Association of Novel Polymorphisms in Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 (<i>LEF-1</i>) Gene with Number of Teats in Different Breeds of Pig

Ru-Xiang Xu; Ning Wei; Yu Wang; Guo-Qiang Wang; Gong-She Yang; Wei-Jun Pang

doi:10.5713/ajas.2013.13772

Xu, Wei, Wang, Wang, Yang, and Pang: Association of Novel Polymorphisms in Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 (LEF-1) Gene with Number of Teats in Different Breeds of Pig

Article

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (AJAS) 2014; 27(9): 1254-1262.

https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13772

Association of Novel Polymorphisms in Lymphoid Enhancer Binding Factor 1 (LEF-1) Gene with Number of Teats in Different Breeds of Pig

Ru-Xiang Xu^a, Ning Wei^a, Yu Wang, Guo-Qiang Wang, Gong-She Yang, Wei-Jun Pang^*

^*Corresponding Author: Wei-Jun Pang.
Tel: +86-29-87091017, Fax: +86-29-87092430, E-mail: pwj1226@nwsuaf.edu.cn

^a Ru-Xiang Xu and Ning Wei contributed equally to this study.

Laboratory of Animal Fat Deposition and Muscle Development, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling Shaanxi 712100, China

Received November 29, 2013 Revised February 14, 2014 Accepted April 14, 2014

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF-1) is a member of the T-cell specific factor (TCF) family, which plays a key role in the development of breast endothelial cells. Moreover, LEF-1 gene has been identified as a candidate gene for teat number trait. In the present study, we detected two novel mutations (NC_010450.3:g. 99514A>G, 119846C>T) by DNA sequencing and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in exon 4 and intron 9 of LEF-1 in Guanzhong Black, Hanjiang Black, Bamei and Large White pigs. Furthermore, we analyzed the association between the genetic variations with teat number trait in these breeds. The 99514A>G mutation showed an extremely significant statistical relevance between different genotypes and teat number trait in Guanzhong (p<0.001) and Large White (p = 0.002), and significant relevance in Hanjiang (p = 0.017); the 119846C>T mutation suggested significant association in Guanzhong Black pigs (p = 0.042) and Large White pigs (p = 0.003). The individuals with “AG” or “GG” genotype displayed more teat numbers than those with “AA”; the individuals with “TC” or “CC” genotype showed more teat numbers than those with “TT”. Our findings suggested that the 99514A>G and 119846C>T mutations of LEF-1 affected porcine teat number trait and could be used in breeding strategies to accelerate porcine teat number trait improvement of indigenous pigs breeds through molecular marker assisted selection.

Keywords: Pig; LEF-1 Gene; Expression Profile; Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RLFP); Teat Number; Haplotype

INTRODUCTION

Porcine teat number is an important indicator of reproductive performance. Pig individuals vary in teat numbers and nipple development, which might be caused by a major gene and several minor genes (Wiesner et al., 1994). However, the genetic model of the major gene and minor genes involved are still unknown. Therefore, it is a noteworthy and interesting task to study unreported genetic variations within candidate genes and evaluate their associations with teat number trait.

Lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 (LEF-1) is a member of the T-cell specific factor (TCF) family, a small family including four members in vertebrates. As a key regulator of wingless signaling (Wnt), LEF-1 mediates β-catenin dependent transcription factors that bind to the promoter of several genes bearing the conserved sequence CTTTGT (Xie et al., 2005) and plays a critical role in the canonical Wnt signalling pathway required for morphogenesis of early mammary gland during embryogenesis. The LEF-1^−/− mice lacked two pairs of placodes, and other pairs that formed were small and degenerated during mammary gland development (van Genderen et al., 1994; Boras-Granic et al., 2006). In addition, it has been recently shown that LEF-1 promotes oncogenic signaling in breast and other cancers (Arce et al., 2006; Gebeshuber et al., 2007; Ravindranath et al., 2008). Misregulation of LEF-1 gene results in overactive Wnt signaling, driving LEF/TCFs to transform cells. Depletion of LEF-1 causes down-regulation of cyclin D and over-expression of matrix metallopeptidase 7 in breast cancer (Wang et al., 2006) and breast cancer cell proliferation (Bucan et al., 2012). Therefore, LEF-1 is of particular interest to many group s for its significant effect on mammary gland development.

As to its expansive role in mammary gland development, LEF-1 gene was identified as a candidate gene for teat number trait (Jonas et al., 2008; Tetzlaff et al., 2009). We tested the levels of LEF-1 mRNA in different tissues and the mammary gland at different developmental stages and found extremely high levels in the teat that had a tendency to gradually decrease during growth which suggested its enormous regulatory potential in mammary gland development.

In previous studies, a 1351T>C transition and 1666A>C transversion in the 3′ end of LEF-1 mRNA affecting porcine teat number trait in commercial populations were identified (Tetzlaff et al., 2009). However, in other pig breeds, whether the two mutants above exist and are there novel genetic variations are still unknown. Here, we aimed to identify novel genetic variations in the coding sequence region (CDs) and partly intron of porcine LEF-1 gene and analyze their associations with teat number trait of Guanzhong Black, Hanjiang Black, Bamei and Large White pigs. It was expected that the results of this study could provide some information for enriching pig genetic resources and accelerate the selection and breeding through marker assisted selection (MAS) to improve teat number trait in Chinese native pig breeds.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement

Experimental animals were meticulously fed and the experimental procedure was in agreement with the Animal Care Commission of the College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, China.

RNA extraction and quantitative reverse transcriptase - polymerase chain reaction

To survey expression of porcine LEF-1 gene in different tissues, glands and organs, quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed. Total RNA was isolated from teat, heart, liver, subcutaneous fat, spleen, kidney, lung and longissimus muscle tissues of 3-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs, teat and teat tissues of 45-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs as well as heart, liver, spleen, lymph, thyroid and fat tissues of 180-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs using TRIzol method. The integrity of RNA was checked by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose gels with ethidium bromide (EB) staining. Three micrograms of total RNA from each category as well as control was reverse transcribed to obtain cDNA using moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) and oligo(dT)18 primer following the manufacturer’s protocol. The primers for LEF-1 were 5′-AAATAAAGTGCC CGTGGTGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GAGAAAAGTGCT CGTCGCTGTA-3′ (reverse), and β-actin (reference gene) primers were 5′-CGTGAAAAGATGACCCAGATCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-CACAGCCTGGATGGCTACGT-3′ (reverse). Each individual sample was run in triplicate wells and the amplification effects were about 95%. PCR amplification cycles were performed using iQ Multicolor Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-RAD, Hercules, CA, USA) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq II kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, Liaoning, China). The reactions were initially denatured at 95°C for 3 min followed by 50 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 15 s, 72°C for 35 s. The melting curve analysis was performed after amplification to verify the accuracy of each amplicion. The density of SYBR green I and determine the threshold cycle (Ct) value were analyzed by iQ Optical System Software 2.1. The change of transcript abundance of all tested genes was calculated using 2^−ΔΔCt method (Livak et al., 2001). All data were expressed as mean±SE. Accordingly, LEF-1 mRNA levels of all the tested tissues were given by the formula F = 2^−ΔΔCt, ΔΔCt = (Ct, _LEF-1 – Ct, _β-actin)_{some tissue} – (Ct, _LEF-1 – Ct, _β-actin)_heart and reported as fold change in abundance relative to heart LEF-1 level.

DNA samples

Three hundred and sixty-one ear samples were obtained from four pig breeds including Guanzhong Black pigs (GZ, N = 198, Hanjiang Black pigs (HJ, N = 34), Bamei pigs (BM, N = 30) and Large White pigs (LW, N = 99). Genomic DNAs were extracted from ear tissues using salt-chloroform extraction protocol (Sambrook et al., 2001) and stored at −80°C. The records of teat number trait from all subjects were collected for statistical analysis.

Primer design and polymerase chain reaction amplification

Based on GenBank sequence No. NC_010450.3, 13 pairs of PCR primers (Table 1) were designed to amplify exon 1–12 and partial intron 1–11 of the pig LEF-1 gene. The 50 μL volume contained: 400 ng genomic DNA, 2.5 μM of each primer, 25 μL MIX (including MgCl₂, dNTPs, Taq DNA polymerase and Bromophenol blue). The cycling protocol was 8 min at 95°C, 32 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, annealing (°C) for 30 s as indicated in Table 1 and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. After amplifying the pig genomic DNA pool (2 μL from every individual) (Sham et al., 2002), PCR products were sequenced by Invitrogen Corporation and then analyzed by the Chromas software.

Polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)

The PCR-RFLP technique was used to detect the polymorphism of 99514A>G and 119846C>T loci in porcine LEF-1 gene. Aliquots of 20 μL PCR products were digested with 10 U EcoR IIand Hinf I (Takara) for 4 h at 37°C following supplier instructions, respectively. The digested products were detected by electrophoresis on 2.0% agarose gel stained with EB.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed on the basis of records of the number of teats in GZ, HJ, BM, and LW breeds. Genotypic and allelic frequencies of polymorphism loci on the LEF-1 gene were analyzed by the T-test for the four pig breeds using the SPSS software (version 19.0). Gene homozygosity (H_O), heterozygosity (H_E), effective allele numbers (N_E), and polymorphism information content (PIC) were evaluated by means of Nei’s methods (Nei et al., 1979). The association between genotypes and teat number trait was analyzed through the general linear model procedure of SPSS software (version 19.0) according to the following model:

Yij=μ+Genotypei+Eij

Where Y_ij was the observation of animal, μ was the overall mean, genotype_i was the fixed effect of the genotype, and E_ij was the random effect. Effects associated with some of the factors, were not included in the above mentioned models, because the preliminary statistical analysis indicated that these factors were not significant sources of variation in the populations. Significant difference was stated when the genotype effect was a significant source of variation, and the p-value for the difference between the least square means for each genotype was less than p = 0.05 level.

RESULTS

Expression of lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 in porcine different tissues

In 3-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs, we detected the relative mRNA levels of porcine LEF-1 in teat, heart, liver, subcutaneous fat, spleen, kidney, lung and longissimus muscle tissues (Figure 1A). The data showed a wide range of expression of LEF-1 in different porcine tissues. In detail, relatively high levels in teat, spleen, kidney and lung tissue (about 25.6, 7.3, 10.3, and 11.9 fold to heart tissue respectively) were observed As well as low levels in subcutaneous fat tissue and longissimus muscle tissue.

In 180-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs, the relative mRNA levels of porcine LEF-1 in teat, heart, liver, spleen, lymph, thyroid and fat tissues are shown in Figure 1B. High abundance was detected in teat tissue and low in heart tissue. In the important glands, such as thyroid, LEF-1 mRNA level was some 8 fold higher than heart tissue. In addition, spleen and liver also had a relatively high level (about 3 fold to heart), while low in subcutaneous fat and lymph node.

Furthermore, we detected the expression of LEF-1 in teat tissues of 3-day-old, 45-day-old and 180-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs as well (Figure 1C), and the data displayed a decrease of the relative mRNA levels of porcine LEF-1 with age, in detail, the porcine LEF-1 was expressed at a level 3.5-fold greater in 3-day-old GZ pigs and 2.1-fold greater in 45-day-old GZ pigs than that in 180-day-old GZ pigs.

Two novel genetic variations of porcine lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1 gene

The porcine LEF-1 gene is located in SSC8 and contains 153883 bases including 12 exons and 11 introns (Figure 2). The LEF-1 mRNA consists of 2357 nucleotides and codes 398 amino acids. Two novel mutations (NC_010450.3: g. 99514A>G, 119846C>T) were firstly detected by DNA pool sequencing in exon 4 and intron 9, respectively (Figure 3). No polymorphism was detected in the remaining sequences (P1–P3, P5–P9, P11, and P12) (Table 1) of the LEF-1 gene. The 99514A>G mutation resulted in a synonymous genetic code of proline, in detail, CCA (Pro)>CCG (Pro) at position 166 aa of LEF-1. The 119846C>T locus was observed in intron 9 and had no effect on amino acids changing.

Population genetic indexes

The population genetic indexes involving in H_O, H_E, N_E, and PIC are listed in Table 2. Generally, when PIC value <0.25, it was defined as the low polymorphism; when 0.25 <PIC value <0.5, it was median polymorphism; when PIC value >0.5, it was high polymorphism (Mateescu et al., 2005). All breeds analyzed were in accordance with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.05). In the 99514A>G mutation, low level PIC was observed in HJ and median level in GZ, LW, and BM; In the 119846C>T mutation, low level PIC was observed in HJ and LW and median level in GZ and BM; Additionally, the homozygosity occupied a higher rate in HJ and LW than that in GZ and BM.

Genotypic and allelic frequencies

The frequencies of widespread allele “A” in 99514A>G mutation ranged from 0.5536 to 0.9118, and “T” in 119846C>T mutation ranged from 0.4833 to 08824 in four pig breeds (Table 3). Generally, more individuals with genotype “AA” and “TT” were identified in HJ and LW, yet few individuals with genotype “GG” and “CC” were detected in GZ, HJ, LW, and BM.

Association analysis of genetic variations with teat number trait

The association analysis between different genotypes and teat number trait was assessed in GZ, HJ, BM, and LW.

The 99514A>G mutation revealed an extremely significant statistical relevance between different genotypes and teat number trait in GZ (p<0.001) and LW (p = 0.002), and significant relevance in GZ (p = 0.017) (Table 4). On the whole, the individuals with genotype “GG” or “AG” showed more teat number than those with genotype “AA”.

The 119846C>T mutation suggested significant association of different genotypes with teat number trait in GZ (p = 0.042) and LW (p = 0.003) and no significance observed in HJ (p = 0.252) and BM (p = 0.591) (Table 4). In general, we found individuals with genotype “TC” had a higher teat number than those with “TT” in the four breeds.

Analysis of haplotype frequencies in Guanzhong Black and Large White pigs

To further observe the correlation between the 99514A>G and the 119846C>T mutation, the haplotype frequencies were analyzed in GZ and LW. The data showed that haplotypes “AGTC” and “AATT” accounted for a large proportion in GZ (34.85% and 57.58%) and LW (58.59% and 37.38%), while other haplotypes accounted for a proportion of less than 8% (Table 5). In addition, we found only one haplotype “GGCC” in LW and the individual had a higher porcine teat number than most of others with haplotypes “AGTC” and “AATT” (The data were not shown), the results implied that “G” and “C” could encode for a high teat number in pigs.

DISCUSSION

Here, the levels of LEF-1 mRNA were detected by qPCR in multiple tissues of 3-day-old and 180-day-old GZ and the results both showed relatively high abundance in teat tissue. In addition, by comparing the expression of porcine LEF-1 among 3-day-old, 45-day-old, and 180-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs in teat tissues, we found the relative levels of porcine LEF-1 mRNA decreased with age. Collectively, it strongly suggested a regulatory potential in development of porcine breast.

The development of porcine breast was mainly composed of the formation and specialization of milk line, formation of mammary placode, glandular bud and primitive ductal branching (Balinsky, 1950). The above phases of breast development were complicated and tightly regulated by a series of signaling pathway including Wnt, fibroblast growth factor (FGF) and T-box 3 (Tbx3).

In Wnt signaling pathway, several molecular markers, such as Wnt10b and the Wnt reporter (TOP-Gal), play key roles in formation and specialization of mammary line. When dickkopf Wnt signaling pathway inhibitor 1 (Dkk1), inhibiting expression of TOP-Gal and Wnt10b, was expressed, all morphologic evidence of mammary development disappeared (Chu et al., 2004; Veltmaat et al., 2004; Veltmaat et al., 2006).

The Tbx3 is relevant to the ulnar-mammary syndrome in humans and haploinsufficiency of Tbx3 causes severe mammary hypoplasia, like the complete loss of mammary glands (Bamshad et al., 1997). Moreover, Tbx3^−/− mice displayed an abnormal phenotype, which failed to develop most mammary placodes (Davenport et al., 2003; Jerome-Majewska et al., 2005). Thus, Tbx3 is required early in the initiation of mammary development. Furthermore, Wnt signaling and FGF/FGFR1 signaling pathways converge to induce and maintain mesenchymal Tbx3 (Eblaghie et al., 2004).

The LEF-1 gene could be treated as a bridge maintaining these three signaling pathways. In Wnt signaling pathway, LEF-1 gene is a downstream transcriptional mediator, which regulates breast development by regulating activity of Wnt signaling. In FGF signaling pathway, FGFR2b could affect expression of LEF-1 gene via regulating Wnt10 (Mailleux et al., 2002; Eblaghie et al., 2004). Additionally, FGF signaling was at least in part mediated by LEF/TCF-β-catenin signaling (Holnthoner et al., 2002). In Tbx3 signaling pathway, preplacodal Tbx3 accumulation was essential for Wnt10b and LEF-1 in development of mammary line (Davenport et al., 2003; Eblaghie et al., 2004; Jerome-Majewska et al., 2005) and prodigious Tbx3 increased LEF-1 and Wnt10b expression (Cho et al., 2006). Therefore, LEF-1 gene plays an important role in development of porcine breast and it is important to search for potentially polymorphic loci.

At present, the LEF-1 gene variations associated with porcine teat number have not been thoroughly investigated. In previous study, there was a 1351T>C (NM_001129967.1) transition and a 1666A>C (NM_001129967.1) transversion found in the 3′ end of LEF1 mRNA. The 1351T>C locus had highly significant associations with inverted teat trait and total teat number trait, while the 1666A>C mutation was significantly associated with total number of inverted teats in commercial populations (Tetzlaff et al., 2009). Here, we further explored potential polymorphic loci of LEF-1 gene and found two novel single nucleotide polymorphism (NC_010450.3:g. 99514A>G, 119846C>T) located in exon 4 (P4) and intron 9 (P9), respectively. Then, through statistical analysis, we found that the 99514A>G mutation showed extremely significant relevance with total teat number trait in GZ (p< 0.001) and LW (p = 0.002), and significant relevance in GZ (p = 0.017), but no significance in BM, while the 119846C>T mutation displayed significant association of different genotypes with teat number trait in GZ (p = 0.042) and LW (p = 0.003) and no significance observed in HJ (p = 0.252) and BM (p = 0.591). The individuals with genotype “AGTC” or “GGCC” had a greater teat number than those with “AATT”. It insinuated the loci “G” and “C” could be associated with higher teat numbers. In addition, the 99514A>G mutation itself demonstrated a synonymous genetic code change of proline, in detail, CCA (Pro) >CCG (Pro) at position 166 aa of LEF-1 (398 aa), which might affect the efficiency of the translation changing phenotype to some extent. However, the precise mechanism of regulation of the porcine nipple numbers is still unknown and further study is urgent.

According to analysis of PIC, the 99514A>G mutation within porcine LEF-1 gene displayed low PIC in HJ and median level in GZ, LW, and BM; the 119846C>T showed low PIC in HJ and LW and median level in GZ and BM. It indicated the difference of teat number trait from interbreed and intrabreed individuals, which could be conducive to assessing important polymorphic loci relevant with teat number trait.

GZ, HJ, BM, and LW are important pig breeds in China. It is necessary to improve their multiple traits using conventional breeding methods combined with MAS. In recent years, teat number trait has been approved as an important indicator for litter size. The difference of numbers and developmental situation s of porcine nipples might be caused by a major gene and several minor genes. However, the major gene affecting teat number trait was still unknown and many groups were attracted to focus on this study. In our study, we assessed two novel polymorphic loci of LEF-1 gene correlationed with teat number trait in GZ, HJ, BM, and LW. The data strongly suggested that the 99514A>G mutation showed extremely significant statistical relevance with porcine teat number trait in GZ and LW and significant relevance in HJ, while the 119846C>T mutation showed significant association in GZ and LW. It suggested that the LEF-1 gene polymorphism could be used as genetic markers to improve breeding for porcine teat number trait.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2012CB124705) and Program of National Pig Industry Technology System (CARS-36).

Figure 1

LEF-1 mRNA levels in Guanzhong Black pigs. (A) LEF-1 mRNA levels in 8 tissues of 3-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs, including teat, heart, liver, subcutaneous fat, spleen, kidney, lung and muscle tissues were detected. All the mRNA levels were normalized to LEF-1 mRNA of heart; (B) LEF-1 mRNA levels in 7 tissues of 180-day-old Guanzhong Black pigs, including teat, heart, liver, spleen, lymph, thyroid and fat tissues, were detected. All the mRNA levels were normalized to LEF-1 mRNA of heart; (C) Comparative analysis of LEF-1 mRNA expression in Guanzhong Black pigs teat tissues during 3 growth stages. All the mRNA levels were normalized to LEF-1 mRNA in 180-day-old. LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1.

Figure 2

The structure of porcine LEF-1 gene. Black boxes correspond to CDs. P1 to P12 denotes the fragments amplified by primers shown in Table 1. The SNP sites detected in present study were also included in this figure. LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1; CDs, coding sequence region; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.

Figure 3

Electrophoresis patterns of the DNA sequencing map and EcoRII and HinfI PCR-RFLP at porcine LEF-1 gene. (A) DNA sequencing map (upper) and electrophoresis pattern of the EcoR II PCR-RFLP (lower). The genotype “GG” demonstrated one undigested band (344 bp); Genotype “AA” showed two digested fragments (155 bp and 189 bp); Genotype “AG” showed three fragments (155, 189, and 344 bp). (B) DNA sequencing maps (upper) and electrophoresis pattern of the Hinf I PCR-RFLP (lower). The genotype “CC” demonstrated one undigested band (116 bp); genotype “TT” showed one digested fragment (89 bp) and; genotype “CT” showed two fragments (89 and 116 bp). Another digested fragment (27 bp) was invisible due to the lack of resolution within agarose gel. PCR-RFLP, polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1.

Table 1

Primer information for PCR amplification of porcine LEF-1 gene

Loci	Primer sequences	Tm (°C)	Sizes and location	GenBank Acc. No.	Detection methods
P1	F:CCAGCGGAGCGGAGATTACA R:AGCCTTCCCTCCCTGCTCTT	57.0	303 bp, including 5’UTR, E1, partial IVS1	NC_010450.3 (nt32-334)	DNA pool sequencing
P2	F:TTCTTTCTTTTGTGGGTGGG R:AACGATAACATTGGGAGTGGTA	60.0	136 bp, including partial IVS1; E2; partial IVS2	NC_010450.3 (nt2679-2715)	DNA pool sequencing
P3	F:TTGTTCTTTGCATTCTCTCAGG R:GTCATTCCTCATAGCAGGTCTTA	59.0	303 bp, including partial IVS2; E3; partly IVS3	NC_010450.3 (nt4139-4442)	DNA pool sequencing
P4	F:TGATTCTTGTTACTGCTGATGC R:ACCACCCACCCAATGACA	60.0	344 bp, including partly IVS3; E4; partial IVS4	NC_010450.3 (nt81993-82337)	DNA pool sequencing; PCR-RFLP
P5	F:GAATGTCCTGACTCTGCCTCT R:TGCTTGTTGATGTGAGGTTTC	59.0	256 bp, including partial IVS4; E5; partial IVS5	NC_010450.3 (nt86310-86536)	DNA pool sequencing
P6	F:GAAGGGAAGCAGGCAATG R:AGCAGAGGCACACGAGATG	59.0	286 bp, including partial IVS5; E6; partly IVS6	NC_010450.3 (nt87924-88210)	DNA pool sequencing
P7	F:ACGTGTTTTCACTCTCAACCA R:TTCATAACAACAGAGGGGGA	60.0	329 bp, including partly IVS6; E7; partial IVS7	NC_010450.3 (nt90181-90510)	DNA pool sequencing
P8	F:GCTGTTCTCCTCCCATCTCT R:ATGAAGCAGTTCCACGGTT	60.0	282 bp, including partial IVS7; E8; partial IVS8	NC_010450.3 (nt91524-91806)	DNA pool sequencing
P9	F:TCCCCTTTCTTTTTCAGTGG R:TCCCAGCATTAGATACACCCT	63.0	234 bp, including partial IVS8; E9; partial IVS9	NC_010450.3 (nt98070-98304)	DNA pool sequencing
P10	F:TCTTGGTTGACTGCCTGCC R:CAGGGTTTGGGAAAGGAGC	59.0	359 bp, including partial IVS9; E10; partly IVS10	NC_010450.3 (nt102365-10272)	DNA pool sequencing
P10	F:AGCACGGAAGGAAAGACAGC R:CAGCATTAGATACACCCTGGAATT	58.0	116 bp, including partial IVS9; E10;	NC_010450.3 (nt102489-10260)	DNA pool sequencing; PCR-RFLP
P11	F:CATCAGTTGGTGAGGTCCTATT R:GAGCAAGAAGAGTCACAAGCA	61.0	322 bp, including partial IVS10; E11; partial IVS11	NC_010450.3 (nt102979-11301)	DNA pool sequencing
P12	F:GACCCCAAAGGAGACTACC R:TTACAACAAGAGGGTGAGA	56.0	813bp including partial IVS11; E12;	NC_010450.3 (nt117632-18445)	DNA pool sequencing

PCR, polymerase chain reaction; LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1; Acc. No., means accession number; E, means exon; IVS, means intron; UTR, means untranscriptional region.

Table 2

Genetic indexes of the 99514A>G and 119846C>T mutation within porcine LEF-1 gene

Loci	Breeds	H_O	H_E	N_E	PIC
99514A>G	GZ	0.3787	0.6212	2.6406	0.3537
	HJ	0.8824	0.1176	1.1724	0.1479
	LW	0.6970	0.3030	1.3912	0.2532
	BM	0.3226	0.6771	3.0998	0.3415
119846C>T	GZ	0.4308	0.5692	2.3213	0.3447
	HJ	0.8387	0.1613	1.1923	0.1860
	LW	0.6875	0.3125	1.4546	0.2289
	BM	0.3000	0.7000	3.3333	0.3747

LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1; H_O, gene homozygosity; H_E, gene heterozygosity; N_E, effective allele numbers; PIC, polymorphism information content; GZ, Guanzhong Black pigs; HJ, Hanjiang Black pigs; LW, Large White pigs; BM, Bamei pigs.

Table 3

Genotypic and allelic frequencies of 99514A>G and 119846C>T mutation within porcine LEF-1 gene

Loci	Breeds	Total	Genotypic frequencies			Allelic frequencies

			AA(P_AA)	AG(P_AG)	GG(P_GG)	A(P_A)	G(P_G)
99514A>G	GZ	198	69(0.3485)	123(0.6212)	6(0.0303)	0.6591	0.3409
	HJ	34	29(0.8529)	4(0.1176)	1(0.0294)	0.9118	0.0882
	LW	99	66 (0.6667)	30 (0.3030)	3(0.0303)	0.8182	0.1818
	BM	30	7(0.2333)	19(0.6333)	4(0.1333)	0.5536	0.4464
	Total	361	171(0.4736)	176(0.4875)	14(0.0388)	0.7175	0.2825

			TT(P_TT)	TC(P_TC)	CC(P_CC)	T(P_T)	C(P_C)

119846C>T	GZ	198	78(0.3939)	111(0.5606)	9(0.0455)	0.6742	0.3258
	HJ	34	26(0.7647)	8(0.2353)	0(0)	0.8824	0.1176
	LW	99	69(0.6970)	30(0.3030)	0(0)	0.8485	0.1515
	BM	30	4(0.1333)	21(0.7000)	5(0.1667)	0.4833	0.5167
	Total	361	177(0.4847)	170(0.4663)	14(0.0491)	0.7258	0.2742

LEF-1, lymphoid enhancer binding factor 1; GZ, Guanzhong Black pigs; HJ, Hanjiang Black pigs; LW, Large White pigs; BM, Bamei pigs.

Table 4

Association of the polymorphic locus with teat number trait

SNP	Genotypes	Teat numbers (mean±SD)

		GZ	HJ	LW	BM
99514A>G	AA	12.36±1.16	13.52±0.87	13.35±1.16	11.81±0.77
	AG	13.28±1.59	14.20±1.10	14.09±0.80	12.29±1.18
	GG	15.33±0.82	16.00	14.67±1.15	13.00±1.55
	p value	<0.001	0.017 (<0.05)	0.002 (<0.05)	0.136
119846C>T	TT	12.33±1.38	13.48±0.92	13.48±1.23	12.33±1.74
	TC	12.38±1.78	14.33±2.89	14.22±0.80	13.25±1.71
	CC	13.77±1.64	0	0	12.60±0.89
	p value	0.042 (<0.05)	0.252	0.003 (<0.05)	0.591

SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; SD, standard deviation; GZ, Guanzhong Black pigs; HJ, Hanjiang Black pigs; LW, Large White pigs; BM, Bamei pigs.

The FGF10 is firstly expressed in the formative period of mammary line and regulates FGFR2b to affect Wnt10 response to the development of the mammary line. Additionally, FGF10^−/− and FGFR2b^−/− mice showed developmental defects of mammary bud. At the same time, FGF/FGFR1 signals were also required early in the initiation of mammary development (Mailleux et al., 2002; Eblaghie et al., 2004).

Table 5

Analysis of haplotype frequencies in GZ and LW

Breeds	Haplotypes	Numbers	Haplotype frequencies (%)
GZ	AATT	69	34.85
	AGTC	114	57.58
	Others	3	7.57
LW	AATT	58	58.59
	AGTC	37	37.38
	Others	4	4.03

GZ, Guanzhong Black pigs; LW, Large White pigs.

REFERENCES

Arce L, Yokoyama NN, Waterman ML. 2006. Diversity of LEF/TCF action in development and diseases. Oncogene 25:7492–7504.

Balinsky BI. 1950. On the prenatal growth of the mammary rudiment in the mouse. J Anat 84:227–235.

Bamshad M, Lin RC, Law DJ, Watkins WS, Krakowiak PA, Moore ME, Franceschini P, Lala R, Holmes LB, Gebuhr TC, Bruneau BG, Schinzel A, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Jorde LB. 1997. Mutations in human TBX3 alter limb, apocrine and genital development in ulnar-mammary syndrome. Nat Genet 16:311–315.

Boras-Granic K, Chang H, Grosschedl R, Hamel PA. 2006. Lef1 is required for the transition of Wnt signaling from mesenchymal to epithelial cells in the mouse embryonic mammary gland. Dev Biol 295:219–231.

Bucan V, Mandel K, Bertram C, Lazaridis A, Reimers K, Park-Simon TW, Vogt PM, Hass R. 2012. LEF-1 regulates proliferation and MMP-7 transcription in breast cancer cells. Genes Cells 17:559–567.

Cho KW, Kim JY, Song SJ, Farrell E, Eblaghie MC, Kim HJ, Tickle C, Jung HS. 2006. Molecular interactions between Tbx3 and Bmp4 and a model for dorsoventral positioning of mammary gland development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:16788–16793.

Chu EY, Hens J, Andl T, Kairo A, Yamaguchi TP, Brisken C, Glick A, Wysolmerski JJ, Millar SE. 2004. Canonical WNT signaling promotes mammary placode development and is essential for initiation of mammary gland morphogenesis. Development 131:4819–4829.

Davenport TG, Jerome-Majewska LA, Papaioannou VE. 2003. Mammary gland, limb and yolk sac defects in mice lacking Tbx3, the gene mutated in human ulnar-mammary syndrome. Development 130:2263–2273.

Eblaghie MC, Song SJ, Kim JY, Akita K, Tickle C, Jung HS. 2004. Interactions between FGF and Wnt signals and Tbx3 gene expression in mammary gland initiation in mouse embryo s. J Anat 205:1–13.

Holnthoner W, Pillinger M, Groger M, Wolff K, Ashton AW, Albanese C, Neumeister P, Pestell RG, Petzelbauer P. 2002. Fibroblast growth factor-2 Induces Lef/Tcf-dependent transcription in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 277:45847–45853.

Gebeshuber CA, Sladecek S, Grunert S. 2007. Beta-catenin/LEF-1 signaling in breast cancer-central players activated by a plethora of inputs. Cells Tissues Organs 185:51–60.

Jerome-Majewska LA, Jenkins GP, Ernstoff E, Zindy F, Sherr CJ, Papaioannou VE. 2005. Tbx3, the ulnar-mammary syndrome gene, and Tbx2 interact in mammary gland development through a p19Arf / p53-independent pathway. Dev Dyn 234:922–933.

Jonas E, Schreinemachers HJ, Kleinwächter T, Un C, Oltmanns I, Tetzlaff S, Jennen D, Tesfaye D, Ponsuksili S, Murani E, Juengst H, Tholen E, Schellander K, Wimmers K. 2008. QTL for the heritable inverted teat defect in pigs. Mamm Genome 19:127–138.

Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2^−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25:402–408.

Mailleux AA, Spencer-Dene B, Dillon C, Ndiaye D, Savona-Baron C, Itoh N, Kato S, Dickson C, Thiery JP, Bellusci S. 2002. Role of FGF10/FGFR2b signaling during mammary gland development in the mouse embryo. Development 129:53–60.

Mateescu RG, Zhang Z, Tsai K, Phavaphutanon J, Burton-Wurster NI, Lust G, Quaas R, Murphy K, Acland GM, Todhunter RJ. 2005. Analysis of allele fidelity, polymorphic information content, and density of microsatellites in a genome-wide screening for hip dysplasia in a crossbreed pedigree. J Hered 96:847–853.

Nei M, Li WH. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:5269–5273.

Ravindranath A, O’Connell A, Johnston PG, El-Tanani MK. 2008. The role of LEF/TCF factors in neoplastic transformation. Curr Mol Med 8:38–50.

Sambrook J, Russell DW. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ednCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; New York, USA:

Sham P, Bader JS, Craig I, O’Donovan M, Owen M. 2002. DNA Pooling: a tool for large-scale association studies. Nat Rev Genet 3:862–871.

Tetzlaff S, Chomdej S, Jonas E, Ponsuksili S, Murani E, Phatsara C, Schellander K, Wimmers K. 2009. Association of parathyroid hormone-like hormone (PTHLH) and its receptor (PTHR1) with the number of functional and inverted teats in pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 126:237–241.

Tetzlaff S, Jonas E, Phatsara C, Murani E, Ponsuksili S, Schellander K, Wimmers K. 2009. Evidence for association of lymphoid enhancer-binding factor-1 (LEF1) with the number of functional and inverted teats in pigs. Cytogenet Genome Res 124:139–146.

van Genderen C, Okamura RM, Farinas I, Quo RG, Parslow TG, Bruhn L, Grosschedl R. 1994. Development of several organs that require inductive epithelial-mesenchymal interactions is impaired in LEF-1-deficient mice. Genes Dev 8:2691–2703.

Veltmaat JM, Relaix F, Le LT, Kratochwil K, Sala FG, van Veelen W, Rice R, Spencer-Dene B, Mailleux AA, Rice DP, Thiery JP, Bellusci S. 2006. Gli3-mediated somitic Fgf10 expression gradients are required for the induction and patterning of mammary epithelium along the embryonic axes. Development 133:2325–2335.

Veltmaat JM, Van Veelen W, Thiery JP, Bellusci S. 2004. Identification of the mammary line in mouse by Wnt10b expression. Dev Dyn 229:349–356.

Wang F, Reierstad S, Fishman DA. 2006. Matrilysin over-expression in MCF-7 cells enhances cellular invasiveness and pro-gelatinase activation. Cancer Let 236:292–301.

Wiesner E, Willer S. 1978. Problems of occurrence of inverted nipples in swine. Monatshefte. Fur. Veterinarmedi-zin 33:189–190.

Xie X, Lu J, Kulbokas EJ, Golub TR, Mootha V, Lindblad-Toh K, Lander ES, Kellis M. 2005. Systematic discovery of regulatory motifs in human promoters and 3’UTRs by comparison of several mammals. Nature 434:338–345.