1. FAO. FAOSTAT Database Results. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2017.
3. Chuppava B, Keller B, Meißner J, Kietzmann M, Visscher C. Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal
Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys. Vet Microbiol 2018;217:18–24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018
5. Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J. Handbook of the birds of the world. Vol. l. Ostrich to Ducks. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions; 1992.
6. Szigeti M. Poultry waste utilization in poultry industry. Baromfitenyésztésés Feldolgozás 1987;34:39–45.
7. Schneider KH. Geese - A guide to their breeding, keeping, feeding. Germany: Deutscher; Landwirtschaftsverlag Berlin GmbH, Berlin1995.
10. Saatci M. Effects of age, sex, feather colour, body measurements, and body weight on down and feather yield in Native Turkish geese. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2008;32:293–7.
12. Kozák J, Bodi L, Karsai KM, Monostori K. The effect of sex on the feather production of geese. In : Proceeding of 1997 Australian Poultry Symposium; University of Sydney; Sydney, Australia: 9:p. 199–202.
13. Yin L, Yang H, Xu L, Zhang J, Xing H, Wang Z. Feather performance, walking ability, and behavioral changes of geese in response to different stocking densities. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2017;196:108–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.017
14. Mehmet AB, Sarica M, Yamak US. Effect of production system on foot pad dermatitis (FPD) and plumage quality of geese. Eur Poult Sci 2017;81:
https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2017.216
16. Japanese Standards Association. 2011. JIS L 1903: 2011 Testing methods for feathers. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Standards Association; 2011.
17. SAS Institute. Sas/Stat Guide for Personal Computers. Version 9. 01. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst. Inc; 2014.
18. Hamadani H, Khan AA, Ganai TAS, Banday MT, Hamadani A. Growth and production traits of domestic geese in local conditions of Kashmir, India. Indian J Anim Sci 2014;84:578–9.
19. Solé M, Peña F, Domenech V, et al. Carcass and meat quality traits in an embden×toulouse goose cross raised in organic
Dehesa
. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2016;29:838–44.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0583
20. El-Hanoun AM, Attia YA, Gad HAM, Abdella MM. Effect of different managerial systems on productive and reproductive traits, blood plasma hormones and biochemical constituents of geese. Animal 2012;6:1795–802.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000808
22. Kucharska-Gaca J, Adamski M, Kuźniacka J, Kowalska E. Influence of the weight of hatching eggs on the hatchability indices and on the body weight of geese in rearing and after fattening with oats. Acta Sci Pol Zootechnica 2016;15:67–82.
https://doi.org/10.21005/asp.2016.15.3.06
23. Saatci M, Kirmizibayrak T, Aksoy AR, Tilki M. Egg weight, shape index and hatching weight and interrelationships among these traits in native Turkish Geese with different coloured feathers. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2005;29:353–7.
27. Szado J, Pakulska E, Kapkowska E. Influence of production factors on feather quality. In : Proceedings of the 10th European Symposium on Waterfowl, Halle (Saale); Germany: World’s Poultry Science Association; 1995; p. 331–41.
28. Tóth S, Szélné Szeri M, Nguyen DV. Factors affecting feather production of geese. Állattenyésztés és Takarmányozás 1988;37:174–9.
29. Tilki M, Saatci M, Kirmizibayrak T, Aksoy A. Effect of age on growth and carcass composition of Native Turkish Geese. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde 2005;69:77–83.
30. Yiliz D, Bozkurt EU, Akturks SH. Determination of goose feather morphology by using SEM. J Anim Vet Adv 2009;8:2650–4.
31. Kozák J. Poultry Industry of Hungary and its EU-conform regulation. Technologies, market regulation and animal welfare. Budapest, Hungary: Agroinform Kiadó; 1999.