed
ad libitum in the barn. J Anim Sci 1952;11:261–5.
4. Kavanagh S, Lynch PB, O’Mara F, Caffrey PJ. A comparison of total collection and marker technique for the measurement of apparent digestibility of diets for growing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2001;89:49–58.
5. Wiseman J. Correlation between physical measurements and dietary energy values of wheat for poultry and pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2000;84:1–11.
6. Hetland H, Choct M, Svihus B. Role of insoluble non-starch polysaccharides in poultry nutrition. Worlds Poult Sci J 2004;60:415–22.
7. Potkins ZV, Lawrence TLJ, Thomlinson JR. Effects of structural and nonstructural polysaccharides in the diet of the growing pig on gastric-emptying rate and rate of passage of digesta to the terminal ileum and through the total gastrointestinal-tract. Br J Nutr 1991;65:391–413.
8. Mavromichalis I, Hancock JD, Senne BW, et al. Enzyme supplementation and particle size of wheat in diets for nursery and finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 2000;78:3086–95.
9. Sappok MA, Gutiérrez OP, Smidt H, et al. Adaptation of faecal microbiota in sows after diet changes and consequences for
in vitro fermentation capacity. Animal 2015;9:1453–64.
10. NRC. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th rev edWashington DC: National Academy Press; 2012.
11. Li P, Li DF, Zhang HY, et al. Determination and prediction of energy values in corn distillers dried grains with solubles sources with varying oil content for growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2014;93:3458–70.
12. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th edAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists; Arlington, VA: AOAC International; 2007.
13. Thiex NJ, Anderson S, Gildemeister B. Crude fat, diethyl ether extraction, in feed, cereal grain, and forage (Randall/Soxtec/submersion method): Collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2003;86:888–98.
14. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583–97.
15. Widmer MR, McGinnis LM, Stein HH. Energy, phosphorus, and amino acid digestibility of high-protein distillers dried grans and corn germ fed to growing pigs. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2994–3003.
17. Healy BJ, Hancock JD, Kennedy GA, et al. Optimum particle size of corn and hard and soft sorghum for nursery pigs. J Anim Sci 1994;72:22–7.
18. Wondra KJ, Hancock JD, Behnke KC, Hines RH, Stark CR. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. J Anim Sci 1995;73:757–63.
19. Sao Z, Li Y, Zhang J, et al. Effect of particle size of wheat on nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and gut microbiota in growing pigs. Livest Sci 2015;183:33–9.
20. DeJong JA, DeRouchey JM, Tokach MD, Manhattan KS, et al. Effects of hard red winter wheat particle size in meal diets on finishing pig growth performance, diet digestibility, and caloric efficiency Kansas State University Swine Day 2014. Report of progress 1110 269–275.
21. Choct M, Dersjant-Li Y, McLeish J, Peisker M. Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010;23:1386–98.
22. Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurements of nutritionally important starch fractions. Eur J Clin Nutr 1992;46:S33–S50.
23. Kim JC, Mullan BP, Pluske JR. A comparison of waxy versus non-waxy wheats in diets for weaner pigs: Effects of particle size, enzyme supplementation, and collection day on total tract apparent digestibility and pig performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2005;120:51–65.
24. Li W, Angel R, Kim SW, et al. Age and adaptation to Ca and P deficiencies: 2. Impacts on amino acid digestibility and phytase efficacy in broilers. Poult Sci 2015;94:2917–31.
25. Cunningham HM, Friend DW, Nicholson JWG. The effect of age, body weight, feed intake and adaptability of pigs on the digestibility and nutritive value of cellulose. Can J Anim Sci 1962;42:167–75.
26. Bakker GCM. Interaction between carbohydrates and fat in pigs. PhD dissertation. Wageningen The Netherlands: Wageningen Agricultural University; 1996.
27. Wiseman J, Cole DJA. Energy evaluation of cereals for pig diets. Cole DJA, Haresign W, editorsRecent developments in pig nutrition. Butterworth, London: Recent Developments in Pig Nutrition; 1985. p. 246–62.
28. Villamide MJ. Methods of energy evaluation of feed ingredients for rabbits and their accuracy. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;57:211–23.
29. Villamide MJ, Garcia J, Cervera C, et al. Comparison among methods of nutritional evaluation of dietary ingredients for rabbits. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003;109:195–207.
30. Bolarinwa OA, Adeola O. Direct and regression methods do not give different estimates of digestible and metabolizable energy of wheat for pigs. J Anim Sci 2012;90:390–2.
31. Liu DW, Liu L, Li DF, Wang FL. Determination and prediction of the net energy content of seven feed ingredients fed to growing pigs based on chemical composition. Anim Prod Sci 2015;55:1152–63.
32. Fan MZ, Sauer WC. Determination of apparent ileal amino-acid digestibility in barley and canola-meal for pigs with the direct, difference, and regression methods. J Anim Sci 1995;73:2364–74.
33. Zebrowska T, Kowalczyk J. Endogenous nitrogen losses in monogastrics and ruminants as affected by nutritional factors. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000;13:210–8.