Evaluation of the functional role of corpus luteum cavity in recipient selection for bovine embryo transfer
Article information
Abstract
Objective
The effectiveness of bovine embryo transfer (ET) programs is significantly influenced by selection of optimal recipient cows, in which a functional corpus luteum (CL) is critical for the maintenance of pregnancy. The relationship between CL size and blood perfusion (CLBP) has been extensively studied; however, the implications of CL cavities (CLcav) on fertility remain controversial. This study aimed to assess the functional significance of CLcav in the selection of recipients for ET by evaluating its association with pregnancy outcomes, CLBP, and hormonal profiles.
Methods
Ninety-eight Hanwoo cows were subjected to estrus synchronization and evaluated using transrectal ultrasonography. Eighty-five recipients were selected based on CL diameter (≥15 mm) and the absence of large dominant follicles with 10 mm or more. On Day 6.5 post-estrus, CL type (compact vs. cavitary), CLBP (color Doppler), and hormone levels (estradiol [E2] and progesterone [P4]) were recorded. ET was performed using in vitro-produced fresh or vitrified embryos, with pregnancy status assessed 40–60 days following transfer.
Results
CLcav identified in 18.8% of recipients, but pregnancy rates were not significantly different between cows with and without CLcav (50.0% vs. 62.3%, p>0.05). When CLcav occupied ≥40% of the CL volume (with CLcav diameter 18 mm or less), conception rates improved (62.5% vs. 37.5%), in conjungtion with elevated E2 levels. At CLBP levels of 40% or higher, both CLcav size and P4 concentration reached their peak, but excessive CLBP did not enhance conception rates.
Conclusion
These findings suggest that CLcav does not negatively affect luteal function or pregnancy outcomes and may, in some cases, indicate enhanced luteal activity. Integrating CL morphology, vascularization, and hormonal balance into recipient selection criteria could improve ET efficiency. Future studies should explore the physiological mechanisms that contribure to CLcav formation and its role in reproductive success.
INTRODUCTION
Embryo transfer (ET) is a widely used reproductive biotechnology in the bovine industry, playing a pivotal role in genetic improvement and herd management by increasing reproductive efficiency and the dissemination of elite genetics [1,2]. While advancements in ET techniques have improved conception rates, several factors continue to influence its success. Among these, the physiological and endocrine status of the recipient cow at the time of ET is a critical determinant of pregnancy establishment and maintenance [3–5]. The corpus luteum (CL), a transient endocrine structure formed after ovulation, is a key component of this process due to its role in progesterone (P4) secretion, which is essential for endometrial receptivity and embryo survival [6–8]. Consequently, selection criteria for recipient cows have historically relied on CL presence, size, and functional status as primary indicators of uterine readiness for implantation [3,9].
Recent advances in ultrasonographic imaging have facilitated a more detailed evaluation of the CL, revealing morphological variations such as CL cavities (CLcav), also referred to as central lacunae, which are fluid-filled spaces within the CL [10]. While CL size and blood perfusion have been correlated with P4 production and pregnancy outcomes, the impact of CLcav on fertility remains a topic of debate. Some studies suggest that the presence of CLcav may be indicative of incomplete luteinization or suboptimal luteal function, potentially leading to reduced P4 production and lower pregnancy rates [11,12]. However, conflicting evidence exists, with reports indicating that CLcav may not negatively affect conception rates and, in some cases, may even be associated with enhanced luteal activity [6]. A recent study assessing recipient cows in a large-scale ET program found no significant differences in conception rates between cows with CLcav and those with CLcom, suggesting that, regardless of the type of CL that is compact or has a cavity, other factors may be predictive factors that are related to reproductive success [12–14].
In addition to CL morphology, other ovarian parameters, including the presence of dominant follicles (DF), serum estradiol (E2) and P4 concentrations, and CL blood perfusion (CLBP), have been investigated as potential predictors of successful conception [15,16]. The balance between E2 and P4 plays a crucial role in modulating uterine receptivity, and an elevated E2/P4 ratio has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes in ET programs [17,18]. Recent studies indicate that optimal hormonal balance may be more predictive of pregnancy success than absolute E2 or P4 concentrations alone [18,19]. Furthermore, while increased CLBP is generally considered a sign of enhanced luteal function, excessive vascularization may not always translate to improved fertility [20]. Although increased CLBP is generally associated with improved reproductive outcomes, some reports suggest that excessive vascularization could reflect abnormal luteal activity, warranting further investigation into standardized CLBP assessment criteria [21,22]. Understanding the interactions between these factors is essential for optimizing recipient selection criteria and improving ET efficiency.
Despite the wealth of research on CL function and its relationship to fertility, there is limited information regarding the specific role of CLcav in ET outcomes, particularly in Hanwoo cattle (native to Korea). Given the economic and genetic significance of ET programs, refining recipient selection protocols based on a comprehensive assessment of ovarian morphology and hormonal status is imperative. This study aims to evaluate the impact of CLcav presence and size on pregnancy rates in ET recipient cows and to investigate the relationship between CLcav, CLBP, and serum hormone levels. By integrating multiple ovarian parameters, we seek to determine whether CLcav should be considered a critical factor in recipient selection and to provide insights that could enhance the success of bovine ET programs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and estrus synchronization
This study was performed as part of a commercial ET program in Hongcheon-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea, with the participation of 11 farms. A total of 98 Hanwoo recipient cows were included in the study, comprising 21 nulliparous and 77 multiparous cows. The experiment was performed between April and September 2024. Estrus synchronization followed the J-Synch protocol (Figure 1), which involved inserting an intravaginal P4 device (Cue-Mate; Bioniche Animal Health Australia/Asia and Bayer Animal Health) containing 1.56 g of P4 on Day 0. Simultaneously, 2.0 mg of intramuscular estradiol benzoate (Esrone; Samyang Anipharm) was administered. On Day 6, the intravaginal device was removed, and 500 μg of prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α; Synchromate; Pfizer) was injected intramuscularly. Estrus was detected approximately 2.5 days after the PGF2α injection, and 200 μg of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH; Gonadon; Dong Bang) was administered intramuscularly 12 h after estrus detection.
Schematic representation of the J-Synch protocol for estrus synchronization in embryo transfer (ET) recipient cows, including ultrasonographic monitoring of ovarian status and measurement of serum progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) concentrations. EB, estradiol benzoate; PGF2α, prostaglandin F2α; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; P4 device (Cue-mate), an intravaginal device containing 1.56 g of progesterone.
Ovarian assessment and ultrasonography
Transrectal ultrasonography was performed on all synchronized cows 6.5 days post-estrus using a 6.5 MHz linear probe (SR-1C; Sonoptek). One experienced technician performed the ultrasonographic evaluation to ensure consistency in data collection. The CL was categorized as either a (CLcom or a CLcav, based on B-mode ultrasound imaging. The diameter of the CL, any CL cavity present, and the DF size were recorded (Figures 2, 3). CL diameter was measured as the mean of its length and width at the center, with CLcom≥15 mm and CLcav≥3 mm considered eligible for ET. DF presence and size (≥10 mm) were also documented. CLBP was assessed using color Doppler ultrasonography (SR-1C; Sonoptek), which allowed visualization of vascularization within the CL (Figure 4). The CLBP was visually estimated as a percentage of the luteal area displaying blood flow. Cows with a CL diameter<15 mm or an absent CL were excluded from ET (n = 13). Due to technical limitations, excessive cow movement, or temporary ultrasonography errors, CLBP measurements were not recorded for 11 cows.
Ultrasound image showing the corpus luteum (CL) of a bovine ovary one day before ET. (A–D) Images in mode B (brightness; gray scale). (A, B) Compact CL. (C, D) Cavity CL. ET, embryo transfer.
Ultrasound image showing dominant follicle coexisting with corpus luteum (CL) in a bovine ovary one day before ET. (A, B) Images in mode B (brightness; gray scale). (A) Dominant follicle coexisting with cavity CL. (B) Dominant follicle coexisting with compact CL. ET, embryo transfer.
Ultrasound image showing corpus luteum blood perfusion (CLBP) in a bovine ovary one day before ET. (A-1, A-2) Images in mode (brightness; gray scale). (B-1–D-1, B-2–D-2) Images in Color-Doppler mode (detection limit: 7.2 m/s). (A-1, A-2) Corpus luteum (CL). (B-1, B-2) CLBP on the left side of the CL. (C-1, C-2) CLBP in the center of the CL. (D-1, D-2) CLBP on the right side of the CL. In image A (A1, A2), the CL cavity is small; images B (B1, B2) and D (D1, D2) show the left and right sides, where the CL cavity is not visible. The CL cavity is visible only in C, which is the exact center of the CL. ET, embryo transfer.
Blood sampling and hormonal analysis
Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein using lithium heparin tubes (BD Vacutainer) on Day 6.5 post-estrus. The plasma was separated within 2 h of collection via centrifugation at 2,000 ×g for 15 min and stored at −70°C until analysis. Prior to hormonal analysis, frozen plasma samples were thawed at room temperature. P4 and E2 concentrations were quantified using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (NBP2-60122, Novus Biologicals; 501890, Cayman Chemical). To improve the accuracy of E2 measurements, samples were pre-extracted with methanol (322415; Sigma-Aldrich) and concentrated using a nitrogen concentrator (NDK200-1N; LabTech).
Embryo transfer procedure
Embryos used in this study were produced by in vitro fertilization (IVF) using oocytes obtained via ovum pick-up (OPU) from donor Hanwoo cows. Oocytes were matured in vitro (IVM) in TCM-199 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 22 h. Fertilization was performed with semen from a Korean Proven Bull (KPN) using the IVF medium (VitroFert; ART Lab Solutions). The embryos were cultured for total of seven days in cleavage medium (VitroCleave; ART Lab Solutions) for five days and blastocyst medium (VitroBlast; ART Lab Solutions) for two days before either being transferred fresh or cryopreserved through vitrification. For vitrified embryos, the thawing protocol was applied before transfer [23]. Recipient cows underwent ultrasonographic evaluation one day prior to ET. Those with a CL diameter<15 mm or an excessively large follicle relative to the CL were excluded from ET (n = 13). A total of 52 fresh embryos and 33 vitrified-thawed embryos were transferred. ET was performed by two skilled technicians using a 0.25 mL ET gun (Watanabe Tecnologia Aplicada) and a sterile ET sheath (Minitube). Each embryo was deposited into the uterine horn ipsilateral to the ovary bearing the CL.
Pregnancy diagnosis
Pregnancy status was determined via transrectal ultrasonography 40–60 days post-ET using a 6.5 MHz linear probe (SR-1C; Sonoptek). Successful pregnancies were defined based on the presence of an intact CL, visible amniotic fluid, and a developing fetus (Figure 5). The conception rate was calculated as the number of confirmed pregnancies divided by the total number of ETs performed.
The ultrasound image shows the corpus luteum and fetus on day 56. (A, C) Images in mode (brightness; gray scale). (B) Image in Color-Doppler mode (detection limit: 7.2 m/s). (A) Corpus luteum; (B) CLPB (corpus luteum blood perfusion) in the center of the corpus luteum; (C) fetus.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences in ovarian parameters and hormonal profiles among the various experimental groups. For comparisons involving multiple groups, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to identify overall differences, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test to determine pairwise significance. For comparisons between two groups, an independent t-test was used. Given the variability in group sizes, an equal variance test was conducted prior to the t-test to ensure homogeneity of variances. The comparison of conception rates was performed using the Chi-square test (GraphPad Prism 8.0.1; non-pregnant, 0; pregnant, 1). All statistical analyses except conception rate were performed using SPSS 29 (IBM SPSS Statistics 29; IBM), and the results were expressed as the mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was determined at a p-value threshold of <0.05.
RESULTS
Presence of corpus luteum cavities and pregnancy outcomes
Among the 85 recipient cows selected for ET, 16 (18.8%) exhibited a detectable CLcav, whereas the remaining 69 (81.2%) had CLcom. The CLcav group had a slightly larger CL diameter (21.5±0.8 mm) compared to the CLcom group (19.3±2.8 mm), although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, serum P4 concentrations were slightly higher in the CLcav group (37.7±3.5 ng/mL) than in the CLcom group (33.0±2.2 ng/mL; p>0.05). Likewise, there were no differences in ovarian morphology and hormone levels, and there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between cows with and without CLcav (50.0% vs. 62.3%, p>0.05) (Table 1). These results indicate that the presence of CLcav does not have a detrimental effect on pregnancy outcomes and suggests that its impact on luteal function may be more complex than previously assumed.
Hormone levels, corpus luteum (CL) diameter and conception rate according to presence of CL with cavity
Size of corpus luteum cavities and its association with pregnancy success
To further evaluate the functional significance of CLcav, recipient cows were categorized based on the proportion of CLcav relative to the total CL volume: those with CLcav occupying 40% or more of the CL and those with CLcav occupying less than 40%. Cows in which CLcav comprised 40% or more of the total CL volume exhibited a higher pregnancy rate (62.5% vs. 37.5%). Although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.62), the odds of conception tended to be higher in cows with larger CLcav (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 0.37–21.03). In addition, these cows had higher serum E2 concentrations (83.8±21.8 pg/mL) compared to cows with smaller CLcav (48.0±6.5 pg/mL) but no significant difference was observed in the data (p>0.05) (Table 2). These findings suggest that a larger CLcav may not necessarily indicate impaired luteal function but could instead reflect a compensatory physiological response that supports reproductive success. The increased E2 levels in cows with larger CLcav may contribute to improved endometrial receptivity, thereby enhancing pregnancy outcomes.
Comparison of corpus luteum (CL) diameter, hormone profiles, and conception rates according to the ratio of CL cavity
Relationship between corpus luteum blood perfusion and corpus luteum cavities
CLBP was analyzed to determine whether vascularization differed between CLcav and CLcom. Cows with CLcav exhibited higher P4 concentrations when CLBP exceeded 40%, suggesting an association between increased luteal vascularization and enhanced P4 secretion. However, the highest pregnancy rates were observed in cows with moderate CLBP (<25%) rather than in those with excessive perfusion (71.4% vs. 50.0%) (Table 3). This finding indicates that while an increase in CLBP may support luteal function by enhancing P4 synthesis, excessive vascularization does not necessarily lead to improved pregnancy rates. An optimal balance of luteal blood flow may be required to sustain a favorable uterine environment for embryo implantation.
Corpus luteum (CL) cavity diameter, hormone profiles and conception rate according to presence of corpus luteum blood perfusion (CLBP)
Interaction between corpus luteum cavities, hormonal profiles, and pregnancy success
Given the importance of hormonal balance in pregnancy establishment, further analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between CLcav, E2/P4 ratio, and pregnancy outcomes. The E2/P4 ratio tended to be higher in cows with CLcom (3.4±2.0) compared to those with CLcav (2.0±0.4), although this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Table 1). However, when a CLcav was present, the E2/P4 ratio was higher and conception rates were also increased when CLcav occupied more than 40% of the CL volume (Table 2). These findings suggest that while the presence of CLcav alone does not negatively impact pregnancy outcomes, its functional role may be dependent on its interaction with other ovarian parameters, particularly hormonal dynamics.
DISCUSSION
The selection of suitable recipient cows is a critical factor influencing the success of ET programs, as the physiological status of the recipient at the time of ET directly affects conception rates and overall reproductive outcomes. Traditionally, the presence of a functional CL has been a key criterion for recipient selection, given its role in producing P4, which is essential for pregnancy maintenance [6]. However, additional factors such as the presence and size of a CLcav, CLBP, and hormonal balance have been increasingly recognized as important determinants of reproductive success. Recent studies have also suggested that the intensity of estrus expression in recipient cows may be associated with higher pregnancy rates, indicating that behavioral and endocrine factors should be considered alongside ovarian morphology [24]. This study aimed to assess the combined impact of these factors on pregnancy outcomes in Hanwoo cows undergoing ET, thereby improving selection criteria in commercial settings.
The presence of CLcav in recipient cows has been a subject of debate in reproductive research, with conflicting reports on its influence on conception rates. Some studies have suggested that CLcav indicates compromised luteal function and reduced P4 production, potentially leading to lower pregnancy rates [6,25]. However, our findings align with previous research indicating that the presence of CLcav does not necessarily impair reproductive success [3]. In our study, conception rates did not significantly differ between cows with and without CLcav, suggesting that a CL with a central cavity can still function adequately to support early pregnancy. Interestingly, when CLcav occupied more than 40% of the total CL volume, conception rates were higher compared to those with smaller CLcav. However, given the limited sample size in this study, caution is needed when interpreting these findings. Although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.62), the odds of conception tended to be higher in cows with larger CLcav (OR = 2.78, 95% CI: 0.37–21.03). This trend suggests a potential positive association that warrants further confirmation in studies with larger sample sizes. As conception rate is a qualitative variable, a larger sample size would be necessary to achieve statistical significance and validate these results. Future studies with an expanded cohort are warranted to confirm the impact of CLcav size on reproductive success in bovine ET recipients [6,26]. This observation suggests that, rather than being a negative indicator, the presence of a larger CLcav may reflect an active luteal response that compensates for the cavity. Previous studies have indicated that luteal cells surrounding the cavity may become hyperfunctional, producing sufficient P4 to maintain pregnancy [27]. Moreover, recent research has shown that metabolic parameters influence CLcav formation and luteal function, suggesting that a more comprehensive assessment of recipient metabolic status may refine selection criteria [12]. This compensatory mechanism may explain the increased conception rates observed in cows with larger CLcav in this study.
CLBP is considered a reliable indicator of luteal function, as it reflects the vascularization and functional capacity of the CL [16,20,28]. In this study, we observed a notable interaction between CLcav and CLBP, with cows exhibiting larger CLcav also demonstrating higher CLBP. This finding suggests that CLcav may be associated with increased blood perfusion, potentially enhancing luteal activity and P4 synthesis [29]. These results are in agreement with previous studies reporting that well-perfused CLs with high blood flow tend to exhibit superior reproductive performance due to improved nutrient and hormone delivery [6,30]. However, it is also essential to consider that excessive vascularization may indicate abnormal luteal activity, as observed in other species, where excessive blood flow can contribute to local inflammation and disrupt pregnancy maintenance [29].
However, despite the positive correlation between CLBP and P4 levels, conception rates did not increase proportionally with CLBP. The highest conception rates were observed in cows with moderate CLBP coverage (<25%), while excessively high CLBP (>40%) did not provide additional benefits [25]. This suggests that while increased vascularization is beneficial, excessive blood flow may indicate abnormal luteal function or inflammation, potentially disrupting pregnancy establishment. Future studies should explore optimal CLBP thresholds to refine recipient selection criteria. Additionally, studies on hormonal modulation of CL function have shown that P4 supplementation during the early luteal phase can enhance CL development and function, potentially benefiting cows with suboptimal CLBP [29]. This approach could be explored further to optimize pregnancy rates in ET programs.
The findings of this study highlight the complexity of recipient selection in bovine ET programs. While conventional selection methods have focused primarily on CL size and P4 levels, our results suggest that additional factors such as CLcav characteristics and CLBP should be considered when evaluating recipient suitability. Importantly, our data indicate that the presence of CLcav should not be an exclusion criterion for ET, as CLs with larger cavities can still support pregnancy effectively [31]. This is further supported by recent findings in Holstein Friesian cows, where no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were found between cows with CLcom and CLcav, emphasizing the importance of overall luteal function rather than morphology alone [32]. Furthermore, while CLBP serves as a useful marker of luteal activity, extreme variations in blood perfusion may not always translate to improved conception rates [33]. These insights have practical implications for commercial ET programs, where optimizing recipient selection is essential for maximizing pregnancy success rates. By adopting a more holistic approach that incorporates CL morphology, vascularization, and hormonal balance, practitioners can enhance the precision of recipient selection, ultimately improving reproductive efficiency in cattle operations.
While this study provides valuable insights into the role of CL characteristics in ET outcomes, certain limitations should be acknowledged. The study was conducted under commercial field conditions, introducing variability in factors such as recipient parity, nutritional status, and farm management practices [34]. Additionally, while CLBP assessment was performed using color Doppler ultrasonography, variations in operator interpretation may have influenced the results [6,35,36]. Future research should aim to standardize CLBP assessment protocols and explore the use of advanced imaging techniques, such as three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonography, for more accurate evaluations [29]. Moreover, while this study focused primarily on ovarian parameters, other factors such as endometrial receptivity, immune response, and embryo quality may also play crucial roles in pregnancy establishment. Recent studies have indicated that delayed endometrial preparation in heifers with high antral follicle counts may improve pregnancy rates, suggesting that incorporating endometrial and ovarian reserve assessments could further optimize recipient selection [37]. Integrating these factors into a comprehensive selection model could further improve ET success rates.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that CLcav and CLBP are important factors influencing reproductive success in ET recipient cows. The presence of CLcav does not negatively impact conception rates, and in some cases, larger CLcav may be associated with improved pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, while increased CLBP reflects enhanced luteal function, an optimal range of perfusion is necessary for maximizing conception rates. These findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach to recipient selection, incorporating CL morphology, vascularization, and hormonal balance to optimize ET outcomes. Future studies should further investigate these relationships using standardized methodologies to refine selection criteria and improve reproductive efficiency in commercial bovine ET programs.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Upon reasonable request, the datasets of this study can be available from the corresponding author.
Notes
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: Park J, Ro Y, Lee S, Yi J, Cho J.
Data curation: Park J, Qamar AY, Bang S, Yi J, Cho J.
Formal analysis: Park J, Qamar AY, Lee W, Song K, Bang S, Yi J.
Methodology: Park J, Song K, Park M, Hong L, Yi J.
Software: Park J, Lee S.
Validation: Park J.
Investigation: Park J, Qamar AY, Lee W, Song K, Ro Y, Yi J.
Writing - original draft: Park J, Yi J.
Writing - review & editing: Park J, Qamar AY, Lee W, Song K, Park M, Hong L, Bang S, Ro Y, Lee S, Kim M, Yi J, Cho J.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the New Faculty Startup Fund from Seoul National University. This study was partially funded by the Research Institute for Veterinary Science at Seoul National University.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Not applicable.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Not applicable.
ETHICS APPROVAL
The animal experiments were conducted following the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Hankyong National University (HK2024-14).
DECLARATION OF GENERATIVE AI
No AI tools were used in this article.