A relatively high DM content (476 g/kg) for ensiling was obtained after field wilting of Italian ryegrass (
Table 2). The counts of epiphytic LAB were below the detectable level (10
2cfu/g) in the pre-ensiled Italian ryegrass material. A medium DM content (347 g/kg) was observed in the pre-ensiled whole crop maize (
Table 2). The counts of epiphytic LAB, yeast and enterobacteria were approximately 10
6 cfu/g in the whole crop maize material.
The untreated ryegrass silage had lactic acid and acetic acid contents of 2.46 and 4.15 g/kg DM, respectively (
Table 3). The ethanol and 2, 3-butanediol contents were determined as 21.4 and 37.3 g/kg DM, respectively, dominating the fermentation of untreated ryegrass silage. A small amount of propionic acid was also detected in untreated silage. A large number of enterobacteria (>10
7 cfu/g) was found in the untreated ryegrass silage. The number of LAB was 10
7 cfu/g and of yeasts approximately 10
2 cfu/g. Benefits were found when the silage was inoculated with
P. acidilactici. One example was the rapid production of lactic acid with contents of 31.9 g/kg DM as well as ethanol and 2, 3-butanediol contents of 6.50 and 3.40 g/kg DM, respectively. The 2, 3-butanediol production was inhibited to about one-tenth by
P. acidilactici inoculation compared with the untreated control. The acetic acid content was increased to 13.5 g/kg DM by
P. acidilactici inoculation. The number of LAB was as high as 10
8 cfu/g but no yeasts or enterobacteria were detected in
P. acidilactici-inoculated silage. Inoculation with
L. brevis also increased the lactic acid content and decreased the ethanol content compared with the untreated control. The lactic acid content was 19.8 g/kg DM, lower than with
P. acidilactici-inoculated silage. The ethanol and 2, 3-butanediol contents were similar for both
L. brevis-inoculated and
P. acidilactici-inoculated silage. Acetic acid was the main product of
L. brevis-inoculated silage with a content of 31.5 g/kg DM. The growth of yeasts and enterobacteria was inhibited by this hetero-fermentative LAB and the numbers of LAB increased in
L. brevis-inoculated compared to the control silage. Silage inoculated with both
P. acidilactici and
L. brevis exhibited similar fermentation profiles to silages inoculated with
L. brevis alone. Aerobic stability was undoubtedly higher in the inoculated silage treatments (
Table 3). When untreated silage was exposed to air, the pH increased to over 6.7 and the fermentation products decreased to almost negligible levels and heating appeared at day 2. No distinct heating was found during the 7-d test (
Table 4) and the stability was not affected by the inoculants. In inoculated silage, the pH value and acetic acid content remained unchanged but the lactic acid content increased after 7 d. However, a large increase in yeasts was found in
P. acidilactici-treated silage and acetic acid content increased in the combination-treated silage.
All maize silage showed a low pH of 3.70 with lactic acid dominating the fermentation products regardless of the LAB inoculated (
Table 5). The lactic and acetic acid contents were also similar between untreated and inoculated silages. Adding
L. brevis lowered the lactic acid and ethanol contents and increased the acetic acid content in maize silage. Inoculation with
P. acidilactici did not affect the fermentation of maize silage, whereas yeast counts were slightly decreased by
P. acidilactici and combined inoculations. After 7 d, neither
P. acidilactici nor
L. brevis could prevent spoilage if inoculated alone, but the deterioration was suppressed by a combined inoculation of both LABs. Aerobic deterioration occurred within 7 d in all treatments after exposure to air. The combined inoculation silage resisted deterioration for more than 6 days in the presence of air. The pH was more than 6.0 in all treatments except for combined inoculation of the two LABs. The pH was 4.5 for the combined silage. In the control,
P. acidilactici and
L. brevis silages, the lactic acid content decreased by more than 90% compared with the initial values immediately after opening the silos. However, in the combined treatment, the lactic acid content fell to 50%. Very little acetic acid remained after 7 days in any treatment. Both yeasts and LAB levels increased after the silos were opened.