Effects of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) as feed supplements on muscle nutrient composition, meat quality, and antioxidant capacity in Qianbei goat

Article information

Anim Biosci. 2024;37(12):2167-2177
Publication date (electronic) : 2024 June 25
doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0173
1School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Muang, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
2Program in Agriculture, Faculty of Science and Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Muang, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
3Institute of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*Corresponding Author: Pramote Paengkoum, Tel: +66-872353974, E-mail: pramote@sut.ac.th
Received 2024 March 22; Revised 2024 May 1; Accepted 2024 May 26.

Abstract

Objective

Black soldier fly (BSF) as an animal protein feed source is currently becoming a hot research topic. This study investigated the effects of the BSF as a protein feed source for goats on slaughter performance, muscle nutrient composition, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, and antioxidant levels.

Methods

Thirty Qianbei Ma goats (20.30±1.09 kg) were randomly divided into three groups: the control group (GRPC) supplemented with 10% full-fat soybean, treatment 1 (GRPU) supplemented with 10% untreated BSF, and treatment 2 (GRPT) supplemented with 10% heat-treated BSF. One-way analysis of variance among groups (with Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc comparison) was used in this study.

Results

The nutrients, amino acids, fatty acids, minerals, and antioxidants in muscle were analyzed. The results showed that there were no significant differences in the moisture, dry matter, crude protein, ash, amino acids, and mineral content of the muscles among the three feeding groups. The slaughter rate and carcass weight of the GRPU and GRPT groups were significantly lower (p<0.05). The overall meat quality of the GRPU and GRPT groups decreased (p<0.05). The individual unsaturated fatty acids and total unsaturated fatty acids in the GRPU group were higher (p<0.05) than those in the GRPC and GRPT groups. Both GRPU and GRPT decreased (p<0.05) the antioxidant capacity of the meat.

Conclusion

Therefore, the heat-treated BSF had a better effect on meat quality compared to untreated BSF, but there were greater negative effects on the meat quality of GRPU and GRPT than GRPC.

INTRODUCTION

Due to the projected 76% increase in global demand for meat, it is imperative to explore new methods for augmenting protein production while minimizing the utilization of natural resources to ensure food security within the carrying capacity of Earth [1]. Hence, there is a particular need to identify additional protein-rich feed ingredients for livestock with less environmental impact [2]. In this context, insects have been explicitly recommended as sustainable protein sources for both human consumption and livestock feed [3]. Currently, insects such as black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens, L. BSF), crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae), and mealworm larvae (Tenebrio molitor L.) are being utilized as protein sources in animal feed [4]. These three insects are rich in protein and essential amino acids (EAA), minerals, fats, and a significant amount of saturated fatty acids (FA). Among other insect species, BSF stands out due to its excellent protein conversion rate [5]. However, a high content of saturated fatty acids (SFA) may have adverse effects on the rumen fermentation, and meat quality of goats [6]. Although the FA composition of ruminant tissues is less influenced by dietary lipid components compared to non-ruminant animals, differences in dietary FA composition can still lead to variations in tissue FA composition in goats [7]. This difference primarily arises from the hydrogenation of dietary lipids by rumen microorganisms, n-3 and n-6 FA from feed can be incorporated into the adipose tissues and muscles of ruminant animals [8]. Moreover, the levels of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in ruminant tissues can be increased by feeding a diet rich in dietary lipids, which can be protected from rumen biohydrogenation through chemical or physical processing [9]. Previous research on rapeseed indicated that heat treatment reduced the biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) in the rumen, which subsequently increased the proportion of undegraded protein in the rumen [10]. In a study by Scollan et al [8], feeding a protected lipid supplement composed of soybean, flaxseed, and sunflower seeds resulted in a slight increase in the concentration of 18:3 n-3 in muscle phospholipids, rising from 12.7 mg/100 g to 16.0 mg/100 g, but there was no occurrence of chain elongation or desaturation of long-chain n-3 PUFA. Simultaneously, feeding heat-treated protein supplements can also enhance the tenderness of meat and intramuscular fat [11]. We hypothesized that heat-treated BSF could yield similar results. This experiment represents the final stage of a series of three trials. Earlier, we supplemented goat diets with varying levels of BSF and investigated the effects of different temperatures on BSF rumen degradation and protein digestion in the small intestine. Based on the above research, we determined the appropriate supplementation level and treatment temperature of BSF, and therefore, we conducted this experiment.

Guizhou Province is in the eastern part of the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau in southwestern China, where there is lack of protein feed sources. The cultivation of BSF does not require extensive land, significant labor costs, or time investments, making it particularly suitable for development in countries and regions with limited arable land. The Qianbei Ma Goat (the goats raised in the north of Guizhou Province) is known for its excellent meat quality, with mild odor and tender texture [12]. Currently, it is not clear whether BSF has any negative impact on the meat quality of Qianbei Ma goat. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of heat-treated BSF on the slaughter performance, muscle nutritional composition, amino acid (AA), FA, minerals, and antioxidant levels of Qianbei Ma goat, providing data support for the application of BSF in goats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical permission for this study was obtained from the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Guizhou University (protocol number EAE-GZU-2021-E024).

Animals, diets, and experimental design

BSF purchased from farmers in Henan Province, China, was ground and sieved through a 1 mm sieve to prepare the experimental powder. The chemical composition and minerals of BSF are listed in Table 1. This study was conducted at Fuxing Husbandry Co., Ltd., Guizhou, China (106.198244 E, 28.26403 N). After acclimatizing animals for 14 days, we tested them for the following 60 days. Thirty Qianbei Ma goats (20.30±1.09 kg) were randomly divided into three groups, and all of goats were fed individually. The control group (GRPC) was supplemented with 10% full-fat soybean, treatment 1 (GRPU) was supplemented with 10% untreated BSF, and treatment 2 (GRPT) was supplemented with 10% heat-treated BSF. Before formulating the feed, cassava was mixed with either full-fat soybean (FFS) or BSF in a 95:5 ratio. For the GRPT, an additional 75% water was added. The mixture was vigorously kneaded and firmly pressed evenly into a heated square pan (100 cm×55 cm×6.5 cm) to a thickness of about 5 cm, and treated in an oven at 140°C for 120 min. The experimental diets for goats were formulated according to NRC2007, as detailed in Table 2. Equal amounts of feed were offered daily at 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. for ad libitum water and intake, and 10% refusals on an as-fed basis. AA and FA in the diet were detailed respectively in Table 3 and 4.

The proximate composition of black soldier fly (DM basis, %)

Concentrate supplement formula and chemical composition (DM basis, %)

Amino acids composition of concentrate

Fatty acids composition of concentrate

Chemical composition of feed and muscle

The BSF and basal diet were collected, dried in a vacuum oven at 65°C for 72 h, and further analyzed through a 1 mm sieve. Additionally, the longissimus thoracis and lumborum (LTL) (a muscle) were collected and lyophilized. The BSF, diet, and muscle were then analyzed for dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and ash content, following AOAC method [13] methods. Mineral content in the feed, BSF, and LTL muscle was also analyzed using (AOAC 2005) [13] methods. Gross energy was determined using an adiabatic cartridge calorimeter (WGR-WR3; Changsha Benyi Instrument Co., Ltd., Changsha, China), with each sample assayed three times.

Slaughtering procedure, carcass dissection and meat sampling

Slaughter and dissection procedures were conducted according to the Livestock and Poultry Slaughter Operation Regulations (Goat) (NY/T 3469-2019). Six goats were selected randomly to be weighed and slaughtered in each group after a 12-hour fasting period. The LTL muscle was separated from each carcass for meat quality testing. The dressing percentage (%) was calculated as (carcass weight/live weight before slaughter) ×100. The pH of the LTL muscle was measured at 45 min and 24 h post-mortem (maintained at 4°C) using a pH meter (Matthäus, Eckelsheim, Germany) that had been calibrated with standard pH 4.0 and 7.0 buffers. Meat color attributes, including lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*), were assessed using a portable meat colorimeter (NR110; Qinyou Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Chongqing, China). The colorimeter was pre-calibrated with a manual white calibration plate provided by the manufacturer, with an illuminance level of D65, an 8-degree standard viewer, and an aperture size of 4.0 mm for the closed candle. To determine water loss, fresh meat samples were cut and weighed after 45 minutes from slaughter (W3), covered with 17 layers of filter paper, and compressed using a meat press (Tenovo Meat-1; Tenovo International Co., Limited Beijing, China). The samples were reweighed (W4), water loss (%) = ([W3–W4]/W3) ×100%. Cooking loss, 50 g of the sample (W5) was weighed after the removal of tendons, fascia, and fat. The sample was boiled in water for 30 min, cooled for 30 min, and reweighed (W6), cooking loss (%) = ([W5–W6]/W5)×100%. Water holding capacity (WHC), samples 2.5 cm in diameter and 1 cm thick were cut and weighed (W7). The samples were pressed under a 35 kg weight for 5 min and reweighed (W8), WHC (%) = ([W7–W8]/W7)×100. Longitudinal sections of 1×1×3 cm parallel to the muscle fibers were cut and the shear force (in Newtons) was measured with a digital flexometer (Harbin Xeriki Co., Ltd., Harbin, China). Each sample was tested three times.

Amino acid analysis

The preprocessing of BSF AA analysis followed the method outlined by Tian et al [14]. The UHPLC conditions for analyzing individual AA included using an ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1×100 mm×1.7 μm; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) at 40°C with a 5 μL injection volume. Mobile phases A and B consisted of 10% methanol (0.1% formic acid) and 50% methanol (0.1% formic acid), respectively. The elution gradient ranged from 10% to 30% B over 0 to 6.5 min, increased to 100% B from 6.5 to 7 min, held at 100% B from 7 to 8 min, decreased to 10% B from 8 to 8.5 min, and finally maintained at 10% B from 8.5 to 12.5 min. The flow rate changed from 0.3 mL/min to 0.4 mL/min during the run. Mass spectral analysis was conducted using an electrospray ion source in positive ion mode with a source temperature of 500°C, source voltage of 5,500 V, and gas pressures of 6 psi for impact gas, 30 psi for curtain gas, and 50 psi for atomization and auxiliary gases. Multi-reaction monitoring scan mode was used for data acquisition.

Fatty acid profiles analysis

Individual LTL muscles were dried in a vacuum freeze dryer, and following the method by Tian et al [14], FA from both feed and muscle were extracted using a chloroform-methanol solution. The procedure was as follows: Approximately 50 mg of the sample was mixed with 3 mL of a chloroform-methanol solution (2:1) and agitated in a tissue lyser at 60 Hz for 15 min. The resulting extract was combined with 0.6 mL of physiological saline, followed by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 10 min to obtain a lipid extract. 1 mL of the lipid extract was mixed with 0.2 mL of a 5.00 mg/mL glycerol undecanoic acid triglyceride (C36H68O6, CAS: 13552-80-2) internal standard and esterified with 0.2 mL of methanol. This mixture was further esterified using 8 mL of a 2% sodium hydroxide-methanol solution. After adding 1 mL of n-heptane and centrifuging at 10,000×g for 5 min, the supernatant was collected, and 100 mg of powdered anhydrous sodium sulfate was added for drying. The dried extract was filtered through a 13 mm 0.45 μm nylon syringe filter and analyzed for individual fatty acids using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) by Thermo Fisher Scientific. The instrumental conditions included a polydicyanopropylsiloxane strong polar stationary phase capillary column with a length of 100 m, inner diameter of 0.25 mm, and film thickness of 0.2 μm. The GC-MS parameters were set as follows: injector temperature at 270°C, detector temperature at 280°C, and a programmed temperature starting at 100°C for 13 min, followed by a heating rate of 10°C/min to reach 180°C and maintained for 6 min. Subsequently, the temperature was increased at a rate of 1°C/min to 200°C and held for 20 min, followed by a final increase to 230°C at a rate of 4°C/min and maintained for 10.5 min. The carrier gas used was nitrogen with a shunt ratio of 100:1, and the sample volume injected was 1.0 μL. The assay conditions aimed to achieve a theoretical plate number (n) of at least 2,000/m and a separation degree (R) of at least 1.25.

Antioxidant analysis

The preparation of muscle homogenates followed the method by Wang et al [15], with slight modifications. In a glass homogenizer, mix 100 mg of muscle tissue with 900 mg of phosphate buffer solution. The mixture was then subjected to ultrasonication using a Bransonic ultrasonic cleaner (Branson Ultrasonics Corp., Danbury, CT, USA). Following ultrasonication, the muscle homogenate was collected by centrifugation at 4,000×g for 15 min and stored at –80°C until further analysis.

All the assay kits used in the analysis were obtained from Nanjing Jianjian Bioengineering Institute, with the following kit numbers: superoxide dismutase (SOD, #A001-2-2), catalase (CAT, #A007-1-1), glutathione peroxidase superoxide (GSH-Px, #A005-1-2), and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC, #A015-1-2).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of data was performed in IBM SPSS Statistics 27 software (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), with one-way analysis of variance among groups (followed by Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc comparison) for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance is defined when p-values are less than 0.05.

RESULTS

Slaughter performance and meat quality

Slaughtering performance and meat quality are shown in Table 5. The moisture, DM, CP, and ash content of the three muscle groups showed no significant differences. However, the EE content significantly increased (p<0.05) in the GRPC and GRPT groups. Dressing percentages significantly decreased (p<0.05) in the GRPU and GRPT groups. Comparatively, the GRPU group led to lower (p<0.05) carcass weights compared to the GRPC group. Additionally, drip loss and pH45 min levels were significantly higher (p<0.05) in the GRPU group compared to the GRPC and GRPT groups, with no significant differences observed between the GRPC and GRPT groups. No significant differences were observed among the three feeding groups in terms of shear force, WHC, cooking loss, and pH24 h. Furthermore, the L* value significantly increased (p<0.05) in the GRPT group, while the a* and b* values significantly decreased (p<0.05).

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on slaughter performance and meat quality

Amino acid content of longissimus thoracis and lumborum

Amino acids content of LTL is shown in Table 6. There was only the methionine level in the GRPU group was significantly higher (p<0.05) than that in the GRPC group. However, differences in other essential AA were non-significant in our study. There were no significant differences in the total amino acid (TAA), EAA, and umami amino acids (UAA) among the three feeding groups.

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on amino acids content of muscle (mg/100 g)

Fatty acid content of longissimus thoracis and lumborum

Fatty acid content of LTL is shown in Table 7. The levels of C10:0, C18:1n9t, C18:2n6c, C20:0, and C18:3n3 in muscle were significantly reduced (p<0.05) in the GRPU and GRPT groups, while the levels of C14:1 and C16:1 were increased (p<0.05). Moreover, the levels of C12:0, C14:0, and C16:0 in the GRPU group were significantly higher (p<0.05) than those in the GRPC and GRPT groups. The GRPT group exhibited the highest (p<0.05) levels of C18:1n9c, while the GRPU group showed the lowest levels (p<0.05). Additionally, the levels of C18:2n6t, C18:3n6, and C20:2 significantly increased (p<0.05) in the GRPT group. The SFA levels were highest (p<0.05) in the GRPU group, followed (p<0.05) by the GRPC group, and lowest (p<0.05) in the GRPT group. Furthermore, the GRPU group significantly decreased (p<0.05) the PUFA/SFA ratio, but the n-6/n-3 ratio significantly increased (p<0.05) compared to the GRPC group.

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on fatty acids content of muscle (mg/100 g)

Mineral content and antioxidant capacity of longissimus longissimus thoracis and lumborum

The mineral content and antioxidant capacity of longissimus LTL are shown in Table 8. There was only the Cu level in the GRPU group was significantly lower (p<0.05) than that in the GRPC group. There were no significant differences in the levels of other minerals and SOD in the muscles among the three feeding groups. The levels of CAT, GSH-Px, and T-AOC were significantly lower (p<0.05) in the GRPU and GRPT groups.

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on the mineral content and antioxidant capacity of longissimus thoracis and lumborum

DISCUSSION

Crude fat, CP, and moisture are the main chemical components of muscle. The fat content and fatty acid composition can influence the hardness of meat because different fatty acids have different melting points [16]. The water content of muscle directly influences the juiciness of the meat, while the crude ash content is related to the mineral and trace element content in the meat [17]. In this study, besides the significantly lower EE observed in the GRPU group, there were no significant differences in moisture, DM, CP, and ash content. This suggests a weaker lipid deposition capacity in the muscles of the GRPU group. Given the lack of research on the nutritional composition of ruminant muscle by BSF, and the rich protein and mineral content in chicken and goat meat, we have introduced a discussion on chicken in this section [18]. As Pieterse et al [19] reported, supplementing BSF had no significant impact on the approximate composition of broiler breast muscle. Aprianto et al [20] also obtained a similar result, suggesting that the BSF oil (1%, 2%, and 3%) feed supplement and approximate broiler muscle compositions were unrelated, however, with an increase in supplementation levels, there was a reduction in the deposition of EE in the muscle. Similarly, BSF reduced abdominal fat in laying hens [21] and broilers [22]. Many studies attributed this result to the high content of C12:0 in BSF because it was found that feeding palm oil, sunflower seed oil, flaxseed, or flaxseed oil resulted in higher intramuscular fat compared to animals fed coconut oil (also rich in C12:0) or BSF [23]. This interpretation was evidently in contrast with our study. Since the muscle EE content of GRPT did not decrease but the levels of C12:0 in the diets of both GRPU and GRPT groups were similar. This could be attributed to the processing method of the GRPT group, wherein starch, protein, and fatty acids undergo structural rearrangement at high temperatures, forming a protective barrier that reduced the oxidation of C12:0. According to reports, C12:0 was oxidized to CO2 faster than 18:3n-3 and other long-chain fatty acids, making it less available for storage in tissues or elongation to 14:0 and 16:0 [24].

Factors influencing meat quality include dressing percentage, color, pH, tenderness, WHC, and muscle fibers. Among them, the dressing percentage is an important index to evaluate carcass quality [25]. Meat color is a direct factor in assessing meat quality and customer purchasing intention. Muscle pH value is an important indicator reflecting the post-slaughter muscle glycolysis rate in animals. It is related to the WHC and color of goat meat [26]. In this study, the dressing percentage and carcass weight of BSF-fed goats were lower than those of the GRPC group, indicating that BSF feeding might have a negative influence on carcass quality. A similar study result was also found by Murawska et al [27], BSF supplementation led to a decrease in the carcass yield of broiler chickens. This may be the increase of parts not intended for consumption, such as offal and limbs. Although shear force, WHC, and cooking loss showed no difference, the untreated BSF exhibited higher drip loss and pH45 min. Interestingly, the GRPT group exhibited higher L* values, while a* and b* values were lower. This was inconsistent with the findings of research by Herrera et al [28], in which they concluded that BSF did not affect WHC, pH, and meat color in guinea pig muscles. Pieterse et al [19] also concluded that BSF did not impact the meat color and pH of chicken muscles. However, there was also a study that indicated that supplementing BSF increased the b* values and pH of chicken muscles [29]. Schiavone et al [30] observed a 10% increase in the a* value of chicken muscles with BSF supplementation, which is consistent with our GRPU group results while in contrast with the GRPT group. We assume that this may be related to the higher deposition of UFA in the LTL muscles of the GRPT group. In summary, despite the lower EE content in the LTL of the GRPU group, overall, the GRPT group had a negative impact on meat quality.

The types and content of AA determine the nutritional value of proteins. In goat meat, the types and content of AA are related to factors such as animal species and feed composition. The results of this study indicated that there were no differences in TAA, EAA, and UAA among the three feeding groups. This is consistent with the findings of the studies conducted by Herrera et al [28]. The only exception was that the GRPU exhibited higher levels of methionine compared to the GRPC group. This may be related to the overall better meat quality in the GRPU group, as methionine was positively correlated with muscle WHC, color stability, and the prevention of lipid and protein oxidation [31].

Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) play a crucial role in reducing the incidence of coronary heart disease and preventing atherosclerosis, while PUFA is involved in the development of the brain and retina. Among PUFA, arachidonic acid (C20:4n6c), linseed oil, and alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3n3) are considered essential FA for the human body, which can only be obtained from food [32,33]. In this study, although the C18:3n3 content in the GRPU and GRPT groups was lower than that in the GRPC group, the C18:1n9c in the GRPT group was significantly higher than that in the GRPC group, while the GRPU group was significantly lower than the GRPC group. Interestingly, a significant increase of UFA and a significant decrease of SFA in the GRPT were observed, whereas the GRPU group exhibited the opposite pattern. Moreover, in terms of the PUFA/SFA and n-6/n-3 ratios, the GRPU group also demonstrated significantly lower values. Among individual SFA (C12:0 to C17:0), the content was consistently the lowest in the GRPT group. However, no significant differences were observed in the content of these FA in the basic diets of the GRPU and GRPT groups. This indicated that GRPT could improve the compositional pattern of FA in LTL muscles, promoting the deposition of FA in a more favorable direction. Our results regarding the positive influence of BSF on SFA was also confirmed by other reports [34,35]. In the GRPT group, it may be that heat treatment forms starch-lipid complexes, which could protect the degradation of UFA in the rumen and allow more UFA to be absorbed in the small intestine [34], subsequently increasing the content of UFA in the muscles.

Generally, several minerals in meat such as Fe, Zn, Na, Ca, Mg, and Se are considered important for human intake. In this study, we observed that the Cu content in the LTL of the GRPU group was significantly lower than that of the control group, while other minerals showed no significant differences. This indicated that most minerals in BSF were not absorbed and deposited in muscle tissue, possibly due to the lower bioavailability of minerals in insects [36]. Specific proteins (such as hemoglobin and casein) and mineral-binding peptides (casein phosphopeptides) support the absorption and bioavailability of minerals from traditional foods (such as meat and dairy). However, these pathways may not be applicable to the consumption of insects [37]. Furthermore, Cu transport occurs in two stages: first from the intestines to the liver and kidneys, and from the liver and kidneys to other tissues. This process requires the transport of albumin, transcuprein, and ceruloplasmin [38]. This study found that supplementation with BSF led to a decrease in antioxidant levels in muscle, which may indicate impaired liver and kidney function. Consequently, this resulted in a reduced deposition of Cu in the muscle of the GRPU group.

The oxidation of meat can decrease its hydrolytic sensitivity, weaken protein degradation, and reduce the moisture reserves in myofibers, thereby increasing water loss and brightness in meat. Enhancing the antioxidant defense system can protect muscles from damage caused by free radicals, contributing to more effective binding and retention of moisture in the muscles [39]. However, this study found that the antioxidant levels in the GRPU and GRPT groups decreased. This contrasts with the results obtained by Dalle Zotte et al [24]. The decrease in muscle antioxidant levels in the GRPT group could be attributed to the decline in meat quality and the increase in UFA contents. Furthermore, there was a downward trend in the levels of antioxidant-related minerals (Zn, Se, etc.) in the muscles of both GRPU and GRPT, which may also contribute to the decrease in muscle antioxidant levels. In conclusion, supplementing BSF could be detrimental to the antioxidant performance of muscles.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that there were no significant differences in muscle moisture, DM, CP, and ash among the three groups, but the EE of the GRPU group was significantly reduced. Both the GRPU and GRPT groups exhibited a decrease in dressing percentage, carcass weight, and muscle antioxidant capacity. Additionally, the meat quality parameters of the GRPT group were the poorest. Overall, there were no significant differences in the muscle AA and mineral content among the three groups. GRPT improved the favorable FA composition in the muscle for human health, such as C18:2n6t, C18:3n6, and UFA. In summary, under the experimental conditions, both untreated and heat-treated BSF had some negative impacts on the quality of goat meat. However, heat-treated BSF demonstrated a positive effect on improving the FA composition of the muscle. Consequently, further development of various BSF treatment methods can be explored for their reasonable application in goat feed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We express our gratitude to all the team members involved in sample collection and data analysis. Special thanks to the reviewers and editors for their insightful comments, valuable suggestions, and meticulous revision of our manuscript. Your contributions have greatly improved the quality and clarity of our work.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any organization regarding the materials discussed in the manuscript.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: Shengyong Lu, Siwaporn Paengkoum and Pramote Paengkoum; methodology: Shengyong Lu, Yong Long, and Shengchang Chen; investigation: Shengyong Lu and Xinran Niu; project administration: Sorasak Thongpea, Nittaya Taethaisong and Weerada Meethip; funding acquisition: Siwaporn Paengkoum and Pramote Paengkoum; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

FUNDING

This work was supported by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) and Suranaree University of Technology (SUT) project code NRCT5-RSA63009-01. Major Special Projects of the Guizhou Province Department of Science and Technology (Qianke Service Enterprise [2022] 033).

DATA AVAILABILITY

Datasets used or analyzed in this study were available by reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

1. Sekaran U, Lai L, Ussiri DAN, Kumar S, Clay S. Role of integrated crop-livestock systems in improving agriculture production and addressing food security – a review. J Agric Food Res 2021;5:100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100190.
2. Aldis RE, Muhlisin M, Zuprizal Z, Sasongko H, Hanim C, Anas MA. Black soldier fly larvae meal supplementation in a low protein diet reduced performance, but improved nitrogen efficiency and intestinal morphology of duck. Anim Biosci 2024;37:678–88. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.23.0259.
3. Sogari G, Amato M, Biasato I, Chiesa S, Gasco L. The potential role of insects as feed: a multi-perspective review. Animals 2019;9:119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9040119.
4. Lu S, Taethaisong N, Meethip W, et al. Nutritional composition of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens L.) and its potential uses as alternative protein sources in animal diets: a review. Insects 2022;13:831. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13090831.
5. Wang YS, Shelomi M. Review of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) as animal feed and human food. Foods 2017;6:91. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods6100091.
6. Goetsch AL, Merkel RC, Gipson TA. Factors affecting goat meat production and quality. Small Rumin Res 2011;101:173–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.037.
7. Rhee KS, Waldron DF, Ziprin YA, Rhee KC. Fatty acid composition of goat diets vs intramuscular fat. Meat Sci 2000;54:313–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00094-7.
8. Scollan ND, Enser M, Gulati SK, Richardson I, Wood JD. Effects of including a ruminally protected lipid supplement in the diet on the fatty acid composition of beef muscle. Br J Nutr 2003;90:709–16. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN2003933.
9. Kim B, Kim M, Jeong JY, et al. Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae oil as an alternative fat ingredient to soybean oil in laying hen diets. Anim Biosci 2022;35:1408–17. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0052.
10. Subuh AMH, Rowan TG, Lawrence TLJ. Effect of heat or formaldehyde treatment on the rumen degradability and intestinal tract apparent digestibility of protein in soya-bean meal and in rapeseed meals of different glucosinolate content. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;57:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00857-8.
11. Hao L, Xiang Y, Degen A, et al. Adding heat-treated rapeseed to the diet of yak improves growth performance and tenderness and nutritional quality of the meat. Anim Sci J 2019;90:1177–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13266.
12. Tian X, Li J, Luo Q, et al. Effects of purple corn anthocyanin on growth performance, meat quality, muscle antioxidant status, and fatty acid profiles in goats. Foods 2022;11:1255. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11091255.
13. AOAC. Official methods of analysis 18th edth ed. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC; 2005.
14. Tian XZ, Lu Q, Paengkoum P, Paengkoum S. Short communication: effect of purple corn pigment on change of anthocyanin composition and unsaturated fatty acids during milk storage. J Dairy Sci 2020;103:7808–12. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-18409.
15. Wang X, Li J, Zhou D, et al. Effects of Rosa roxburghii Tratt seed on the growth performance, meat quality, and sensory evaluation characteristics in growing rabbits. Meat Sci 2024;208:109394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109394.
16. Wood JD, Enser M, Fisher AV, et al. Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2008;78:343–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019.
17. Mir NA, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V, Shukla V. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J Food Sci Technol 2017;54:2997–3009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2789-z.
18. Astuti DA, Wiryawan KG. Black soldier fly as feed ingredient for ruminants. Anim Biosci 2022;35:356–63. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.21.0460.
19. Pieterse E, Erasmus SW, Uushona T, Hoffman LC. Black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) pre-pupae meal as a dietary protein source for broiler production ensures a tasty chicken with standard meat quality for every pot. J Sci Food Agric 2019;99:893–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9261.
20. Aprianto MA, Muhlisin , Kurniawati A, Hanim C, Ariyadi B, Anas MA. Effect supplementation of black soldier fly larvae oil (Hermetia illucens L.) calcium salt on performance, blood biochemical profile, carcass characteristic, meat quality, and gene expression in fat metabolism broilers. Poult Sci 2023;102:102984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2023.102984.
21. Nilugonda A, Sankaralingam S, Anitha P, Mathew DKD, Aswathi PB. Influence of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae feeding on carcass characteristics of Gramasree hens. J Vet Anim Sci 2022;53:429–34. https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2022.53.3.429-434.
22. Hartinger K, Greinix J, Thaler N, et al. Effect of graded substitution of soybean meal by Hermetia illucens larvae meal on animal performance, apparent ileal digestibility, gut histology and microbial metabolites of broilers. Animals 2021;11:1628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061628.
23. Suryati T, Julaeha E, Farabi K, Ambarsari H, Hidayat AT. Lauric acid from the black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) and its potential applications. Sustainability 2023;15:10383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310383.
24. Dalle Zotte A, Cullere M, Martins C, et al. Incorporation of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae fat or extruded linseed in diets of growing rabbits and their effects on meat quality traits including detailed fatty acid composition. Meat Sci 2018;146:50–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.08.002.
25. Cerdeño A, Vieira C, Serrano E, Lavín P, Mantecón AR. Effects of feeding strategy during a short finishing period on performance, carcass and meat quality in previously-grazed young bulls. Meat Sci 2006;72:719–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.10.002.
26. Wang Y, Wang Q, Dai C, et al. Effects of dietary energy on growth performance, carcass characteristics, serum biochemical index, and meat quality of female Hu lambs. Anim Nutr 2020;6:499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.008.
27. Murawska D, Daszkiewicz T, Sobotka W, et al. Partial and total replacement of soybean meal with full-fat black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae meal in broiler chicken diets: impact on growth performance, carcass quality and meat quality. Animals 2021;11:2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092715.
28. Herrera E, Petrusan JI, Salvá-Ruiz B, et al. Meat quality of guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) fed with black soldier fly larvae meal (Hermetia illucens) as a protein source. Sustainability 2022;14:1292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031292.
29. Murawska D, Daszkiewicz T, Sobotka W, et al. Partial and total replacement of soybean meal with full-fat black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae meal in broiler chicken diets: impact on growth performance, carcass quality and meat quality. Animals 2021;11:2715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092715.
30. Schiavone A, Dabbou S, Petracci M, et al. Black soldier fly defatted meal as a dietary protein source for broiler chickens: effects on carcass traits, breast meat quality and safety. Animal 2019;13:2397–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119000685.
31. Estévez M, Geraert PA, Liu R, Delgado J, Mercier Y, Zhang W. Sulphur amino acids, muscle redox status and meat quality: more than building blocks – invited review. Meat Sci 2020;163:108087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108087.
32. Lotfi K, Salari-Moghaddam A, Yousefinia M, Larijani B, Esmaillzadeh A. Dietary intakes of monounsaturated fatty acids and risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease and cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev 2021;72:101467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2021.101467.
33. Kapoor B, Kapoor D, Gautam S, Singh R, Bhardwaj S. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs): uses and potential health benefits. Curr Nutr Rep 2021;10:232–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-021-00363-3.
34. Zhou JS, Liu SS, Ji H, Yu HB. Effect of replacing dietary fish meal with black soldier fly larvae meal on growth and fatty acid composition of Jian carp (Cyprinus carpio var. Jian). Aquac Nutr 2018;24:424–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.12574.
35. Cullere M, Tasoniero G, Giaccone V, Acuti G, Marangon A, Dalle Zotte A. Black soldier fly as dietary protein source for broiler quails: meat proximate composition, fatty acid and amino acid profile, oxidative status and sensory traits. Animal 2018;12:640–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001860.
36. Mwangi MN, Oonincx DGAB, Stouten T, et al. Insects as sources of iron and zinc in human nutrition. Nutr Res Rev 2018;31:248–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422418000094.
37. Ojha S, Bekhit AED, Grune T, Schlüter OK. Bioavailability of nutrients from edible insects. Curr Opin Food Sci 2021;41:240–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2021.08.003.
38. Linder MC, Wooten L, Cerveza P, Cotton S, Shulze R, Lomeli N. Copper transport. Am J Clin Nutr 1998;67:965–71S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.5.965S.
39. Zhang L, Wang YX, Zhou Y, Zheng L, Zhan XA, Pu QH. Different sources of maternal selenium affect selenium retention, antioxidant status, and meat quality of 56-day-old offspring of broiler breeders. Poult Sci 2014;93:2210–9. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03605.

Article information Continued

Table 1

The proximate composition of black soldier fly (DM basis, %)

Items Contents
DM 97.28
OM 87.74
CP 35.85
EE 37.65
Ca (g/kg) 45.90
Cu (mg/kg) 13.80
Fe (mg/kg) 886.00
K (g/kg) 14.30
Mg (g/kg) 3.51
Mn (mg/kg) 129.00
Na (g/kg) 3.08
P (g/kg) 8.48
Se (mg/kg) 0.50
Zn (mg/kg) 79.20

DM, dry matter; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract.

Table 2

Concentrate supplement formula and chemical composition (DM basis, %)

Items GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1)
Corn 64.0 64.0 64.0
Soybean meal 10.0 10.0 10.0
FFS 10.0 - -
BSF - 10.0 -
HTBSF - - 10.0
Wheat bran 10.0 10.0 10.0
Ca (H2PO4)2 1.0 1.0 1.0
NaCl 1.0 1.0 1.0
Premix2) 4.0 4.0 4.0
Total 100.0 100.0 100.0
Chemical composition (%)
 DM 94.79 95.19 95.19
 OM 92.60 91.08 90.46
 CP 16.10 16.19 16.09
 EE 5.50 5.50 5.50
 Ca 0.92 0.95 0.95
 P 0.36 0.37 0.37
 NDF 18.27 19.57 21.35
 ADF 6.63 7.25 7.41
 GE (KJ/g) 16.96 16.53 16.63

DM, dry matter; FFS, full-fat soybean; BSF, black soldier fly; HTBSF, heat-treated black soldier fly; OM, organic matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ADF, acid detergent fiber; GE, gross energy.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

2)

The vitamin-mineral premix was purchased from the Feed Division of Beijing Sanyuan Seed Industry Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), containing the following per kg: 100,000 IU of VA, 400 IU of VE, 11% of Ca, 1,500 mg/kg of Mg, 50 mg/kg of Cu, 1,500 mg/kg of Zn, 1,100 mg/kg of Mn, 20 mg/kg of P, 5 mg/kg of Se, 8 mg/kg of Co.

Table 3

Amino acids composition of concentrate

Items (mg/100 g) GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1)
Indispensable amino acids
 Arginine 0.44±0.01 0.64±0.01 0.91±0.01
 Histidine - - -
 Isoleucine 0.10±0.00 0.20±0.00 0.31±0.00
 Leucine 0.89±0.00 1.10±0.01 1.21±0.00
 Lysine - 0.11±0.01 0.47±0.01
 Methionine - - -
 Phenylalanine 0.13±0.04 0.45±0.01 0.63±0.00
 Threonine 0.21±0.00 0.32±0.01 0.47±0.00
 Valine 0.13±0.00 0.25±0.00 0.39±0.00
Dispensable amino acids
 Alanine 0.65±0.01 0.81±0.01 0.87±0.00
 Aspartic acid 0.74±0.00 1.08±0.01 1.54±0.00
 Glycine 0.39±0.00 0.56±0.00 0.70±0.00
 Glutamic acid 2.05±0.01 2.62±0.01 3.00±0.01
 Proline 0.72±0.01 0.79±0.04 0.91±0.00
 Serine 0.40±0.00 0.57±0.00 0.75±0.00
 Tyrosine - 0.07±0.00 0.25±0.00

Values represent the means of twelve replicates (n = 3), mean±standard error.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

Table 4

Fatty acids composition of concentrate

Items (mg/100 g) GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1)
C6:0 - 0.23±0.00 0.22±0.00
C8:0 - - 0.08±0.00
C10:0 - 0.74±0.01 0.68±0.00
C12:0 0.08±0.00 16.32±0.01 15.51±0.01
C14:0 - 2.57±0.01 2.45±0.01
C14:1 - 0.05±0.00 -
C15:0 13.93±0.01 0.09±0.00 0.09±0.00
C16:0 0.14±0.00 16.82±0.01 17.41±0.01
C16:1 0.09±0.00 1.17±0.00 1.03±0.00
C17:0 2.93±0.01 0.23±0.00 0.23±0.00
C18:0 0.18±0.00 2.80±0.01 2.99±0.01
C18:1n9t 30.71±0.02 0.18±0.00 0.19±0.00
C18:1n9c 47.21±0.02 27.31±0.01 29.10±0.01
C18:2n6c 0.60±0.00 28.84±0.02 27.46±0.01
C20:0 0.29±0.00 0.34±0.00 0.40±0.00
C18:3n6 - 0.18±0.00 0.20±0.00
C20:1n9 2.87±0.00 - 0.31±0.00
C18:3n3 0.21±0.00 1.50±0.00 1.07±0.00
C21:0 0.31±0.00 - -
C20:2 - 0.11±0.00 0.13±0.00
C20:4n6 0.22±0.00 0.07±0.00 -
C22:2 0.12±0.00 0.11±0.00 0.13±0.00
C24:0 0.10±0.00 0.18±0.00 0.17±0.00
C20:5n3 17.96±0.01 0.17±0.00 0.15±0.00
SFA 82.04±0.03 40.32±0.02 40.22±0.02
UFA 2.84±0.01 59.68±0.02 59.78±0.02
PUFA/SFA 2.97±0.01 0.72±0.00 0.72±0.00
n-3 PUFA 47.51±0.03 1.66±0.00 1.22±0.00
n-6 PUFA 30.89±0.02 29.09±0.01 27.66±0.01
n-9 PUFA 16.00±0.01 27.49±0.02 29.60±0.02
n-6/n-3 - 17.48±0.01 22.65±0.01

Values represent the means of twelve replicates (n = 3), mean±standard error.

SFA, saturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid. PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

Table 5

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on slaughter performance and meat quality

Items GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1) SEM p-value
Moisture (%) 72.90 72.30 72.84 0.19 0.40
DM (%) 27.10 27.70 27.16 0.19 0.40
CP (%) 19.52 20.17 19.48 0.03 0.30
EE (%) 3.56a 3.40b 3.55a 0.19 0.02
Ash (%) 4.02 4.14 4.13 0.03 0.25
Dressing percentage (%) 49.53a 45.3b 45.15b 0.53 <0.01
Carcass weight (kg) 12.73a 11.02b 12.49ab 0.31 0.04
Shear force (N) 16.17 17.92 14.10 0.69 0.08
WHC (%) 87.16 85.04 86.72 0.88 0.61
Cooking loss (%) 42.84 42.12 43.20 0.41 0.59
Drip loss (%) 2.07b 2.56a 2.04b 0.09 0.04
pH45 min 6.10ab 6.19a 5.99b 0.03 0.04
pH24 h 5.46 5.70 5.53 0.04 0.75
Lightness (L*) 19.8b 25.2ab 26.6a 1.25 0.03
Redness (a*) 16.8a 17.4a 13.6b 0.49 <0.01
Yellowness (b*) 17.2a 17.3a 12.9b 0.58 <0.01

SEM, standard error of the mean; DM, dry matter; CP, crude protein; EE, ether extract; WHC, water holding capacity; pH45 min, pH at 45 min post-slaughter; pH24 h, pH at 24 h post-slaughter.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

a,b

Different letters within a row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 6

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on amino acids content of muscle (mg/100 g)

Items GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1) SEM p-value
Essential amino acids arginine
 Arginine 4.61 4.73 4.60 0.05 0.55
 Histidine 2.24 2.26 2.42 0.04 0.11
 Isoleucine 2.23 2.27 2.25 0.03 0.85
 Leucine 5.94 6.04 5.96 0.07 0.83
 Lysine 6.74 6.72 6.72 0.06 0.98
 Methionine 1.32b 1.58a 1.51ab 0.04 0.04
 Phenylalanine 3.08 3.17 3.17 0.04 0.60
 Threonine 3.40 3.50 3.42 0.05 0.69
 Valine 2.61 2.65 2.62 0.03 0.88
Dispensable amino acids
 Alanine 4.58 4.64 4.58 0.04 0.81
 Aspartic acid 7.37 7.49 7.44 0.08 0.86
 Glycine 3.62 3.70 3.66 0.03 0.51
 Glutamic acid 12.14 12.50 12.43 0.14 0.58
 Proline 2.91 2.99 2.78 0.05 0.20
 Serine 3.30 3.45 3.32 0.05 0.47
 Tyrosine 2.58 2.55 2.46 0.03 0.23
 TAA 68.67 70.24 69.34 0.73 0.70
 EAA 32.17 32.92 32.68 0.36 0.72
 UAA 33.37 34.05 33.74 0.32 0.71

SEM, standard error of the mean; TAA, total amino acid; EAA, essential amino acid; UAA, umami amino acid (phenylalanine, alanine, aspartic acid, glycine, glutamic acid, tyrosine).

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

a,b

Different letters within a row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 7

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on fatty acids content of muscle (mg/100 g)

Items GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1) SEM p-value
C10:0 0.18a 0.13b 0.11b 0.01 <0.01
C12:0 0.09b 0.15a 0.11ab 0.01 0.03
C14:0 1.69b 2.27a 1.82b 0.08 <0.01
C14:1 0.07b 0.11a 0.09a 0.001 <0.01
C15:0 0.35 0.42 0.32 0.02 0.08
C16:0 21.06b 23.38a 20.73b 0.31 <0.01
C16:1 1.37b 1.86a 1.82a 0.07 <0.01
C17:0 0.79a 0.80a 0.05b 0.13 0.02
C17:1 0.66 0.76 0.52 0.06 0.27
C18:0 15.67 15.39 15.53 0.23 0.90
C18:1n9t 1.79a 1.32b 1.26b 0.08 <0.01
C18:1n9c 51.75b 49.57c 53.62a 0.48 <0.01
C18:2n6t 0.23b 0.26ab 0.28a 0.01 0.03
C18:2n6c 3.65a 3.01b 3.06b 0.11 0.03
C20:0 0.18a 0.12b 0.09b 0.01 <0.01
C18:3n6 0.05b 0.03b 0.09a 0.01 0.04
C18:3n3 0.20a 0.15b 0.15b 0.01 <0.01
C20:2 - 0.02b 0.05a 0.01 <0.01
C20:3n6 - - 0.01 0.00 -
C20:4n6 0.30 0.27 0.28 0.02 0.83
SFA 39.99b 42.66a 38.76c 0.44 <0.01
UFA 60.01b 57.34c 61.24a 0.44 <0.01
PUFA/SFA 0.11a 0.09b 0.10a 0.003 <0.01
n-3 PUFA 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.01 0.98
n-6 PUFA 4.20 3.56 3.73 0.12 0.06
n-9 PUFA 53.54a 50.89b 54.88a 0.47 <0.01
n-6/n-3 29.81a 24.43b 24.79ab 0.95 <0.01

SEM, standard error of the mean; SFA, saturated fatty acid; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

a–c

Different letters within a row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Table 8

Effects of heat treatment black soldier fly on the mineral content and antioxidant capacity of longissimus thoracis and lumborum

Items GRPC1) GRPU1) GRPT1) SEM p-value
Fe (mg/kg) 67.99 59.95 56.46 3.14 0.40
Mn (mg/kg) 0.58 0.42 0.44 0.03 0.11
Cu (mg/kg) 2.84a 2.30b 2.58ab 0.09 0.04
Zn (mg/kg) 109.18 102.87 102.89 2.18 0.50
K (g/kg) 19.43 18.80 19.27 0.20 0.51
Na (g/kg) 2.04 2.21 2.09 0.06 0.62
Ca (mg/kg) 258.30 196.75 239.72 13.89 0.23
Mg (g/kg) 1.17 1.13 1.18 0.01 0.34
P (g/kg) 9.68 9.30 9.54 0.10 0.38
Se (mg/kg) 0.46 0.43 0.45 0.01 0.47
SOD (U/mL) 88.13 94.45 88.69 1.29 0.08
CAT (U/mL) 13.87a 5.72b 6.71b 0.92 <0.01
GSH-Px (U/mL) 54.29a 47.13b 48.89b 0.84 <0.01
T-AOC (mmol/mL) 16.00a 13.64b 14.02b 0.31 <0.01

SEM, standard error of the mean; SOD, superoxide dismutase; CAT, catalase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase superoxide; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity.

1)

GRPC, full-fat soybeans group; GRPT, heat-treated black soldier fly group; GRPU, black soldier fly group.

a,b

Different letters within a row are significantly different (p<0.05).