Characterization of the Methylation Status of <i>Pax7</i> and  Myogenic Regulator Factors in Cell Myogenic Differentiation

Zhe Chao; Xin-Li Zheng; Rui-Ping Sun; Hai-Long Liu; Li-Li Huang; Zong-Xi Cao; Chang-Yan Deng; Feng Wang

doi:10.5713/ajas.15.0459

Anim Biosci > Volume 29(7); 2016 > Article

Chao, Zheng, Sun, Liu, Huang, Cao, Deng, and Wang: Characterization of the Methylation Status of Pax7 and Myogenic Regulator Factors in Cell Myogenic Differentiation

Article

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) 2016; 29(7): 1037-1043.

Published online: November 16, 2015

https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0459

Characterization of the Methylation Status of Pax7 and Myogenic Regulator Factors in Cell Myogenic Differentiation

Zhe Chao, Xin-Li Zheng, Rui-Ping Sun, Hai-Long Liu, Li-Li Huang, Zong-Xi Cao, Chang-Yan Deng¹, Feng Wang^*

Institute of Animal Sciences and Veterinary, Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haikou 571100, China

¹College of Animal Science, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

^*Corresponding Author: Feng Wang.
Tel: +86-898-65314685, Fax: +86-898-65314685, E-mail: 503911940@qq.com

Received May 25, 2015 Revised October 01, 2015 Accepted November 13, 2015

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Epigenetic processes in the development of skeletal muscle have been appreciated for over a decade. DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification important for regulating gene expression and suppressing spurious transcription. Up to now, the importance of epigenetic marks in the regulation of Pax7 and myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) expression is far less explored. In the present study, semi-quantitative the real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses showed MyoD and Myf5 were expressed in activated and quiescent C2C12 cells. MyoG was expressed in a later stage of myogenesis. Pax7 was weakly expressed in differentiated C2C12 cells. To further understand the regulation of expression of these genes, the DNA methylation status of Pax7, MyoD, and Myf5 was determined by bisulfite sequencing PCR. During the C2C12 myoblasts fusion process, the changes of promoter and exon 1 methylation of Pax7, MyoD, and Myf5 genes were observed. In addition, an inverse relationship of low methylation and high expression was found. These results suggest that DNA methylation may be an important mechanism regulating Pax7 and MRFs transcription in cell myogenic differentiation.

Keywords: Pax7; Myogenic Regulatory Factors; C2C12; DNA Methylation; CpG Islands

INTRODUCTION

The Pax gene family defines an evolutionary conserved group of transcription factors that play critical roles during organogenesis and tissue homeostasis (Olguin et al., 2007). Two members of the Pax family of transcriptional factors, Pax3 and Pax7, are supposed to be involved in the myogenic cell specification (Horst et al., 2006). The Pax7 gene is indeed a key regulator of muscle cell differentiation in specific populations of adult stem cells and is a good candidate to distinguish activated satellite cells (Caliaro et al., 2005).

Differentiation of mammalian skeletal muscle cells is regulated by members of the MyoD family of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs). These include MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4 (Weintraub, 1993). Cultured myoblasts express one or others of these markers as well. MyoD and Myf5 are required for commitment to myogenic lineage. Myogenin and MRF4 have been reported to have a role in terminal differentiation of the myoblasts (Abe et al., 2009). MRFs and Pax7 appear to play critical roles during satellite cell activation, proliferation and differentiation. Pax7 is expressed almost ubiquitously by quiescent satellite cells and is co-expressed with MyoD in their proliferating myoblast progeny (Collins et al., 2009). In C2C12 immortalised myoblasts, Pax7 has recently been shown to induce chromatin modifications through association with a histone methyltransferase complex and direct binding to regulatory regions of the Myf5 locus. Although some results provide evidence for a functional relationship between Pax7 and the MyoD family of transcription factors, the exact nature of this relationship is controversial.

DNA methylation at CpG dinucleotides is a well-studied epigenetic mechanism, defined as a heritable and enzyme-induced chemical modification of DNA, not altering the DNA sequence (Wu et al., 2007). The frequency of CpG dinucleotides is strikingly low in the mammalian genome. However, approximately half of the human gene promoter regions contain dinucleotide clusters of CpGs, known as “CpG islands”. A large number of experiments have shown that methylation of promoter CpG islands plays an important role in the regulation of gene expression, genomic imprinting, mammalian development, inactivation of the X chromosome, and carcinogenesis (Takai and Jones, 2002; Palacios and Puri, 2006; Nakamura et al., 2014).

Epigenetic changes occur within muscle cells during development, maturation and regeneration. During development, the determination of mesenchymal cells to either a myogenic, adipogenic, osteogenic or chrondrogenic lineage is in part due to stable modifications made to the methylation pattern of DNA that prevents the transcription of genes from other lineages (Barr, 2010). The DNA methylation states of Pax7 and MRFs may serve as an effective indicator of the degree of cell myogenic differentiation. To this purpose, we examined the methylation profile expression of Pax7 and MRFs in the mouse skeletal muscle precursor cell line C2C12. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and bisulfite genomic sequencing show a correlation between the state of DNA methylation within the promoter or exon1 CpG-islands and the levels of Pax7 and MRFs expression in cell myogenic differentiation. These findings suggest that DNA methylation is a major regulator of Pax7 and MRFs transcription in cell myogenic differentiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture

The C2C12 (mouse) skeletal muscle cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Nos. CRL-1772). The cell line was cultured in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Invitrogen, USA) as recommended by the supplier. C2C12 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 2% horse serum (Invitrogen, USA) for differentiation, and harvested at various times (0, 1, 3, 5, 8, or 10 days).

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and semi-quantitative RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated from the cells with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to standard protocols, and the reverse transcription was performed based on the method described previously by Qiao et al. (2010). The PCR primer sequences used for semi-quantitative RT-PCR for Pax7 (NM_011039.2), MyoD (NM_010866.2), Myf5 (NM_008656.5), myogenin (NM_031189.2), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (NM_008084.2) are presented in Supplemental Table 1. The sequences of these genes were obtained from GenBank database.

The Pax7 and MRFs genes mRNA expression in cell myogenic differentiation were detected by semi-quantitative RT-PCR with the GAPDH gene as an internal control, and all PCRs were performed in triplicate. PCR amplifications were carried out in a 50 μL reaction mixture containing 2 μL normalized template cDNA, 1.0 μL of each primer (5 μM), 4.0 μL of each dNTP (2 mM), 5.0 μL of 10×PCR buffer, 4.0 μL of (25 mmol/L) Mg²⁺ and 2 μL (1 U/μL) of Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Burlington, ON, Canada) and 31.0 μL sterile water. The PCR amplification profiles were as follows: 94°C initial denaturation for 4 min, 35 cycles of 94°C denaturation for 40 s, 59°C to 65°C annealing for 40 s, and 72°C extension for 15 to 20 s (according the length of the target fragments), followed by a 10 min extension at 72°C.

DNA isolation and bisulfite modification

Genomic DNA was extracted from the cells according to the standard phenol-chloroform method and stored at −20°C. About 0.5 to 1 μg of genomic DNA was used for subsequent modification. Bisulfite treatment converting all cytosine residues except 5-methylcytosine to uracil was performed by established protocols (Frommer et al., 1992).

PCR amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA and sequencing

All mutagenized DNA was subjected to three independent nested amplifications, to eliminate the sampling bias of PCR. About 2 μL of bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified using specific primers (Table 1), which were designed by Methyl Primer Express Software v1.0 (ABI, Foster, CA, USA). Taq DNA polymerase (Fermentas, Canada) was used for the two rounds of PCR, following the annealing temperatures described in Table 1.

For sequence analysis, the PCR products were cloned into the pMD 18-T cloning vector (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and 10 individual clones were sequenced.

CpG islands identification

CpG islands were predicted using an online software (http://www.urogene.org/methprimer/index1.html).

RESULTS

Expression analysis of Pax7 and MRFs genes in myogenic differentiation in C2C12 cells

To investigate the differential expression of Pax7 and MRFs during myoblasts differentiation, cultured C2C12 myoblasts were induced to differentiate. Myotubes started to appear at day 3 and became more evident at days 5, 7, and 10 (Supplementary Figure S1). As shown in Figure 1, MyoD and Myf5 were expressed at 0 d with a relatively low level then increased to a peak at 3 d. Myogenin was hardly expressed at 0 d and 1 d, and then increased within the first 5 d after the induction of differentiation. Increased MyoD/Myf5/myogenin mRNA levels from 0 d to 5 d confirmed that the cells had undergone differentiation. During the whole duration of cell differentiation, a low level mRNA of Pax7 can be detected.

DNA methylation pattern of the MyoD in myogenic differentiation

To determine DNA methylation changes during myogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells, we analyzed the methylation states around the promoter regions of several marker genes (MyoD, Myf5, and Pax7). Total genomic DNA was isolated from C2C12 cells of 0 d, 3 d, and 5 d (differentiation), respectively. DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, chemically introduced a C to T conversion at unmethylated cytosines.

Firstly, the methylation status of the MyoD gene was investigated. The mouse MyoD gene sequence was determined including three exons and two introns. Figure 2A illustrates the exon 1 region of the MyoD gene where we might obtain a big CpG island in DNA sequence of MyoD gene exon 1 from −50 to +618 bp (translation start site: +1). Bisulfite sequencing analysis indicated that a differentially methylated region was found from −13 to +296 bp, which contains a total of 22 CpG sites (Figure 2A). Methylation levels reached 76.4%, 60.9%, and 69.1% at 0 d, 3 d, and 5 d, respectively (Figure 2B).

DNA methylation pattern of the Myf5 in myogenic differentiation

Next, the research focused on the methylation status of the Myf5 gene, which contains three exons and two introns. Myf5 is devoid of CpG islands near the promoter and exon 1. The region (−1,105 to −806 bp) with relatively high CpG density (12 CpG sites) was selected for methylation analysis (Figure 3A). A significant variation in methylation status of this region in C2C12 cells of different stages of myogenic differentiation was observed. The percentage methylation of this region at 0 d, 3 d, and 5 d was 60%, 100%, and 47.5%, respectively (Figure 3B).

DNA methylation pattern of the Pax7 in myogenic differentiation

Analysis of the sequencing data revealed that the mouse Pax7 gene contains nine exons and eight introns. The structure of the analysed CpG islands and their locations within the Pax7 gene is shown in Figure 4A. We examined both of the first CpG islands, extending from −777 to −210 positions, and the second CpG island, extending from −106 to +529 positions, in the promoter and exon 1 of the Pax7 gene. A differentially methylated region was found in DNA sequence of Pax7 gene promoter from −517 to −227 bp, which contains a total of 20 CpG sites (Figure 4A). Methylation levels reached 0%, 8%, and 18.5% at 0 d, 3 d, and 5 d, respectively (Figure 4B).

DISCUSSION

Skeletal muscle development occurs in several defined steps. Mesoderm-derived precursor cells become committed to the myogenic lineage and develop into myoblasts, which subsequently fuse to form myotubes. Later, myotubes mature into multinucleated, highly specialized muscle fibers that show cross striation (Steffens et al., 2011). Differentiation involves various cellular changes, including physiology, structural architecture and functions (Xiong et al., 2011). Every event in the course of differentiation should be accompanied by coordinated expression and/or repression of certain subsets of genes (Yeo et al., 2007). DNA methylation can regulate the expression of many vital genes while the base compositions of these genes do not change. It is very important to the growth and development of organism. Consequently, clarifying the relationship between gene expression and DNA methylation during C2C12 myoblasts fusion process should enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying muscle development.

Great care was taken in all the optimization steps for validating the semi-quantitative PCR method used in this study, and the appropriate controls were included. GAPDH was used as an internal housekeeping gene to normalize total RNA input and reaction efficiency. GAPDH has been used as an internal control because it is ubiquitously expressed, in moderately abundant levels in almost all cell types and in general, its expression is not influenced by any hormonal treatment (Ghai et al., 2010). In present system, the expression pattern of control gene in all samples studied was found to be uniform.

Previous work concerning MyoD has indicated a constitutive expression at the myoblast stage (Dedieu et al., 2002). Some observations showed that the MRFs investigated are all expressed during postnatal phases of pig development although a descending trend was detected from day 1 towards day 20 and day 50 after birth for MyoD, Myf5, and myogenin but not myostatin and Pax7 (Caliaro et al., 2005). Our results complete these studies and show that MyoD is expressed throughout the process of fusion and even at the later stages of differentiation. The methylation patterns we observed may be relevant to transcriptional silencing of the MyoD gene, higher methylation being correlated with lower expression. Studies have shown that CpG islands are mainly distributed in the promoter and first exon of the genes (Butcher and Beck, 2008). In skeletal muscle tissues, the exon 1 hypermethylation status of myostatin gene was found to be negatively correlated with the gene expression (Liu et al., 2010). In addition, Kim et al. (2008) demonstrated prominent hypermethylation of CpG dinucleotides in TCF4 exon 1, which significantly correlates with gene inactivation in early stage gastric cancers and in intestinal-type gastric cancers.

The expression patterns of MyoD/Myf5/myogenin have proven that the cells undergo differentiation. Our data showed that CpG methylation in Pax7 promoter gradually increased in an day-dependent manner during differentiation of C2C12—the average percent of methylated CpG sites ranging from 0% at 0 d to 18.5% at 5 d. Fan et al. (2002) reported that CpG island methylation was a gradual process, that was, a cytosine base existing in each CpG island was gradually being methylated. The methylation of critical CpG sites decreases gene expression and causes gene silence. Over the past decade, a large number of studies focused on the mechanism of mRNA expression levels and methylation. Methyl groups of CpG sites can directly interfere with binding of transcription factors to their recognition cis elements or, on the other side, can facilitate interaction with a family of methyl-binding proteins. Upon binding to methylated DNA, these proteins can mask binding sites for transcription factors or recruit chromatin-modifying enzymes to silence particular DNA loci (Zelko et al., 2010).

There is not one standard CpG island in Myf5 gene sequence. So we chose to examine one region with relatively high CpG density. In the present study, methylation of the Myf5 gene is a dynamic process. Nevertheless, expression level of Myf5 is not inversely correlated with DNA methylation status. It was reported that a third of the genes analyzed show inverse correlation between the state of DNA methylation in the 5′-regulatory regions and gene expression, whereas the methylation state did not correlate with mRNA expression levels for 63% of the genes (Eckhardt et al., 2006; Fan et al., 2011). These data suggest that chromosomal regions near the promoters of Myf5 gene do not contain the necessary cis-acting regulatory factors required for its expression, and that further studies are necessary to determine the mechanism of Myf5 expression. In addition, only one region with relatively high CpG density in promoter region of Myf5 gene was investigated. The importance of the other regions needs further analysis and comparison.

The observed expression pattern of myogenin is in agreement with the published data. Myogenin is the only MRFs gene expressed in all skeletal muscle cell lines. With the onset of myogenin expression, cells are withdrawn from the cell cycle and start to fuse into myofibres (Verner et al., 2007). Although there is a weak CpG island in myogenin promoter, it has been shown that methylation status of the weak CpG island plays an important role in the activation of myogenin (Steffens et al., 2011).

Collectively, our results indicate that DNA methylation within CpG islands during cell differentiation is associated with a variety of gene regulatory processes, including transcriptional regulation. However, one representative gene, Myf5, which does not contain canonical CpG islands within the promoter region, displays some degree of methylation upon differentiation. The gene expression seems to also be regulated by several mechanisms in addition to direct DNA methylation, suggesting that novel approaches are required to gain a comprehensive understanding of transcriptional regulation in myogenic differentiation.

Supplementary Material

ajas-29-7-1037-supplementary.pdf

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31560628), National “863” project of China (2011AA100302), Hainan science projects (13-214002-0001, KYYS-2014-33, KYYS-2015-02) and Hainan Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project (CXZX201414).

Figure 1

Expression analyses of MRFs and Pax7 genes in differentiated C2C12 cells. M: DNA Ladder. MRFs, myogenic regulatory factors.

Figure 2

Genomic structure of mouse MyoD gene and relative CpG islands (A). Exons are depicted as solid boxes. Right-angled arrowhead indicates the translation start site. Open grey box represents CpG islands; the results of bisulfite sequencing analysis (B). Each line represents an individual sequence molecule, with each circle corresponding to a separate CpGs. Black and white circles indicate methylated and unmethylated CpGs respectively.

Figure 3

Genomic structure of mouse Myf5 gene (A). Exons are depicted as solid boxes. Right-angled arrowhead indicates the translation start site; the results of bisulfite sequencing analysis (B). Each line represents an individual sequence molecule, with each circle corresponding to a separate CpGs. Black and white circles indicate methylated and unmethylated CpGs respectively.

Figure 4

Genomic structure of mouse Pax7 gene and relative CpG islands (A). Exons are depicted as solid boxes. Right-angled arrowhead indicates the translation start site. Open grey boxes represent CpG islands; the results of bisulfite sequencing analysis (B). Each line represents an individual sequence molecule, with each circle corresponding to a separate CpGs. Black and white circles indicate methylated and unmethylated CpGs respectively.

Table 1

Primers used for nested polymerase chain reaction

Gene	Primer name	Primer sequence(5′→3′)	AT (°C)	Size (bp)
MyoD	Outside forward	ATTTAGGAATTGGGATATGGAG	62	402
	Outside reverse	AAAACCTCATTCACTTTACTCAAA
	Inside forward	TAGGAATTGGGATATGGAGTTTT	63	309
	Inside reverse	TTACAAACCCACAACAAACAAC
Myf5	Outside forward	GGTATTTTTGAAAGGTTTTTGTT	58	417
	Outside reverse	AAATAAACCAAATAACCTTCCC
	Inside forward	GGTGTTAGTTGGTTTGAAAAGT	60	300
	Inside reverse	AAATAAACCAAATAACCTTCCC
Pax7	Outside forward	TAGGGTGTGAGGGTTAGTAGAA	60	297
	Outside reverse	ACAAAAAAATTCAAACAAACAAA
	Inside forward	GGTGTGAGGGTTAGTAGAAAGA	61	291
	Inside reverse	AAAAAATTCAAACAAACAAACACT

AT, annealing temperature.

REFERENCES

Abe S, Rhee S, Iwanuma O, Hiroki E, Yanagisawa N, Sakiyama K, Ide Y. 2009. Effect of mechanical stretching on expressions of muscle specific transcription factors MyoD, Myf5, Myogenin and MRF4 in proliferated myoblasts. Anat Histol Embryol 38:305–310.

Baar K. 2010. Epigenetic control of skeletal muscle fibre type. Acta Physiol 199:477487.

Butcher LM, Beck S. 2008. Future impact of integrated high-throughput methylome analyses on human health and disease. J Genet Genomics 35:391–401.

Caliaro F, Maccatrozzo L, Toniolo L, Reggiani C, Mascarello F, Patruno M. 2005. Myogenic regulatory factors expressed during postnatal hyperplastic growth in porcine muscles. Basic Appl Myol 15:55–60.

Collins CA, Gnocchi VF, White RB, Boldrin L, Perez-Ruiz A, Relaix F, Morgan JE, Zammit PS. 2009. Integrated functions of Pax3 and Pax7 in the regulation of proliferation, cell size and myogenic differentiation. PloS one 4:e4475.

Dedieu S, Mazères G, Cottin P, Brustis JJ. 2002. Involvement of myogenic regulator factors during fusion in the cell line C. Int J Dev Biol 46:235–241.

Eckhardt F, Lewin J, Cortese R, Rakyan VK, Attwood J, Burger M, Burton J, Cox TV, Davies R, Down TA, et al. 2006. DNA methylation profiling of human chromosomes 6, 20 and 22. Nat Genet 38:1378–1385.

Fan H, Cinar MU, Phatsara C, Tesfaye D, Tholen E, Looft C, Schellander K. 2011. Molecular mechanism underlying the differential MYF6 expression in postnatal skeletal muscle of Duroc and Pietrain breeds. Gene 486:8–14.

Fan X, Inda M, Tunon T, Castresana JS. 2002. Improvement of the methylation specific PCR technical conditions for the detection of p16 promoter hypermethylation in small amounts of tumor DNA. Oncol Rep 9:181–183.

Frommer M, McDonald LE, Millar DS, Collis CM, Watt F, Grigg GW, Molloy PL, Paul CL. 1992. A genomic sequencing protocol that yields a positive display of 5-methylcytosine residues in individual DNA strands. Proc Natil Acad Sci USA 89:1827–1831.

Ghai S, Monga R, Mohanty TK, Chauhan MS, Singh D. 2010. Tissue-specific promoter methylation coincides with Cyp19 gene expression in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) placenta of different stages of gestation. Gen Comp Endocrinol 169:182–189.

Horst D, Ustanina S, Sergi C, Mikuz G, Jurgens H, Braun T, Vorobyov E. 2006. Comparative expression analysis of Pax3 and Pax7 during mouse myogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 50:47–54.

Kim SK, Jang HR, Kim JH, Kim M, Noh SM, Song KS, Kang GH, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Yoo HS, Kim YS. 2008. CpG methylation in exon 1 of transcription factor 4 increases with age in normal gastric mucosa and is associated with gene silencing in intestinal-type gastric cancers. Carcinogenesis 29:1623–1631.

Liu GQ, Zong K, Zhang LL, Cao SQ. 2010. Dietary methionine affect meat qulity and myostatin gene exon 1 region methylation in skeletal muscle tissues of broilers. Agric Sci China 9:1338–1346.

Nakamura J, Tanaka T, Kitajima Y, Noshiro H, Miyazaki K. 2014. Methylation-mediated gene silencing as biomarkers of gastric cancer: a review. World J Gastroenterol 20:11991–12006.

Olguin HC, Yang Z, Tapscott SJ, Olwin BB. 2007. Reciprocal inhibition between Pax7 and muscle regulatory factors modulates myogenic cell fate determination. J Cell Biol 177:769–779.

Palacios D, Puri PL. 2006. The epigenetic network regulating muscle development and regeneration. J Cell Physiol 207:1–11.

Qiao MH, Wu Y, Li FE, Jiang SW, Xiong YZ, Deng CY. 2010. Molecular characterization, expression profile and association analysis with carcass traits of porcine LCAT gene. Mol Biol Rep 37:2227–2234.

Steffens AA, Hong GM, Bain LJ. 2011. Sodium arsenite delays the differentiation of C2C12 mouse myoblast cells and alters methylation patterns on the transcription factor myogenin. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 250:154–161.

Takai D, Jones PA. 2002. Comprehensive analysis of CpG islands in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Proc Nati Acad Sci USA 99:3740–3745.

Verner J, Humpolícek P, Knoll A. 2007. Impact of MYOD family genes on pork traits in Large White and Landrace pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 124:81–85.

Weintraub H. 1993. The MyoD family and myogenesis: Redundancy, networks, and thresholds. Cell 75:1241–1244.

Wu Q, Lothe RA, Ahlquist T, Silins I, Tropé CG, Micci F, Nesland JM, Suo Z, Lind GE. 2007. DNA methylation profiling of ovarian carcinomas and their in vitro models identifies HOXA9, HOXB5, SCGB3A1, and CRABP1 as novel targets. Mol Cancer 6:45.

Xiong Q, Chai J, Zhang PP, Wu J, Jiang SW, Zheng R, Deng CY. 2011. MyoD control of SKIP expression during pig skeletal muscle development. Mol Biol Rep 38:267–274.

Yeo S, Jeong S, Kim J, Han JS, Han YM, Kang YK. 2007. Characterization of DNA methylation change in stem cell marker genes during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 359:536–542.

Zelko IN, Mueller MR, Folz RJ. 2010. CpG methylation attenuates Sp1 and Sp3 binding to the human extracellular superoxide dismutase promoter and regulates its cell-specific expression. Free Radic Biol Med 48:895–904.