2. Ma T, Xu GS, Deng KD, et al. Energy requirements of early-weaned Dorper cross-bred female lambs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2016;100:1081–9.
3. Ogino A, Sommart K, Subepang S, et al. Environmental impacts of extensive and intensive beef production systems in Thailand evaluated by life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 2016;112:22–31.
4. The Working Committee of Thai Feeding Standard for Ruminant. Nutrient requirement of beef cattle in Indochinese Peninsula. 1st rev edKhon Kaen, Thailand: Klungnanavithaya Press; 2010.
5. Chaokaur A, Nishida T, Phaowphaisal I, Sommart K. Effects of feeding level on methane emissions and energy utilization of Brahman cattle in the tropics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 2015;199:225–30.
6. Tangjitwattanachai N, Phaowphaisal I, Otsuka M, Sommart K. Enteric methane emission, energetic efficiency and energy requirements for maintenance of beef cattle in the tropics. Jpn Agric Res Q 2015;49:399–407.
7. Kamphayae S, Kumagai H, Angthong W, Narmseelee R, Bureenok S. Effects of different ratios and storage periods of liquid brewer’s yeast mixed with cassava pulp on chemical composition, fermentation quality and
in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:470–8.
8. Sommart K, Parker DS, Rowlinson P, Wanapat M. Fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in an
in vitro system using cassava, rice straw and dried Ruzi grass as substrates. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000;13:1084–93.
9. Sommart K, Wanapat M, Rowlinson P, et al. The use of cassava chips as an energy source for lactating dairy cows fed with rice straw. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2000;13:1094–101.
10. Lofgreen GP, Garrett WN. A system for expressing net energy requirements and feed values for growing and finishing beef cattle. J Anim Sci 1968;27:793–806.
11. Agricultural Research Council. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Farnham Royal, Slough, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; 1980.
12. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th edWashington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
13. Chuntrakort P, Otsuka M, Hayashi K, et al. The effect of dietary coconut kernels, whole cotton seeds and sunflower seeds on the intake, digestibility and enteric methane emissions of Zebu beef cattle fed rice straw based diets. Livest Sci 2014;161:80–9.
14. Kongphitee K, Udchachon S, Otsuka M, Sommart K. Energetic efficiency of Thai native beef cattle fed rice straw or Ruzi straw base diet. Khon Kaen Agric J 2010;38:176–9.
17. Kongphitee K, Sommart K. Ensilage quality, digestibility and enteric methane emission of the fermented total mixed ration in Thai native beef cattle. In : Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tropical Animal Science and Production; 2016 Jul 26–29; Bangkok, Thailand: Lerdsilp Printing; 2016. p. 116–20.
18. Suzuki T, Phaowphaisal I, Pholsen P, et al.
In vivo nutritive value of Pangola grass (
Digitaria eriantha) hay by a novel indirect calorimeter with a ventilated hood in Thailand. Jpn Agric Res Q 2008;42:123–9.
19. Brouwer E. Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. Blaxter KL, editorEnergy metabolism of farm animals. London, UK: Academic Press; 1965. p. 441–3.
20. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edArlington, VA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 1995.
21. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74:3583–97.
22. Galyean ML. Laboratory Procedures in Animal Nutrition Research. 12th edLubbock, TX: Department of Animal and Food Science; 1997.
24. Porter MG, Murray RS. The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter-relationship between dry-matter content estimated by different analytical methods. Grass Forage Sci 2001;56:405–11.
27. Koike S, Kobayashi Y. Development and use of competitive PCR assays for the rumen cellulolytic bacteria:
Fibrobacter succinogenes,
Ruminococcus albus and R
uminococcus flavefaciens
. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2001;204:361–6.
30. Kaewpila C. Energy utilization and enteric methane emission assessment in beef cattle fed on selected tropical feeds [dissertation]. Khon Kaen, Thailand: Khon Kaen University; 2016.
31. Wang C, Nishino N. Effects of storage temperature and ensiling period on fermentation products, aerobic stability and microbial communities of total mixed ration silage. J Appl Microbiol 2013;114:1687–95.
32. Rabelo E, Rezende RL, Bertics SJ, Grummer RR. Effects of transition diets varying in dietary energy density on lactation performance and ruminal parameters of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2003;86:916–25.
33. Koike S, Yabuki H, Kobayashi Y. Interaction of rumen bacteria as assumed by colonization patterns on untreated and alkali-treated rice straw. Anim Sci J 2014;85:524–31.
34. Newbold CJ, de la Fuente G, Belanche A, Ramos-Morales E, McEwan NR. The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen. Front Microbiol 2015;6:1313.
35. Miron J, Adin G, Solomon R, et al. Effects of feeding cows in early lactation with soy hulls as partial forage replacement on heat production, retained energy and performance. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2010;155:9–17.
36. Pathak AK, Dutta N, Pattanaik AK, Chaturvedi VB, Sharma K. Effect of condensed tannins from
Ficus infectoria and
Psidium guajava leaf meal mixture on nutrient metabolism, methane emission and performance of lambs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017;30:1702–10.
38. Ferrell CL, Jenkins TG. Energy utilization by Hereford and Simmental males and females. Anim Prod 1985;41:53–61.
39. Calegare L, Alencar MM, Packer IU, Lanna DPD. Energy requirements and cow/calf efficiency of Nellore and Continental and British
Bos taurus×Nellore crosses. J Anim Sci 2007;85:2413–22.
40. Ferrell CL, Oltjen JW. ASAS CENTENNIAL PAPER: Net energy systems for beef cattle – concepts, application, and future models. J Anim Sci 2008;86:2779–94.
41. Kirkland RM, Gordon FJ. The metabolisable energy requirement for maintenance and the efficiency of use of metabolisable energy for lactation and tissue gain in dairy cows offered a straw/concentrate ration. Livest Prod Sci 1999;61:23–31.