Archimède H, Eugène M, Marie Magdeleine C, Boval M, Martin C, Morgavi DP, Lecomte P, Doreau M. 2011. Comparison of methane production between C3 and C4 grasses and legumes. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166:59–64.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). 1990. Association of Official Methods of Analysis. AOAC; Arlington, VA, USA:
Beauchemin KA, McAllister TA, McGinn SM. 2009. Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 4:1–18.
Boadi D, Benchaar C, Chiquette J, Masse D. 2004. Mitigation strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from dairy cows: Update review. Can J Anim Sci 84:319–335.
Boadi DA, Wittenberg KM. 2002. Methane production from dairy and beef heifers fed forages differing in nutrient density using the sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) tracer gas technique. Can J Anim Sci 82:201–206.
Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1993. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. CCAC; Ottawa, ON, Canada:
Carulla JE, Kreuzer M, Machmuller A, Hess HD. 2005. Supplementation of
Acacia mearnsii tannins decreases methanogenesis and urinary nitrogen in forage-fed sheep. Aust J Agric Res 56:961–970.
Chaves AV, Thompson LC, Iwaasa AD, Scott SL, Olson ME, Benchaar C, Veira DM, McAllister TA. 2006. Effect of pasture type (alfalfa vs. grass) on methane and carbon dioxide production by yearling beef heifers. Can J Anim Sci 86:409–418.
Demeyer DI, Van Nevel CJ. 1975. Methanogenesis, an integrated part of carbohydrate fermentation, and its control. Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant. Mcdonald IW, Warner ACI, editorsThe University of New England Publishing Unit; Armidale, NSW, Australia: p. 366–382.
Doane P, Schofield HP, Pell AN. 1997. Neutral detergent fibre disappearance and gas and volatile fatty production during the
in vitro fermentation of six forages. J Anim Sci 75:3342–3352.
Durmic Z, Hutton P, Revell DK, Emms J, Hughes S, Vercoe PE. 2010.
In vitro fermentative traits of Australian woody perennial plant species that may be considered as potential sources of feed for grazing ruminants. Anim Feed Sci Technol 160:98–109.
Fedorak PM, Hrudey SE. 1983. A simple apparatus for measuring gas production by methanogenic cultures in serum bottles. EnvironTechnol Lett 4:425–432.
Grainger C, Clarke T, Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, Eckard RJ. 2008. Supplementation with whole cottonseed reduces methane emissions and can profitably increase milk production of dairy cows offered a forage and cereal grain diet. Aust J Exp Agric 48:73–76.
Hariadi BT, Santoso B. 2010. Evaluation of tropical plants containing tannin on
in vitro methanogenesis and fermentation parameters using rumen fluid. J Sci Food Agric 90:456–461.
Holtshausen L, Chaves AV, Beauchemin KA, McGinn SM, McAllister TA, Cheeke PR, Benchaar C. 2009. Feeding saponin-containing Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria to decrease enteric methane production in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 92:2809–2821.
Jayanegara A, Wina E, Soliva CR, Marquardt S, Kreuzer M, Leiber F. 2011. Dependence of forage quality and methanogenic potential of tropical plants on their phenolic fractions as determined by principal component analysis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 163:231–243.
Johnson DE, Johnson KA, Ward GM, Branine ME. 2000. Ruminants and other animals. Atmospheric methane: Its role in the global environment. Kakil MAK, editorSpringer-Verlag; Berlin, Germany: p. 112–133.
Johnson KA, Johnson DE. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. J Anim Sci 73:2483–2492.
Leng RA. 1993. Quantitative ruminant nutrition - a green science. Aust J Agric Res 44:363–380.
McAllister TA, Okine EK, Mathison GW, Cheng KJ. 1996. Dietary, environmental and microbiological aspects of methane production in ruminants. Can J Anim Sci 76:231–243.
Mertens DR. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem Int 85:1217–1240.
Njidda AA, Nasiru A. 2010.
In vitro gas production and dry mater digestibility of tannin-containing forges of semi-arid region of north-eastern Nigeria. Pakistan J Nutr 9:60–66.
Pinares-Patino CS, Ulyatt MJ, Waghorn GC, Lassey KR, Barry TN, Holmes CW, Johnson DE. 2003. Methane emission by alpaca and sheep fed on lucerne hay or grazed on pastures of perennial ryegrass/white clover or birdsfoot trefoil. J Agric Sci 140:215–226.
Robertson JB, Van Soest PJ. 1981. The detergent system of analysis. p. 123–158. The Analysis of Dietary Fibre in Food. James WPT, Theander O, editorsMarcel Dekker; New York, NY, USA. Chapter 9.
SAS Institute Inc. 2011. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. SAS Institute Incorporation; Cary, NC, USA:
Satter LD, Slyter LL. 1974. Effect of ammonia concentration on rumen microbial protein production
in vitro. Br. J. Nutr 199–208.
Tavendale MH, Meagher LP, Pacheco D, Walker N, Attwood GT, Sivakumaran S. 2005. Methane production from
in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Medicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Anim Feed Sci Technol 123:403–419.
Valenciaga D, Chongo B, Herrera RS, Torres V, Oramas A, Herrera M. 2009. Effect of regrowth age on in vitro dry matter digestibility of Pennisetum purpureum cv. CUBA CT-115. Cuban J Agric Sci 43:79–82.
VanKessel JAS, Russell JB. 1996. The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 20:205–210.
Waghorn G. 2008. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production-Progress and challenges. Anim Feed Sci Technol 147:116–139.
Wang Y, McAllister TA, Yanke LJ, Cheeke PR. 2000. Effect of steroidal saponin from Yucca schidigera extract on ruminal microbes. J Appl Microbiol 88:887–896.
Wang Y, Xu Z, Bach SJ, McAllister TA. 2008. Effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on
in vitro ruminal digestion of mixed forage or barley grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol 145:375–395.
Weatherburn MW. 1967. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 39:971–974.
Wilson JR, Mertens DR. 1995. Cell wall accessibility and cell structure limitations to microbial digestion of forage. Crop Sci 35:251–259.