1. FAO. Food outlook: biannual report on global food markets [Internet]. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; c2022. [cited 2023 May 29]. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.4060/cc2864en
5. FAOSTAT. Crops and livestock products [Internet]. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; c2023. [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from:
https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
7. OECD/FAO. OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2022–2031 [Internet]. Paris, France: OECD Agriculture Statistics; 2021. [cited 2023 Nov 18]. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1787/4bde2d83-en
8. NBSC. Annual data: agriculture [Internet]. Beijing, China: National Bureau of Statistics of China; 2022. [cited 2023 May 21]. Available from:
https://www.stats.gov.cn/ (in Chinese)
11. Qui NH, Budi G. Challenges, opportunities and prospects of swine industry in Vietnam. In : Proceeding International Conference on Green Agro-Industry; 2020; Kota Malang. p. 189–96.
13. Zhang S, Wu X, Han DD, et al. Pork production systems in China: a review of their development, challenges and prospects in green production. Front Agric Sci Eng 2021;8:15–24.
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020377
14. Xayalath S, Abulbashar MM, Ortega ADSV, Rátky J. Opportunities and challenges for pig production in Vientiane Capital, Laos: a review. Rev Agric Rural Dev 2022;11:3–8.
https://doi.org/10.14232/rard.2022.1-2.3-8
15. Barcellos MD, Grunert KG, Zhou YF, Verbeke W, Perez-Cueto F, Krystallis A. Consumer attitudes to different pig production systems: a study from mainland China. Agric Human Values 2013;30:443–55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9416-4
20. Pan YC. Take the development path of pig industry with ‘Chinese characteristics’. Chin J Anim Sci 2017;53:165–8. (in Chinese)
24. Mosnier E, van der Werf HMG, Boissy J, Dourmad JY. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in the manufacturing of pig and broiler feeds using life cycle assessment. Animal 2011;5:1972–83.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001078
25. Hanserud OS, Lyng KA, Vries JWD, Øgaard AF, Brattebø H. Redistributing phosphorus in animal manure from a livestock-intensive region to an arable region: Exploration of environmental consequences. Sustainability 2017;9:595.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040595
27. De VJ, Groenestein C, Schröder J, et al. Integrated manure management to reduce environmental impact: II. Environmental impact assessment of strategies. Agric Syst 2015;138:88–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.05.006
29. Ali BM, van Zanten HH, Berentsen P, Bastiaansen JW, Bikker P, Lansink AO. Environmental and economic impacts of using co-products in the diets of finishing pigs in Brazil. J Clean Prod 2017;162:247–59.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.041
30. Weiss F, Leip A. Greenhouse gas emissions from the EU livestock sector: a life cycle assessment carried out with the CAPRI model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2012;149:124–34.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.12.015
31. Dietz FJ, Hoogervorst NGP. Towards a sustainable and efficient use of manure in agriculture: the Dutch case. Environ Resour Econ 1991;1:313–32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367923
33. Noya I, Villanueva-Rey P, González-García S, Fernandez MD, Rodriguez MR, Moreira MT. Life cycle assessment of pig production: a case study in Galicia. J Clean Prod 2017;142:4327–38.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.160
34. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, Haan C. Livestock's long shadow: environmental issues and options. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2006.
35. Bai ZH, Ma L, Qin W, Chen Q, Oenema O, Zhang FS. Changes in pig production in China and their effects on nitrogen and phosphorus use and losses. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:12742–9.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es502160v
38. Tapinta S, Boonrat P, Buanak S, Songkamilin A, Laisood J. Guildlines for environmental management in pig farm. Bangkok, Thailand: Pollution Control Department; 2014.
40. Drew TW. The emergence and evolution of swine viral diseases: to what extent have husbandry systems and global trade contributed to their distribution and diversity? Rev Sci Tech 2011;30:95–106.
https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.30.1.2020
56. Neeteson-van Nieuwenhoven AM, Knap P, Avendaño S. The role of sustainable commercial pig and poultry breeding for food security. Anim Front 2013;3:52–7.
https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2013-0008
66. Ho NN, Do TL, Tran DT, Nguyen TT. Indigenous pig production and welfare of ultra-poor ethnic minority households in the Northern mountains of Vietnam. Environ Dev Sustain 2022;24:156–79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01348-6
68. Rodriguez-Verde I, Regueiro L, Carballa M, Hospido A, Lema JM. Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters. Sci Total Environ 2014;497:475–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.127
71. Wang H, Long W, Chadwick D, et al. Dietary acidifiers as an alternative to antibiotics for promoting pig growth performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2022;289:115320.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115320
72. Bogere P, Choi YJ, Heo J. Probiotics as alternatives to antibiotics in treating post-weaning diarrhoea in pigs: review papaer. S Afr J Anim Sci 2019;49:403–16.
https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v49i3.1
74. Zhu Z, Wang Y, Yan T, Zhang Z, Wang S, Dong H. Greenhouse gas emissions from livestock in China and mitigation options within the context of carbon neutrality. Front Agric Sci Eng 2023;10:226–33.
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2023486