1. Deep A, Schwean-Lardner K, Crowe TG, Fancher BI, Classen HL. Effect of light intensity on broiler production, processing characteristics, and welfare. Poult Sci 2010; 89:2326–33.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2010-00964
5. Prayitno DS. The effects of colour and intensity of light on the behaviour and performance of broilers [dissertation]. Bangor, UK: University of Wales; 1994.
6. Cao J, Liu W, Wang Z, Xie D, Jia L, Chen Y. Green and blue monochromatic lights promote growth and development of broilers via stimulating testosterone secretion and myofiber growth. J Appl Poult Res 2008; 17:211–8.
https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00043
7. Karakaya M, Parlat SS, Yilmaz MT, Yildirim I, Ozalp B. Growth performance and quality properties of meat from broiler chickens reared under different monochromatic light sources. Br Poult Sci 2009; 50:76–82.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660802629571
9. Awad WA, Mann E, Dzieciol M, et al. Age-related differences in the luminal and mucosa-associated gut microbiome of broiler chickens and shifts associated with
Campylobacter jejuni infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2016; 6:154
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2016.00154
11. Cui C, Shen CJ, Jia G, Wang KN. Effect of dietary
Bacillus subtilis on proportion of
Bacteroidetes and
Firmicutes in swine intestine and lipid metabolism. Genet Mol Res 2013; 12:1766–76.
https://doi.org/10.4238/2013.May.23.1
14. Kim MJ, Parvin R, Mushtaq MMH, et al. Growth performance and hematological traits of broiler chickens reared under assorted monochromatic light sources. Poult Sci 2013; 92:1461–6.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02945
15. Campbell CL, Colton S, Haas R, et al. Effects of different wavelengths of light on the biology, behavior, and production of grow-out Pekin ducks. Poult Sci 2015; 94:1751–7.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev166
16. Blatchford RA, Klasing KC, Shivaprasad HL, Wakenell PS, Archer GS, Mench JA. The effect of light intensity on the behavior, eye and leg health, and immune function of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2009; 88:20–8.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00177
17. Colton S, Fraley GS. The effects of environmental enrichment devices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks. Poult Sci 2014; 93:2143–50.
https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-03885
18. Hanage WP. Microbiology: microbiome science needs a healthy dose of scepticism. Nature 2014; 512:247–8.
19. Dartnall HJA, Bowmaker JK, Mollon JD. Human visual pigments: microspectrophotometric results from the eyes of seven persons. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1983; 220:115–30.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1983.0091
20. Hart NS, Hunt DM. Avian visual pigments: characteristics, spectral tuning, and evolution. Am Nat 2007; 169:Suppl 1S7–26.
https://doi.org/10.1086/510141
21. Odeen A, Hart NS, Hastad O. Assessing the use of genomic DNA as a predictor of the maximum absorbance wavelength of avian SWS1 opsin visual pigments. J Comp Physiol A 2009; 195:167–73.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0395-2
23. Del Rio D, Stewart AJ, Pellegrini N. A review of recent studies on malondialdehyde as toxic molecule and biological marker of oxidative stress. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2005; 15:316–28.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2005.05.003
24. Guo YL, Li WB, Chen JL. Influence of nutrient density and lighting regime in broiler chickens: effect on antioxidant status and immune function. Br Poult Sci 2010; 51:222–8.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071661003746503
26. Sofka D, Pfeifer A, Gleiß B, Paulsen P, Hilbert F. Changes within the intestinal flora of broilers by colonisation with
Campylobacter jejuni
. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2015; 128:104–10.
https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-128-104
27. Sakaridis I, Ellis RJ, Cawthraw SA, et al. Investigating the association between the caecal microbiomes of broilers and
Campylobacter burden. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:927
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00927