1. Tao L, Zhou H, Zhang N, et al. Effects of different source additives and wilt conditions on the pH value, aerobic stability, and carbohydrate and protein fractions of alfalfa silage. Anim Sci J 2017; 88:99–106.
https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12599
2. McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. Abersyth, UK: Chalcombe Publication; 1991.
4. Wen A, Yuan X, Wang J, Desta ST, Shao T. Effects of four short-chain fatty acids or salts on dynamics of fermentation and microbial characteristics of alfalfa silage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 223:141–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.11.017
5. Repetto JL, Echarri V, Aguerre M, Cajarville J. Use of fresh cheese whey as an additive for lucerne silages: effects on chemical composition, conservation quality and ruminal degradation of cell walls. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011; 170:160–4.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.09.004
6. McDonald P, Henderson AR, Heron SJE. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed.Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications; 1981.
7. Singh K, Honig H, Wermke M, Zimmer E. Fermentation pattern and changes in cell wall constituents of straw-forage silages, straws and partners during storage. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996; 61:137–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(96)00953-4
9. McAllister TA, Feniuk R, Mir Z, Mir P, Selinger LB, Cheng K-J. Inoculants for alfalfa silage: Effects on aerobic stability, digestibility and the growth performance of feedlot steers. Livest Prod Sci 1998; 53:171–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00150-4
10. Kızılşimşek M, Erol A, Ertekin İ, Dönmez R, Katrancı B. Relationship among silage micro flora and their effects on silage fermentation and quality. KSU J Agric Nat Sci 2016; 19:136–40.
https://dx.doi.org/10.18016/ksujns.35488
15. AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official method of analysis. 15th edWashington, USA: AOAC International; 1990. p. 66–88.
17. Menke KH, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim Res Dev 1988; 28:7–55.
18. Blümmel M, Orskov ER. Comparison of
in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1993; 40:109–19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(93)90150-I
19. Menke KH, Raab L, Salewski A, Steingass H, Fritz D, Schneider W. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor
in vitro. J Agric Sci 1979; 93:217–22.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305
20. Van Dyke NJ, Anderson PM. Interpreting a forage analysis. Alabama cooperative extension system. 1998. Report No.: ANR–890.
22. Holden LA. Comparison of methods of
in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J Dairy Sci 1999; 82:1791–4.
23. Sturgeon LS, Baker LA, Pipkin JL, Haliburton JC, Chisare NK. The digestibility and mineral availability of mutual, bermuda grass and alfalfa hay in mature horses. J Equine Vet Sci 2000; 20:45–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0737-0806(00)80320-2
24. Jeranyama P, Garcia AD. Understanding relative feed value (RFV) and relative forage quality. South Dakota State University: Cooperative Extension Service: Extension Extra; 2004. p. 352–4.
27. Filya I. The effect of
Lactobacillus buchneri and
Lactobacillus plantarum on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal degradability of low dry matter corn and sorghum silages. J Dairy Sci 2003; 86:3575–81.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73963-0
28. Kizilsimsek M, Schmidt RJ, Kung L. Effects of a mixture of lactic acid bacteria applied as a freeze-dried or fresh culture on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:5698–705.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0448
29. Filya I, Muck RE, Contreas-govea FE. Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: Fermentation products and nutritive value. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90:5108–14.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-877
33. Kızılşimşek M, Küsek M, Gezginç Y, Erol A. Isolation and identification of high lactic acid producer bacteria from forage and their silages grown in different ecologies. Kafkas Vet Fak Derg 2016; 22:291–6.
https://doi.org/10.9775/kvfd.2015.14291
34. Silva VP, Pereira OG, Leandro ES, et al. Effects of lactic acid bacteria with bacteriocinogenic potential on the fermentation profile and chemical composition of alfalfa silage in tropical conditions. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99:1895–902.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9792
35. Schmidt RJ, Hu W, Mills JA, Kung L. The development of lactic acid bacteria and
Lactobacillus buchneri and their effects on the fermentation of alfalfa silage. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92:5005–10.
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1701
36. Yavuz M. Determination of some ruminant feeds’ relative feed value and in vitro digestion values. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniv Zir Fak Derg 2005; 22:97–101.
37. Canpolat Ö, Karaman Ş. Comparison of
in vitro gas production, organic matter digestibility, relative feed value and metabolizable energy contents of some legume forages. Tar Bil Der 2009; 15:188–95.
39. Przemysław S, Cezary P, Stanisław M, et al. The effect of nutritional and fermentational characteristics of grass and legume silages on feed intake, growth performance and blood indices of lambs. Small Rumin Res 2015; 123:1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.11.008
40. Đorđević S, Mandić V, Stanojević D. The effect of bacterial inoculant on chemical composition and fermentation of alfalfa silage. Biotechnol Anim Husb 2016; 32:413–23.
https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1604413D
41. Ce L, Yu-jiao L, Xiao-nan L, Ping-ting G, Hai-ling L. Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on alfalfa (
Medicago sativa L.) silage quality: assessment of degradation (
in situ) and gas production (
in vitro). J Integr Agr 2016; 15:2834–41.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61424-7
42. Buxton DR, Mertens DR. Quality-related characteristics of forages. Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ, editorsThe science of grassland agriculture. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1995. p. 83–96.
43. González J, Faría-Mármol J, Rodríguez CA, Martínez A. Effects of ensiling on ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of Italian rye-grass. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2007; 136:38–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.08.022