1. Sutarno , Setyawan AD. Review: Genetic diversity of local and exotic cattle and their crossbreeding impact on the quality of Indonesian cattle. Biodiversitas 2015;16:327–54.
3. Said S, Putra WPB, Anwar S, Agung PP, Yuhani H. Phenotypic, morphometric characterization and population structure of Pasundan cattle at West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2017;18:1638–45.
4. Bennett P. Microsatellites. J Clin Pathol Mol Pathol 2000;53:177–83.
5. Rehman MS, Khan MS. Genetic diversity of Hariana and Hissar cattle from Pakistan using microsatellite analysis. Pakistan Vet J 2009;29:67–71.
6. Maretto F, Ramljak J, Sbarra F, et al. Genetic relationships among Italian and Croatian Podolian cattle breeds assessed by microsatellite markers. Livest Sci 2012;150:256–64.
7. Stevanovic J, Stanimirovic Z, Dimitrijevic V, Maletic M. Evaluation of 11 microsatellite loci for their use in paternity testing in Yugoslav Pied cattle (YU Simmental cattle). Czech J Anim Sci 2010;55:221–6.
9. Agung PP, Anwar S, Wulandari AS, et al. The potency of Sumba Ongole (SO) cattle: a study of genetic characterization and carcass productivity. J Indonesian Trop Anim Agric 2015;40:71–8.
10. Glaubitz JC. Convert: a user-friendly program to reformat diploid genotypic data for commonly used population genetic software packages. Mol Ecol Notes 2004;4:309–10.
11. Yeh FC, Boyle TJB. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belg J Bot 1997;129:157–63.
12. Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 2007;16:1099–106.
15. Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genet Resour 2012;4:359–61.
16. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 2005;14:2611–20.
17. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F. Montpellier, France: Université de Montpellier II; [cited 2017 Oct 14]GENETIX 4.05, Logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171. Available from:
http://kimura.univ-montp2.fr/genetix
20. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [cited 2017 Aug 28]. Available from:
http://www.R-project.org
21. Weir BS, Cockerham CC. Estimating
F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984;38:1358–70.
22. Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press Inc; 2000.
23. Sutarno , Setyawan AD, Lymbery AJ. Genetic diversity of five indonesian native cattle breeds at microsatellite loci. Asian J Anim Sci 2015;9:57–64.
24. Selkoe KA, Toonen RJ. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett 2006;9:615–29.
25. Cervini M, Henrique-Silva F, Mortari N, Matheucci E. Genetic variability of 10 microsatellite markers in the characterization of Brazilian Nellore cattle (
Bos indicus). Genet Mol Biol 2006;29:486–90.
26. Czerneková V, Kott T, Dudková G, Sztankóová Z, Soldát J. Genetic diversity between seven central European cattle breeds as revealed by microsatellite analysis. Czech J Anim Sci 2006;51:1–7.
27. Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 1980;32:314–31.
28. Berthouly C, Bed’Hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, et al. Using molecular markers and multivariate methods to study the genetic diversity of local European and Asian chicken breeds. Anim Genet 2008;39:121–9.
29. Agung PP, Ridwan M, Handrie , et al. Morphological profile and estimation of genetic distance of Simmental crossbred. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 2014;19:112–22. (in Indonesian with English abstract).
31. Suyadi S, Hakim L, Wahjuningsih S, Nugroho H. Reproductive performance of Peranakan Ongole (PO)-and Limousin x PO Crossbred (Limpo) cattle at different altitude areas in East Java, Indonesia. J Appl Sci Agric 2014;9:81–5.
32. Nijman IJ, Otsen M, Verkaar ELC, et al. Hybridization of banteng (
Bos javanicus) and zebu (
Bos indicus) revealed by mitochondrial DNA, satellite DNA, AFLP and microsatellites. Heredity 2003;90:10–6.
34. Radko A, Zyga A, Zabek T, Slota E. Genetic variability among Polish Red, Hereford and Holstein-Friesian cattle raised in Poland based on analysis of microsatellite DNA sequences. J Appl Genet 2005;46:89–91.
35. Zhou GL, Jin HG, Zhu Q, Guo SL, Wu YH. Genetic diversity analysis of five cattle breeds native to China using microsatellites. J Genet 2005;84:77–80.
36. Martojo H. Indigenous Bali cattle is most suitable for sustainable small farming in Indonesia. Reprod Domest Anim 2012;47:10–4.
38. Widi TSM, Udo HMJ, Oldenbroek K, et al. Unique cultural values of Madura cattle: is cross-breeding a threat? Anim Genet Resour 2014;54:141–52.
39. Hilmia N, Noor RR, Sumantri C, Gurnadi RE, Priyanto R. Productivity and genetic diversity of local cattle in Ciamis-West Java. J Indonesian Trop Anim Agric 2013;38:10–9.
40. Fitzpatrick BM. Power and sample size for nested analysis of molecular variance. Mol Ecol 2009;18:3961–6.