Corn hybrid (Dekalb D26-78) was seeded in the Témiscamingue region of Québec, Canada, at a density of 74,074 plants/ha. A total of 150 kg N/ha, 70 kg P/ha, and 40 kg K/ha were applied during the growing season. After 129 days of growth, corn plants were harvested at 1/3 milk line and chopped (average particle size of 1.0 cm) with a forage harvester (New Holland 900, Belleville, PA, USA) on 20 September 2010. No silage inoculants were added. The fresh material was immediately transported to the laboratory where experimental silos were prepared. Chopped corn was used to fill 40 plastic pouches (10×16×6 mil) at a weight of 350 g/pouch [9]. Air was removed using a commercial vacuum sealer (Nel 216/219M, Hi-Tech Vacuum, Saint-Cyrille-de-Wendover, QC, Canada) according to parameters described by Johnson et al [10] with a set density of 0.490 g per cubic centimeter.

A factorial experiment with fermentation temperature (10°C and 20°C)×storage temperature (5°C, 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, and 25°C) was carried out. The 40-experimental vacuum bag mini-silos were split into two groups of 20 silos each, and incubated at either 10°C or 20°C, respectively, for two months (Figure 1). After that initial fermentation steps, all 40 mini-silos were stored at 5°C for another two months. Afterwards, storage temperature was increased progressively from 5°C to 25°C following a weekly increment of 2.5°C. Four repetitions were made for each treatment. It took two weeks for storage temperature increased from 5°C to 10°C, 10°C to 15°C, and etc. Four silos from each storage temperature treatment (5°C, 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, and 25°C) were sampled at the end of each incubation period. Thus, silos which were sampled at 5°C had been stored for four months and silos which were sampled at 25°C had been stored for six months. This represents what happened on commercial farms.

For each experimental silo, 20 g of silage were sampled for pH measurement, whereas 100 g of silage were sampled for the biochemical analyses. Finally, 20 g of silage were used to perform microbial enumeration and another 20 g were used for molecular microbial diversity analyses. Fresh chopped corn samples prior to ensiling were submitted to similar biochemical analyses (i.e., pH, DM, WSC, and total N) and microbial enumeration.

The pH was measured with a pH meter (Accumet AB15, Fisher Scientific, Toronto, ON, Canada), where duplicate samples (10.0 g) of silage were macerated with 100 mL distilled water and spun at 200 rpm for 60 min at 4°C. The DM content was determined by oven-drying for 72 h at 55°C±2°C and the dry sample was ground in a Standard Model 4 Wiley mill (Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA) at 1 mm. Total N was determined according to the method 7.022 of AOAC (1990), and WSC were extracted using water (100 mg of ground forage in 25 mL distilled water) and measured by the phenol sulphuric acid colorimetric method according to Dubois et al [11]. Ethanol, lactic acid, acetic acid, propionic acid, n-butyric acid, and iso-butyric acid were determined on silage water extract according to Fussell and McCalley [12]. Analyses were conducted with a gas chromatograph (Model 6850, Agilent, Mississauga, ON, Canada) equipped with a 25 m capillary column (i.d. 0.319 mm; film thickness, 0.50 μm; DB-FFAP, J & W 123-3223) and a flame ionization detector. At injection of the sample, 0.5 μL, the column temperature was set to 60°C for 1 min, then oven temperature increased to 120°C at a rate of 20°C/min, to 150°C at a rate of 15°C/min, and then to 220°C at a rate of 35°C/min and maintained for 5 min. Inlet and detector temperature were 220°C and 300°C respectively. The split ratio was 25:1. The flow rate of hydrogen which was used as carrier gas was 30 mL/min. The detector gases and their flow rate were: 30 mL/min for hydrogen, 400 mL/min for air. Peaks were identified and quantified by comparison with pure standards of acetic acid (#A38, Fisher Scientific, Canada), propionic acid (#75992-320, Anachemia, Lachine, QC, Canada), iso-butyric acid (#1754 Sigma-Aldrich; St-Louis, MO, USA), n-butyric acid (#109959, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and ethanol (Alcools de Commerce Ltd., Boucherville, QC, Canada).

In addition, 20.0 g of silage was macerated in 200 mL of 0.1 N HCl for 60 min on a reciprocal shaker set at 200 rpm and then filtered through a Whatman #541 paper. The filtrate was used for the analyses of lactic acid and ammonia. Lactic acid was determined by a spectrophotometric method according to Taylor [13]. Ammonia was determined as described by Flipot et al [14] on an automated Kjeltec 1030 (Foss, Eden Prairie, MN, USA).

Each silage samples (20.0 g) were blended in a Stomacher (Seward, UK) for 2 min with 180 mL of peptone water (0.2% Bacto peptone [w/v] with 0.01% Tween 80 [w/v]), and serial dilutions were prepared with the same peptone water. Total colony forming units (CFUs) of LAB, enterobacteria and fungi (i.e., yeasts and moulds) were enumerated after incubation at 28°C for three days on plates of Rogosa Agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK), Violet Red Bile Glucose Agar (Oxoid, UK) and malt extract agar (MEA) (BD Difco, Sparks, MD, USA), respectively. Clostridial spores were counted on reinforced clostridial agar (Oxoid, UK) according to Jonsson [15]. Triplicates of each dilution series were made.

Polymerase chain reaction–denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE) fingerprinting was used to analyze the bacterial and fungal diversity in corn silage. Total DNA was extracted from silage samples using the PowerFood Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

For bacterial diversity, we tested four primer sets and retain 357F (5′-CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG-3′)/517R (5′-ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG-3′) [16] since it produced more distinct bands from the V3 region of the 16S rDNA of bacteria from silage. A 40-bp GC clamp (5′-CGC CCG GGG CGC GCC CCG GGC GGC CCG GGG GCA CCG GGG G-3′) was attached to the 5′ end of primer 357F for DGGE analyses. PCR was carried out in a volume of 15 μL containing 1 μL of DNA template (50 ng), 1 X standard Taq reaction buffer, 200 μM of each deoxynucleotide, 0.3 μM of each primer and 0.025 U/μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Taq PCR Kit, New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). PCR cycles consisted of an initial DNA denaturation at 95°C for 10 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 93°C for 1 min, annealing at 48°C for 1 min, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. DGGE was carried out using a DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to Kebli et al [17] with a modification in the range of denaturing gradient. PCR products (15 μL) were applied on 8% polyacrylamide gels (acrylamide:bis-acrylamide, 37.5:1) with a linear denaturing gradient range of 32% to 60% in 1× Tris-acetate-ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid electrophoresis buffer. Electrophoresis was performed at a constant voltage of 75 V and a temperature of 60°C for 16 h. Then the gels were stained with SYBR Gold (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and visualized under UV illumination using a Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). DGGE profiles were analyzed using software GelCompar II version 6.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). One matrix of band relative intensity was obtained. And the relative intensity of each band was calculated by dividing the intensity of the band by the sum of the intensity of all the bands within the lane.

As for the fungal diversity (i.e., yeasts and moulds), we tested five primer sets including NS1 (5′-GTA GTC ATA TGC TTG TCT C-3′)/Fung (5′-ATT CCC CGT TAC CCG TTG-3′) [18], NL1 (5′-GCC ATA TCA ATA AGC GGA GGA AAA G-3′)/LS2 (5′-ATT CCC AAA CAA CTC GAC TC-3′) [19], NL3A (5′-GAG ACC GAT AGC GAA CAA G-3′)/NL4 (5′-GGT CCG TGT TTC AAG ACG G-3′) [20], ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′)/ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) [21], and ITS1F (5′-TTG GTC ATT TAG AGG AAG TAA-3′)/ITS2 (5′-GCT GCG TTC TTC ATC GAT GC-3′) [17]. A 40-bp GC clamp (above) was attached to the 5′ end of primer Fung, NL1, NL4, ITS1, and ITS1F for DGGE analyses. PCR amplification failed with ITS1GC/ITS4. By comparing their DGGE profiles, primer set ITS1FGC/ITS2 produced more distinct bands and therefore was selected to amplify a fragment of 280 bp of the single sequence repeats region of fungi in silages. PCR was carried out in a volume of 15 μL containing 1 μL of DNA template (50 ng), 1 X standard Taq reaction buffer, 200 μM of each deoxynucleotide, 0.3 μM of each primer and 0.025 U/μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Taq PCR Kit, New England BioLabs, USA). PCR cycles consisted of an initial DNA denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 45 s, annealing at 55°C for 45 s, extension at 72°C for 1 min 15 s, and a final elongation step at 72°C for 5 min. DGGE was performed according to the same protocol described above, with a linear denaturing gradient range of 20% to 50%. DGGE profiles were analyzed as described above.

A protocol based on band excision-amplification was initially used to identify DGGE bands. Despite being time-consuming and laborious procedures, results of the following check-up DGGE showed that this protocol failed to extract specific bands from DGGE gels. High bacterial diversity in the silage samples probably explains this failure. Similar difficulties have also been encountered by many other DGGE users [22]. We thereafter tried to clone the PCR products of representative silage samples, and then identified individual DGGE bands by aligning the PCR amplicons of the clones with the PCR products of silage samples on same DGGE gels. This procedure required that the DNAs of silage samples were amplified using the same selected primers as described above, the PCR products were purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and subsequently cloned using the pGEM-T Easy Vector System II (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. 80 bacterial and 80 fungal positive clones were screened and streaked twice. Their plasmids were isolated using the Wizard Plus SV Minipreps DNA Purification System (Promega, USA). Sequence analysis was conducted with a BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit on the genetic analyzer 3130XL (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the Plate-forme d’Analyses Biomoléculaires (Université Laval, QC, Canada), where promoter primers Sp6 and T7 were used. The nucleotide sequences of clones were aligned using BioEdit software (version 7.1.3.0) and DNA sequence similarity searches were done via BLASTn against the GenBank database of the United States National Center for Biotechnology Information. Finally, representative clones with different sequences were re-amplified using same primers, and then aligned with the PCR amplicons of silage samples on same DGGE gels.

For this factorial experiment (fermentation temperature [10°C and 20°C]×storage temperature [5°C, 10°C, 15°C, 20°C, and 25°C]), firstly, a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with interaction was done with the biochemical and microbiological results. Interaction was found significant for several parameters. Thereafter, one-way ANOVA was performed on the biochemical and microbiological compositions of corn silages for each Fermentation Temperature. Normality of residual error was assessed using Shapiro-Wilk normality test and homogeneity of variance was verified with Fligner-Killeen test. If these two criteria were met, the data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA. The values for the ethanol concentration were log transformed in order to meet the criteria. Differences between treatment means were tested by Tukey honestly significant difference test in cases where statistical significance was observed (α = 0.05). Otherwise, mean value and standard error of the mean were presented in cases where either or both of the two assumptions were violated. Shannon diversity index were calculated based on the matrix of band relative intensity. All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 3.0.0, http://www.r-project.org).

Fresh corn forage contained 309.90±2.72, 125.55±2.59, 13.06± 0.03 g/kg DM, WSC, and total N, respectively. Fresh corn forage pH was 5.85±0.03. The numbers of LAB, yeasts, enterobacteria, and moulds were 4.43±0.10, 4.95±0.04, 7.04± 0.19, and 4.38±0.05 log10 CFU/g fresh materials (FM), respectively. The number of clostridial spores was 3.18±0.20 log₁₀ CFU/g FM. Overall, the biochemical and microbiological compositions of the fresh corn forage used in the present experiment was normal for whole-plant corn harvested at one-third milk line.

Table 1 gives the results of the effects of fermentation temperature on the biochemical composition of corn silages after two months of fermentation (20°C vs 10°C) and two months of storage at 5°C. All silages could putatively be considered well conserved since the pH was below the pHw (pH of anaerobic stability) [23]. Silages incubated at 10°C were less fermented than those at 20°C and had significantly higher pH value (4.04 vs 3.74) and residual WSC (95.84 vs 35.94 g/kg DM) (p<0.01). Silages fermented at 20°C also contained significantly (p<0.01) higher contents of lactic acid (59.24 vs 34.99 g/kg DM), ethanol (10.66 vs 2.83 g/kg DM) and NH₃-N/total-N (5.41% vs 3.13%). In addition, no significant differences were found on DM and total N content, as well as single VFA concentration.

Table 2 and Figure 2 present the biochemical changes in corn silages as storage temperature increased from 5°C to 25°C. For corn silages initially fermented at 20°C, no important changes were observed in pH and WSC content as storage temperature increased from 5°C to 25°C. No significant change (p>0.05) was found in the content of DM, total N, lactic acid, or most VFAs except acetic acid. The concentration of acetic acid, ethanol and ammonia (NH₃-N/total-N) in these silages increase as storage temperature rose up to 25°C. On the other hand, the results from corn silages initially fermented at 10°C differ from those from silages fermented at 20°C. As storage temperature increased to 25°C, silage fermentation resumed as demonstrated by a substantial decline in WSC content (from 108.65 to 47.04 g/kg DM) and pH (from 4.02 to 3.80) (p< 0.05) (Figure 2). Simultaneously, significant increases were observed in the production of acetic acid and ammonia at 25°C (p<0.001). A biological trend was also observed for an increase in propionic acid as the temperature increase (p = 0.063).

Microbial enumeration was made on corn silage (Table 3) after each silo openings with increasing temperature. Regarding the effects of initial fermentation temperature (20°C vs 10°C), significant higher LAB counts were detected at 20°C than at 10°C (7.85 vs 5.80 log₁₀ CFU/g FM) (p<0.001) (Table 1). For silages initially fermented at 20°C, LAB counts slightly increase as storage temperature increased from 20°C to 25°C. Undesirable microbes (i.e., enterobacteria and yeasts) started to appear at 15°C and above. On the contrary, in silages initially fermented at 10°C, LAB counts increased sharply as storage temperature reached 20°C and 25°C (p<0.05), and neither enterobacteria nor yeasts were detected (<2.00 log₁₀ CFU/g FM).

No moulds were detected in all silage samples (<2.00 log₁₀ CFU/g FM). Number of clostridial spores was not affected by neither initial fermentation temperatures (20°C vs 10°C) (Table 1) nor following temperature increases from 5°C to 25°C during the storage period. Moreover, the numbers of spores in corn silage were similar to those in corn forage prior to ensiling. These findings indicated that the growth of Clostridium was inhibited, and no germination of clostridial spores took place during the entire experimental period.

LAB species represented the major bacterial population, in particular species such as Lactobacillus buchneri (Lb. buchneri), Lactobacillus brevis (Lb brevis), Weissella koreensis, and Leuconostoc citreum (Table 4). Other LAB species such as Lactobacillus oryzae and Pediococcus parvulus were also found. Enterobacteria such as Pantoea agglomerans were detected. Our results indicated that, a clone identified of the genus Chryseobacterium, was reported for the first time in corn silage in rather high occurrence as shown by its high relative intensity in Figure 3. Figure 3 presents the DGGE profiles of universal bacteria in corn silages and the corresponding Shannon diversity index (H′). Higher diversity was observed in corn silages initially fermented at 10°C compared to 20°C. H′ of silages initially fermented at 20°C was not affected by storage temperatures (p>0.05). However, in silages which were fermented at 10°C, a significant decrease in H′ was observed as storage temperature increased to 25°C (p<0.05). At 25°C, the H′ value of both initial fermentation treatments reached the same value. In addition, six operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in the DGGE profiles were aligned to bacteria clones. It was noticed that the relative intensity of Lb. buchneri (OTU E) tended to increase at higher storage temperatures, particularly in silage samples which were initially fermented at 10°C.

As shown in Table 5, several species of mould flora were detected in corn silage samples using the cultural-independent approach. However, the microbial counts showed that moulds were under the detection level on the MEA medium (Table 3). In addition, some mould spores may also be present in silages, but cannot germinate and grow on the MEA plates due to the unsuitable lab conditions. This suggests that culturable fungi species on the MEA medium accounts for only a small portion of whole fungal community in silages, and the method of enumeration of microbial colonies on this medium underestimate the true number of moulds present in silage. Following sequencing, several mould genera were detected, including Oidiodendron, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Davidiella, Basidiomycota, Tremellales, and Alternaria. It was also observed that the yeast species Candida humilis (C. humilis) were frequently detected in our samples. The DGGE profiles of silages fermented at 10°C differed from those fermented at 20°C (Figure 4). Higher diversity level of fungi (i.e., yeasts and moulds) was observed in silages fermented at 10°C compared to 20°C. As storage temperature increased from 5°C to 25°C, no important changes were observed within neither of the two fermentation temperatures. This can also be seen along the difference in H′ between both temperatures (Figure 4).

The results from the current study are generally consistent with our earlier findings [8] that low fermentation temperature (10°C vs 20°C) restricts silage fermentation, resulting in higher pH, more residual WSC, less lactic acid production, lower levels of ethanol and ammonia, as well as lower numbers of LAB (p<0.05) (Table 1).

After an additional two months of storage at 5°C, a highly acidic environment was reached (pH = 3.74) in corn silage initially fermented at 20°C. Little changes occurred as storage temperature increased from 5°C to 25°C. Basically, the increasing storage temperature from 5°C to 25°C did not affect much the fermentation profiles, in terms of most biochemical parameters (i.e., pH, WSC, DM, total-N, lactic acid and most VFAs) (Figure 2, Table 2), as well as for the bacterial and fungal populations (Figures 3, 4). The number of LAB colonies as determined from plate counts stayed rather stable, although a statistically significant increase was observed at 25°C (Table 3). In addition, DGGE analysis results showed that the LAB flora in corn silage consisted of mainly heterofermentative species, such as Lb. buchneri, Lb. brevis, Leuconostoc citreum, and Weissella koreensis (Figure 3). This is in agreement with our results [8] as well as many previous studies that heterofermentative LAB species usually predominate in the latter stages of ensilage [24].

It should be noticed that, as incubation temperatures rose up to 15°C, a fairly high number of enterobacteria and yeasts (4 to 5 log₁₀ CFU/g FM) were detected. Enterobacteria and yeasts are facultative anaerobes. Under anaerobic conditions, enterobacteria ferment available sugars producing mainly acetic acid, with lesser quantities of ethanol, formic acid, 2,3-butanediol and CO₂. Some enterobacteria can also deaminate amino acids to ammonia. Yeasts ferment sugars to mainly ethanol and CO₂ along with small amounts of other alcohols and VFAs. In addition, the activity of plant proteases was reported to increase as temperature increases, which results in greater protein breakdown and ammonia accumulation in silages [25]. This could explain the significantly higher contents of acetic acid and ammonia (p<0.05) at higher storage temperatures, as well as the significantly higher concentration of ethanol (p<0.05) (Table 2; fermentation temperature 20°C). Furthermore, our DGGE results showed that the yeast C. humilis predominated the fungi flora in these silages (Figure 4). Candida spp. are commonly detected in ensiled samples, and C. humilis has been reported to predominate in whole-plant corn silage using classical plate counts techniques [26,27], but also following operon-based metasequencing [28]. Most Candida spp. can readily assimilate lactate for their metabolism under aerobic conditions [29]. Therefore, these corn silages which were initially ensiled at 20°C might be prone to aerobic deterioration, as it was reported that yeast number higher than 10⁵ CFU per gram is considered a threshold level to induce aerobic deterioration at feed-out [30].

As storage temperature increased from 5°C to 20°C, no significant changes were observed in most silage characteristics, including pH, WSC content, lactic acid, ethanol and most microbial counts (Tables 2, 3; Figure 2). But, a significant increase in the number of LAB colonies was observed at 20°C and 25°C (Table 3). Results of the bacterial diversity measurements further showed that, as temperatures reached 20°C and 25°C, two heterofermentative species, Lb. buchneri and Lb. brevis, became the dominant species of the LAB flora in these silages (Figure 3). As a consequence, the content of acetic acid in these silages increased considerably (by 71.5%) at 25°C, and this was in accordance with the rapid decline in pH and WSC concentration (Figure 2). In addition, ammonia concentration also increased as temperature rose up to 25°C putatively due to the increased in proteolysis from plant-based enzymes. All above changes clearly indicated that silage fermentation resumed as temperatures increased. Indeed, it has been observed in cool climates that silage fermentation could restart as weather warms up, in particular for the less fermented silages due to low temperature at ensiling [7].

Yeasts were under the detection level in these silages (<2.00 log₁₀ CFU/g FM) (Table 3), and DGGE results showed that the lactate-assimilating species C. humilis represented only a small fraction of the fungi flora (Figure 4).

As storage temperature increased to 20°C and 25°C, Lb. buchneri, started to prevail (Figure 3). The metabolism of Lb. buchneri [31] and the merits of inoculating with Lb. buchneri to improve silage aerobic stability have been well studied [32–34]. Hence, due to the increased activity of the heterofermentative Lb. buchneri, more acetic acid was produced (p<0.001) along with small increased of propionic acid (p = 0.063), ensuring the absence of undesirable yeasts in silage. The increase in lactic acid observed during the last incubation phase, although not significant, could be due to low activity of homofermentative strains. A combination of the low incubation temperature and higher pH (10°C incubation series) could protect the cells homeostasis [35].

The occurrence of DGGE OTU (Figure 3) and clones (Table 4) belonging to Chryseobacterium sp. is puzzling since this bacterium is rarely mentioned in silage, neither do other members of this family. The only occurrence was very recent in an operon-based metasequencing analysis of grass silage [36]. They reported that 3% of the diversity was related to Flavobacterium and Chryseobacterium, and nearly 10% for the Flavobacteria. Ridwan et al [37] also reported the identification of Chryseobacterium following T-RFLP of grass-legumes silages. Another operon-based metasequencing projects observed this genus in around 5% of the OTU from fresh whole plant corn and 2% of the OTU from non-inoculated ensiled samples (Drouin, personal communication). Chryseobacterium is a ubiquitous bacterium belonging to the Flavobacteriaceae family. Some bacteria from this family are often used to produce extracellular enzymes as silage additives, but this does not explain their presence since no inoculant were used. Although they are frequently observed in soils, they were also isolated from decayed plants [38]. Since some of the corn tissues are in senescence, this bacterium could actively colonize decaying leaves or teasel. By doing so, they would become part of the epiphytic microflora of corn. Residual DNA would then have been amplified by PCR. Presence of the corresponding OTU on fresh material (results not presented) confirmed this hypothesis. It was also observed that the intensity of this OTU was higher following ensiling at 10°C than at 20°C, and it diminished as storage temperature increased. Degradation of dead microbial cells and residual DNA from this organism could be more important as the temperature increased. The occurrence of this organism on corn plants prior to ensiling could affect silage quality in relation with suboptimal fermentation parameters in early stages of ensilage.

To conclude, this experiment simulated what happens to commercial silages as storage temperature gradually increases in spring time. Ambient temperature at ensiling affects the fermentation characteristics of whole-plant corn silage during long-term storage. Previously, it has been concluded in many short-term silage studies that moderate temperatures (between 20°C and 30°C) are more favourable for ensilage and result in better quality silage. However, in this long-term study, we showed that it was true with many fermentation parameters but might not be so in terms of the survival of spoilage microbes in silage (such as yeasts and enterobacteria). This partially explains why well-fermented silages are sometimes observed to be prone to aerobic deterioration. On the contrary, although low temperatures at ensiling restrict silage fermentation, fermentation could resume following warm-up weather. Moreover, the survival of yeasts in these silages is lower than in silages made at warmer temperature at ensiling. In practice, these observations allowed us to recommend that producers feed silages which were initially ensiled at warmer temperature earlier and quickly during winter or early spring time, in order to reduce aerobic spoilage. Moreover, for silages which were ensiled at low temperatures, it is suggested to add inoculants, such as Lb. buchneri, to ensure silage aerobic stability as ambient temperature warms up, particularly if the silage is used for summer feeding.