1. Gusha J, Halimani TE, Katsande S, Zvinorova PI. The effect of
Opuntia ficus indica and forage legumes based diets on goat productivity in smallholder sector in Zimbabwe. Small Rumin Res 2015; 125:21–5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.02.018
2. Wanderley WL, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, et al. Intake, digestibility and ruminal measures in sheep feed silage and hay in association with cactus pear. Rev Bras Saúde Prod Anim 2012; 13:444–56.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-99402012000200013
4. Costa RG, Treviño IH, Medeiros GR, Medeiros AN, Pintoa TF, Oliveirac RL. Effects of replacing corn with cactus pear (
Opuntia ficus indica Mill) on the performance of Santa Inês lambs. Small Rumin Res 2012; 102:13–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.012
5. Silva RC, Ferreira MA, Oliveira JCV, et al.
Orelha de Elefante Mexicans (
Opuntia stricta [Haw.] Haw.) spineless cactus as an option in crossbred dairy cattle diet. S Afr J Anim Sci 2018; 48:516–25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v48i3.12
6. Gebremariam T, Melaku S, Yami A. Effect of different levels of cactus (
Opuntia ficus-indica) inclusion on feed intake, digestibility and body weight gain in tef (
Eragrostis tef) straw-based feeding of sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2006; 131:43–52.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.02.003
7. Batista ÂMV, Ribeiro Neto AC, Lucena RB, Santos DC, Dubeux JB, Mustafa AF. Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of spineless cactus grown in Northeastern Brazil. Rangel Ecol Manag 2009; 62:297–301.
https://doi.org/10.2111/07-099R1.1
8. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and New World camelids. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2007.
https://doi.org/10.17226/11654
9. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis. 15th ed.Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC International; 1990.
10. Mertens DR. Gravimetric determination of amylase treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study. J AOAC Int 2002; 85:1217–40.
12. Senger CCD, Kozloski GV, Sanchez LMB, Mesquita FR, Alves TP, Castagnino DS. Evaluation of autoclave procedures for fibre analysis in forage and concentrate feedstuffs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 146:169–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.12.008
13. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB. Analysis of forages and fibrous foods. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University; 1985.
15. Hall MB. Calculation of non-structural carbohydrate content of feeds that contain non-protein nitrogen. Gainesville, FL, USA: University of Florida; 2000.
16. Valente TNP, Detmann E, Valadares Filho SC, et al.
In situ estimation of indigestible compounds contents in cattle feed and feces using bags made from different textiles. R Bras Zootec 2011; 40:666–75.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300027
17. Weiss WP. Energy prediction equations for ruminant feeds. In : Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers; 1999 Oct 19–21; Rochester, NY. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University; 1999. p. 176–85.
19. Ørskov ER, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 1979; 92:499–503.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600063048
20. Martin P, Bateson P. Measuring behavior: an introductory guide. 2th edNew York, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
21. Vieira EL, Batista ÂMV, Guim A, et al. Effects of hay inclusion on intake,
in vivo nutrient utilization and ruminal fermentation of goats fed spineless cactus (
Opuntia ficus-indica Mill) based diets. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 141:199–208.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.05.031
22. Siqueira MCB, Ferreira MA, Monnerat JPIDS, et al. Optimizing the use of spineless cactus in the diets of cattle: total and partial digestibility, fiber dynamics and ruminal parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2017; 226:56–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.12.006
24. Silva ETDS, Melo AASD, Ferreira MA, et al. Acceptability by Girolando heifers and nutritional value of erect prickly pear stored for different periods. Pesq Agropec Bras 2017; 52:761–7.
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2017000900008
25. Costa CTF, Ferreira MA, Campos JMS, et al. Intake, total and partial digestibility of nutrients, and ruminal kinetics in crossbreed steers fed with multiple supplements containing spineless cactus enriched with urea. Livest Sci 2016; 188:55–60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.04.008
27. Tosto MSL, Araújo GGL, Ribeiro LGP, et al.
In vitro rumen fermentation kinetics of diets containing oldman saltbush hay and forage cactus, using a cattle inoculum. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2015; 67:149–58.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6937
28. Moraes GSO, Guim A, Tabosa JN, Chagas JCC, Almeida MP, Ferreira MA. Cactus [
Opuntia stricta (Haw.) Haw] cladodes and corn silage: how do we maximize the performance of lactating dairy cows reared in semiarid regions? Livest Sci 2019; 221:133–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.01.026