Relationship between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Gene and Fatty Acid Composition in Korean Native Cattle

Article information

Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2016;29(2):184-194

Publication date (electronic) : 2015 September 3

doi : https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.15.0502

Jea-young Lee ^a, Jae-jung Ha ¹^,^a, Yong-soo Park ², Jun-koo Yi ¹, Seunguk Lee ³, Seyoung Mun ⁴^,⁵, Kyudong Han ⁴^,⁵, J.-J. Kim ⁶, Hyun-Ji Kim, Dong-yep Oh ¹^,

Department of Statistics, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk 712-749, Korea.

¹Livestock Research institute, Yeongju 750-871, Korea.

²Department of Equine Industry, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, Hwaseong 445-760, Korea.

³Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo 113-8657, Tokyo.

⁴Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan 330-714, Korea.

⁵DKU-Theragen institute for NGS analysis (DTiNa), Cheonan 330-714, Korea.

⁶School of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 712-749, Korea.

^*Corresponding Author: Dong-yep Oh. Tel: +82-54-638-6012, Fax: +82-54-638-6013, E-mail: moocic@hanmail.net

aJea-young Lee and Jae-jung Ha are contributed equally to this work.

Received 2015 June 10; Revised 2015 August 03; Accepted 2015 August 24.

Abstract

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) gene plays an important role in the biosynthesis process controlled by a number of fatty acid transcription factors. This study investigates the relationships between 130 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the PPARγ gene and the fatty acid composition of muscle fat in the commercial population of Korean native cattle. We identified 38 SNPs and verified relationships between 3 SNPs (g.1159-71208 A>G, g.42555-29812 G>A, and g.72362 G>T) and the fatty acid composition of commercial Korean native cattle (n = 513). Cattle with the AA genotype of g.1159-71208 A>G and the GG genotype of g.42555-29812 G>A and g.72362 G>T had higher levels of monounsaturated fatty acids and carcass traits (p<0.05). The results revealed that the 3 identified SNPs in the PPARγ gene affected fatty acid composition and carcass traits, suggesting that these 3 SNPs may improve the flavor and quality of beef in commercial Korean native cattle.

Keywords: Korean Native Cattle; PPARγ; SNP; Fatty Acid Composition; Marbling Score

INTRODUCTION

The fatty acid composition of livestock adipose tissue is recognized as an important carcass trait affecting meat quality. The quality of fat is determined by its fatty acid composition, and beef quality depends not only on the marbling score but also on fatty acid composition. Although beef marbling is an important factor, fatty acid composition also plays an important role in the eating quality of meat (Laborde et al., 2001). About 90% of the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat from the longissimus muscle of beef cattle is accounted for by palmitic acid (16:0) and stearic acid (18:0) from saturated fatty acid (SFA) and oleic acid (18:1) from monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA). Oleic acid accounts for the highest proportion of MUFAs in beef cattle and is positively correlated with marbling, beef flavor, tenderness, and soft fat (Melton et al., 1982; Kim et al., 2002; Lee et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2009). These factors are of considerable interest because of their implications for human health. Stearic acid (18:0) is a primary determinant of fat hardness (Smith et al., 1998; Wood et al., 2004; Chung et al., 2006).

Therefore, genetic factors that enhance the conversion of stearic acid into oleic acid are expected to increase tenderness, flavor, and marbling (Yang et al., 1999). The fatty acid biosynthesis process is controlled by a number of transcription factors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPA), and sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs). Many studies have reported that genetic factors in transcription factor genes are associated with fatty acid composition and the marbling score in Korean native cattle and Japanese Black cattle (Shin et al., 2007; Hoashi et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2008; Oh et al., 2012). These findings suggest that fatty acid composition may be controlled by genetic factors such as genes related to lipid synthesis and fatty acid metabolism (Narukami et al., 2011).

PPARγ, a member of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, acts as a ligand-inducible transcription factor (Spiegelman, 1998; Kersten et al., 2000). PPARγ forms a heterodimer complex with one of the three retinoid X receptor (RXR) proteins and then binds to PPAR-responsive elements (PPRE) in promoters of PPARγ target genes (Mangelsdorf and Evans, 1995; Schulman et al., 1998).

PPARs contain general structural features of other nuclear receptor family members, including a central DNA-binding domain, a C-terminal domain mediating ligand binding, and two transcription activation function motifs (Rosen and Spiegelman, 2001). PPARγ is expressed abundantly in adipocytes and plays a key role in mediating adipocyte differentiation and insulin sensitivity. Many adipocyte-specific genes such as adiponectin and perilipin contain response elements for PPARγ in their promoter regions (Iwaki et al., 2003; Nagai et al., 2004; Guan et al., 2005). In the absence of any ligand, nuclear corepressors bind PPAR/RXR heterodimers and recruit histone deactylases to down regulate gene transcription (Yu et al., 2005). The present study evaluates the relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of intron and exon regions in the PPARγ gene and fatty acid composition in Korean native cattle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and phenotypic Data

A total of 513 commercial Korean native cattle samples from Gyeungsangbuk, 96, Korea, were included in the study where 10 sires were used to produce this half sib population. Feeding conditions (slaughter age, the fattening period, forage intake, and concentration) were controlled under livestock management of each region (n = 14). They were all steers slaughtered at 941±72 days of age, and the marbling score was measured 24 h after slaughter. First, the carcass was dissected at the last rib and the first lumber vertebra according to the Animal Product Grading System of Korea. Marbling scores were measured or scored in the left carcass cut across the vertebra between the last thoracic vertebra and the first lumbar vertebra. The marbling degree was scored from 1 to 9 with a mean of 5.43 such that the higher score, the more abundant the intramuscular fat (Table 1). Genomic DNA was extracted from the longissimus muscle by using the LaboPass Tissue Mini Kit (Cosmo Genetech, Seoul, Korea).

Table 1

Means and standard deviations for carcass traits and fatty acid composition for Korean native cattle

Fatty acid composition

Total lipids were extracted from approximately 500 mg of the longissimus muscle with chloroform/methanol (2/1, v/v) (Folch et al., 1957) and then methylated with sodium methylate (O’Keefe et al., 1968). Samples were filtered through a filter paper in a water bath (40°C). The filtrate was mixed with distilled water, from which a layer of methanol and water was removed. After the removal of chloroform and lipid layers by using nitrogen gas, the sample was treated with BF3-methanol (14%) and then subjected to transmethylation at 65°C. Fatty acid content was analyzed using gas-chromatography (PerkinElmer, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Fatty acids included myristic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, myristoleic acid, palmitoleic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and linolenic acid. The composition and function of fatty acids were used as phenotypes in the analysis of the genetic relationship (Table 1).

Genotyping

130 SNPs in PPARγ were selected based on the reference SNP of the bovine PPARγ gene (GenBank No. NC_007320.5) in dbSNP. Genotypes of 10 SNPs were subjected to a preliminary analysis. Primers for the amplification and extension were designed for the single-base extension (SBE) (Vreeland et al., 2002) by using forward, reverse, and extension primer sequences (Supplementary Table 1). Reactions of the primer extension were performed using the SNaPshot ddNTP Primer Extension Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). To purify reactions of the primer extension, mixtures containing exonuclease I and shrimp alkaline phosphatase were added to the reaction mixture. Samples were cultured at 37°C for 1 h and then inactivated at 72°C for 15 min. The polymerase chain reaction product was mixed with Genescan 120 LIZ standard and HiDi formamide (Applied Biosystems, USA), followed by denaturation at 95°C for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed using the ABI PRISM 3130XL Genetic Analyzer, and then electrophoresis products were assayed using GeneMapper v.4.0 (Applied Biosystems, USA).

Statistic analysis

The significance of SNP allele frequency between the two groups (high and low) was analyzed using chi-square test for extremely varied 44 samples. Those SNP alleles for which there were significant differences in frequency were included in a linear discriminant analysis (Venables and Ripley, 2002) to develop a function that classified animals into two groups. Only influential fragments for discrimination (F>4.0) were included in the function.

The Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested for each SNP in the Korean native cattle population by using the chi-square statistic. Relationships between fatty acid composition and the marbling score for individual SNPs were analyzed using the following mixed model based on SPSS v19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA): Y_ijkl = μ+S_i+P_j+G_k+b_age+e_ijk, where Y_ijkl is the phenotype, μ is the overall mean, S_i is the random effect of sire i with the assumption of an independent and identical normal distribution, P_j is the fixed effect of calving place j (14 classes), G_k is the fixed effect of genotype k, b is the regression coefficient, age is a covariate for age in days at slaughter, and e_ijk is a random residual assumed to have an independent and identical normal distribution. Significant differences in mean values between different genotypes were calculated using Duncan’s multiple-range test. Here p<0.05 was considered to be significant. Additive and dominant effects were estimated using the REG procedure in SAS version 9.2. For the haplotype analysis, the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNP pairs was measured according to D′ and r² based on the HaploView software package (MIT/Harvard Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The SNP selection of the PPARγ gene and the haplotype analysis of Hanwoo

All 130 SNPs at the intron and exon were identified by an NCBI-based analysis to evaluate the relationships between SNPs in the PPARγ gene and fatty acid composition (Figure 1). Here 129 SNPs were located at the intron, and 1, at exon 7. In addition, the phenotypic mean and standard deviation, the min and max of carcass traits, fatty acid composition, and the fatty acid index were determined for cattle (Table 1). By the SBE for the verification of 130 SNPs in 44 cattle for the high- and low-MUFA groups of Korean native cattle, 38 SNPs were identified: 37 SNPs at the intron and 1 at exon 7. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine genotypic and allelic frequency, heterozygotes, minor-allele frequency (MAF), and the HWE. MAF was lower than 0.100, and segregation was not clearly observed following the LD analysis, which reduced analytical accuracy (Eberle et al., 2006; Lee et al., 2006). The 38 identified SNPs were found to have MAF values greater than 0.100, and their genotypes did not deviate from the HWE (p>0.05; Table 2) (Falconer and Mackay, 1996).

Figure 1

130 SNPs and linkage disequilibrium (LD) values for 3 SNPs in the bovine PPARγ gene. The HaploView plot is color-coded using the following scheme: White represents r² = 0, and red signifies r² = 1. Numbers in cells are R² values. However, R² values of 1.0 are not shown. SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

Table 2

The genotype and frequency of 38 SNPs in the PPARγ gene of Korean native cattle

Discrimination efficiency

Table 3 shows the efficiency of discrimination for the 38 SNPs in the high- and low-MUFA groups of Korean native cattle (n = 44). To classify 44 extreme animals into the high and low MUFAs groups, discriminant coefficients were calculated for the 38 SNPs, and these coefficients were derived using information on the SNP genotype and the high- or low-MUFA group. Among these SNPs, the g.1159-71208 A>G, g.42555-29812 G>A, and g.72367 G>T SNPs had the highest discriminant coefficients (−1.094, 0.700, and −0.941, respectively). Three SNPs showed significant relationships with MUFAs (p<0.05, F>4.0). This is equivalent to a discriminative error of 2.1% and a high correlation ratio of 0.91. These results indicated that the discriminant function successfully separated extreme Korean native cattle (Tsuji et al., 2004). Therefore, the g.1159-71208 A>G, g.42555-29812 G>A, and g.72367 G>T SNPs were selected for large-scale genotyping in commercial Korean native cattle (n = 513). Based on these results, a pairwise LD analysis of these 3 SNPs showed that the PPARγ gene cannot be conducted block (Figure 1).

Table 3

The efficiency of discrimination of 38 SNPs in high- and low-MUFA groups of Korean native cattle (n = 44)

Relationships with fatty acid composition

Previous studies have shown that the content of unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) (Alexander et al., 2007) and a high MUFA level have significant effects on beef flavor (Hoashi et al., 2007). Based on these reports, fatty acid composition, carcass phenotypes, and genetic effects were examined for a single Korean native cattle genotype (Tables 4 and 5). The results revealed significant differences according to the SNP of the PPARγ gene.

Table 4

Effects of 2 SNPs at the intron on the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat

Table 5

Effects of the g.72362 G>T genotype at exon 7 on the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat

According to the results for carcass traits and two SNPs (g.1159-71208 A>G and g.72362 G>T), g.1159-71208 A>G were significantly related to backfat thickness (BFT), and g.72362 G>T to the marbling score (MS). The relationships between carcass traits and each SNP were based on the p-value (p<0.05). Yue et al. (2011) and Shin et al. (2006) reported significant effects of the bovine PPARγ genotype (p<0.05) on tenderness, BFT and water-holding capacity in Chinese indigenous bovine and on the longissimus muscle area and carcass weight in Korean native cattle. And All the mRNA region of the PPARγ gene within 760 individuals of four Chinese cattle breeds was scanned and four SNPs (−110G>C, −27C>T and +20A>G) of the PPARγ were detected in three Chinese indigenous cattle breeds (Qinchuan, Nangyang and Jiaxian cattle), rather than Chinese Holstein cattle. The mutations −110G>C, −27C>T and +20A>G located in the Exon1 of the PPARG and were under LD. The individuals with these three mutations had smaller body measurements (Hua et al., 2011). In the case of these five SNPs, they were located at intron 3 (C/T, 292), intron 5 (C/T, 1,064) and exon 1 (−110G>C, −27C>T, +20A>G) in the PPARγ gene. Although the position of these SNPs and the breed of cattle in these studies are different from those in the present study, their findings are consistent with this study’s results.

As shown in Table 4 and 5, SFA in the g.1159-71208 A>G, g.42555-29812 G>A, and g.72362 G>T SNPs was observed at 41.66%, 42.01%, and 42.58% in genotypes of GG, AA, and TT, respectively (p<0.05). By contrast, oleic acid (C18:1) levels were significantly related to the AA genotype of g.1159-71208 A>G, the GG genotype of g.42555-29812 G>A, and the GG genotype of g.72362 G>T (p<0.01). In addition, the AA and GG genotypes of g.1159-71208 A>G and g.42555-29812 G>A and the GG genotype of g.72362 G>T were related to the highest oleic acid content. MUFAs account for a high proportion of fatty acid composition and are an important factor influencing meat quality. Among MUFAs, oleic acid (C18:1) is one of the major MUFAs in beef cattle and the aroma source of cooked beef (Melton et al., 1982; Mandell et al., 1998). MUFA levels (54.13%, 54.05%, and 54.03%, respectively) showed the same trends as those for oleic acid (p<0.05). Clinical studies have shown that long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA; linolenic acid) have beneficial effects on human health. On the other hand, high levels of omega-6 PUFAs (n-6 PUFAs; linoleic acid) are closely related to certain human diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and various mental disorders (Reidiger et al., 2009). In the present study, levels of PUFAs, which included linoleic acid (C18:2n6; omega-6) and linolenic acid (C18:3n3; omega-3), were related to the three SNPs evaluated (p<0.05). Linolenic acid had the highest content in GG, AA, and TT genotypes, but the opposite trend was observed for linoleic acid. Variations in linolenic acid showed trends similar to those in oleic acid and MUFA content. However, the opposite trend was observed for linoleic acid. These results suggest that the consumption of meat from Korean native cattle with specific SNPs that alter levels of different fatty acids may enhance human health.

As shown in Table 4, g.1159-71208 A>G and g.42555-29812 G>A had additive effects on oleic acid, linoleic acid, linolenic acid, SFAs, and MUFAs (p<0.05). In addition, g.72362 G>T had an additive effect on MS, oleic acid, SFAs, and MUFAs. In particular, oleic acid (C18:1), an important factor influencing beef flavor, had significant additive effects (1.031, 0.848, and 1.660, respectively) on quantitative traits, and these effects were positive.

In general, PPARγ is a type of nuclear receptor superfamily with the N-Terminal domain, the DNA-binding domain, and the ligand-binding domain. Previous studies have reported that PPARγ, whose ligand-binding domain is bound by the ligand, forms a dimer with RXR, which is a 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor, and thus that it controls adipocyte differentiation by combining with the peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE), which belongs to the area of the cis-acting element relevant to adipocyte differentiation (Kodera et al., 2000; Christine et al., 2005; Shanika et al., 2009). This ligand-binding domain consists of 154 amino acids ranging from the 321st valine to the 474th valine in Hanwoo (Jeoung et al., 2004). In particular, g.72367 G>T SNP (Gln1344His) is the 448th glutamine included in the ligand-binding domain. In addition, it may become a non-synonymous SNP that changes into histidine from glutamine as the CAG nucleotide changes into CAT (Oh et al., 2012). This suggests that fatty acid content may vary depending on the level of change in the amino acid of the ligand-binding domain because it affects adipocyte differentiation.

In conclusion, Korean native cattle with AA, GG, and GG genotypes at the g.1159-71208 A>G, g.42555-29812 G>A, and g.72362 G>T SNPs in the PPARγ gene had higher proportions of MUFAs and lower proportions of SFAs. In addition, animals with the GG genotype of g.72362 G>T had higher MSs. These individual SNPs may be effective genetic targets for improving beef quality and have considerable influence on the Korean native cattle industry.

Supplementary Data

ajas-29-2-184-supplementary.pdf

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Yeungnam University Research Grant in 2014.

Notes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

We certify that there is no conflict of interest with any financial organization regarding the material discussed in the manuscript.

References

Alexander LJ, MacNeil MD, Geary TW, Snelling WM, Rule DC, Scanga JA. 2007;Quantitative trait loci with additive effects on palatability and fatty acid composition of meat in a Wagyu-Limousin F₂ population. Anim Genet 38:506–513.

Christine Y, Kathleen M, Karla AT, Dianne D, Matthew JB, Ronald NC. 2005;The nuclear receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT decrease peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ transcriptional activity and repress 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 280:13600–13605.

Chung KY, Lunt DK, Choi CB, Chae SH, Rhoades RD, Adams TH, Booren B, Smith SB. 2006;Lipid characteristics of subcutaneous adipose tissue and M. longissimus thoracis of Angus and Wagyu steers fed to US and Japanese endpoints. Meat Sci 73:432–441.

Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Kruglyak L, Nickerson DA. 2006;Allele frequency matching between snps reveals an excess of linkage disequilibrium in genic regions of the human genome. PLoS Genet 2:e142.

Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics fourth edth ed. Longman. London, England:

Fan YY, Zan LS, Fu CZ, Tian WQ, Wang HB, Liu YY, Xin YP. 2011;Three novel SNPs in the coding region of PPARγ gene and their associations with meat quality traits in cattle. Mol Biol Rep 38:131–137.

Folch J, Lee M, Stanley GHS. 1957;A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226:487–509.

Guan HP, Ishizuka T, Chui PC, Lehrke M, Lazar MA. 2005;Corepressors selectively control the transcriptional activity of PPAR gamma in adipocytes. Genes Dev 19:453–461.

Hoashi S, Ashida N, Ohsaki H, Utsugi T, Sasazaki S, Taniguchi M, Oyama K, Mukai F, Mannen H. 2007;Genotype of bovine sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (SREBP-1) is associated with fatty acid composition in Japanese Black cattle. Mamm Genome 18:880–886.

Hua L, Wang J, Chen F, Hu S, Chen H. 2011;The peroxisome proliferators-ativated receptor gamma (PPARG) gene polymorphisms and associations with body measurements of cattle. Afr J Biotechnol 10:2785–2790.

Iwaki M, Matsuda M, Maeda N, Funahashi T, Matsuzawa Y, Makishima M, Shimomura I. 2003;Induction of adiponectin, a fat-derived antidiabetic and antiatherogenic factor, by nuclear receptors. Diabetes 52:1655–1663.

Jeoung YH, Lee SM, Pack HY, Yoon DH, Choi JG, Moon SJ, Kang MJ. 2004;Molecular Cloning mRNA Expression of the Bovine Peroxisome Proliperator Recepter Gamma (PPARγ). J Anim Sci Technol (Kor) 46:23–30.

Kersten S, Mandard S, Escher P, Gonzalez FJ, Tafuri S, Desvergne B, Wahli W. 2000;The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α regulates amino acid metabolism. FASEB J 15:1971–1978.

Kim JH, Kim CH, Ko YD. 2002;Influence of dietary addition of dried wormwood (Artemisia sp.) of the performance and carcass characteristics of Hanwoo steers and the nutrient digestibility of sheep. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 15:390–395.

Kodera Y, Takeyama K, Murayama A, Suzawa M, Masuhiro Y, Kato S. 2000;Ligand type-specific interactions of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ with transcriptional coactivators. J Biol Chem 275:33201–33204.

Laborde FL, Mandell IB, Tosh JJ, Wilton JW, Buchanan-Smith JG. 2001;Breed effects on growth performance, carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and palatability attributes in finishing steers. J Anim Sci 79:355–365.

Lee MA, Keane OM, Glass BC, Manley TR, Cullen NG, Dodds KG, McCulloch AF, Morris CA, Schreiber M, Warren J, Zadissa A, Wilson T, McEwan JC. 2006;Establishment of a pipeline to analyse non-synonymous SNPs in Bos Taurus. BMC Genomics 7:298.

Lee SH, Yoon DH, Hwang SH, Cheong EY, Kim OH, Lee CS. 2004;Relationship between monounsaturated fatty acid composition and stearoyl-CoA desaturase mRNA level in Hanwoo liver and loin muscle. J Anim Sci Technol (Kor) 46:7–14.

Lee SH, Cho YM, Lee SH, Kim BS, Kim NK, Choy YH, Kim KH, Yoon D, Im SK, Oh SJ, Park EW. 2008;Identification of marbling-related candidate genes in M. longissimus dorsi of high- and low marbled Hanwoo (Korean Native Cattle) steers. BMB Rep 41:846–851.

Mandell IB, Buchanan-Smith JG, Campbell CP. 1998;Effects of forage vs grain feeding on carcass characteristics, fatty acid composition, and beef quality in Limousin-cross steers when time on feed is controlled. J Anim Sci 76:2619–2630.

Mangelsdorf DJ, Evans RM. 1995;The RXR heterodimers and orphan receptors. Cell 83:841–850.

Melton SL, Amiri M, Davis GW, Backus WR. 1982;Flavor and chemical characteristics of ground beef from grass-, forage-grain- and grain-finished steers. J Anim Sci 55:77–87.

Nagai S, Shimizu C, Umetsu M, Taniguchi S, Endo M, Miyoshi H, Yoshioka N, Kubo M, Koike T. 2004;Identification of a functional peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor responsive element within the murine perilipin gene. Endocrinology 145:2346–2356.

Narukami T, Sasazaki S, Oyama K, Nogi T, Taniguchi M, Mannen H. 2011;Effect of DNA polymorphisms related to fatty acid composition in adipose tissue of Holstein cattle. Anim Sci J 82:406–411.

Oh D, Lee Y, Lee C, Chung E, Yeo J. 2012;Association of bovine fatty acid composition with missense necleotide polymorphism in exon7 of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma gene. Anim Genet 43:474.

O’Keefe PW, Wellington GH, Mattick LR, Stouffer JR. 1968;Composition of bovine muscle lipids at various carcass locations. J Food Sci 33:188–192.

Reidiger ND, Othman RA, Suh M, Moghadasian MH. 2009;A systemic review of the roles of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease. J Am Diet Assoc 109:668–679.

Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. 2001;PPAR gamma: a nuclear regulator of metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth. J Biol Chem 276:37731–37734.

Schulman IG, Shao G, Heyman RA. 1998;Transactivation by retinoid X receptor-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) heterodimers: intermolecular synergy requires only the PPARγ hormone-dependent activation function. Mol Cell Biol 18:3483–3494.

Shanika PS, Maria MS, Arpad MD, Daniel NJ, Matthew JB, Ronald NC. 2009;Altering PPAR ligand selectivity impairs adipogenesis by thiazolidinediones but not hormonal inducers. Obesity 17:965–972.

Shin SC. 2006. The Development of DNA Markers Related to Carcass and Meat quality Traits in Korean Cattle. MS thesis Sang Ji University; Wonju, Korea:

Shin SC, Kang MJ, Chung ER. 2007;Identification of a novel SNP associated with meat quality in C/EBPα gene of Korean cattle. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 20:466–470.

Smith SB, Gill CA, Lunt DK, Brooks MA. 2009;Regulation of fat and fatty acid composition in beef cattle. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 22:1225–1233.

Smith SB, Yang A, Larsen TW, Tume RK. 1998;Positional analysis of triacylglycerols from bovine adipose tissue lipids varying in degree of unsaturation. Lipids 33:197–207.

Spiegelman BM. 1998;PPAR-gamma: adipogenic regulator and thiazolidinedione receptor. Diabetes 47:507–514.

Tsuji S, Itoh K, Sasazaki S, Mannen H, Oyama K, Shojo M, Mukai F. 2004;An association study using AFLP markers and application to a beef cattle breeding population. Anim Genet 35:40–43.

Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S 4th Editionth ed. Springer. New York, USA:

Vreeland WN, Meagher RJ, Barron AE. 2002;Multiplexed, high-throughput genotyping by single-base extension and end-labeled free-solution electrophoresis. Anal Chem 74:4328–4333.

Wood JD, Richardson RI, Nute GR, Fisher AV, Campo MM, Kasapidou E, Sheard PR, Enser M. 2004;Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Sci 66:21–32.

Yang A, Larsen TW, Smith SB, Tume RK. 1999;Δ9-desaturase activity in bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue of different fatty acid composition. Lipids 34:971–978.

Yu C, Markan K, Temple KA, Deplewski D, Brady MJ, Cohen RN. 2005;The nuclear receptor corepressors NCoR and SMRT decrease peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma transcriptional activity and repress 3T3-L1 adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 280:13600–13605.

Article information Continued

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Figure 1

Table 1

Means and standard deviations for carcass traits and fatty acid composition for Korean native cattle

Trait	Description	Mean±SD	Min	Max
CW (kg)	Carcass weight	427.25±43.28	321	573
BFT (mm)	Backfat thickness	13.22±5.13	3	42
MS	Marbling score	5.43±1.93	1	9
Fatty acid composition (%)
C14:0	Myristic acid	3.63±0.65	1.68	5.52
C16:0	Palmitic acid	25.65±1.96	18.86	31.12
C18:0	Stearic acid	10.48±1.39	6.74	15.34
C14:1	Myristoleic acid	1.24±0.38	0.11	2.73
C16:1	Palmitoleic acid	6.61±0.97	4.04	10.29
C18:1	Oleic acid	44.30±2.66	36.85	53.69
C18:2n6	Linoleic acid	3.02±0.76	2.17	3.98
C18:3n3	Linolenic acid	0.35±0.20	0.14	0.89
C18:3n3/C18:2n6	Linolenic acid/linoleic acid	1:8.62	1:2.44	1:28.43
SFA	Saturated fatty acid	40.60±2.86	30.36	48.44
MUFA	Monounsaturated fatty acid	53.50±2.96	45.82	63.46
M/S	MUFA/SFA	1.32±0.16	0.99	2.07
C14 index	[C14:1/(C14:0+C14:1)]×100	25.37±6.37	11.98	39.82
C16 index	[C16:1/(C16:0+C16:1)]×100	20.50±2.81	13.35	31.18
C18 index	[C18:1/(C18:0+C18:1)]×100	80.86±2.43	72.16	87.34

SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

The genotype and frequency of 38 SNPs in the PPARγ gene of Korean native cattle

SNP	Region	Genotype (No. of head)				H	MAF	HWE1

		Frequency
g.1159-71208 A>G	Intron	AA (16)	AG (14)	GG (14)	N (44)	0.499	0.420	0.016
		0.364	0.318	0.318	1.000
g.2869-69498 A>G	Intron	AA (25)	AG (19)	GG (0)	N (44)	0.407	0.187	0.008
		0.568	0.432	0.000	1.000
g.2896-69471 A>C	Intron	AA (0)	AC (5)	CC (39)	N (44)	0.107	0.183	0.689
		0.000	0.114	0.886	1.000
g.5248-67119 C>T	Intron	CC (23)	CT (21)	TT (0)	N (44)	0.363	0.204	0.038
		0.523	0.477	0.000	1.000
g.12138-60229 C>G	Intron	CC (14)	CG (25)	GG (5)	N (44)	0.496	0.455	0.029
		0.318	0.568	0.114	1.000
g.12729-59638 A>G	Intron	AA (18)	AG (8)	GG (18)	N (44)	0.500	0.500	0.014
		0.409	0.182	0.409	1.000
g.13344-59023 A>T	Intron	AA (14)	AT (1)	TT (29)	N (44)	0.442	0.330	0.002
		0.318	0.023	0.659	1.000
g.22327-50040 A>G	Intron	AA (25)	AG (19)	GG (0)	N (44)	0.339	0.216	0.166
		0.568	0.432	0.000	1.000
g.30339-42028 T>C	Intron	CC (7)	CT (19)	TT (18)	N (44)	0.469	0.375	0.776
		0.159	0.432	0.409	1.000
g.31768-40599 C>G	Intron	CC (14)	CG (25)	GG (5)	N (44)	0.479	0.398	0.398
		0.318	0.568	0.114	1.000
g.31777-40590 G>A	Intron	AA (14)	AG (18)	GG (12)	N (44)	0.499	0.477	0.330
		0.318	0.409	0.273	1.000
g.32333-40034 G>A	Intron	AA (7)	AG (23)	GG (14)	N (44)	0.487	0.420	0.925
		0.159	0.523	0.318	1.000
g.32487-39880 C>G	Intron	CC (16)	CG (23)	GG (5)	N (44)	0.469	0.375	0.718
		0.363	0.523	0.114	1.000
g.32508-39859 A>T	Intron	AA (14)	AT (25)	TT (5)	N (44)	0.479	0.398	0.398
		0.318	0.568	0.114	1.000
g.35937-36430 G>A	Intron	AA (0)	AG (14)	GG (30)	N (44)	0.268	0.159	0.586
		0.000	0.318	0.682	1.000
g.39018-33349 G>A	Intron	AA (13)	AG (21)	GG (10)	N (44)	0.498	0.466	0.963
		0.295	0.478	0.227	1.000
g.39148-33219 C>G	Intron	CC (12)	CG (26)	GG (6)	N (44)	0.491	0.432	0.329
		0.273	0.591	0.136	1.000
g.41072-31295 T>G	Intron	GG (22)	GT (22)	TT (0)	N (44)	0.375	0.250	0.058
		0.500	0.500	0.000	1.000
g.42346-30021 T>C	Intron	CC (15)	CT (19)	TT (10)	N (44)	0.494	0.443	0.546
		0.341	0.432	0.227	1.000
g.42499-29868 T>G	Intron	GG (21)	GT (21)	TT (2)	N (44)	0.407	0.284	0.487
		0.477	0.477	0.046	1.000
g.42523-29844 T>C	Intron	CC (13)	CT (19)	TT (12)	N (44)	0.500	0.489	0.497
		0.295	0.432	0.273	1.000
g.42555-29812 G>A	Intron	AA (19)	AG (17)	GG (8)	N (44)	0.469	0.375	0.354
		0.432	0.386	0.182	1.000
g.43637-28730 C>G	Intron	CC (15)	CG (26)	GG (3)	N (44)	0.463	0.364	0.145
		0.341	0.591	0.068	1.000
g.43645-28722 G>A	Intron	AA (4)	AG (12)	GG (28)	N (44)	0.351	0.227	0.254
		0.091	0.273	0.636	1.000
g.47009-25358 T>C	Intron	CC (3)	CT (26)	TT (15)	N (44)	0.463	0.364	0.145
		0.068	0.591	0.341	1.000
g.49232-23135 T>C	Intron	CC (15)	CT (26)	TT (3)	N (44)	0.463	0.364	0.145
		0.341	0.591	0.068	1.000
g.54191-18176 G>A	Intron	AA (16)	AG (22)	GG (6)	N (44)	0.474	0.386	0.718
		0.364	0.500	0.136	1.000
g.56135-16232 T>C	Intron	CC (2)	CT (26)	TT (16)	N (44)	0.449	0.341	0.083
		0.045	0.591	0.364	1.000
g.56223-16144 T>C	Intron	CC (0)	CT (17)	TT (27)	N (44)	0.312	0.193	0.293
		0.000	0.386	0.614	1.000
g.57085-15282 T>C	Intron	CC (17)	CT (20)	TT (7)	N (44)	0.474	0.386	0.969
		0.471	0.550	0.429	1.000
g.60868-11499 C>T	Intron	CC (20)	CT (24)	TT (0)	N (44)	0.397	0.273	0.025
		0.455	0.545	0.000	1.000
g.60917-11450 A>G	Intron	AA (19)	AG (13)	GG (12)	N (44)	0.487	0.420	0.016
		0.432	0.295	0.273	1.000
g.61873-10494 G>T	Intron	GG (15)	GT (25)	TT (4)	N (44)	0.469	0.375	0.309
		0.341	0.568	0.091	1.000
g.62724-9643 C>T	Intron	CC (27)	CT (17)	TT (0)	N (44)	0.312	0.193	0.293
		0.614	0.386	0.000	1.000
g.63097-9270 A>G	Intron	AA (8)	AG (21)	GG (15)	N (44)	0.487	0.420	0.891
		0.182	0.477	0.341	1.000
g.63137-9230 A>T	Intron	AA (0)	AT (18)	TT (26)	N (44)	0.325	0.205	0.223
		0.000	0.409	0.591	1.000
g.69435-2932 C>T	Intron	CC (5)	CT (22)	TT (17)	N (44)	0.463	0.364	0.902
		0.114	0.500	0.386	1.000
g.72367 G>T	Exon 7	GG (16)	GT (22)	TT(6)	N (44)	0.474	0.397	0.718
		0.364	0.500	0.136	1.000

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma; H, heterozygosity, MAF, minor allele frequence; HWE, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; N, total number.

p value for deviation of genotype distribution from HWE.

Table 3

The efficiency of discrimination of 38 SNPs in high- and low-MUFA groups of Korean native cattle (n = 44)

SNP	Region	Genotype (No. of head)						Discriminant coefficient	F-value	p-value

		High MUFAs group			Low MUFAs group

		Frequency			Frequency
g.1159-71208 A>G	Intron	AA (7)	AG (4)	GG (11)	AA (9)	AG (10)	GG (3)	−1.094	5.469	0.025
		0.438	0.286	0.786	0.562	0.714	0.214
g.2869-69498 A>G	Intron	AA (12)	AG (10)	GG (0)	AA (13)	AG (9)	GG (0)	−0.183	0.092	0.761
		0.480	0.526	0.000	0.520	0.474	0.000
g.2896-69471 A>C	Intron	AA (0)	AC (2)	CC (20)	AA (0)	AC (3)	CC (19)	−0.223	0.223	0.635
		0.000	0.400	0.513	0.000	0.600	0.487
g.5248-67119 C>T	Intron	CC (10)	CT (12)	TT (0)	CC (13)	CT (9)	TT (0)	0.532	0.797	0.365
		0.435	0.571	0.000	0.565	0.429	0.000
g.12138-60229 C>G	Intron	CC (7)	CG (11)	GG (4)	CC (7)	CG (14)	GG (1)	−0.400	1.000	0.340
		0.500	0.440	0.800	0.500	0.560	0.200
g.12729-59638 A>G	Intron	AA (9)	AG (4)	GG (9)	AA (9)	AG (4)	GG (9)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500
g.13344-59023 A>T	Intron	AA (7)	AT (0)	TT (15)	AA (7)	AT (1)	TT (14)	0.284	0.284	0.596
		0.500	0.000	0.517	0.500	1.000	0.483
g.22327-50040 A>G	Intron	AA (13)	AG (9)	GG (0)	AA (12)	AG (10)	GG (0)	0.183	0.092	0.761
		0.520	0.474	0.000	0.480	0.526	0.000
g.30339-42028 T>C	Intron	CC (3)	CT (10)	TT (9)	CC (4)	CT (9)	TT (9)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.429	0.526	0.500	0.571	0.474	0.500
g.31768-40599 C>G	Intron	CC (7)	CG (11)	GG (4)	CC (7)	CG (14)	GG (1)	−0.403	1.008	0.340
		0.500	0.440	0.800	0.500	0.560	0.200
g.31777-40590 G>A	Intron	AA (7)	AG (9)	GG (6)	AA (7)	AG (9)	GG (6)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500
g.32333-40034 G>A	Intron	AA (4)	AG (11)	GG (7)	AA (3)	AG (12)	GG (7)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.571	0.478	0.500	0.429	0.522	0.500
g.32487-39880 C>G	Intron	CC (8)	CG (11)	GG (3)	CC (8)	CG (12)	GG (2)	0.050	0.025	0.885
		0.500	0.478	0.600	0.500	0.522	0.400
g.32508-39859 A>T	Intron	AA (7)	AT (12)	TT (3)	AA (7)	AT (13)	TT (2)	0.086	0.043	0.887
		0.500	0.480	0.600	0.500	0.520	0.400
g.35937-36430 G>A	Intron	AA (0)	AG (7)	GG (15)	AA (0)	AG (7)	GG (15)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.000	0.500	0.500	0.000	0.500	0.500
g.39018-33349 G>A	Intron	AA (6)	AG (11)	GG (5)	AA (7)	AG (10)	GG (5)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.462	0.524	0.500	0.538	0.476	0.500
g.39148-33219 C>G	Intron	CC (6)	CG (14)	GG (2)	CC (6)	CG (12)	GG (4)	0.433	0.216	0.663
		0.500	0.538	0.333	0.500	0.462	0.667
g.41072-31295 T>G	Intron	GG (10)	GT (12)	TT (0)	GG (12)	GT (10)	TT (0)	0.350	0.350	0.546
		0.455	0.545	0.000	0.545	0.455	0.000
g.42346-30021 T>C	Intron	CC (8)	CT (11)	TT (3)	CC (7)	CT (8)	TT (7)	−0.405	1.005	0.343
		0.533	0.579	0.300	0.467	0.421	0.700
g.42499-29868 T>G	Intron	GG (11)	GT (10)	TT (1)	GG (10)	GT (11)	TT (1)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.524	0.476	0.500	0.476	0.524	0.500
g.42523-29844 T>C	Intron	CC (7)	CT (10)	TT (5)	CC (6)	CT (9)	TT (7)	0.111	0.056	0.793
		0.538	0.526	0.417	0.462	0.474	0.583
g.42555-29812 G>A	Intron	AA (9)	AG (12)	GG (1)	AA (10)	AG (5)	GG (7)	0.700	4.200	0.024
		0.474	0.706	0.125	0.526	0.294	0.875
g.43637-28730 C>G	Intron	CC (8)	CG (12)	GG (2)	CC (7)	CG (14)	GG (1)	−0.129	0.065	0.758
		0.533	0.462	0.667	0.467	0.538	0.333
g.43645-28722 G>A	Intron	AA (2)	AG (6)	GG (14)	AA (2)	AG (6)	GG (14)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500
g.47009-25358 T>C	Intron	CC (2)	CT (12)	TT (8)	CC (1)	CT (14)	TT (7)	0.111	0.056	0.758
		0.667	0.462	0.533	0.333	0.538	0.467
g.49232-23135 T>C	Intron	CC (8)	CT (12)	TT (2)	CC (7)	CT (14)	TT (1)	0.105	0.052	0.758
		0.533	0.462	0.667	0.467	0.538	0.333
g.54191-18176 G>A	Intron	AA (8)	AG (11)	GG (3)	AA (8)	AG (11)	GG (3)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500	0.500
g.56135-16232 T>C	Intron	CC (1)	CT (12)	TT (9)	CC (1)	CT (14)	TT (7)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.462	0.562	0.500	0.538	0.438
g.56223-16144 T>C	Intron	CC (0)	CT (8)	TT (14)	CC (0)	CT (9)	TT (13)	−0.177	0.089	0.757
		0.000	0.471	0.519	0.000	0.529	0.481
g.57085-15282 T>C	Intron	CC (8)	CT (11)	TT (3)	CC (9)	CT (9)	TT (4)	0.839	0.042	0.818
		0.471	0.550	0.429	0.529	0.450	0.571
g.60868-11499 C>T	Intron	CC (10)	CT (12)	TT (0)	CC (10)	CT (12)	TT (0)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.500	0.000	0.500	0.500	0.000
g.60917-11450 A>G	Intron	AA (9)	AG (8)	GG (5)	AA (10)	AG (5)	GG (7)	−0.231	0.347	0.583
		0.474	0.615	0.417	0.526	0.385	0.583
g.61873-10494 G>T	Intron	GG (7)	GT (12)	TT (3)	GG (8)	GT (13)	TT (1)	0.338	0.507	0.575
		0.467	0.480	0.750	0.533	0.520	0.250
g.62724-9643 C>T	Intron	CC (0)	CT (14)	TT (8)	CC (0)	CT (13)	TT (9)	0.177	0.089	0.757
		0.000	0.519	0.471	0.000	0.481	0.529
g.63097-9270 A>G	Intron	AA (4)	AG (11)	GG (7)	AA (4)	AG (10)	GG (8)	0.000	0.000	1.000
		0.500	0.524	0.467	0.500	0.476	0.533
g.63137-9230 A>T	Intron	AA (0)	AT (8)	TT (14)	AA (0)	AT (10)	TT (12)	0.362	0.362	0.540
		0.000	0.444	0.538	0.000	0.556	0.462
g.69435-2932 C>T	Intron	CC (3)	CT (10)	TT (9)	CC (2)	CT (12)	TT (8)	0.177	0.089	0.802
		0.600	0.455	0.529	0.400	0.545	0.471
g.72367 G>T	Exon 7	GG (13)	GT (6)	TT (3)	GG (3)	GT (16)	TT (3)	−0.941	5.642	0.005
		0.812	0.273	0.500	0.188	0.727	0.500

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid.

Table 4

Effects of 2 SNPs at the intron on the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat

Trait	g.1159-71208 A>G						g.42555-29812 G>A						Total (N = 513) LSM±SE

	AA (N = 134) LSM±SE	AG (N = 303) LSM±SE	GG (N = 76) LSM±SE	p-value	Genetic effect		AA (N = 83) LSM±SE	AG (N = 113) LSM±SE	GG (N = 317) LSM±SE	p-value	Genetic effect

					Additive	Dominance					Additive	Dominance
CW (kg)	422.49±3.52	430.25±2.52	423.66±5.09	0.165	−0.586±3.52	7.179±2.52	424.88±4.82	422.81±3.84	429.44±2.46	0.325	2.283±2.47	−4.348±3.84	427.25±1.91
BFT (mm)	12.70±0.46^a	13.07±0.27^a	14.71±0.66^b	0.018	−1.005±0.46	−0.633±0.28	13.53±0.59	12.59±0.47	13.36±0.28	0.330	−0.085±0.29	−0.852±0.48	13.22±0.22
MS	5.38±0.16	5.48±0.11	5.29±0.23	0.705	0.046±0.17	0.147±0.11	5.01±0.22	5.47±0.17	5.52±0.11	0.101	0.254±0.11	0.203±0.17	5.43±0.08
Fatty acid composition (%)
C14:0	3.51±0.05^a	3.64±0.03^a	3.85±0.08^b	0.002	−0.166±0.05	−0.042±0.04	3.80±0.07^b	3.74±0.05^a	3.55±0.03^a	0.002	−0.119±0.04	0.070±0.06	3.63±0.02
C16:0	25.24±0.16^a	25.68±0.11^a	26.25±0.22^b	0.001	−0.506±0.16	−0.064±0.11	26.69±0.21^c	25.91±0.19^b	25.28±0.10^a	0.000	−0.707±0.1	−0.071±0.2	25.65±0.08
C18:0	10.44±0.10	10.44±0.08	10.72±0.16	0.260	−0.143±0.1	−0.142±0.08	10.88±0.17^b	10.56±0.12^ab	10.35±0.07^a	0.007	−0.265±0.08	−0.055±0.13	10.48±0.06
C14:1	1.27±0.02	1.23±0.02	1.26±0.03	0.562	0.003±0.03	−0.036±0.02	1.22±0.04	1.21±0.03	1.26±0.02	0.407	0.018±0.02	−0.035±0.03	1.24±0.01
C16:1	6.49±0.07	6.65±0.05	6.65±0.11	0.452	−0.043±0.07	0.085±0.06	6.50±0.11	6.49±0.08	6.67±0.05	0.128	0.087±0.05	−0.099±0.08	6.61±0.04
C18:1	45.00±0.22^c	44.32±0.14^b	42.94±0.30^a	0.000	1.031±0.22	0.356±0.15	43.09±0.28^a	43.83±0.25^b	44.79±0.14^c	0.000	0.848±0.14	−0.111±0.26	44.30±0.11
C18:2n6	2.95±0.07^a	3.01±0.04^ab	3.18±0.08^b	0.048	−0.112±0.07	−0.051±0.04	3.23±0.06^b	3.13±0.07^ab	2.93±0.04^a	0.001	−0.150±0.04	0.050±0.07	3.02±0.03
C18:3n3	0.41±0.02^b	0.33±0.01^a	0.32±0.02^a	0.001	0.044±0.02	−0.028±0.01	0.33±0.01	0.34±0.01	0.46±0.01	0.027	0.015±0.01	−0.008±0.02	0.35±0.01
SFA¹	40.01±0.23^a	40.60±0.16^a	41.66±0.33^b	0.000	−0.825±0.23	−0.235±0.16	42.01±0.33^c	40.99±0.28^b	40.09±0.14^a	0.000	−0.954±0.15	−0.061±0.29	40.60±0.12
MUFA²	54.13±0.23^b	53.58±0.17^b	52.07±0.33^a	0.000	1.027±0.24	0.483±0.17	52.23±0.34^a	52.92±0.28^a	54.05±0.15^b	0.000	0.909±0.16	−0.219±0.28	53.50±0.13
M/S³	1.36±0.01^b	1.33±0.01^b	1.25±0.01^a	0.000	0.052±0.01	0.020±0.01	1.25±0.17^a	1.30±0.01^b	1.36±0.01^c	0.000	0.051±0.01	−0.002±0.02	1.33±0.01
C14 index⁴	26.54±0.53^b	25.01±0.37^ab	24.75±0.67^a	0.044	0.896±0.53	−0.641±0.38	24.26±0.82^a	24.35±0.57^a	26.03±0.34^b	0.012	0.886±0.34	−0.795±0.57	25.37±0.28
C16 index⁵	20.55±0.21	20.57±0.16	20.12±0.31	0.455	0.215±0.22	0.228±0.17	19.59±0.34^a	20.08±0.25^a	20.88±0.15^b	0.000	0.642±0.15	−0.164±0.26	20.50±0.12
C18 index⁶	81.15±0.18^b	80.94±0.14^b	80.00±0.28^a	0.003	0.573±0.18	0.355±0.14	79.83±0.31^a	80.56±0.22^b	81.23±0.12^c	0.000	0.699±0.13	0.034±0.23	80.85±0.10

SNPs, single nucleotide polymorphisms; LSM, least square mean; SE, standard error; CW, carcass weight; BFT, backfat thickness; MS, marbling scores from 1 to 9 (a larger score indicates more abundant intramuscular fat); SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, mono unsaturated fatty acid; M/S, mono unsaturated fatty acid/saturated fatty acid ratio.

I_C14 [C14:1/(C14:0+C14:1)]×100, I_C16 [C16:1/(C16:0+C16:1)]×100, I_C18 [C18:1/(C18:0+C18:1)]×100.

Mean values with different superscripts in the same row for each SNP indicate statistical differences (p<0.05); * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001.

Table 5

Effects of the g.72362 G>T genotype at exon 7 on the fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat

Trait	g.72362 G>T						Total (N = 513) LSM±SE

	GG (N = 302) LSM±SE	GT (N = 160) LSM±SE	TT (N = 51) LSM±SE	p-value	Genetic effect

					Additive	Dominance
CW (kg)	428.70±2.49	423.38±3.36	430.80±6.32	0.375	−1.054±2.49	−6.375±3.37	427.25±1.91
BFT (mm)	12.99±0.28	13.25±0.42	14.49±0.72	0.153	−0.752±0.29	−0.488±0.42	13.22±0.22
MS	5.62±0.11^b	5.27±0.15^ab	4.80±0.28^a	0.010	0.406±0.11	0.059±0.15	5.43±0.08
Fatty acid composition (%)
C14:0	3.54±0.03^a	3.70±0.05^a	4.01±0.10^b	0.000	−0.238±0.03	−0.067±0.05	3.63±0.02
C16:0	25.34±0.10^a	25.81±0.16^a	26.95±0.30^b	0.000	−0.800±0.1	−0.332±0.16	25.65±0.08
C18:0	10.47±0.07^a	10.34±0.11^a	11.02±0.22^b	0.009	−0.278±0.08	−0.407±0.11	10.48±0.06
C14:1	1.23±0.02^ab	1.29±0.03^b	1.15±0.05^a	0.057	0.037±0.02	0.101±0.03	1.24±0.01
C16:1	6.57±0.05	6.73±0.08	6.46±0.15	0.127	0.057±0.05	0.216±0.08	6.61±0.04
C18:1	44.90±0.13^c	44.02±0.21^b	41.58±0.31^a	0.000	1.660±0.14	0.780±0.22	44.30±0.11
C18:2n6	2.94±0.04^a	3.03±0.06^a	3.46±0.10^b	0.000	−0.260±0.04	−0.164±0.06	3.02±0.03
C18:3n3	0.37±0.01^b	0.34±0.01^ab	0.28±0.02^a	0.019	0.041±0.01	0.010±0.02	0.35±0.01
SFA¹	40.23±0.14^a	40.67±0.23^a	42.58±0.46^b	0.000	−1.172±0.15	−0.733±0.23	40.60±0.12
MUFA²	54.03±0.15^b	53.44±0.25^b	50.57±0.38^a	0.000	1.729±0.15	1.142±0.25	53.50±0.13
M/S³	1.35±0.01^b	1.32±0.01^b	1.19±0.02^a	0.000	0.078±0.01	0.051±0.01	1.33±0.01
C14 index⁴	25.64±0.37^b	25.81±0.47^b	22.38±0.82^a	0.002	1.628±0.37	1.803±0.48	25.37±0.28
C16 index⁵	20.59±0.15^b	20.69±0.23^b	19.34±0.41^a	0.007	0.624±0.15	0.732±0.23	20.50±0.12
C18 index⁶	81.10±0.13^b	80.97±0.19^b	79.07±0.38^a	0.000	1.014±0.13	0.885±0.2	80.85±0.10

LSM, least square mean; SE, standard error; CW, carcass weight; BFT, backfat thickness; MS, marbling scores from 1 to 9 (a larger score indicates more abundant intramuscular fat); SFA, saturated fatty acid; MUFA, mono unsaturated fatty acid; M/S, mono unsaturated fatty acid/saturated fatty acid ratio.

IC14 [C14:1/(C14:0 + C14:1)] *100, IC16 [C16:1/(C16:0 + C16:1)] *100, IC18 [C18:1/(C18:0 + C18:1)] *100.

Mean values with different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences (p<0.05); * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, and *** p<0.001.