A novel p.127Val>Ile single nucleotide polymorphism in the MTNR1A gene and its relation to litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

Article information

Anim Biosci. 2025;38(2):209-222
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0187
1Doctoral Program in Veterinary Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
2Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, Al-Qasim Green University, Al-Qasim, 51013, Babil, Iraq
3College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China
4Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
5Department of Veterinary Reproduction, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Airlangga University, Surabaya 60115, Indonesia
6Department of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki 481101, Nigeria
*Corresponding Author: Mustofa Helmi Effendi, Tel: +62-85-733-021783, E-mail: mheffendi@yahoo.com
Received 2024 March 29; Revised 2024 May 31; Accepted 2024 June 7.

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective was to identify and characterize the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the MTNR1A gene sequence in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes to assess the possible association of MTNR1A gene polymorphism with litter size trait.

Methods

Forty-seven Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep were selected for the study. Genotyping involved collecting blood samples, and sequencing exon 2 of the MTNR1A gene.

Results

The study identified 19 novel SNPs, with 10 being non-synonymous variations, in the MTNR1A gene of Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes. One non-synonymous SNP (rs1087815963) showed a significant association with litter size, with the GC genotype exhibiting a higher average litter size than the GG genotype. The deleterious impact of p.Val127Ile SNP was predicted by various in silico tools that predicted a highly damaging effect of p.Val127Ile SNP on the structure, function, and stability of MTNR1A. Docking reactions showed a critical involvement of this locus with the binding with melatonin.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that rs1087815963 has a remarkable negative impact on the MTNR1A with a putative alteration in the binding with melatonin. Therefore, the implementation of the novel p.Val127Ile could be a useful marker in marker-assisted selection.

INTRODUCTION

In 2022, the sheep population in Indonesia was recorded at 15.62 million head, showing a slight decrease of 0.13% compared to the previous year’s count of 15.64 million sheep. This is a notable shift from the peak population of 17.77 million sheep in 2020. Interestingly, West Java province contributes significantly to Indonesia’s sheep population, housing approximately 12.27 million sheep, which constitutes a substantial 69% of the nation’s total sheep population [1]. Sheep reproduction is an essential economic characteristic [24], The complicated trait affecting multiple indicators such as fertility, fecundity, and prolificacy [5], is a complicated trait with low (5% to 10%) heritability that is influenced by both genetic and environmental [6]. Identifying candidate genes and their causative mutations is a powerful method for comprehending the genetic process that contributes to the diversity in reproductive performance in sheep [2].

In sheep breeding, litter size is the primary limiting factor, controlled by numerous unidentified factors. The progress in science and technology has enabled the utilization of molecular genetics and biology advancements to enhance the number of offspring produced [7]. In order to expedite the reproductive rate and diversify agricultural sectors, efforts are being made to enhance the breeding speed. This will enable the production of high-quality economic animal products to fulfill the demands of a rapidly growing population [8]. The investigation of genes associated with litter size, whether through direct or indirect means, has gained popularity in recent decades. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are being utilized more and more to investigate the candidate genes that have polymorphisms associated with a certain phenotype [9,10], and marker-assisted selection (MAS) enables precise and rapid analysis of the genetic makeup of individuals at the molecular level, facilitating the selection of specific genotypes. Due to the substantial decrease in the cost of genetic marker detection, it is now feasible to simultaneously examine the presence of various markers in one individual [7]. Traditional selection approaches should be complemented with MAS to augment reproductive capability. Utilizing MAS for the validation of candidate genes will significantly enhance breeding efficiency [11]. The reproductive seasonality of ewes is characterized by the presence of a seasonal anestrus period, which refers to the number of days from when rams are introduced to ewes until lambing occurs. This time is regulated by the photoperiod [12].

Melatonin governs the seasonal reproductive processes in mammals by regulating the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone via the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis [13]. Melatonin (MT) is a hormone derived from indole that is produced in the pineal gland [14,15]. The melatonin receptor (MTNR) plays a crucial role in various biological processes such as the control of animal sexual behavior, reproduction, and circadian rhythm [16,17]. The melatonin receptors can be classified into two subtypes: melatonin receptor subtype 1A (MNTR1A) and melatonin receptor subtype 1B (MTNR1B) [14,18].

MTNR1A is primarily localized in the suprachiasmatic nucleus and pituitary nodules within the hypothalamus of mammals. Its function is closely associated with the regulation of animal reproduction [14]. He at al [19] discovered that administering melatonin before the peak expression of MTNR1A, which occurs before ovulation, can enhance luteal function, elevate progesterone secretion levels, and improve the pregnancy rate and litter size of mice. Various studies have discovered connections between MTNR1A and reproductive functions in various animal species [17]. As of now, a considerable number of studies have delved into the association between polymorphisms of MTNRs and traits related to litter size or reproductive seasonality in various mammalian species [6,20,21]. Studies in sheep have predominantly concentrated on the sites 606 and 612 within the MTNR1A gene exon 2. Mutations identified at these positions have been suggested as potential contributors to seasonal reproduction [22,23].

The Rasa Aragonesa breed has been found to have an association between the polymorphism SNP rs403212791 and reproductive seasonality [16]. In Barbarine ewes, the study identified two single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), namely rs430181568 and rs40738822721, demonstrating complete linkage and a robust correlation with the resumption of reproductive activity. Significantly, these SNPs were found to exert a substantial impact on the birth weights of lambs. Specifically, Barbarine ewes with the A/A genotype at these SNPs exhibited elevated birth weights, implying a potential influence on reproductive efficiency [12].

Therefore, a multitude of studies has scrutinized the association between MTNR1A and reproductive traits across diverse species, designating it as a potential candidate gene for quantitative trait loci. Nonetheless, findings in sheep underscore that the relationship between MTNR1A gene polymorphism and reproduction can exhibit variability based on the breed [17]. In the MTNR1A gene exon II, different sheep breeds exhibit nucleotide variations. These are assumed to change the reproductive response to seasonal variations and to improve, in general, the reproductive performance [24] Given these considerations, the objective of this study is to identify and characterize the patterns of SNPs within the MTNR1A gene sequence, and to evaluate the possible association of these SNPs with litter size traits in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes. Additional assessment of the potential molecular mechanism by which the identified SNPs affect litter size is deduced using various computational tools. The utilization of in silico prediction has enhanced the classical genotype-phenotype association by offering a possible three-dimensional elucidation for the variations in performance between the normal and altered MTNR1A protein in ewes with wild-type and altered alleles, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethical approval

The Animal Care and Use Committee (ACUC) under the control of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Airlangga University approved the use of animals in experiments and granted ethical permission for this study (No: 1.KEH.117.09. 2022). Furthermore, the experimentation on animals was conducted in strict adherence to the pertinent local legislation and regulations governing animal care.

Animals and management

A total of 47 Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes were used in this study. The animals were raised and located in the East Java Island of Indonesia (Malang); the farm is located at 8.0553° S, 112.5066° E near Kawi Mount. In the study, the animals were provided with leguminous and gramineous grasses equivalent to 10% of their body weight during the day. Additionally, they were given a daily ration of commercial concentrate feed, amounting to 5% of their body weight per head. The concentrate feed had a composition of 15% crude protein.

Genotyping

A blood sample was obtained from each sheep by collecting it from the jugular vein using a sterile vacuum tube (BD Vacutainer System, Believer Industrial Estate, Plymouth, UK) using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an anticoagulant. Afterward, 5 mL were taken from each sample and kept at a temperature of −20°C until further analysis. The primers employed for amplifying the exon 2 region, spanning 824 bp (F: 5′-TGT GTT TGT GGT GAG CCT GG-3′ and R: 5′-ATG GAG AGG GTT TGC GTT TA-3′) in the MNTR1A gene were the ones documented by Saxena et al [ 25]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was conducted using the gradient PCR system T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio–Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with a reaction volume of 30 μL. The reaction mix consisted of 2.5 μL genomic DNA, 0.5 μL each of forward and reverse primer, 12.5 μL Taq Green PCR Master Mix, and 14-μL ddH2O. The PCR amplification was conducted according to the following protocol: an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 57.7°C for 45 seconds, and elongation at 72°C for 1 minute. The amplification was completed with a final extension step at 72°C for 10 minutes. The expected lengths of PCR products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% W/V) using ethidium bromide as a staining dye. Subsequently, the 25 μL PCR result was sent to a commercial laboratory service (1st BASE Laboratories Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia) for sequencing analysis using Sanger DNA sequencing with capillary electrophoresis. The DNA sequences were examined utilizing the BioEdit tool version 7.00, developed by Tom Hall of Ibis Therapeutics in California, USA. The SNPs were detected by comparing them to the reference genomic sequences of the MTNR1A gene. The detected SNPs were confirmed by reviewing their original electropherogram files. The variant effect predictor (VEP), a tool provided by the Ensembl genome browser, was utilized to forecast the consequences of a missense variant on the structure and function of a protein. The VEP can be accessed at https://www.ensembl.org/Ovisaries/Tools/VEP?db=core.

Statistical analysis

Genotyping data were calculated using Pop Gene version 1.32 to compute allele and genotype frequencies, assess polymorphism information content (PIC), evaluate heterozygosity (HE), determine the number of effective alleles, and use chi-square (χ2) tests to derive the corresponding p-value. Based on the identified genetic polymorphism of the MTNR1A gene, the PIC is categorized into three levels: high (PIC>0.5), intermediate (0.25<PIC<0.5), and low genetic diversity (PIC <0.25) [26]. An analysis of variance was conducted using IBM SPSS 24.0 software to analyze the association between litter size and genotypes. Yij = μ+Gi+eij, where Yij is the litter size phenotype of the individual Thin-Tailed sheep, μ is the population mean, Gi is the effect of genotype or haplotype, and eij is the random error effect. The continuous variables were represented as mean±standard deviation (SD) and p< 0.05 was considered to be significant. Using the Haploview v4.2 software [27], the linkage disequilibrium (LD) was evaluated among genotypes, and the structure of LD was determined using the D’ and r2 parameters. If r2>0.33, the LD is considered as sufficiently strong; and if r2 = 1, the LD is complete.

Prediction of protein interaction with substrate

The amino acid sequence of the MTNR1A protein in sheep was obtained from the NCBI database (protein ID: NP_001 009725.1). To assess the impact of non-synonymous SNPs (nsSNPs) on the MTNR1A protein, several analyses were conducted. Firstly, the SIFT tool was used to predict whether the nsSNPs were deleterious or non-deleterious [28], Additionally, the PANTHER tool was employed to determine the potential functional impact of these nsSNPs [29]. The results obtained from SIFT and PANTHER were further validated using the PolyPhen-2 tool [30]. The stability of the protein following mutation was assessed using the I-Mutant2 tool [31]. Since there was no crystallized structure of MTNR1A in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) server (https://www.rcsb.org/), the 3D structure of the protein was generated using the Swiss Model tool (https://swissmodel.expasy.org/interactive). The validity of the 3D structure was confirmed using the Ramachandran plot, and the overall model quality was assessed using the ProSA web server (https://prosa.services.came.sbg.ac.at/prosa.php). To describe the status of each amino acid before and after the missense variation within the 3D structure of the protein, PyMol-v1 from Schrödinger, LLC was used. Furthermore, predictions of the effect of nsSNPs on the 3D structure of the altered protein were performed using mSCM [32] and MUpro [33] prediction tools.

Docking with melatonin

To comprehensively predict the effect of the identified nsSNPs on the binding of MTNR1A with melatonin, two separate molecular docking reactions were performed. These reactions aimed to assess the binding efficiency of melatonin with both the normal and altered forms of MTNR1A. Before conducting the docking with MTNR1A, the 3D conformer of melatonin (C13H16N2O2) was retrieved from the PubChem server (PubChem CID 896) in SDF format. The blind docking was carried out using the CB-Dock tool with its default settings [34]. Melatonin and MTNR1A were docked, and the docking scores and cavity sizes for the best pose binding of the normal and altered MTNR1A with melatonin were visualized and compared using the PyMol tool. Additionally, annotations for the bonds shared between the interacting amino acids with melatonin were provided by the protein-ligand interaction profiler (PLIP) [35].

RESULTS

SNPs identification

A total of 824 base pairs (bp) were sequenced from the targeted exon 2 locus. The patterns of the genetic variations were determined using a comparative analysis of ovine sequences, namely GenBank sequence NM_001009752.1 analysis of sequences obtained from the entire population (n = 47) identified a total of 19 genetic variations (Table 1). Table 1 displays the SNPs’ location, alias (nomenclature used in this manuscript), dbSNP identifiers, amino acid substitution effect. The MTNR1A gene is located in the reverse orientation of the genome. The SNPs are arranged based on their position in the most recent version of the genome (Oar4.0: GenBank accession number NW_014639035.1. In exon 2, ten non-synonymous and nine synonymous SNPs were identified in exon 2. Among the analyzed SNPs, five were newly discovered, with four causing changes in the amino acid and one resulting in a premature stop codon.

Identification code of the variant, position in the current assembly, and amino acid changes

Population genetic analysis of polymorphism in the MTNR1A gene

Population genetic analysis was performed to investigate 19 loci of the Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep breed. The findings indicate that the snp1, snp6, snp7, snp9, snp12-snp14, and snp16-snp18 loci exhibited a moderate level of polymorphism (0.25<PIC<0.5) across all sheep breeds. On the other hand, the snp-snp5, snp8, snp10, snp11, snp15, and snp19 loci exhibited a low level of polymorphism (PIC<0.25) in loci (as shown in Table 2). The SNPs that were analyzed most often in previous studies on a variety of sheep breeds were rs406779174, rs430181568, rs407388227, and rs403212791. In our analysis, we discovered that only SNP rs407388227 did not result in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p<0.05).

Frequencies of alleles and genotypes of the MTNR1A gene in thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

Association analysis of MTNR1A gene with litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

A study was conducted to analyze the association between the 19 polymorphic loci and litter size of Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep. The table presents the least squares means and SDs of average litter size. There was a statistically significant association between non-synonymous snp2 (rs1087815963) and litter size in Thin-tailed sheep, with ewes with the GC genotype producing a larger litter size than those with the GG genotype. Another significant association was identified between synonymous snp11 (rs420819884) and litter size, as sheep with the AG genotype showed larger litter size than those with the GG genotype. The remaining loci were not significantly associated with litter size (Table 3).

Least squares mean and standard error for litter size of different genotypes of the MTNR1A gene in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

Linkage disequilibrium estimation

To examine the possible connections between different variations within the MTNR1A gene, we performed a thorough study of LD using Haploview4.2 software, as illustrated in Figure 1. LD analysis revealed a notable scarcity of potential co-inheritance with neighboring SNPs within the genomic block where rs1087815963 SNP is situated. The results of our study showed that there is a significant association between 15 SNPs, which may be grouped into five separate blocks. The SNP rs427019119 and rs417800445 (snp13 and snp14 in our study, respectively) had a strong linkage relationship (D′ = 0.888and r2 = 0.789), as shown in Table 4 allowing us to classify them as a single marker. The LD between snp12 and snp3 exhibited long-range association (D′ = 0.89 and r2 = 0.512). Employing a 5% haplotype frequency threshold in Haploview4.2, we identified a total of 18 haplotypes across the 15 SNPs within the Thin-tailed Indonesian ewe MTNR1A gene.

Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium among the nine single nucleotide polymorphisms of the MTNR1A gene in Thin Tailed Indonesian sheep is evident. The color of the squares corresponds to the degree of linkage, where darker shades indicate higher levels of linkage; The numerical values within the squares represent the strength of the correlation between locations, expressed as a percentage. Haplotype blocks are indicated by dark lines.

Estimated linkage disequilibrium for the 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms identified in the MTNR1A gene

Haplotypes frequency and association analysis of MTNR1A gene haplotypes and litter size in Thin tailed Indonesian ewes

The correlation between haplotypes of the MTNR1A gene and litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes was examined, and the findings are summarized in Table 5. The data revealed a statistically significant association between the four haplotypes in block 1 (snp1, snp2, and snp3) and litter size, with a p<0.05. Haplotype H1 (AG) in block 2 had the highest frequency among the 18 mentioned haplotypes, with a frequency of 0.727.

Estimates of haplotype frequencies and association analysis of MTNR1A gene haplotypes and litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep1)

In silico predictions

Out of ten non-synonymous SNPs, only one (rs1087815963) exhibited a significant association with litter size in the investigated ovine population. Due to its significant association with these traits, the possible effect of this SNP on the biological activity of MTNR1A was explored. Four in silico tools could not individually predict the effect of the missense SNPs, whether neutral or harmful [36]. Therefore, the combined utilization of numerous computational algorithms was applied to predict the effect of the detected SNPs. The effect of the detected missense SNPs in MTNR1A on structure, function, and stability was analyzed using a set of six different state-of-the-art in silico tools (SIFT, PANTHER, PolyPhen-2, I-Mutant2, mCSM, and MUpro). These computational analyses predicted a highly deleterious effect of p.127Val>Ile on the MTNR1A (Figure 1). The cumulative prediction of these tools suggested a highly putative damaging role for this nsSNP in the scheduled MTNR1A-based biological activities in ewes with GC genotype. In contrast, none of the other non-synonymous changes were anticipated to be detrimental; all were classified as tolerated based on the absence of a finding in at least four of these tools. The SIFT scores for the SNPs are as follows: The values for snp17, snp18, and snp12 are 0.51, 0.29, and 0.23, respectively.

To obtain further details of the putative mode of action of the identified missense p.127Val>Ile variant on the MTNR1A, a 3D structure was generated and its quality was assessed. Ramachandran plot showed that the generated model was in a highly qualified physiochemical characteristics since more 97.25% of the amino acid residues were resided in the Ramachandran favoured region (Supplementary File 1). ProSA web showed that the generated PDB model was similar to the native models of similar sizes (Supplementary File 2).

Docking outputs

To evaluate the damaging impact of the p.127Val>Ile variant on MTNR1A and its effect on the binding of the receptor to melatonin, two docking tests were conducted. These tests aimed to assess the efficacy of the binding with melatonin before and after the mutation. Since MTNR1A plays a role in regulating reproductive metabolism and the circadian action of melatonin, understanding the impact of this variant is crucial for elucidating its functional consequences. The first docking was carried out between the wild-type MTNR1A and melatonin, and the second docking was conducted between the altered MTNR1A and melatonin under the same conditions. The docking score of the wild-type MTNR1A-melatonin binding was −7.8 kcal/mol, while the cavity size was 643 Å (Figure 3a). PLIP analysis revealed that the docking score of −7.8 kcal/mol for the wild-type MTNR1A-melatonin binding was generated from the involvement of five amino acid residues in the interaction with melatonin, including Val127, which contributed two hydrophobic interactions (Figure 3a). In the second docking, the altered MTNR1A showed a notable alteration in the binding architecture with melatonin, resulting in a significant reduction in binding efficacy upon the p.127Val>Ile mutation. The docking score for the mutant MTNR1A-melatonin interaction decreased to −6.2 kcal/mol (with a cavity size of 533 Å), with only two amino acid residues participating in the hydrophobic interaction with melatonin. In contrast to the wild-type MTNR1A protein, the altered receptor exhibited largely reduced hydrophobic interactions with melatonin, which was excluded by only two shared with Leu170 and His210. Meanwhile, the altered receptor had shared one H-bond with melatonin using Ala206 residue (Figure 3b).

Figure 2

The in-silico analysis of the deleterious effects of the observed missense p.127Val>Ile variant in the MTNR1A. The 3D structure is shown as cartoons encrypted within a transparent surface.

Figure 3

Docking between MTNR1A with melatonin. (A) Normal MTNR1-melatonin complex, (B) Altered (p.127Val>Ile) MTNR1-melatonin complex. Melatonin is shown as a red stick, while Val127 and Ile127 are shown as green sticks.

DISCUSSION

One of the essential goals of breeding is to detect genetic variation that affects highly beneficial traits, such as fertility. This attribute significantly influences the overall profitability of the sheep industry. The capacity to control genetic variation holds the promise to augment breeding efforts, especially if DNA MAS can be utilized to more consistently, expeditiously, and economically identify superior animals. It is advantageous for a quality or characteristic to only appear once an individual achieves maturity, as is the case with reproduction.

In our extensive sequencing analysis of the MTNR1A gene in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep, we discovered 19 SNPs that were specifically found in exon 2. It is worth mentioning that some SNPs identified in our study have been previously recorded in different breeds through prior research investigations [5,12,22,24,3739] highlighting the extensive prevalence of these genetic variations. It is important to note that our inquiry has identified seven novel SNPs in exon 2. These SNPs are g.15571529G>C, rs108 7815963, rs1091928580, g.15571439A>C, rs1088397747, rs588561468, and g.15570837C>A. In our study, we have referred to these SNPs as snp1, snp2, snp4, snp5, snp8, snp15, and snp19. Remarkably, our research has successfully identified these specific genetic variants for the first time, making a significant addition to the comprehension of the genetic makeup of MTNR1A in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep.

The Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes exhibited a notable genetic characteristic, specifically ten polymorphic sites that induced alterations in the amino acid sequence. This quantity surpassed the corresponding counts documented in various breeds, including Sarda [37], Aragonesa [16,24], Awassi [5], and Tunisian breeds Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest breeds [12]. The observed SNPs suggested a higher level of genetic variety in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes, specifically in relation to the described polymorphic sites and their consequent effect on the composition of amino acids, as compared to the mentioned breeds. A study of the exon II sequence of Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes uncovered a consistent link between snp10 (rs430181568) and snp12 (rs407388227), which is consistent with similar discoveries in other breeds [23,39,40]. These findings suggest that either one or both SNPs may have a role in regulating the timing of reproductive cycles [5,39]. Though our investigation indicated that snp10 and snp12 as the most polymorphic loci, both SNPs did not exhibit any significant association with litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep. This observation aligns with the other similar findings in Awassi [5,12] and Istrian Pramenka ewes [38]. Interestingly, our results diverge from those reported by Vandeputte et al [41], where snp10 was associated with variations in litter size.

Individual SNPs may be directly used in research to investigate their correlation with phenotypic traits, but their impact on traits might be relatively small [42]. Linkage disequilibrium analysis emerges as a valuable method for probing the interconnected relationships among SNPs, as supported by numerous studies. Haplotypes encompass a greater amount of information compared to individual SNPs or the mere aggregation of numerous SNPs [43], the interactions between genetic loci, elucidated through such analysis, can provide a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of the genetic information underlying phenotypic traits. Haplotypes are superior to SNP loci as genetic markers due to their increased likelihood of being inherited in combination. Haplotypes shown to be more successful than SNPs for variables with moderate to low heritability [44]. According to Martínez-Royo et al [45], year-round estrus in Rasa Aragonesa sheep is linked to haplotypes of the 612 location T, A, and T alleles in exon 2 and the 422 and 677 positions in the MTNR1A gene promoter. Calvo et al [16] reported 9 SNPs in the MTNR1A gene promoter and 3 SNPs in exon 2 in Rasa Aragonesa sheep, further analysis of haplotypes indicated that the primary influence on seasonal reproduction is primarily due to non-synonymous alterations at position g.15099004G>A in exon 2. The current study, through haplotype analysis, reinforces our findings, particularly in Block 1 (comprising H1, H2, and H3). In this block, all haplotypes share the G allele at position 2, corresponding to snp2 (rs1087815963). Notably, Block 1 haplotypes are strongly associated with an increased litter size in Thin-tailed sheep, suggesting their significant role in enhancing reproductive performance. Furthermore, our results reveal a robust linkage between snp13 and snp14 (rs427019119 and rs417800445), as well as between snp16 and snp17 (rs429718221 and rs41 6266900). In contrast, the LD between snp12 (rs419680097) and snp3 (rs419680097) exhibited a long-range association. This extended LD can be attributed to intensive artificial selection in commercial breeding populations, leading to a reduction in effective population size. Additionally, LD varied significantly between chromosomes, indicating differences in autosomal recombination rates influenced by genetic drift and selection pressures within these populations [46]. This implies that these pairs of SNPs tend to be inherited together, potentially influencing specific genetic traits related to reproduction in Thin-tailed sheep. These strong linkages highlight potential genetic interactions contributing to the observed reproductive outcomes.

The current study revealed a significant correlation between a specific SNP, namely snp2 (rs1087815963), and litter size. The GC genotype exhibited a markedly greater average litter size (2.57±0.787) compared to the GG genotype (1.68 ±0.572). The snp2 variation, which we discovered throughout our analysis, is considered to be a novel finding. However, due to its possible weak collaboration with other surrounding SNPs, the LD findings suggest that the rs1087815963 SNP can largely be inherited independently. This suggests that its inheritance may occur irrespective of other SNPs. Accordingly, the finding of this SNP indicated that the rs1087815963 SNP may not participate with our SNPs in the determination of its impact on the metabolic pathway in which MTNR1A is involved.

The recent advancements in computational tools for predicting the effects of SNPs on protein structure and function have greatly facilitated data interpretation in animal breeding [47]. In our study, the utilization of these tools proved to be highly beneficial in elucidating the impact of observed SNPs on the MTNR1A protein in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep. Specifically, the identification of the V127I mutation as deleterious by computational algorithms provided crucial insights into its potential effects on the structure, biological functions, and stability of MTNR1A. Multiple in silico affirmations of the deleterious effects of the V127I mutation further supported its potential to disrupt the normal functioning of MTNR1A. This mutation, occurring within a critical transmembrane helix region of the protein, may negatively influence its ability to interact with ligands or participate in signaling pathways crucial for reproductive processes in sheep. Considering the essential role of melatonin signaling, mediated by MTNR1A, in regulating seasonal reproduction and circadian rhythms [48], any disturbance in its function due to the V127I mutation could have significant implications for reproductive performance, including litter size traits.

This study employed molecular docking to understand how the p.127Val>Ile SNP modifies MTNR1A action by predicting a substitution of valine with isoleucine at position 127 (V127I) in the third transmembrane domain (TM3), crucial for ligand binding and receptor activation. Molecular docking indicated that the altered MTNR1A had reduced binding with melatonin, resulting in a smaller receptor-ligand cavity. These findings align with previous research on melatonin receptor mutations Chugunov et al [49] discussed how TM3 rotation in the MT2 receptor, involving Val124, affects ligand accessibility and interactions, similar to the p.127Val>Ile mutation effects observed here, which reduced binding efficacy and altered hydrophobic interactions with melatonin. Additionally, Calvo et al [50] highlighted the significance of specific amino acid residues like His195/2085.46, Ser1103.35, and Ser1143.39 in ligand binding and receptor activation, further emphasizing the critical role of TM domain residues in melatonin receptor function. Collectively, these insights underscore the importance of understanding how mutations in TM domains impact receptor-ligand interactions and signaling pathways. Due to the critical role played by MTNR1A in the binding with melatonin, any amino acid substitution that has a deleterious effect on its structure could impact this binding. When the function of this binding protein is impaired or reduced, it can disrupt the normal metabolism of melatonin and lead to variable effects on reproductive traits. When melatonin cannot be transported effectively in the body of sheep, it can disrupt various physiological processes regulated by melatonin, including reproductive functions. Due to the involvement of melatonin in the regulation of the estrous cycle and fertility, disturbances in the reproductive system with a potential decreased litter size result when it is not transported well. The predicted deleterious effects of the V127I mutation on MTNR1A activity underscore its relevance as a genetic marker for reproductive performance in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep.

By providing insights into the biological activity of MTNR1A and its potential effects on litter size, our study contributes to a better understanding of the genetic basis of reproductive traits in sheep. The differences in how the melatonin signal is perceived could perhaps explain the observed variances in reproductive recovery phenotype in this investigation. In addition to our finding, it has been deduced that missense can have a substantial effect on complex characteristics since it has been demonstrated that point mutations in BMP15, MTNR1A, BMP7, and BMP2 have a substantial impact on litter size [24,51,52]. However, litter size is a complex process influenced by various factors, including diet, physical activity, genetics, and overall energy balance. The control of litter size is a multifactorial event, and it therefore cannot be easily determined. While our study in MTNR1A focused on the association between the V127I mutation and litter size traits in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep, it is important to acknowledge the complexity of reproductive traits, which are influenced by multiple genetic and environmental factors. Thus, although the V127I mutation may represent a significant genetic determinant of litter size variation, it is likely just one piece of the broader genetic landscape governing reproductive outcomes in sheep. Furthermore, the high frequency of the V127I mutation in ewes-producing twins suggests its potential role as a causative factor for increased prolificacy in this population. It is well known that several loci contribute to the control of the ovulation rate in sheep [53]. Nevertheless, it is essential to consider that the impact of SNPs on the investigated phenotypic variables, particularly litter size, might have been influenced by the sample size. The need for a more extensive sample size is evident, and further research at a later stage is warranted to enhance our understanding of these genetic interactions and their implications for selective breeding strategy.

CONCLUSION

Our study in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes identified 19 SNPs in exon 2 of the MTNR1A gene. Among them, ten SNPs showed non-synonymous variations. Association analysis of litter size revealed a significant correlation with snp2 (rs1087815963), where ewes with the GC genotype displayed a higher litter size than those with the GG genotype. This novel finding was associated with a substitution (Val> Ile) at amino acid 127, which is crucial for MT1A receptor functionality. Molecular docking experiments revealed a decrease in MTNR1A binding when mutated with the p.127Val>Ile SNP. Reduced binding to melatonin suggests that this crucial hormone may not be adequately transported and utilized within cells. Consequently, more melatonin may accumulate in extracellular compartments, potentially resulting in various consequences, including a presumed decrease in litter size. Our findings suggest that the p.Val127Ile SNP in MTNR1A has dual successive effects: it negatively affects the biological activity of MTNR1A, which negatively influences reproductive performance by lowering litter size indices. Though p.127Val>Ile is strongly recommended as a crucial candidate for MAS in sheep, further in vitro experiments are required to validate this finding.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any organization regarding the materials discussed in the manuscript.

FUNDING

This study was supported in part by the Skema Penelitian Unggulan Airlangga (PUA) Universitas Airlangga in year 2023 (1710/UN3.LPPM/PT.01.03/2023).

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary file is available from: https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0187

Supplementary File S1. Ramachandran plot output data for the generated MTNR1A protein.

ab-24-0187-Supplementary-Fig-1.pdf

Supplementary File S2. ProSA Web plot output data for the generated MTNR1A protein.

ab-24-0187-Supplementary-Fig-2.pdf

References

1. BPS-Statistics Indonesia. Livestock Population by Province and Type of Livestock [Internet] Jakarta, Indonesia: BPS - Statistics Indonesia; c2024. [cited 2024 Jan 20]. Available from: https://buly.kr/Ezgyxyo.
2. Xu SS, Gao L, Xie XL, et al. Genome-wide association analyses highlight the potential for different genetic mechanisms for litter size among sheep breeds. Front Genet 2018;9:118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00118.
3. Hernández-Montiel W, Martínez-Núñez MA, Ramón-Ugalde JP, Román-Ponce SI, Calderón-Chagoya R, Zamora-Bustillos R. Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes for litter size traits in pelibuey sheep. Animals 2020;10:434. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030434.
4. Ibrahim AHM. Association of growth performance and body conformational traits with BMP4 gene variation in Barki lambs. Growth Factors 2019;37:153–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/08977194.2019.1662417.
5. Cosso G, Nehme M, Luridiana S, et al. Detection of polymorphisms in the MTNR1A gene and their association with reproductive performance in awassi ewes. Animals 2021;11:583. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11020583.
6. Kianpoor S, Abdolmohammadi A, Hajarian H, Nikousefat Z, Khamisabadi H. Association of MTNR1A and CYP19 genes polymorphisms with sperm quality and testicular size in Sanjabi breed rams. Ann Anim Sci 2018;18:699–711. https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2018-0021.
7. Yue L, Li W, Pan Y, Lan X, Zhang Q, Pan C. Polymorphism of GTF2A1 gene is associated with litter size in sheep. Theriogenology 2023;208:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2023.06.004.
8. Huang Y, Su P, Akhatayeva Z, Pan C, Zhang Q, Lan X. Novel InDel variations of the Cry2 gene are associated with litter size in Australian White sheep. Theriogenology 2022;179:155–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.11.023.
9. Chen S, Tao L, He X, Di R, Wang X, Chu M. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms in FLT3, NLRP5, and TGIF1 are associated with litter size in Small-tailed Han sheep. Arch Anim Breed 2021;64:475–86. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-64-475-2021.
10. Ma L, Li Y, Ma X, EER H. Genome-wide SNPs and indels characteristics of three chinese domestic sheep breeds from different ecoregions. Livest Sci 2020;240:104122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104122.
11. Wijayanti D, Zhang S, Yang Y, et al. Goat SMAD family member 1 (SMAD1): mRNA expression, genetic variants, and their associations with litter size. Theriogenology 2022;193:11–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2022.09.001.
12. Arjoune A, Alsaleh AB, Messaoudi SA, et al. Analysis of MTNR1A genetic polymorphisms and their association with the reproductive performance parameters in two Mediterranean sheep breeds. Animals 2023;13:448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030448.
13. Paulino LRFM, Barroso PAA, Silva BR, et al. Immunolocalization of melatonin receptors in bovine ovarian follicles and in vitro effects of melatonin on growth, viability and gene expression in secondary follicles. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2022;81:106750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2022.106750.
14. Yang D, He Y, Yuan L, et al. Expression and distribution of MTNR1A in the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal axis of Tibetan sheep during the estrous cycle. Gene 2022;839:146731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2022.146731.
15. Li Y, Lv Y, Bian C, You X, Shi Q. Molecular evolution of melatonin receptor genes (mtnr) in vertebrates and its shedding light on mtnr1c. Gene 2021;769:145256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145256.
16. Calvo JH, Serrano M, Martinez-Royo A, et al. SNP rs403212791 in exon 2 of the MTNR1A gene is associated with reproductive seasonality in the Rasa aragonesa sheep breed. Theriogenology 2018;113:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2018.02.013.
17. He X, Zhang Z, Liu Q, Chu M. Polymorphisms of the melatonin receptor 1A gene that affects the reproductive seasonality and litter size in Small Tail Han sheep. Reprod Domest Anim 2019;54:1400–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13538.
18. He X, Wang W, Sun W, Chu M. Photoperiod induces DNA methylation changes in the melatonin receptor 1A gene in ewes. Animals 2023;13:1917. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121917.
19. He C, Ma T, Shi J, et al. Melatonin and its receptor MT1 are involved in the downstream reaction to luteinizing hormone and participate in the regulation of luteinization in different species. J Pineal Res 2016;61:279–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpi.12345.
20. Gunwant P, Pandey AK, Kumar A, et al. Polymorphism of melatonin receptor (MTNR1A) gene and its association with seasonal reproduction in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Anim Reprod Sci 2018;199:51–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.10.006.
21. Abdolahi S, Shokrollahi B, Saadati N, Morammazi S. No polymorphism of melatonin receptor 1A (MTNR1A) gene was found in Markhoz goat. Vet Med Sci 2019;5:157–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.146.
22. Luridiana S, Mura MC, Daga C, et al. The relationship between melatonin receptor 1A gene (MTNR1A) polymorphism and reproductive performance in Sarda breed sheep. Livest Sci 2015;171:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.11.004.
23. Saxena VK, Jha BK, Meena AS, Naqvi SMK. Characterization of MTNR1A gene in terms of genetic variability in a panel of subtemperate and subtropical Indian sheep breeds. J Genet 2015;94:715–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-015-0587-9.
24. Luridiana S, Cosso G, Pulinas L, et al. New polymorphisms at MTNR1A gene and their association with reproductive resumption in sarda breed sheep. Theriogenology 2020;158:438–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.10.006.
25. Saxena VK, Jha BK, Meena AS, Naqvi SMK. Sequence analysis and identification of new variations in the coding sequence of melatonin receptor gene (MTNR1A) of Indian Chokla sheep breed. Meta Gene 2014;2:450–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2014.05.005.
26. Wijayanti D, Bai Y, Hanif Q, et al. Goat CLSTN2 gene: tissue expression profile, genetic variation, and its associations with litter size. Anim Biotechnol 2023;34:2674–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2022.2111311.
27. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005;21:263–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.
28. Ng PC, Henikoff S. Predicting the effects of amino acid substitutions on protein function. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2006;7:61–80. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115630.
29. Tang H, Thomas PD. Panther-psep: predicting disease-causing genetic variants using position-specific evolutionary preservation. Bioinformatics 2016;32:2230–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw222.
30. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet 2013. Chapter 7(Unit7.20)https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142905.hg0720s76.
31. Capriotti E, Fariselli P, Casadio R. I-mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2005;33(Suppl 2):W306–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki375.
32. Pires DEV, Ascher DB, Blundell TL. mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures. Bioinformatics 2014;30:335–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt691.
33. Cheng J, Randall A, Baldi P. Prediction of protein stability changes for single-site mutations using support vector machines. Proteins 2006;62:1125–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.20810.
34. Liu Y, Grimm M, Dai WT, Hou MC, Xiao ZX, Cao Y. CB-Dock: a web server for cavity detection-guided protein–ligand blind docking. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2020;41:138–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-019-0228-6.
35. Salentin S, Schreiber S, Haupt VJ, Adasme MF, Schroeder M. PLIP: fully automated protein-ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:W443–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv315.
36. Al-Shuhaib MBS. A comprehensive in silico prediction of the most deleterious missense variants in the bovine LEP gene. Biotechnologia 2019;100:429–39. https://doi.org/10.5114/bta.2019.90244.
37. Mura MC, Cosso G, Pulinas L, Carcangiu V, Luridiana S. Reproductive resumption in winter and spring related to MTNR1A gene polymorphisms in Sarda sheep. Animals 2022;12:2947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212947.
38. Pulinas L, Starič J, Cosso G, et al. MTNR1A gene polymorphisms and reproductive recovery after seasonal anoestrus in different Mediterranean sheep breeds. Anim Reprod Sci 2022;236:106905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2021.106905.
39. Starič J, Farci F, Luridiana S, et al. Reproductive performance in three Slovenian sheep breeds with different alleles for the MTNR1A gene. Anim Reprod Sci 2020;216:106352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106352.
40. Arjoune A, Alsaleh AB, Messaoudi SA, et al. Analysis of MTNR1A genetic polymorphisms and their association with the reproductive performance parameters in two Mediterranean sheep breeds. Animals 2023;13:448. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13030448.
41. Fathy HA, Gouda EM, Gafer JA, Galal MK, Nowier AM. Genetic polymorphism in melatonin receptor 1A and arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase and its impact on seasonal reproduction in Egyptian sheep breeds. Arch Anim Breed 2018;61:505–16. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-61-505-2018.
42. Vandeputte M, Dupont-Nivet M, Chavanne H, Chatain B. A polygenic hypothesis for sex determination in the European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Genetics 2007;176:1049–57. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.072140.
43. Ming-Yuan W, Meng-Ting Z, Yan-Yan S, et al. Polymorphisms and haplotypes of MTNR1A gene and their association with litter size in sheep (Ovis aries). J Agric Biotechnol 2021;29:1303–12.
44. Zhao J, Sauvage C, Bitton F, Causse M. Multiple haplotype-based analyses provide genetic and evolutionary insights into tomato fruit weight and composition. Hortic Res 2022. 9uhab009. https://doi.org/10.1093/hr/uhab009.
45. Martínez-Royo A, Lahoz B, Alabart JL, Folch J, Calvo JH. Characterisation of the melatonin receptor 1A (MTNR1A) gene in the Rasa Aragonesa sheep breed: association with reproductive seasonality. Anim Reprod Sci 2012;133:169–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.06.018.
46. Mdladla K, Dzomba EF, Huson HJ, Muchadeyi FC. Population genomic structure and linkage disequilibrium analysis of South African goat breeds using genome-wide SNP data. Anim Genet 2016;47:471–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12442.
47. Alwan IH, Aljubouri TRS, Al-Shuhaib MBS. A novel missense SNP in the fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) gene is associated with growth traits in Karakul and Awassi sheep. Biochem Genet 2023;62:1462–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10528-023-10504-8.
48. Kárpáti E, Fürlinger D, Pleskó AM, Gulyás L, Gáspárdy A, Becskei Z. Various approaches to influence melatonin level in sheep reproduction. Vet Glas 2023;77:16–34. https://doi.org/10.2298/VETGL220308007K.
49. Chugunov AO, Farce A, Chavatte P, Efremov RG. Differences in binding sites of two melatonin receptors help to explain their selectivity to some melatonin analogs: a molecular modeling study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2006;24:91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2006.10507103.
50. Alkozi HA, Montero JMS, Doadrio AL, Pintor J. Docking studies for melatonin receptors. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2018;13:241–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2018.1419184.
51. Calvo JH, Chantepie L, Serrano M, et al. A new allele in the BMP15 gene (FecXRA) that affects prolificacy co-segregates with FecXR and FecXGR in Rasa aragonesa sheep. Theriogenology 2020;144:107–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.010.
52. Zhang Z, Liu Q, Di R, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in BMP2 and BMP7 and the association with litter size in Small Tail Han sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 2019;204:183–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2019.04.001.
53. Abdoli R, Zamani P, Mirhoseini SZ, Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N, Nadri S. A review on prolificacy genes in sheep. Reprod Domest Anim 2016;51:631–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.12733.

Article information Continued

Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium among the nine single nucleotide polymorphisms of the MTNR1A gene in Thin Tailed Indonesian sheep is evident. The color of the squares corresponds to the degree of linkage, where darker shades indicate higher levels of linkage; The numerical values within the squares represent the strength of the correlation between locations, expressed as a percentage. Haplotype blocks are indicated by dark lines.

Figure 2

The in-silico analysis of the deleterious effects of the observed missense p.127Val>Ile variant in the MTNR1A. The 3D structure is shown as cartoons encrypted within a transparent surface.

Figure 3

Docking between MTNR1A with melatonin. (A) Normal MTNR1-melatonin complex, (B) Altered (p.127Val>Ile) MTNR1-melatonin complex. Melatonin is shown as a red stick, while Val127 and Ile127 are shown as green sticks.

Table 1

Identification code of the variant, position in the current assembly, and amino acid changes

Alias Uploaded variant Location Amino acid change MTNR1A region Uploaded allele
snp1 g.15571529G>C 26:15571529 Arg/Gly Exon2 G/C
snp2 rs1087815963G>C 26:15571508 Val/Ile Exon2 C/T
snp3 rs419680097G>T 26:15571482 None Exon2 C/A
snp4 rs1091928580G>C 26:15571480 Gly/Val Exon2 C/A
snp5 g.15571439A>C 26:15571439 Gly/* Exon2 A/C
snp6 g.15571438G>A 26:15571438 Thr/Ile Exon2 G/A
snp7 g.15571433G>A 26:15571433 Arg/Cys Exon2 G/A
snp8 rs1088397747 26:15571413 None Exon2 C/T
snp9 rs406779174 26:15571329 None Exon2 G/A
snp10 rs430181568 26:15571323 None Exon2 C/T
snp11 rs420819884 26:15571260 None Exon2 T/C
snp12 rs407388227 26:15571229 Val/Ile Exon2 C/T
snp13 rs427019119 26:15571152 None Exon2 C/T
snp14 rs417800445 26:15571134 None Exon2 C/T
snp15 rs588561468 26:15571104 None Exon2 G/A
snp16 rs429718221 26:15571044 None Exon2 G/A
snp17 rs416266900 26:15571042 Ala/Asp Exon2 G/T
snp18 rs403212791 26:15570842 Arg/Cys Exon2 G/A
snp19 g.15570837C>A 26:15570837 Lys/Asn Exon2 C/A

Table 2

Frequencies of alleles and genotypes of the MTNR1A gene in thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

SNP number dbSNPs Genotype Genotype frequency PIC HWE (p-value) Allele Allele frequency
snp1 g.15571529 CC 0 0.428 0.002 C 0.309
GC 0.617 G 0.691
GG 0.383
snp2 rs1087815963 CC 0 0.148 0.611 C 0.074
GC 0.149 G 0.926
GG 0.851
snp3 rs419680097 GG 0.830 0.214 0.00044 G 0.883
GT 0.106 T 0.117
TT 0.064
snp4 rs1091928580 CC 0 0.217 0.339 C 0.128
GC 0.255 G 0.872
GG 0.745
snp5 g.15571439 AA 0.830 0.160 0.552 A 0.915
CA 0.170 C 0.085
CC 0
snp6 g.15571438 AA 0.043 0.370 0.566 A 0.245
AG 0.404 G 0.755
GG 0.553
snp7 g.15571433 AA 0 0.251 0.210 A 0.160
AG 0.319 G 0.840
GG 0.681
snp8 rs1088397747 GG 0.809 0.183 0.495 G 0.904
GT 0.191 T 0.096
TT 0
snp9 rs406779174 CC 0.447 0.466 0.212 C 0.639
CT 0.383 T 0.361
TT 0.170
snp10 rs430181568 AA 0.043 0.217 0.082 A 0.128
AG 0.170 G 0.872
GG 0.787
snp11 rs420819884 AA 0 0.021 1.00 A 0.010
AG 0.021 G 0.99
GG 0.979
snp12 rs407388227 AA 0.149 0.278 0.0000 A 0.170
AG 0.043 G 0.830
GA 0.809
snp13 rs427019119 AA 0.255 0.375 0.0000 A 0.260
AG 0 G 0.740
GG 0.745
snp14 rs417800445 AA 0.234 0.375 0.0000 A 0.260
AG 0.043 G 0.740
GG 0.723
snp15 rs588561468 CC 0.936 0.095 0.0000 C 0.970
CT 0 T 0.063
TT 0.064
snp16 rs429718221 CC 0.531 0.493 0.0000 C 0.553
CT 0.043 T 0.447
TT 0.426
snp17 rs416266900 AA 0.234 0.375 0.0000 A 0.255
AC 0.043 C 0.745
CC 0.723
snp18 rs403212791 CC 0.617 0.365 0.230 C 0.766
CT 0.298 T 0.234
TT 0.85
snp19 g.15570837 AA 0.064 0.095 0.0000 A 0.063
AC 0 C 0.937
CC 0.936

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; PIC, polymorphism information content; HWE, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 3

Least squares mean and standard error for litter size of different genotypes of the MTNR1A gene in Thin-tailed Indonesian ewes

SNP number dbSNPs Genotype LSmeans SNP
snp1 g.15571529 GC (19) 1.76±0.577
GG (28) 1.89±0.832
snp2 rs1087815963 GC (7) 2.57±0.787a
GG (40) 1.68±0.572b
snp3 rs419680097 GG (39) 1.82±0.721
GT (5) 1.60±0.548
TT (3) 2.00±0.000
snp4 rs1091928580 GC (12) 1.58±0.515
GG (35) 1.89±0.718
snp5 g.15571439 AA (39) 1.77±0.667
CA (8) 2.00±0.756
snp6 g.15571438 AA (2) 2.50±0.707
AG (19) 1.68±0.671
GG (26) 1.85±0.675
snp7 g.15571433 AG (15) 1.60±0.737
GG (32) 1.91±0.641
snp8 rs1088397747 GG (38) 1.79±0.664
GT (9) 1.89±0.782
snp9 rs406779174 CC (21) 1.81±0.750
CT (18) 1.78±0.647
TT (8) 1.88±0.641
snp10 rs430181568 AA (2) 2.00±0.000
AG (8) 1.63±0.518
GG (37) 1.84±0.727
snp11 rs420819884 AG (1) 4.00a
GG (46) 1.76±0.603b
snp12 rs407388227 AA (7) 1.71±0.488
AG (2) 1.00±0.000
GA (38) 1.87±0.704
snp13 rs427019119 AA (11) 1.82±0.751
GG (36) 1.81±0.668
snp14 rs417800445 AA (11) 1.82±0.751
AG (2) 2.00±1.414
GG (34) 1.79±0.641
snp15 rs588561468 CC (44) 1.82±0.691
TT (3) 1.67±0.577
snp16 rs429718221 CC (25) 1.84±0.688
CT (2) 2.00±1.414
TT (20) 1.75±0.639
snp17 rs416266900 AA (11) 1.82±0.751
AC (2) 2.00±01.414
CC (34) 1.79±0.641
snp18 rs403212791 CC (29) 1.69±0.604
CT (14) 2.07±0.829
TT (4) 1.75±0.500
snp19 g.15570837 AA (3) 2.00±1.00
CC (44) 1.80±0.668

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; LSmean, least squares mean.

a,b

Values with different superscripts within the same column differ significantly (p<0.05).

Table 4

Estimated linkage disequilibrium for the 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms identified in the MTNR1A gene

Block D′ r2
Block 1
 g.15571529/ rs1087815963 0.354 0.005
 g.15571529/ rs419680097 1 0.059
 rs1087815963/ rs419680097 1 0.011
Block 2
 g.15571439 / g.15571438 0.553 0.088
Block 3
 rs406779174/ rs430181568 1 0.083
 rs406779174/ rs420819884 1 0.006
 rs430181568/ rs420819884 1 0.002
Block 4
 rs407388227/ rs427019119 0.755 0.04
 rs407388227/ rs417800445 1 0.07
 rs427019119/ rs417800445 0.888 0.789
Block 5
 rs588561468/ rs429718221 1 0.084
 rs588561468/ rs416266900 1 0.023
 rs588561468/ rs403212791 1 0.021
 rs429718221/ rs416266900 1 0.424
 rs429718221/ rs403212791 0.895 0.198
 rs416266900/ rs403212791 0.804 0.068

Table 5

Estimates of haplotype frequencies and association analysis of MTNR1A gene haplotypes and litter size in Thin-tailed Indonesian sheep1)

Block2) Haplotype Number of samples Haplotype frequencies Litter size (mean±standard deviation) p-value
1 H1 (GGG) 44 0.503 1.79±0.701b <0.05
H2 (CGG) 29 0.305 1.75±0.576b
H3 (GGT) 7 0.117 1.71±0.487ab
H4 (GCG) 6 0.071 2.33±0.516a
2 H1 (AG) 44 0.727 1.77±0.677 0.82
H2 (AA) 21 0.188 1.76±0.700
H3 (CA) 4 0.056 2.00±1.154
3 H1 (CGG) 37 0.5 1.78±0.712 0.85
H2 (TGG) 26 0.362 1.81±0.634
H3 (CAG) 9 0.128 1.67±0.500
4 H1 (GGG) 28 0.564 1.86±0.705 0.70
H2 (GAA) 11 0.234 1.82±0.751
H3 (AGG) 8 0.160 1.63±0.518
5 H1 (CCCC) 21 0.330 1.86±0.727 0.84
H2 (CTAC) 13 0.244 1.85±0.801
H3 (CCCT) 17 0.223 2.00±0.791
H4 (CTCC) 9 0.128 1.67±0.707
H5(TTCC) 3 0.064 1.67±0.577
1)

Haplotypes with a frequency below 0.01 are not shown.

2)

Block1, snp1-snp2-snp3; Block2, snp5-snp6; Block3, snp9-snp10-snp11; Block4, snp12-snp13-snp14; Block 5, snp15-snp16-snp17-snp18-snp19 -snp_25-snp_26-snp_28-snp_29-snp_30-snp_32-snp_33-snp_34.