 |
|
Use of welfare outcome information in three types of dairy farm inspection reports
Yi-Chun Lin (Lin YC), Siobhan Mullan (Mullan S), David C. J. Main (Main DCJ)
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2018;31(9):1525-1534. Published online 2018 Apr 12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0851
|
|
Citations to this article as recorded by
 The value of regulating stocking densities in aquaculture must not be dismissed: a reply to Saraiva et al. 2022
Helen Lambert, Amelia Cornish, Doug Waley
Frontiers in Veterinary Science.2024;[Epub] CrossRef How Far Are We From Data-Driven and Animal-Based Welfare Assessment? A Critical Analysis of European Quality Schemes
Anna H. Stygar, Caspar Krampe, Pol Llonch, Jarkko K. Niemi
Frontiers in Animal Science.2022;[Epub] CrossRef Animal welfare official inspections: farmers and inspectors shared concerns
I. Veissier, M. Miele, L. Mounier
Animal.2021; 15(1): 100038. CrossRef Recommendations for Ensuring Good Welfare of Horses Used for Industrial Blood, Serum, or Urine Production
Xavier Manteca Vilanova, Bonnie Beaver, Mette Uldahl, Patricia V. Turner
Animals.2021; 11(5): 1466. CrossRef Compliance with animal welfare regulations: drivers and consequences
Charlotte Berg, Hedman Frida Lundmark
CABI Reviews.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
|