1. Kabploy K, Bunyapraphatsara N, Morales NP, Paraksa N. Effect of antibiotic growth promoters on anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory activities in broiler chickens. Thai J Vet Med 2016; 46:89–95.
2. Khan SH, Iqbal J. Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition. J Appl Anim Res 2016; 44:359–69.
3. Moquet PCA, Onrust L, Van Immerseel F, et al. Importance of release location on the mode of action of butyrate derivatives in the avian gastrointestinal tract. World’s Poult Sci J 2016; 72:61–80.
4. Van Immerseel F, Fievez V, Buck JD, et al. Microencapsulated short-chain fatty acids in feed modify colonization and invasion early after infection with Salmonella Enteritidis in young chickens. Poult Sci 2004; 83:69–74.
6. Chamba F, Puyalto M, Ortiz A, et al. Effect of partially protected sodium butyrate on performance, digestive organs, intestinal villi and
E. coli development in broilers chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2014; 13:390–6.
7. Fang CL, Sun H, Wu J, Niu H, Feng J. Effects of sodium butyrate on growth performance, haematological and immunological characteristics of weanling piglets. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2014; 98:680–5.
9. Ahsan U, Cengiz O, Raza I, et al. Sodium butyrate in chicken nutrition: the dynamics of performance, gut microbiota, gut morphology, and immunity. World’s Poult Sci J 2016; 265–75.
10. Hassan HMA, Mohamed MA, Youssef AW, Hassan ER. Effect of using organic acids to substitute antibiotic growth promoters on performance and intestinal microflora of broilers. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010; 23:1348–53.
11. Abdelqader A, Al-Fataftah A. Effect of dietary butyric acid on performance, intestinal morphology, microflora composition and intestinal recovery of heat-stressed broilers. Livest Sci 2016; 183:78–83.
12. Kiczorowska B, Al-Yasiry ARM, Samolińska W, Marek A, Pyzik E. The effect of dietary supplementation of the broiler chicken diet with Boswellia serrata resin on growth performance, digestibility, and gastrointestinal characteristics, morphology, and microbiota. Livest Sci 2016; 191:117–24.
13. Corrier DE. Comparison of phytohemagglutinin-induced cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in the interdigital skin of broiler and layer chicks. Avian Dis 1990; 34:369–73.
14. King DJ. A comparison of the onset of protection induced by Newcastle disease virus strain B1 and a fowl poxvirus recombinant Newcastle disease vaccine to a viscerotropic velogenic Newcastle disease virus challenge. Avian Dis 1999; 43:745–55.
15. Madej JP, Stefaniak T, Bednarczyk M. Effect of
in ovo-delivered prebiotics and synbiotics on lymphoid-organs’ morphology in chickens. Poult Sci 2015; 94:1209–19.
16. Anwar S. Effect of dietary supplementation of Catharanthus roseus on gross and micro-structures of selected internal organs of broilers. M.Phil thesis. Lahore, Pakistan: University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences; 2013.
17. Sikandar A, Cheema AH, Younus M, et al. Histopathological and serological studies on paratuberculosis in cattle and buffaloes. Pak Vet J 2012; 32:547–51.
18. Bancroft JD, Gamble M, Bancroft OD. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 6th edNew York, NY: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
19. Ashraf S, Zaneb H, Yousaf MS, et al. Effect of dietary supplementation of prebiotics and probiotics on intestinal microarchitecture in broilers reared under cyclic heat stress. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2013; 1:Suppl68–73.
20. Rieger J, Janczyk P, Hunigen H, Neumann K, Plendl J. Intraepithelial lymphocyte numbers and histomorphological parameters in the porcine gut after Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 feeding in a Salmonella Typhimurium challenge. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2015; 164:40–50.
21. Dehghani-Tafti N, Jahanian R. Effect of supplemental organic acids on performance, carcass characteristics, and serum biochemical metabolites in broilers fed diets containing different crude protein levels. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2016; 211:109–16.
22. Zhang WH, Jiang Y, Zhu QF, et al. Sodium butyrate maintains growth performance by regulating the immune response in broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2011; 52:292–301.
23. Schrank CS, Cook ME, Hansen WR. Immune response of Mallard Ducks treated with immunosuppressive agents: antibody response to erythrocytes and
in vivo response to phytohemagglutinin-P. J Wildlife Dis 1990; 26:307–15.
24. Geng T, Guan X, Smith EJ. Screening for genes involved in antibody response to sheep red blood cells in the chicken,
Gallus gallus. Poult Sci 2015; 94:2099–107.
25. El-Abasy M, Motobu M, Sameshima T, et al. Adjuvant effects of sugar cane extracts (SCE) in chickens. J Vet Med Sci 2003; 65:117–9.
27. Zhou ZY, Packialakshmi B, Makkar SK, Dridi S, Rath NC. Effect of butyrate on immune response of a chicken macrophage cell line. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2014; 162:24–32.
30. Majidi-Mosleh A, Sadeghi AA, Mousavi SN, Chamani M, Zarei A. Influence of in ovo inoculation of probiotic strains on the jejunal goblet cell counts and morphometry in peri- and post-hatching chicks. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2017; 23:169–72.