Metabolisable Energy, In situ Rumen Degradation and In vitro Fermentation Characteristics of Linted Cottonseed Hulls, Delinted Cottonseed Hulls and Cottonseed Linter Residue

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2012;25(2):240-247
Publication date (electronic) : 2012 February 01
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11304
1College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumuqi 830052, China.
*Corresponding Author : H. J. Yang. Tel: +86-10-6273-3124, Fax: +86-10-6273-4859, E-mail: yang_hongjian@sina.com
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University (CAU), Beijing 100193, China
Received 2011 August 29; Accepted 2011 November 06.

Abstract

Dietary supplementation with conventional linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) is a common practice in livestock production all over the world. However, supplementation with mechanically delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR) is uncommon. Cottonseed by-products, including LCSH, DCSH and CLR, were assessed by chemical analysis, an in situ nylon bag technique, an in vitro cumulative gas production technique and in vitro enzyme procedure. The crude protein (CP) content of CLR (302 g/kg dry matter (DM)) was approximately 3 times that of LCSH and 5 times that of DCSH. The crude fat content was approximately 3 times higher in CLR (269 g/kg DM) than in LCSH and 4 times higher than in DCSH. Neutral detergent fibre (311 g/kg DM) and acid detergent fibre (243 g/kg DM) contents of CLR were less than half those of DCSH or LCSH. Metabolisable energy, estimated by in vitro gas production and chemical analyses, ranked as follows: CLR (12.69 kJ/kg DM)>LCSH (7.32 kJ/kg DM)>DCSH (5.82 kJ/kg DM). The in situ degradation trial showed that the highest values of effective degradability of DM and CP were obtained for CLR (p<0.05). The in vitro disappearance of ruminal DM ranked as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). The lowest digestibility was observed for DCSH with a two-step in vitro digestion procedure (p<0.05). The potential gas production in the batch cultures did not differ for any of the three cottonseed by-product feeds. The highest concentration of total volatile fatty acids was observed in CLR after a 72 h incubation (p<0.05). The molar portions of methane were similar between all three treatments, with an average gas production of 22% (molar). The CLR contained a higher level of CP than did LCSH and DCSH, and CLR fermentation produced more propionate. The DCSH and LCSH had more NDF and ADF, which fermented into greater amounts of acetate.

INTRODUCTION

The Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region (province), located in the most northwest area of China, produces 95% of China’s long lint cotton (Gossypium spp.). In 2010, the cotton cultivation area in Xinjiang was estimated at more than 109 ha, with an annual yield of about 2.6 million tons (The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China, 2010). After the cotton is harvested and ginned to remove the long lint fibres, the cottonseed by-products (CSBPs) become a readily available non-conventional feed resource for local livestock producers. Ginning typically generates 100 to 120 g of cotton fibres per kg of harvested cotton (Moreira et al., 2004). The remainder is predominantly linted whole cottonseed, which has high levels of metabolizable energy, protein and effective degradable fiber. In developed countries, linted cottonseed is used to replace protein, forage, or grain in ruminant diets (Harvatine et al., 2002; Bertrand, 2005).

Typically, linted cottonseed is run in one direction through a fine set of gin saws to remove short cotton fibres. This leaves mechanically delinted whole cottonseed, which is then usually crushed into a meal and oil fraction. The oil removal process (solvent extraction) is similar to that used in the soybean, flax and canola crushing industry. The meal has been well accepted as a protein supplement for dairy, other livestock and poultry. Mechanically delinted whole cottonseed can also be fed directly to ruminants and is preferred by feed manufacturing firms because of its ease of mechanical handing.

Linted whole cottonseed can also be delinted by sulphuric acid treatment, which leaves a completely slick seed with no usable short fibres. This slick seed is used as a seed stock because it flows well in mechanical cottonseed planters. Acid delinted whole cottonseed can also be fed to livestock, but it is often unpalatable due to odours associated with sulphuric acid. Linted whole cottonseed can also be dehulled, which results in kernels and 250 to 380 g/kg of linted cottonseed hulls (Kromer, 1977). The kernels are mechanically pressed or chemically extracted to produce cottonseed oil, with yields of 150 to 200 g of oil and 470 to 500 g of cottonseed kernel meal per kg of whole linted cottonseed (Cherry, 1983). It is still a luxury to use linted whole cottonseed or delinted whole cottonseed directly in ruminant diets in Xinjiang or other places in China, but the linted cottonseed hulls are routinely used as either roughage for cattle or as a main ingredient of a culture medium for edible mushrooms (Hale et al., 1963).

The long cotton linters that are retained on the hulls, when incubated in sacco and in vitro for periods varying from 12 to 120 h, show a delayed digestibility after colonization. This is due to the highly crystalline structure of long cotton fibres, which hydrate slowly. This lag in cotton long fibre digestion would be expected to increase the pool size of undigested fibre in ruminants fed whole linted cottonseed (Palmquist, 1995). No literature has yet been published regarding the nutritive value of short cotton linters.

In general, linted cottonseed hulls have a low crude protein content ranging from 40 to 120 g/kg dry matter (DM), high neutral detergent fibre ranging from 735 to 890 g/kg DM and a large proportion of acid detergent lignin is negatively correlated with digestibility of DM and fibre (Hsu et al., 1987; Garleb et al., 1988). However, conventional linted cottonseed hulls, when added to low fibre diets, are believed to have greater feeding value than their digestibility indicates (Coppock et al., 1987). Linted cottonseed hulls are well accepted by livestock producers in Xinjiang, on those occasions when income from mushrooms is low and linted cottonseed hulls material is readily available.

Cottonseed short linter residue (CLR) is a material that consists of cotton short linters arising from a fine cottonseed hull delinting process, together with kernels culled before cottonseed oil extraction. No experimental data are yet available to compare feeding of linted versus CLR. Compared to conventional linted cottonseed hulls, delinted cottonseed hulls and CLR have not been as readily accepted by local farmers, due largely to a lack of knowledge regarding their nutritive value. The objective of the present study was to assess the CLR cottonseed by-product in terms of nutrient composition, metabolizable energy content, in situ ruminal degradation and in vitro fermentation characteristics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cottonseed by-products

The locations of Changji (87°31′E, 44°05′N), Shihezi (85°94′E, 37°49′N) and Kuitun (84°89′E, 44°45′N) are important sites in the northern region of Tianshan Mountain in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China for the production of long lint cotton (Gossypium spp.). In each location, representative samples of lint cottonseed hull (LCSH), delinted cottonseed hull (DCSH) and CLR were collected from two cottonseed oil-extracting plants. All samples were dried at 65°C for 24 h in a forced air oven, ground to pass through a 1.18-mm screen and stored prior to chemical analyses, in situ degradation trials and in vitro batch culture trials.

Animals and feeding

Three lactating Holstein dairy cows, each fitted with a ruminal cannula (Bar Diamond Inc., Parma, Idaho, USA), were fed 25 kg of a total mixed ration with a DM content of 520 g/kg, divided in equal portions and offered daily at 06:00 and 18:00. The animals had free access to water. The ration, on an as-fed basis, consisted of 83 g alfalfa hay, 167 g Chinese wild rye grass hay, 250 g corn silage, 267 g maize meal, 68.9 g wheat bran, 137.5 g soybean meal, 11.1 g limestone, 6.1 g dicalcium phosphate, 4.4 g sodium chloride and 5.0 g commercial vitamin and trace mineral premix (per kg DM). The net energy for lactation and the crude protein (CP) content (per kg of the ration as fed) were 6.17 MJ and 138.7 g, respectively.

In situ degradation trial

Nylon bags (12 cm×8 cm i.d. and 48 μm of pore size) were filled with 3 g cottonseed material sample (1.18-mm) and incubated in the rumen for periods of 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 48 and 72 h. Duplicate bags were incubated in each animal for each incubation time. All bags were placed in the rumen simultaneously, just before the animals were offered their first meal of the morning. After removal from the incubation, the bags were washed with tap water for 15 min until the washing water was clear. The same procedure was used for two series of two bags to obtain the 0 h value. For each animal and incubation time, bags were dried at 65°C for 48 h and analysed for DM and nitrogen (N).

In vitro gas production trial

A total of 500 mg of each cottonseed material feeds (1.18-mm) was placed into 120 ml glass bottles containing 25 ml of a medium (pH 6.8; Menke and Steingass, 1988) containing rumen liquor that had been filtered through 4 layers of cheesecloth. The rumen liquor was collected from the animals one hour after the morning feeding. The entire batch culture was conducted and repeated in five runs.

In the automated system, 5 bottles were set up for each cottonseed feed per run. The bottles were purged with N2 for 5 s, sealed with butyl rubber stoppers and Hungate’s screw caps, connected to the gas inlets of an automated gas production recording system and incubated at 39°C, as described by Zhang and Yang (2011). A 3.0 ml calibrated cumulative gas production for each vent was automatically recorded with a differential pressure switch (pressure range: 20 to 300 pa, Huba Control Inc., USA) when the pressure inside the bottle had reached 100 pa. Cumulative gas production in each bottle was recorded against time of incubation.

In the manually operated system, extra 5 bottles of the same size, containing the same medium, inoculum and cottonseed material as in the automated system trial were connected to pre-emptied airbags and incubated at 39°C. This allowed collection of whole fermentation gas end products for later analysis of CO2, CH4 and H2 composition. In both incubation systems, five bottles without any cottonseed substrate were included in each run as blanks and, if necessary, to correct for variation between the runs caused by differences in the rumen fluid inoculum collected at different periods.

After 72 h incubation, three 1.0 ml gas samples were removed from the airbags used in the manual incubation system and were immediately analysed for CO2, CH4 and H2 concentration using the gas chromatographic method of Zhang and Yang (2011). For both the automatic and manual systems, 1 ml of the culture fluids from each bottle was mixed with 0.3 ml of 250 g/L meta-phosphoric acid solution, incubated for 30 min and then centrifuged at 10,000×g at 4°C for 15 min. Ammonia N concentration in the supernatants was then measured by spectrophotometry (Verdouw et al., 1978), and the concentrations of volatile fatty acids (VFA), including acetate, propionate, butyrate, iso-butyrate, valerate and iso-valerate, were measured by the gas chromatographic method described by Zhang and Yang (2011).

The biomass cultures remaining in the bottles were centrifuged at 4,000×g at 4°C for 30 min, and the pellets were dried at 105°C. In vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD1) was calculated as the loss in DM, represented as the difference between the incubated DM and residual DM, corrected by blanks.

Two step in vitro DM digestion trial

Following the method of Tilley and Terry (1963), 500 mg of CSBP samples (1.18 mm) were incubated at 39°C for 24 h with 50 ml McDougall’s buffer (containing 9.8 g NaHCO3, 2.77 g Na2HPO4, 0.57 g KCl, 0.47 g NaCl, 0.12 g MgSO4.7H2O, and 0.16 g CaCl2.2H2O per litre) and 25 ml filtered rumen liquor, followed by a 24 h acid-pepsin digestion at 39°C. Five blanks without CSBP sample were also run. The biomass cultures were centrifuged at 4,000×g for 20 min and the pellets were dried at 105°C for the determination of the residual DM. The two-step in vitro DM disappearance (IVDMD2) was calculated as the difference between the original incubated DM and the residual DM, corrected by the blank readings. All analyses were performed using five replicates for each feed.

Chemical analyses

For the representative CSBP samples and the residues used in the trials, the chemical analysis methods of AOAC (1999) were followed to determine the DM (method ID 934.15), ether extract (EE, method ID 920.30), CP (N×6.25; method ID 984.13), calcium (method ID 968.08) and total phosphorous (method ID 995.11) levels. Neutral detergent fibre (NDFom; not assayed with a heat stable amylase) and acid detergent fibre (ADFom) were analysed following the method of Van Soest et al. (1991) and the data were expressed without residual ash.

Biometric analyses

The ruminal disappearance (Y) of DM and CP at time (t) was fitted to an exponential model by an iterative regression analysis (Ørskov and McDonald, 1979) using the nonlinear (NLIN) procedure of SAS (1999). The model is described by Eq. (1):

(1) Y=a+b×(1-e-c×t)

where ‘e’ is the base of a natural logarithm; the constant ‘a’ represents the soluble and very rapidly degradable component and ‘b’ represents the insoluble, but potentially degradable, component, which has a constant degradation rate (c) per unit time.

The effective degradabilities (EDs) of DM and CP were then estimated using Eq. (2) (Ørskov and McDonald 1979):

(2) ED=a+b×cc+k

where ‘k’ refers to the fractional outflow rate. A value of 0.06/h was assumed for k, as suggested in the literature (INRA, 1988).

The cumulative gas production (Y, ml/g DM) at time (t) was fitted to the same exponential model as in Eq. (1). In this model, the constant ‘a’ represents gas production of the soluble and very rapidly degradable nutrients, while ‘b’ represents gas production of the insoluble but potentially degradable nutrients that generate fermentation gases at a constant fractional rate (c) per unit time. A sum of parameters ‘a’ and ‘b’ was assumed to represent maximum gas production at infinite time because parameters ‘a’ and ‘b’ cannot be measured separately in vitro.

The in vitro 24 h gas production from 200 mg DM of the CSBPs was extrapolated according to the gas production Eq. (1). Metabolisable energy (ME) of CSBPs was calculated with the empirical equations noted in Table 2. Data for ME for three CSBPs were analysed using a general linear model procedure of SAS (1999), and the means of ME between CSBPs were compared using Duncan’s test.

Metabolisable energy (ME) of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR) estimated by in vitro ruminal gas production and chemical composition

Individual VFAs were summed to give a total VFA concentration. Iso-butyrate and iso-valerate were summed as the branched chain VFAs (BCVFA). The ratio of nonglucogenic to glucogenic acids (NGR; Ørskov, 1975) was calculated using Eq. (3):

(3) NGR=Acetate+2×Butyrate+ValeratePropionate+Valerate

For comparison between CSBPs, data for the in situ degradation (animal replicate: N = 3) and in vitro batch culture trials (batch replicate: N = 5) were subjected to one-way analysis of variance. On detection of overall significant differences by analysis of variance, multiple comparisons among least square means were carried out by Duncan’s new multiple range test. The means and standard errors of least square means were reported in the result tables. Significance was declared at p<0.05, unless otherwise noted.

RESULTS

Nutrient composition and estimated metabolisable energy

Table 1 shows the CP content ranking to be as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). The NDFom and ADFom contents ranking was as follows: DCSH>LCSH>CLR (p<0.05); and the EE content ranking was CLR>LCSH> DCSH (p<0.05). The calcium content was higher in DCSH and LCSH than in CLR feeds (p<0.05). Total phosphorus content ranking was as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). As shown in Table 2, ME content ranked as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05).

Chemical composition (g/kg DM) of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR)

In situ DM and CP degradation kinetics

For the DM degradation kinetics shown in Table 3, the ‘a’ value ranking was CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). The ‘b’ values of these CSBPs ranked as follows: DCSH> LCSH>CLR (p<0.05). The degradation rate ‘c’ ranking was CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). Consequently, the highest value of ED was found for CLR, followed by LCSH and DCSH in that order (p<0.05).

In situ dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR)

For the CP degradation kinetics shown in Table 3, a high value of parameter ‘a’ occurred for CLR (p<0.05), whereas no difference was noted between DCSH and LCSH. Both the parameters ‘b’ and ‘c’ ranked as CLR>LCSH> DCSH (p<0.05). Consequently, the ED ranked as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05).

In vitro dry matter digestibility and fermentation characteristics

As shown in Table 4, the values for the one-step measured IVDMD1 ranked as follows: CLR>LCSH> DCSH (p<0.05). No differences were observed for the values for the two-step measured IVDMD2 obtained for LCSH and CLR. The lowest value of IVDMD2 was observed for DCSH (p<0.05).

In vitro dry matter digestibility and fermentation characteristics of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR) after 72 h incubation

Ammonia N concentration showed no differences between LCSH and CLR, and the lowest ammonia N concentration was found for DCSH (p<0.05). The highest means for total VFA concentration and molar propionate proportion were found for CLR (p<0.05). No difference was found between LCSH and CLR. Molar proportions of acetate, butyrate, valerate and BCVFA were similar among the three CSBPs, but molar propionate proportion ranking was CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). The lowest value of NGR occurred with CLR (p<0.05), and no difference for NGR was noted between DCSH and LCSH.

The maximum gas production ‘a+b’ value was similar between CLR and LCSH, but their means were greater than the mean for DCSH (p<0.05). The gas production rate ‘c’ value ranked as follows: CLR>LCSH>DCSH (p<0.05). Molar proportions of CO2, CH4 and H2 did not statistically differ among the tested CSBPs.

DISCUSSION

Nutrient composition of the CSBPs

Many agricultural residues are poorly digested by ruminants because of their high content of cell wall materials. Physical and chemical methods are often used to break down the lignocellulosic materials of some agricultural residues and thereby improve the feeding value of crop residues such as stalks or straws. Oltjen et al. (1977) found that cottonseed hulls were more readily consumed (3.1% of body weight (BW)) than were chopped barley straw (2.0% of BW) or corn stover (1.4% of BW). In the present study, the CP contents of DCSH and LCSH were close to literature values reported for the lower limit (40 g/kg DM) and upper limit (124 g/kg DM), respectively, for cottonseed hulls (Hsu, 1987; Garleb, 1988). The lower CP and higher fibre contents seen in DCSH compared to LCSH may be explained by the short delinting process, which might remove hull-associated protein, and the removal of the protein free short linters. The CP content in DCSH was somewhat higher than that reported for wheat straw (52 g/kg DM; Chriyaa, 1997) and the CP content of LCSH was similar to that reported for tall fescue and soybean stover and hulls (National Research Council (NRC), 1989).

The CLR product was actually a mixture of short linter dust and culled cottonseed kernels discarded in the process of cottonseed extraction. The exact ratio of short linter waste to culled cottonseed kernels was not determined in the present study. The CLR had a high CP content (302.2 g/kg DM), close to that of different varieties of cottonseed hulls (230 to 303 g/kg DM) reported in the literature (Fadel, 1999; Robinson et al., 2001). The EE content of CLR (268.7 g/kg DM) was close to that of delinted cottonseeds reviewed by Coppock et al. (1987) and greater than that of whole cottonseeds reported by Sullivan et al. (1993) and NRC (1989). These results indicated that a substantial portion of culled cottonseed kernels had been mixed with short linter dust to result in the CLR cottonseed by-product. The calcium content was comparable among the three CSBPs, but CLR had substantial phosphorus content.

Metabolisable energy prediction of CSBPs

In the present study, the ME value for CLR was greater than that determined for LCSH and almost twice that found for DCSH. The ME content of CLR was close to previously estimated ME contents of whole cottonseed and soybean meal (Getachew et al., 2002; Granger et al., 2010) and was at least 20% higher than that reported for corn silage, alfalfa hay and fresh napier grass (Lee et al., 2000). A greater ME content was observed for LCSH than for DCSH and was comparable to the ME value determined for dehydrated alfalfa meal (NRC, 1989).

In situ and in vitro degradability of CSBPs

In the last few decades, several high energy, high fibre alternative feeds have been categorized as either concentrates or forages. The concentrate group includes linted whole cottonseed, dried distillers grains and dried brewers grains, whereas the forage group includes, beet pulp, soy hulls, cottonseed hulls and others. These feeds can be economical sources of fibre, energy, indigestible and degradable protein and other nutrients. In the present paper, the in situ and in vitro trials indicated a greater digestibility and fermentability of CLR than was seen for either LCSH or DCSH. This suggests that the ruminal degradation rate for the CSBPs should correlate positively with the ratio of kernel content to short linter. In the present study, the in situ DM and CP kinetic parameter ‘c’ and the ED of CLR were higher than for the other two feeds, which suggested that CLR had a higher degradable kernel CP content in CLR than was present in the other two CSBPs.

Moreira et al. (2004) reported that mechanically delinted whole cottonseed was just as effective a feed as linted whole cottonseed, as determined by dairy cow milk yield and milk composition. However, a negative interaction was noted when a combination of cottonseed hulls and cotton long linter were fed to ruminants (Coppock et al., 1985; Sullivan et al., 1993). Palmquist (1995) observed that addition of cottonseed long fibre decreased fibre digestibility because it increased the pool size of undigested fibre in the rumen. In the present study, both in situ and in vitro ruminal degradation of DM and CP were greater for LCSH than for DCSH, which suggests that short linters are more readily degraded in the rumen than are long linters.

The in vitro acid-pepsin digestion at 39°C for 24 h provides an estimate of the amount of rumen by-pass protein digested in the small intestine (McNiven et al., 2002; Mesgaran and Stern, 2005). Mesgaran (2005) observed that the post-rumen disappearance of protein from barley grains could reach 28%, which is comparable to the value obtained for CLR in the present study. This finding suggests that CLR feed could be a potential source of easily digested rumen by-pass protein.

Gas production kinetics and fermentation end products

In the present study, gas production was higher for CLR than for the other two CSBPs. This difference is possibly a result of the presence of highly fermentable organic matter in CLR, which would agree with its apparent high in vitro degradability. Gas production has also been reported to be more affected by digestible energy content (e.g., the presence of starch and sugars) than by protein or fat content (Abate, 1980), and high degradable N compounds have been reported to decrease gas production to some extent (Krishnamoorthy et al., 1995). In the present study, a faster degradation rate was observed for CLR than for either LCSH or DCSH. No apparent differences were observed for ammonia N in the three CSBPs. We speculated that cottonseed hull-associated protein in LCSH might not be a readily degraded form for rumen microorganisms, and that the high fat content could depress the degradation of the high amount of cottonseed kernel associated protein found in CLR.

The products of the anaerobic microbial fermentation of complex carbohydrates in the rumen include the predominant VFAs, acetate, propionate and butyrate. These are readily absorbed and assimilated as a nutrient source by the host ruminant; in fact, ruminants depend on VFAs for up to 80% of their maintenance energy requirements (Bergman, 1990). In the present study, total VFA production was markedly lower for DSCH than for CLR, which might be a consequence of the presence of higher amounts of hull associated structural fibre in DCSH than in CLR. Acetate is a necessary component for the formation of milk fat, while propionate is used for glucose production through hepatic gluconeogenesis and is needed for synthesis of milk lactose. A relatively low molar proportion of acetate and a remarkably high molar proportion of propionate occurred with CLR metabolism, which suggested that inclusion of CLR in the diet could serve as a supply of glucogenic precursors in the rumen for glucose production in the host animal.

Methane production in the rumen is an energetically wasteful process. Approximately 6% of dietary gross energy intake is lost into the atmosphere as CH4 (Holter and Young, 1992; DeRamus et al., 2003). This CH4 in turn contributes to climatic change and global warming (Johnson and Johnson, 1995), as CH4 traps outgoing terrestrial infrared radiation 20 times more effectively than does CO2. Interestingly, although the molar proportion of CO2 and CH4 did not statistically differ when DCSH and LCSH were tested in the present study, comparatively higher CO2 and lower CH4 proportions were observed with CLR.

Long-chain fatty acids have been shown to decrease fibre digestibility and acetate production and to suppress methane production (Getachew et al., 2004; Getachew et al., 2005). The supplementation of whole cottonseed to dairy cows that are offered a forage and cereal diet resulted in a long term reduction in CH4 emissions, which might be caused by an overall increase in dietary fat content (Dohme et al., 2001; Grainger, 2010). Thus, the very high fat content of 268.7 g/kg DM (Table 1) could explain why a comparatively high depression of CH4 occurred when CLR was used as a feed. In summary, the products of delinted cottonseed hulls can be defined as roughage with a low crude protein and very high fibre content, when compared to feeds consisting of conventional linted cottonseed hulls. The cottonseed linter residue can provide a ME content of 13.29 kJ/kg DM, which is almost twice that of delinted cottonseed hulls and conventional linted cottonseed hulls. Both in situ and in vitro digestibility results indicated that cottonseed linter residue could be regarded and/or defined as an energy and protein concentrate for ruminant animals that would be expected to generate comparatively less greenhouse gas due to its high fat content.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We appreciate the support of the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Project No: 2011CB100801) and National Natural Science Foundation (Project No. 31072054).

References

Abate A. 1980;In vitro estimation of the energy content of some feeds commonly fed to livestock in Kenya. East Afr Agric Forest J 45:255–260.
AOAC. 1999. Official methods of analysis 16th ednth ed. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington DC, USA:
Belasco IJ. 1956;The role of carbohydrates in urea utilization, cellulose digestion and fatty acid formation. J Anim Sci 15:496–508.
Bergman E. (1990)Energy contribution of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. Physiol Rev 70:567–590.
Bertrand JA, Sudduth TQ, Condon A, Jenkins TC, Calhoun MC. 2005;Nutrient content of whole cottonseed. J Dairy Sci 88:1470–1477.
Cherry JR. 1983;Cotton seed oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 60:360–367.
Chriyaa A, Moore KJ, Waller SS. 1997;Browse foliage and annual legume pods as supplements to wheat straw for sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 62:85–96.
Coppock CE, Lanham JK, Home JI. 1987;A review of the nutritive value and utilization of whole cottonseed, cottonseed meal and associated by-products by dairy cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 18:89–129.
Coppock CE, Moya JR, West JW, Nav DH, Labore JM, Gates CE. 1985;Effect of lint on whole cottonseed passage and digestibility and diet choice on intake of whole cottonseed by Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 68:1198–1206.
DeRamus HA, Clement TC, Giampola DD, Dickison PC. 2003;Methane emissions of beef cattle on forages efficiency of grazing management systems. J Environ Qual 32:269–277.
Dohme F, Machmueller A, Wasserfallen A, Kreuzer M. 2001;Ruminal methanogenesis as influenced by individual fatty acids supplemented to complete ruminant diets. Lett Appl Microbiol 32:47–51.
Fadel JG. 1999;Quantitative analyses of selected plant by-product feedstuffs, a global perspective. Anim Feed Sci Technol 79:255–268.
Garleb KA, Fahey GC Jr, Lewis SM, Kerley MS, Montgomery L. 1988;Chemical composition and digestibility of fiber fractions of certain by-product feedstuffs fed to ruminants. J Anim Sci 66:2650–2662.
Getachew G, Crovettob GM, Fondevilac M, Krishnamoorthyd U, Singhe B, Spangherof M, Steingassg HP, Robinsona H, Kailasd MM. 2002;Laboratory variation of 24 h in vitro gas production and estimated metabolizable energy values of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 102:169–180.
Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ. 2004;Relationships between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 111:57–71.
Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ, Gisi DD, Higginbotham GE, Riordan TJ. 2005;Methane production from commercial dairy rations estimated using an in vitro gas technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol 123–124:391–402.
Grainger C, Williams R, Clark T, Wright G, Eckard RJ. 2010;Supplementation with whole cottonseed causes long-term reduction of methane emission from diary cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. J Dairy Sci 93:2612–2619.
Hale WH, Lambeth C, Theurer B, Ray DE. 1963;Digestibility and utilization of cottonseed hulls by cattle. J Anim Sci 29:773–776.
Harvatine DI, Firkins JL, Eastridgea ML. 2002;Whole linted cottonseed as a forage substitute fed with ground or steam-flaked corn digestibility and performance1. J Dairy Sci 85:1976–1987.
Holter JB, Young AJ. 1992;Methane production in dry and lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 75:2165–2175.
Hsu JT, Faulkner DB, Garleb KA, Barclay RA Jr, Fahey GC Jr, Berger LL. 1987;Evaluation of corn fiber, cottonseed hulls, oat hulls and soybean hulls as roughage sources for ruminants. J Anim Sci 65:244–255.
INRA. 1988. Alimentation des bovins, ovins et caprins Institut Nationale de la Recherche Agronomique. Paris, France:
Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995;Methane Emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492.
Krishnamoorthy U, Soller H, Steingas H, Menke KH. 1995;Energy and protein evaluation of tropical feedstuffs for whole tract and ruminal digestion by chemical analyses and rumen inoculum studies in vitro. Anim Feed Sci Technol 52:177–188.
Kromer GW. 1977. In glandless cotton: its significance, status, and prospects. In : Proceedings of a conference. Dallas, TX: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture; p. 1.
Lee CF, Buu RH, Shy YM, Chen MC. 1991;The nutritive value of pangola grass A253 at different stages of growth. Taiwan Livest Res 24:59–65. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Lee M, Hwang SY, Chiou PW. 2000;Metabolizable energy of roughage in Taiwan. Small Rumin Res 36:251–259.
McNiven MA, Prestlokken E, Mydland LT, Mitchell AW. 2002;Laboratory procedure to determine protein digestibility of heat-treated feedstuffs for dairy cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 96:1–13.
Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988;Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 28:7–12.
Mesgaran DM, Stern MD. 2005;Ruminal and post-ruminal protein disappearance of various feeds originating from Iranian plant varieties determined by the in situ mobile bag technique and alternative methods. Anim Feed Sci Technol 118:31–46.
Moreira VR, Satter LD, Harding B. 2004;Comparison of conventional linted cottonseed and mechanically delinted cottonseed in diets for dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87:131–138.
National Research Council. 1989. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle 6th rev ednth ed. Natl Acad Sci. Washington DC, USA: p. 157.
Oltjen RR, Dinius DA, Goering HK. 1977;Performance of steers fed crop residues supplemented with nonprotein nitrogen, minerals, protein and monensin. J Anim Sci 45:1442–1452.
Ørskov ER. 1975;Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum food utilization. World Rev Nutr Diet 22:152–182.
Ørskov ER, McDonald I. 1979;The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci (Camb) 92:499–503.
Palmquist DL. 1995;Digestibility of cotton lint fiber and whole oilseeds by ruminal microorganisms. Anim Feed Sci Technol 56:231–242.
Robinson PH, Getachew G, De Peters EJ. 2001;Influence of variety and storage for up to 22 days on nutrient composition and gossypol level of Pima cottonseed (Gossypium spp.). Anim Feed Sci Technol 91:149–156.
SAS. 1999. Statistical analytical system (SAS) users guide: statistics, version 8.2 Statistical Analysis Institute. Cary NC, USA:
Sullivan JL, Huber JT, Price RL, Harper JM. 1993;Comparison of digestibility, nutritive value, and storage characteristics of different forms of cottonseed in diets fed to lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci 71:2837–2842.
The Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. 2010. China Agricultural Yearbook in 2009 China Agriculture Press. Beijing: (in Chinese).
Tilley JMA, Terry RA. 1963;A two stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J Br Grassland Soc 18:104–111.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991;Methods for dietary fiber, neutral fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74:3583–3597.
Verdouw H, Van Echteld CJA, Dekkers EMJ. 1978;Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salicylate. Water Res 12:399–402.
Zhang DF, Yang HJ. 2011;In vitro ruminal methanogenesis of a hay-rich substrate in response to different combination supplements of nitrocompounds, pyromellitic diimide and, 2-bromoethanesulphonate. Anim Feed Sci Technol 163:20–32.

Article information Continued

Table 1

Chemical composition (g/kg DM) of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR)

DCSH LCSH CLR SEM
Crude protein 62.2c 108.8b 302.2a 5.7
Ether extract 54.8c 81.3b 268.7a 6.6
NDFoma 829.4a 716.4b 311.4c 7.4
ADFomb 565.6a 464.1b 242.9c 6.3
Calcium 0.9a 0.8a 0.6b 0.1
Phosphorus 2.9c 5.5b 7.5a 0.2

Means in a row without a common superscript differ (p<0.05, N = 5).

a

Neutral detergent fibre content expressed exclusive of residual ash.

b

Acid detergent fibre content expressed exclusive of residual ash.

Table 2

Metabolisable energy (ME) of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR) estimated by in vitro ruminal gas production and chemical composition

DCSH LCSH CLR SEM
ME (kJ/kg DM) 6.06c 7.14b 13.29a 0.601

Means in a row without a common superscript differ (p<0.05, N = 5).

In the table, the equation to estimate metabolizable energy is as follows: ME = 146×GP24+7×CP+22.4×EE+1,242 (Lee et al., 1991) where CP and EE represent crude protein and ether extractable contents, with units of g/kg DM, while GP24 represents an extrapolated gas production with units of ml/200 mg DM for the fermentation time of up to 24 h.

Table 3

In situ dry matter and crude protein degradation kinetics of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR)

Items DCSH LCSH CLR SEM
Dry matter
 a 0.04c 0.05b 0.14a 0.002
 b 0.95a 0.77b 0.50c 0.047
 c 0.005c 0.014b 0.049a 0.0024
 ED 0.12c 0.18b 0.36a 0.005
Crude protein
 a 0.03b 0.03b 0.16a 0.029
 b 0.37c 0.44b 0.64a 0.063
 c 0.021c 0.038b 0.078a 0.0115
 ED 0.11c 0.17b 0.52a 0.041

Means in a row without a common superscript differ (p<0.05, N = 3).

In the table, item ‘a’ represents the soluble and very rapidly degradable nutrient; item ‘b’ represents the insoluble, but potentially degradable nutrient, which is degraded at a constant fractional rate (c, /h); and item ED is effective degradation in the rumen.

Table 4

In vitro dry matter digestibility and fermentation characteristics of delinted cottonseed hulls (DCSH), linted cottonseed hulls (LCSH) and cottonseed linter residue (CLR) after 72 h incubation

DCSH LCSH CLR SEM
IVDMD1 0.16c 0.32b 0.37a 0.008
IVDMD2 0.30b 0.53a 0.64a 0.051
Ammonia N (mM) 10.6b 15.3a 14.5a 1.33
Total VFA (mM) 74.0b 89.7a 103.7a 4.86
VFA pattern (%, molar)
 Acetate 62.5 60.3 56.3 4.54
 Propionate 21.2b 23.6b 30.4a 1.35
 Butyrate 11.2 11.7 11.3 0.93
 Valerate 2.22 2.23 2.72 0.262
 BCVFA 2.71 2.71 3.04 0.283
NGR 3.7a 3.7a 2.4b 0.51
Kinetic gas production
 a+b (ml/g DM) 127.1b 148.8a 153.3a 10.64
 c (/h) 0.050c 0.124b 0.171a 0.0067
Fermentation gas pattern (%, molar)
 CO2 79.5 74.7 82.3 2.84
 CH4 23.5 25.0 17.5 3.15
 H2 0.09 0.10 0.14 0.006

Means in a row without a common superscript differ (p<0.05, N = 5).

In the table, IVDMD1 and IVDMD2 represent in vitro dry matter disappearance measured by the one-step and the two-step methods, respectively; VFA is volatile fatty acids; BCVFA is branch-chained volatile fatty acids; NGR is the ratio of non-glucogenic to glucogenic acids; ‘a’ is the gas production of soluble and very rapidly degradable portion, ‘b’ represents the gas production of insoluble, but potentially degradable nutrient, which yields fermentation gases at a constant fractional rate (c, /h).