Effect of Individual, Group or ESF Housing in Pregnancy and Individual or Group Housing in Lactation on Sow Behavior
R. C. Weng (Weng RC), S. A. Edwards (Edwards SA), L. C. Hsia (Hsia LC)
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2009;22(11):1574-1580.   Published online 2009 Oct 21     DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2009.80254
Citations to this article as recorded by Crossref logo
Effects of free farrowing system on the productive performance and welfare of sows and piglets
José A. Sánchez-Salcedo, Ariadna Yáñez-Pizaña
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science.2024; 27(1): 1.     CrossRef
Providing periodic exercise to stall-housed gestating sows influences only the total number of live-born piglets in older parity sows
Mariia Tokareva, Jennifer A. Brown, Daniel J. MacPhee, Yolande M. Seddon
Canadian Journal of Animal Science.2022; 102(3): 509.     CrossRef
The effect of group-housing with free-farrowing pens on reproductive traits and the behaviour of low-risk and high-risk crushing sows
C.G.E. Grimberg-Henrici, K. Büttner, R.Y. Lohmeier, O. Burfeind, J. Krieter
Applied Animal Behaviour Science.2019; 211: 33.     CrossRef
Chidgey Farrowing pens used with and without short-term fixation – Impact on reproductive traits of sows
R.Y. Lohmeier, C.G.E. Grimberg-Henrici, K. Büttner, O. Burfeind, J. Krieter
Livestock Science.2019; : 103889.     CrossRef
Sow behavior and productivity in a small stable group-housing system
Magnus Campler, Monique Pairis-Garcia, Justin Kieffer, Steven Moeller
Journal of Swine Health and Production.2019; 27(2): 76.     CrossRef
Comparing gestating sows housing between electronic sow feeding system and a conventional stall over three consecutive parities
J.C. Jang, J.S. Hong, S.S. Jin, Y.Y. Kim
Livestock Science.2017; 199: 37.     CrossRef
The Effects of Gilts Housed Either in Group with the Electronic Sow Feeding System or Conventional Stall
J. C. Jang, S. W. Jung, S. S. Jin, S. J. Ohh, J. E. Kim, Y. Y. Kim
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.2015; 28(10): 1512.     CrossRef
Effects of Gestational Housing on Reproductive Performance and Behavior of Sows with Different Backfat Thickness
K. H. Kim, A. Hosseindoust, S. L. Ingale, S.H. Lee, H. S. Noh, Y. H. Choi, S. M. Jeon, Y. H. Kim, B. J. Chae
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences.2015; 29(1): 142.     CrossRef
Development of piglets raised in a new multi-litter housing system vs. conventional single-litter housing until 9 weeks of age1
S. E. van Nieuwamerongen, N. M. Soede, C. M. C. van der Peet-Schwering, B. Kemp, J. E. Bolhuis
Journal of Animal Science.2015; 93(11): 5442.     CrossRef
Higher preweaning mortality in free farrowing pens compared with farrowing crates in three commercial pig farms
J. Hales, V.A. Moustsen, M.B.F. Nielsen, C.F. Hansen
Animal.2014; 8(1): 113.     CrossRef
REVIEW: Updated scientific evidence on the welfare of gestating sows kept in different housing systems
John J. McGlone
The Professional Animal Scientist.2013; 29(3): 189.     CrossRef
Influence of Different Housing Systems on Distribution, Function and Mitogen-Response of Leukocytes in Pregnant Sows
Verena Grün, Sonja Schmucker, Christiane Schalk, Birgit Flauger, Ulrike Weiler, Volker Stefanski
Animals.2013; 3(4): 1123.     CrossRef
Effects of farrowing system on behavior and growth performance of growing-finishing pigs
Y. Z. Li, L. H. Wang, L. J. Johnston
Journal of Animal Science.2012; 90(3): 1008.     CrossRef
Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs
E.M. Baxter, A.B. Lawrence, S.A. Edwards
Animal.2012; 6(1): 96.     CrossRef
Effects of previous housing system on agonistic behaviors of growing pigs at mixing
Yuzhi Li, Lihua Wang
Applied Animal Behaviour Science.2011; 132(1-2): 20.     CrossRef