2. Verbeke W, Van Oeckel MJ, Warnants N, Viaene J, Boucque ChV. Consumer perception, facts and possibilities to improve acceptability of health and sensory characteristics of pork. Meat Sci 1999; 53:77–99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00036-4
4. Lonergan SM, Huff-Lonergan E, Rowe LJ, Kuhlers DL, Jungst SB. Selection for lean growth efficiency in Duroc pigs influences pork quality. J Anim Sci 2001; 79:2075–85.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.7982075x
7. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J, Lebret B. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat—1. Composition of the lipid fraction and sensory characteristics of
m. longissimus lumborum
. Meat Sci 1999; 53:59–65.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00037-6
8. Fernandez X, Monin G, Talmant A, Mourot J, Lebret B. Influence of intramuscular fat content on the quality of pig meat—2. Consumer acceptability of
m. longissimus lumborum
. Meat Sci 1999; 53:67–72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00038-8
9. Brewer MS, Zhu LG, McKeith FK. Marbling effects on quality characteristics of pork loin chops: Consumer purchase intent, visual and sensory characteristics. Meat Sci 2001; 59:153–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00065-1
12. Moeller SJ, Miller RK, Edwards KK, et al. Consumer perceptions of pork eating quality as affected by pork quality attributes and end-point cooked temperature. Meat Sci 2010; 84:14–22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.06.023
17. Font-i-Furnols M, Tous N, Esteve-Garcia E, Gispert M. Do all the consumers accept marbling in the same way? The relationship between eating and visual acceptability of pork with different intramuscular fat content. Meat Sci 2012; 91:448–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.02.030
23. National Pork Board. Official color & marbling quality standards. Des Moines, IA, USA: National Pork Board; 2011.
25. CIE. Recommendations on uniform color spaces-color difference equations, psychometric color terms. Suppl 2 to CIE Publication no. 15 (E-1.3.1.) 1978 1971/(TC-1-3)Paris, France: Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage; 1976.
26. Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Johnson LP, Miller MF, Miller RK, Koohmaraie M. A comparison of Warner-Bratzler shear force assessment within and among institutions. J Anim Sci 1997; 75:2423–32.
https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.7592423x
27. Boccard R, Buchter L, Casteels E, et al. Procedures for measuring meat quality characteristics in beef production experiments. Report of a working group in the commission of The European communities’ (CEC) beef production research programe. Livest Prod Sci 1981; 8:385–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(81)90061-0
28. Tuma HJ, Venable JH, Wuthier PR, Henrickson RL. Relationship of fiber diameter to tenderness and meatiness as influenced by bovine age. J Anim Sci 1962; 21:33–6.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.21133x
31. AOAC International. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edGaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International; 2000.
32. SPSS. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 17.0 SSfWV. Chicago, IL, USA: SPSS Inc; 2008.
34. DeVol DL, McKeith FK, Bechtel PJ, Novakofski J, Shanks RD, Carr TR. Variation in composition and palatability traits and relationships between muscle characteristics and palatability in a random sample of pork carcasses. J Anim Sci 1988; 66:385–95.
https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.662385x
35. Li C, Zhou G, Xu X, Zhang J, Xu S, Ji Y. Effects of marbling on meat quality characteristics and intramuscular connective tissue of beef
Longissumus muscle. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19:1799–808.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1799
36. Okumura T, Saito K, Nade T, et al. Effects of intramuscular fat on the sensory characteristics of
M. Longissimus dorsi in Japanese black steers as judged by a trained analytical panel. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2007; 20:577–81.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.577
38. Smith AM, Harris KB, Haneklaus AN, Savell JW. Proximate composition and energy content of beef steaks as influenced by USDA quality grade and degree of doneness. Meat Sci 2011; 89:228–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.027
39. Okrouhlá M, Stupka R, Čítek J, Šprysl M, Trnka M, Kluzáková E. Effect of lean meat proportion on the chemical composition of pork. Czech J Food Sci 2008; 26:464–9.
https://doi.org/10.17221/18/2008-CJFS
40. Wheeler TL, Shackelford SD, Koohmaraie M. Variation in proteolysis, sarcomere length, collagen content, and tenderness among major pork muscles. J Anim Sci 2000; 78:958–65.
https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.784958x
43. Voutila L, Ruusunen M, Puolanne E. Comparison of the thermal characteristics of connective tissue in loose structured and normal structured porcine M.
semimembranosus
. Meat Sci 2008; 80:1024–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.04.021